From OpenAI's statement
"Our review found no evidence of patient records being accessed.
The information accessed included aggregate health statistics
and internal file names."
"We notified the organisations and are providing technical
information to support their investigations and help address
potential security vulnerabilities" https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-24/ai-agent-accessed-australian-government-site-pm-says/107189078
"The government on Thursday launched a taskforce to investigate and
assess gaps in Australia's existing laws around reporting
requirements, enforcement, and cyber protections.
It is also investigating if the OpenAI incident broke any
Australian laws, though government sources said the initial view
was that this was unlikely." https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-25/openai-breach-builds-case-for-tough-ai-rules/107192992
Sounds like the AI just guessed some URLs that aren't linked from
public pages, and got to see pages and directories that were really
public in a technical sense anyway (not password protected by the
server software).
In that case it's not really a hack at all - just incompetent
configuration of the website
which a human attacker would have
easily found too if they saw a real motive to work on something as
boring as a statistics "portal".
No surprise the government is covering up this incompetance,
which--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
OpenAI highlighted to them, by beating their chest about the new
powers of AI and boasting new regulations that are likely to be as
weak as their websites.
From OpenAI's statement:
"Our review found no evidence of patient records being accessed.
The information accessed included aggregate health statistics
and internal file names."
"We notified the organisations and are providing technical
information to support their investigations and help address
potential security vulnerabilities" https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-24/ai-agent-accessed-australian-government-site-pm-says/107189078
"The government on Thursday launched a taskforce to investigate and
assess gaps in Australia's existing laws around reporting
requirements, enforcement, and cyber protections.
It is also investigating if the OpenAI incident broke any
Australian laws, though government sources said the initial view
was that this was unlikely." https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-25/openai-breach-builds-case-for-tough-ai-rules/107192992
Sounds like the AI just guessed some URLs that aren't linked from
public pages, and got to see pages and directories that were really
public in a technical sense anyway (not password protected by the
server software).
In that case it's not really a hack at all - just incompetent
configuration of the website which a human attacker would have
easily found too if they saw a real motive to work on something as
boring as a statistics "portal".
No surprise the government is covering up this incompetance, which
OpenAI highlighted to them, by beating their chest about the new
powers of AI and boasting new regulations that are likely to be as
weak as their websites.
Computer Nerd Kev wrote
From OpenAI's statement
"Our review found no evidence of patient records being accessed.
The information accessed included aggregate health statistics
and internal file names."
"We notified the organisations and are providing technical
information to support their investigations and help address
potential security vulnerabilities"
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-24/ai-agent-accessed-australian-government-site-pm-says/107189078
"The government on Thursday launched a taskforce to investigate and
assess gaps in Australia's existing laws around reporting
requirements, enforcement, and cyber protections.
It is also investigating if the OpenAI incident broke any
Australian laws, though government sources said the initial view
was that this was unlikely."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-25/openai-breach-builds-case-for-tough-ai-rules/107192992
Sounds like the AI just guessed some URLs that aren't linked from
public pages, and got to see pages and directories that were really
public in a technical sense anyway (not password protected by the
server software).
In that case it's not really a hack at all - just incompetent
configuration of the website which a human attacker would have
easily found too if they saw a real motive to work on something as
boring as a statistics "portal".
No surprise the government is covering up this incompetance, which
OpenAI highlighted to them, by beating their chest about the new
powers of AI and boasting new regulations that are likely to be as
weak as their websites.
The point is that the "AI" was not supposed to go beyond publicly
available information,
but decided of it's own accord to do so.
Similarly when it hacked into Hugging Face.
Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> wroteIt was supposed to get information by normal means, it didn't, it hacked
Computer Nerd Kev wrote
-aFrom OpenAI's statement
"Our review found no evidence of patient records being accessed.
-a The information accessed included aggregate health statistics
-a and internal file names."
-a"We notified the organisations and are providing technical
-a information to support their investigations and help address
-a potential security vulnerabilities"
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-24/ai-agent-accessed-australian-
government-site-pm-says/107189078
-a"The government on Thursday launched a taskforce to investigate and
-a assess gaps in Australia's existing laws around reporting
-a requirements, enforcement, and cyber protections.
-a-a It is also investigating if the OpenAI incident broke any
-a Australian laws, though government sources said the initial view
-a was that this was unlikely."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-25/openai-breach-builds-case-for-
tough-ai-rules/107192992
-aSounds like the AI just guessed some URLs that aren't linked from
public pages, and got to see pages and directories that were really
public in a technical sense anyway (not password protected by the
server software).
In that case it's not really a hack at all - just incompetent
configuration of the website which a human attacker would have
easily found too if they saw a real motive to work on something as
boring as a statistics "portal".
No surprise the government is covering up this incompetance, which
OpenAI highlighted to them, by beating their chest about the new
powers of AI and boasting new regulations that are likely to be as
weak as their websites.
The point is that the "AI" was not supposed to go beyond publicly
available information,
BULLSHIT
but decided of it's own accord to do so.
Nope, because that's what AI does
Similarly when it hacked into Hugging Face.
Nothing to do with your stupid claim about publicly available info
Rod Speed wrote
Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev wrote
From OpenAI's statement
"Our review found no evidence of patient records being accessed.
The information accessed included aggregate health statistics
and internal file names."
"We notified the organisations and are providing technical
information to support their investigations and help address
potential security vulnerabilities"
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-24/ai-agent-accessed-australian- >>>> government-site-pm-says/107189078
"The government on Thursday launched a taskforce to investigate and
assess gaps in Australia's existing laws around reporting
requirements, enforcement, and cyber protections.
It is also investigating if the OpenAI incident broke any
Australian laws, though government sources said the initial view
was that this was unlikely."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-25/openai-breach-builds-case-for- >>>> tough-ai-rules/107192992
Sounds like the AI just guessed some URLs that aren't linked from
public pages, and got to see pages and directories that were really
public in a technical sense anyway (not password protected by the
server software).
In that case it's not really a hack at all - just incompetent
configuration of the website which a human attacker would have
easily found too if they saw a real motive to work on something as
boring as a statistics "portal".
No surprise the government is covering up this incompetance, which
OpenAI highlighted to them, by beating their chest about the new
powers of AI and boasting new regulations that are likely to be as
weak as their websites.
The point is that the "AI" was not supposed to go beyond publicly
available information,
BULLSHIT
but decided of it's own accord to do so.
Nope, because that's what AI does
Similarly when it hacked into Hugging Face.
Nothing to do with your stupid claim about publicly available info
It was supposed to get information by normal means,
it didn't, it hacked the site.
I was not told to do that.
On 25/09/2026 8:57 am, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
From OpenAI's statement:The point is that the "AI" was not supposed to go beyond publicly
"Our review found no evidence of patient records being accessed.
The information accessed included aggregate health statistics
and internal file names."
"We notified the organisations and are providing technical
information to support their investigations and help address
potential security vulnerabilities"
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-24/ai-agent-accessed-australian-government-site-pm-says/107189078
"The government on Thursday launched a taskforce to investigate and
assess gaps in Australia's existing laws around reporting
requirements, enforcement, and cyber protections.
It is also investigating if the OpenAI incident broke any
Australian laws, though government sources said the initial view
was that this was unlikely."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-25/openai-breach-builds-case-for-tough-ai-rules/107192992
Sounds like the AI just guessed some URLs that aren't linked from
public pages, and got to see pages and directories that were really
public in a technical sense anyway (not password protected by the
server software).
In that case it's not really a hack at all - just incompetent
configuration of the website which a human attacker would have
easily found too if they saw a real motive to work on something as
boring as a statistics "portal".
No surprise the government is covering up this incompetance, which
OpenAI highlighted to them, by beating their chest about the new
powers of AI and boasting new regulations that are likely to be as
weak as their websites.
available information, but decided of it's own accord to do so.
Similarly when it hacked into Hugging Face.
Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> wroteNope, perfectly possible to fix the deficiencys
Computer Nerd Kev wroteRegarding "Hugging Face" AI
From OpenAI's statement:The point is that the "AI" was not supposed to go beyond publicly
"Our review found no evidence of patient records being accessed.
The information accessed included aggregate health statistics
and internal file names."
"We notified the organisations and are providing technical
information to support their investigations and help address
potential security vulnerabilities"
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-24/ai-agent-accessed-australian-government-site-pm-says/107189078
"The government on Thursday launched a taskforce to investigate and
assess gaps in Australia's existing laws around reporting
requirements, enforcement, and cyber protections.
It is also investigating if the OpenAI incident broke any
Australian laws, though government sources said the initial view
was that this was unlikely."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-25/openai-breach-builds-case-for-tough-ai-rules/107192992
Sounds like the AI just guessed some URLs that aren't linked from
public pages, and got to see pages and directories that were really
public in a technical sense anyway (not password protected by the
server software).
In that case it's not really a hack at all - just incompetent
configuration of the website which a human attacker would have
easily found too if they saw a real motive to work on something as
boring as a statistics "portal".
No surprise the government is covering up this incompetance, which
OpenAI highlighted to them, by beating their chest about the new
powers of AI and boasting new regulations that are likely to be as
weak as their websites.
available information, but decided of it's own accord to do so.
Similarly when it hacked into Hugging Face.
The threat is a combination of careless human design and unpredictable> AI behavior.
Human operators create the vulnerabilities by rushing development or
failing to secure their code, but advanced AI has reached a point
where it can autonomously exploit those human mistakes in ways the
creators never anticipated or intended.
So this again the Genie is out of the bottle,
whining about it is notNo different to humans doing it
going to change this aspect from happening from/by countries that have> bad intentions .
My interest is this fool Albanese. trying to cover up his continuingThe only idiocy is yours
idiocy.
In UN with a massive audience of 14 people, claims he is worried about> AI, he is not he hates social media showing deserved Albanese disgustJust because some fool claims something...
<https://x.com/roberts_pa97578>
just a quick look straight away]
Albanese fled AustraliaJust another of your pathetic little drug crazed drunken fantsys
when he read his latest achievementNothing to do with Albo, those fucking indians fucked up
(Destroying a construction company by CGT)! <https://www.news24.com.au/business/real-estate/major-real-estate-business-bathla-falls-into-administration-owing-lenders-more-than-3-billion/news-story/7c47300d649f32ffc8bb042f1ef657f6>
https://tinyurl.com/jtxsxa8d
Major real estate business Bathla falls into administration owingBecause those fucking indians fucked up
lenders more than $3 billion
The explicit government assurancesThat sentance mangles the actual change
Labor repeatedly and publicly promised no changes to capital gains tax> (CGT) settings or negative gearing:
Albanese Labor
rCLWe have no plans to touch or change negative gearing.rCY> Before and during the 2025 election, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese
ruled it out multiple times (famously answering rCLYes. How hard is it?
For the 50th timerCY when asked to confirm no changes if re-elected). Treasurer Jim Chalmers similarly stated the government was not
considering or working on changes to either policy.
This was presented as providing certainty after earlier Labor
platforms (e.g. 2019) had proposed reforms.
These were clear election commitments. Industry participants,
including large-volume developers like Bathla, operated on that basis.> The reversal and the rCLtraprCY
In the May 2026 Budget the government broke those commitments,
announcing:
Replacement of the 50% CGT discount with cost-base indexation plus a
30% minimum tax (from July 2027).
Negative gearing limited to new builds (with grandfathering for
existing holdings).
Bathla itself named rCLimpacts from the changes made in the federal governmentrCOs May budgetrCY as one element of the rCLperfect stormrCY that hit sales, confidence, and cash flow.Just more indian bullshit
The policy shift reduced the attractiveness of established property investment,Bullshit when negative gearing is still fine
contributed to softer buyer demand,Nothing to do with what collapsed Bathla
and added uncertaintyBecause the contracts stupidly didn't allow for inflation
precisely when the company was heavily leveraged and absorbing higher construction costs.
The sequence matched a prolonged period of strong price growth andThat was in fact the real problem
supply shortage encouraged aggressive expansion (rCLmaking hay while the
sun shinesrCY) under explicit policy stability assurances, only for the sudden change in tax settings to help trigger the market softening
that exposed the high-debt model.
Other factors remained critical rCo the sheer scale of private-credit
debt (~$3.4 billion),
rising costs the group absorbed, and operationalBecause those fucking indians fucked up;
issues
But the broken promise on CGT/negative gearing was a materialBullshit
contribution
On 25/09/2026 8:57 am, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
No surprise the government is covering up this incompetance, whichThe point is that the "AI" was not supposed to go beyond publicly
OpenAI highlighted to them, by beating their chest about the new
powers of AI and boasting new regulations that are likely to be as
weak as their websites.
available information, but decided of it's own accord to do so.
Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev wrote
No surprise the government is covering up this incompetance,
which OpenAI highlighted to them,
by beating their chest about the new powers of AI
and boasting new regulations that are likely to be as
weak as their websites.
The point is that the "AI" was not supposed to go beyond publicly
available information,
but decided of it's own accord to do so.
But it didn't "decide", it just didn't know the difference.
It just knows patterns that get it results.
Understanding the ethics of those patterns
would require some real intelligence,
which these AIs so clearly lack.
New laws won't change that.
From OpenAI's statement:
"Our review found no evidence of patient records being accessed.
The information accessed included aggregate health statistics
and internal file names."
On 25 Sep 2026 08:57:13 +1000, not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd
Kev) wrote:
From OpenAI's statement:
"Our review found no evidence of patient records being accessed.
The information accessed included aggregate health statistics
and internal file names."
Perhaps insurance companies were involved.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 121:07:58 |
| Calls: | 1,194 |
| Files: | 1,352 |
| Messages: | 290,208 |