https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/04/analysis-finds-google-ai-overviews-is-wrong-10-percent-of-the-time/
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/04/analysis-finds-google-ai-overviews-is-wrong-10-percent-of-the-time/
Hardly surprising that some new tech has some glitches
Only a fool like you refuses to use it when it gets 90% right
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/04/analysis-finds-google-ai-overviews-is-wrong-10-percent-of-the-time/
Hardly surprising that some new tech has some glitches
Only a fool like you refuses to use it when it gets 90% right
90% is nowhere near good enough.
Great if it tells you to buy some part for a VY Commodore, which is actually for a VZ, wasting your dollars and time.
https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/04/analysis-finds-google-ai-overviews-is-wrong-10-percent-of-the-time/
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote:
https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/04/analysis-finds-google-ai-overviews-is-wrong-10-percent-of-the-time/
This reveals how little reasoning and cross-checking really goes on
when these AIs answer questions:
Scientists invented an obviously fake illness, and AI spread it
like truth within weeks https://www.osnews.com/story/144787/scientists-invented-an-obviously-fake-illness-and-ai-spread-it-like-truth-within-weeks/
This seems to be the fact some people here can't get their head
around:
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't actually
make sense of anything.
They are glorified pachinko machines with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already
hit.
"AI" output understands the world about as much as the
pachinko ball does, and as such, can't pick up on even the most
obvious of cues that something is a fake or a forgery."
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote:
https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/04/analysis-finds-google-ai-overviews-is-wrong-10-percent-of-the-time/This reveals how little reasoning and cross-checking really goes on
when these AIs answer questions:
Scientists invented an obviously fake illness, and AI spread it
like truth within weeks https://www.osnews.com/story/144787/scientists-invented-an-obviously-fake-illness-and-ai-spread-it-like-truth-within-weeks/
This seems to be the fact some people here can't get their head
around:
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already
hit. "AI" output understands the world about as much as the
pachinko ball does, and as such, can't pick up on even the most
obvious of cues that something is a fake or a forgery."
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already
hit.
Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
This seems to be the fact some people here can't get their head
around:
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already
hit. "AI" output understands the world about as much as the
pachinko ball does, and as such, can't pick up on even the most
obvious of cues that something is a fake or a forgery."
interesting. but if they can't 'think' how do/can they write essays?
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already
hit.
Just did this one, https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would
get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that
question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and
didnt get as useful a result from google
Axel <none@not.here> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev wrote
This seems to be the fact some people here can't get their head
around:
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already
hit. "AI" output understands the world about as much as the
pachinko ball does, and as such, can't pick up on even the most
obvious of cues that something is a fake or a forgery."
interesting. but if they can't 'think' how do/can they write essays?
Same as everything: Model the language structure of essays found on
the web then reformat text believed relevent to the topic according
to that model. This is the basis of the Large Language Models. Real
AI is what's now being called "Artificial General Intelligence",
the LLMs are a shortcut method that doesn't bother with
understanding things but figures out how words go together in
relevent ways, without regard to whether the words they're
rearrangeing are completely irrelevent or in this case obviously
nonsensical.
Hence the convincing BS it shovels onto you when it
hasn't found the equivalent of good search resultsand reformats words from irrelevent texts instead.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_General_Intelligence--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would
get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that
question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and
didnt get as useful a result from google
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range given
in your AI answer
ans disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would
get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that
question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and
didnt get as useful a result from google
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
ans disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't actually >>>>> make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would
get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that
question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and
didnt get as useful a result from google
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in range of
425-450mL
and always matches a schooner.
ans disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it could be way
off.
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't actually >>>>>> make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines with >>>>>> the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between >>>>>> the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already >>>>>> hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would
get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that
question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and
didnt get as useful a result from google
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in range of
425-450mL
Bullshit does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
ans disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that
phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has
been used recently, something google wouldnt have done
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it could be way
off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase was used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate even for the NT
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wroteYou just ignored that
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no >>>>>>> understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't >>>>>>> actuallyJust did this one,
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines with >>>>>>> the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between >>>>>>> the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already >>>>>>> hit.
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91 >>>>>> That result is nothing even remotely like what you would
get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that
question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and
didnt get as useful a result from google
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lieIt says it over and over from the start:Bullshit it doesBut inaccurately states the volume only varies between in range ofI get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of beer"The grok response accurately points out that
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range given
in your AI answer
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
425-450mL
and always matches a schooner.It doesn't say that either
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of beer inPity about
Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
But it did work that out. So much for yourWhich is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't apply inBut it did accurately work out where I was getting thatYour question to the AI never mentioned any location.and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has
been used recently, something google wouldnt have done
the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC article was
what prompted your question.
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.Bullshit it does with
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artistWell my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial Idiot'sIt was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it could be way>>> off.But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase was used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate even for the NT
source is... nothing.
No cites except the very ABC article thatEven a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the SOURCES
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the accuracy
of its statement since you can only guess where it might have got
the info from.
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no >>>>>>>> understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't >>>>>>>> actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines with >>>>>>>> the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between >>>>>>>> the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already >>>>>>>> hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would
get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that
question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and
didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in range of
425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of beer in
Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that
phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has
been used recently, something google wouldnt have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't apply in
the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC article was
what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it could be way
off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase was used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate even for the NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial Idiot's
source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the accuracy
of its statement since you can only guess where it might have got
the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the SOURCES
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no >>>>>>>>> understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't
actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines >>>>>>>>> with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path >>>>>>>>> between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has >>>>>>>>> already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would
get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that
question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and
didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
What, that you can't Google?
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of beer" >>>>>>> with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range given >>>>>>> in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in range of
425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of beer in
Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Like the USSD definition,
in normal grammar the qualification at theend would only apply to the part after the "--".
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that
phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has
been used recently, something google wouldn't have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't apply in
the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC article was
what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
He says while snipping where it said that.
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
And replacing it with where talked about something else.
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it could be way >>>>> off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase was used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate even for the >>>> NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial Idiot's
source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit
artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the accuracy
of its statement since you can only guess where it might have got
the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the SOURCES
Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,
which it probably paid attention to insteadof better results like the brewery I found.
But since it doesn't say specificallywhere it got those facts it
stated from,
you can't tell. Useless.
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no >>>>>>>>>> understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't >>>>>>>>>> actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines >>>>>>>>>> with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path >>>>>>>>>> between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has >>>>>>>>>> already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would
get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that
question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and
didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
What, that you can't Google?
I can and do google
No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what
you would get from a glorified pachinko machine
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of beer" >>>>>>>> with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range given >>>>>>>> in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in range of >>>>>> 425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of beer in
Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Like the USSD definition,
There was no USSD definition
in normal grammar the qualification at theend would only apply to the
part after the "--".
Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that
phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has
been used recently, something google wouldn't have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't apply in
the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC article was
what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
He says while snipping where it said that.
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Pity about the
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted
And replacing it with where talked about something else.
Bullshit it talked about something else
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it could be way >>>>>> off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase was used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate even for the >>>>> NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial Idiot's
source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit
artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the accuracy
of its statement since you can only guess where it might have got
the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the SOURCES
Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,
More of your barefaced lies on the random
which it probably paid attention to insteadof better results like the >> brewery I found.
Bullshit it did and it basically said the same
thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have >>>>>>>>>>> no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't >>>>>>>>>>> actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines >>>>>>>>>>> with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path >>>>>>>>>>> between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has >>>>>>>>>>> already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would
get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that
question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and
didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
What, that you can't Google?
I can and do google
No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what
you would get from a glorified pachinko machine
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of beer" >>>>>>>>> with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range given >>>>>>>>> in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in range of >>>>>>> 425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of beer in
Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Like the USSD definition,
There was no USSD definition
in normal grammar the qualification at theend would only apply to the
part after the "--".
Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that
phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has
been used recently, something google wouldn't have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't apply in
the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC article was
what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
He says while snipping where it said that.
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Pity about the
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted
And replacing it with where talked about something else.
Bullshit it talked about something else
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it could be >>>>>>> way off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase was used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate even for the >>>>>> NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial Idiot's
source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit
artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the accuracy
of its statement since you can only guess where it might have got
the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the SOURCES
Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,
More of your barefaced lies on the random
which it probably paid attention to instead of better results like the >>> brewery I found.
Bullshit it did and it basically said the same
thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml
No, it only talked about the term being used in the NT,
and for the same 285ml quanity as a "middy" or "pot" in other sates.
Plus it didn't know where you were asking about anyway
so shouldn't assume what it "normally means" there.
You say it did correctly pick the article that prompted your question:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-14/pedestrian-death-flinders-island-coroner-dismissal/106562466
So I did a web search for "coronial findings tasmania" and found
the actual coroner's report that had prompted the article here:
https://www.magistratescourt.tas.gov.au/coronerscourt/findings/coronialfindings/2026/Investigation-into-the-death-of-David-Stanley-Bailey-Ruling.pdf
Footnote number 6, on page 3, is of interest:
"6 A handle of beer is 285mls in volume."
So your Artificial Idiot lied about the quantity meantin the exact article that prompted your question!
Its total quantity would be off by at least 2.52L!
An intelligent web search on the other hand helps get you the
actual answer from the source of the article that prompted your
question, instead of that useless AI BS.
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have >>>>>>>>>>>> no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't >>>>>>>>>>>> actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines >>>>>>>>>>>> with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path >>>>>>>>>>>> between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has >>>>>>>>>>>> already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would >>>>>>>>>>> get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that >>>>>>>>>>> question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and >>>>>>>>>>> didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
What, that you can't Google?
I can and do google
No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what
you would get from a glorified pachinko machine
There you go, ignoring that again
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of beer" >>>>>>>>>> with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range given >>>>>>>>>> in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in range of >>>>>>>> 425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of beer in
Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Like the USSD definition,
There was no USSD definition
in normal grammar the qualification at theend would only apply to the >>>> part after the "--".
Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
That doesnt even say what the volume of a handle of beer is
And neither does anything else that google turns up
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that
phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has
been used recently, something google wouldn't have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't apply in
the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC article was >>>>>> what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
He says while snipping where it said that.
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Pity about the
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted
And replacing it with where talked about something else.
Bullshit it talked about something else
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it could be >>>>>>>> way off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase was used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate even for the >>>>>>> NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial Idiot's
source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit
artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the accuracy
of its statement since you can only guess where it might have got
the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the SOURCES
Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,
More of your barefaced lies on the random
which it probably paid attention to instead of better results like the >>>> brewery I found.
Bullshit it did and it basically said the same
thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml
No, it only talked about the term being used in the NT,
Which isnt where we are discussing,
so is a completely useless result
and for the same 285ml quanity as a "middy" or "pot" in other sates.
Plus it didn't know where you were asking about anyway
Corse it did when it named that explicitly
so shouldn't assume what it "normally means" there.
It didn't assume anything you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
You say it did correctly pick the article that prompted your question:
It clearly did
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-14/pedestrian-death-flinders-island-coroner-dismissal/106562466
So I did a web search for "coronial findings tasmania" and found
the actual coroner's report that had prompted the article here:
https://www.magistratescourt.tas.gov.au/coronerscourt/findings/coronialfindings/2026/Investigation-into-the-death-of-David-Stanley-Bailey-Ruling.pdf
Footnote number 6, on page 3, is of interest:
"6 A handle of beer is 285mls in volume."
Just because that fuckwit got that wrong...
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
So your Artificial Idiot lied about the quantity meantin the exact
article that prompted your question!
More of your mindless bullshit
Its total quantity would be off by at least 2.52L!
Wrong, as always
An intelligent web search on the other hand helps get you the
actual answer from the source of the article that prompted your
question, instead of that useless AI BS.
The fuckwit coroner actually got it wrong
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools >>>>>>>>>>>>> have
no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't >>>>>>>>>>>>> actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines >>>>>>>>>>>>> with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path >>>>>>>>>>>>> between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has >>>>>>>>>>>>> already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would >>>>>>>>>>>> get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that >>>>>>>>>>>> question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and >>>>>>>>>>>> didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
What, that you can't Google?
I can and do google
No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what
you would get from a glorified pachinko machine
There you go, ignoring that again
Yep.
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of >>>>>>>>>>> beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range >>>>>>>>>>> given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in range >>>>>>>>> of 425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of beer in >>>>>>> Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Like the USSD definition,
There was no USSD definition
in normal grammar the qualification at the end would only apply to >>>>> the part after the "--".
Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
That doesnt even say what the volume of a handle of beer is
285ml in the NT like I quoted before.
It also says this which would
suggest such terms also mean less than the 425ml for a schooner
elsewhere in Aus:
"By and large, jugs, pints and schooners are a pretty universally
understood size (except in SA), with most of the smaller options
often having a name unique to the region."
And neither does anything else that google turns up
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that
phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has
been used recently, something google wouldn't have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't apply in >>>>>>> the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC article was >>>>>>> what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
He says while snipping where it said that.
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Pity about the
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted
And replacing it with where talked about something else.
Bullshit it talked about something else
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it could be >>>>>>>>> way off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase was used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate even for >>>>>>>> the NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial Idiot's >>>>>>> source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit >>>>>> artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the accuracy
of its statement since you can only guess where it might have got >>>>>>> the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the SOURCES
Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,
More of your barefaced lies on the random
which it probably paid attention to instead of better results like >>>>> the brewery I found.
Bullshit it did and it basically said the same
thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml
No, it only talked about the term being used in the NT,
Which isnt where we are discussing,
so is a completely useless result
and for the same 285ml quanity as a "middy" or "pot" in other sates.
Plus it didn't know where you were asking about anyway
Corse it did when it named that explicitly
so shouldn't assume what it "normally means" there.
It didn't assume anything you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
It assumed everything, and clearly got it all wrong.
You say it did correctly pick the article that prompted your
question:
It clearly did
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-14/pedestrian-death-flinders-island-coroner-dismissal/106562466
So I did a web search for "coronial findings tasmania" and found
the actual coroner's report that had prompted the article here:
https://www.magistratescourt.tas.gov.au/coronerscourt/findings/coronialfindings/2026/Investigation-into-the-death-of-David-Stanley-Bailey-Ruling.pdf
Footnote number 6, on page 3, is of interest:
"6 A handle of beer is 285mls in volume."
Just because that fuckwit got that wrong...
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
So your Artificial Idiot lied about the quantity meantin the exact
article that prompted your question!
More of your mindless bullshit
Its total quantity would be off by at least 2.52L!
Wrong, as always
An intelligent web search on the other hand helps get you the
actual answer from the source of the article that prompted your
question, instead of that useless AI BS.
The fuckwit coroner actually got it wrong
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Hillarious!
You had to ask what a handle of beer is,
but now you're denying what a brewery,
and the coroner who first used the phrase,
both say it means. On the basis of an AI response which doesn't
even say specificially where it got its definition from.
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path >>>>>>>>>>>>>> between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has >>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would >>>>>>>>>>>>> get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that >>>>>>>>>>>>> question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and >>>>>>>>>>>>> didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
What, that you can't Google?
I can and do google
No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what
you would get from a glorified pachinko machine
There you go, ignoring that again
Yep.
Because even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that terminal stupidity
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of >>>>>>>>>>>> beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range >>>>>>>>>>>> given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in range >>>>>>>>>> of 425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of beer in >>>>>>>> Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that stupid lie
Like the USSD definition,
There was no USSD definition
in normal grammar the qualification at the end would only apply to >>>>>> the part after the "--".
Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
That doesnt even say what the volume of a handle of beer is
285ml in the NT like I quoted before.
Pity we aren't discussing the NT, as I told you before
It also says this which would
suggest such terms also mean less than the 425ml for a schooner
elsewhere in Aus:
"By and large, jugs, pints and schooners are a pretty universally
understood size (except in SA), with most of the smaller options
often having a name unique to the region."
That suggests nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
And neither does anything else that google turns up
Which blows a fucking great hole in your stupid
claim that google gets it right and grok doesn't
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that
phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has
been used recently, something google wouldn't have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't apply in >>>>>>>> the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC article was >>>>>>>> what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
He says while snipping where it said that.
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Pity about the
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted
And replacing it with where talked about something else.
Bullshit it talked about something else
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it could be >>>>>>>>>> way off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase was used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate even for >>>>>>>>> the NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial Idiot's >>>>>>>> source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit >>>>>>> artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the accuracy >>>>>>>> of its statement since you can only guess where it might have got >>>>>>>> the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the SOURCES
Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,
More of your barefaced lies on the random
which it probably paid attention to instead of better results like >>>>>> the brewery I found.
Bullshit it did and it basically said the same
thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml
No, it only talked about the term being used in the NT,
Which isnt where we are discussing,
so is a completely useless result
and for the same 285ml quanity as a "middy" or "pot" in other sates.
Plus it didn't know where you were asking about anyway
Corse it did when it named that explicitly
so shouldn't assume what it "normally means" there.
It didn't assume anything you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
It assumed everything, and clearly got it all wrong.
It didnt get where the term handle was used
wrong, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
And you haven't extablished that the term
handle isnt mostly used for 425-450 ml either
You say it did correctly pick the article that prompted your
question:
It clearly did
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-14/pedestrian-death-flinders-island-coroner-dismissal/106562466
So I did a web search for "coronial findings tasmania" and found
the actual coroner's report that had prompted the article here:
https://www.magistratescourt.tas.gov.au/coronerscourt/findings/coronialfindings/2026/Investigation-into-the-death-of-David-Stanley-Bailey-Ruling.pdf
Footnote number 6, on page 3, is of interest:
"6 A handle of beer is 285mls in volume."
Just because that fuckwit got that wrong...
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Have fun listing anywhere that does
So your Artificial Idiot lied about the quantity meantin the exact
article that prompted your question!
More of your mindless bullshit
Its total quantity would be off by at least 2.52L!
Wrong, as always
An intelligent web search on the other hand helps get you the
actual answer from the source of the article that prompted your
question, instead of that useless AI BS.
The fuckwit coroner actually got it wrong
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Hillarious!
Pathetic!!
You had to ask what a handle of beer is,
Because I had never heard that term
used before for a measure of beer.
The only thing that comes even close is
a stein or a jug of beer, both of which I
have heard plenty of times before
but now you're denying what a brewery,
It never says that that term is used in Kangaroo Island
and the coroner who first used the phrase,
And got it wrong and even google proves that
both say it means. On the basis of an AI response which doesn't
even say specificially where it got its definition from.
More of your stupid bare faced lies with the SOURCES
And the coroner and stoneandwood doesn't either
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines
with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
What, that you can't Google?
I can and do google
No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what
you would get from a glorified pachinko machine
There you go, ignoring that again
Yep.
Because even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that terminal stupidity
Nope.
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of >>>>>>>>>>>>> beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range >>>>>>>>>>>>> given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in range >>>>>>>>>>> of 425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of beer in >>>>>>>>> Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that stupid lie
Umm, That was your AI's lie.
But I'm glad you finally agree it was telling you BS.
Like the USSD definition,
There was no USSD definition
in normal grammar the qualification at the end would only apply to >>>>>>> the part after the "--".
Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
That doesnt even say what the volume of a handle of beer is
285ml in the NT like I quoted before.
Pity we aren't discussing the NT, as I told you before
Your AI didn't know that.
It also says this which would
suggest such terms also mean less than the 425ml for a schooner
elsewhere in Aus:
"By and large, jugs, pints and schooners are a pretty universally
understood size (except in SA), with most of the smaller options
often having a name unique to the region."
That suggests nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit
artist
Smaller options have the names "unique to the region" such as
handle.
And neither does anything else that google turns up
Which blows a fucking great hole in your stupid
claim that google gets it right and grok doesn't
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that
phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has
been used recently, something google wouldn't have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't apply in >>>>>>>>> the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC article >>>>>>>>> was what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
He says while snipping where it said that.
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Pity about the
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted
And replacing it with where talked about something else.
Bullshit it talked about something else
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it could >>>>>>>>>>> be way off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase was used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate even for >>>>>>>>>> the NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial Idiot's >>>>>>>>> source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a
bullshit artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the accuracy >>>>>>>>> of its statement since you can only guess where it might have got >>>>>>>>> the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the >>>>>>>> SOURCES
Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,
More of your barefaced lies on the random
which it probably paid attention to instead of better results like >>>>>>> the brewery I found.
Bullshit it did and it basically said the same
thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml
No, it only talked about the term being used in the NT,
Which isnt where we are discussing,
so is a completely useless result
and for the same 285ml quanity as a "middy" or "pot" in other sates.
Plus it didn't know where you were asking about anyway
Corse it did when it named that explicitly
so shouldn't assume what it "normally means" there.
It didn't assume anything you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
It assumed everything, and clearly got it all wrong.
It didnt get where the term handle was used
wrong, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
Did so too.
And you haven't extablished that the term
handle isnt mostly used for 425-450 ml either
Did so too.
You say it did correctly pick the article that prompted your
question:
It clearly did
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-14/pedestrian-death-flinders-island-coroner-dismissal/106562466
So I did a web search for "coronial findings tasmania" and found
the actual coroner's report that had prompted the article here:
https://www.magistratescourt.tas.gov.au/coronerscourt/findings/coronialfindings/2026/Investigation-into-the-death-of-David-Stanley-Bailey-Ruling.pdf
Footnote number 6, on page 3, is of interest:
"6 A handle of beer is 285mls in volume."
Just because that fuckwit got that wrong...
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Have fun listing anywhere that does
Furneaux Tavern where David Bailey was served, of course!
So your Artificial Idiot lied about the quantity meantin the exact
article that prompted your question!
More of your mindless bullshit
Its total quantity would be off by at least 2.52L!
Wrong, as always
An intelligent web search on the other hand helps get you the
actual answer from the source of the article that prompted your
question, instead of that useless AI BS.
The fuckwit coroner actually got it wrong
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Hillarious!
Pathetic!!
Well yes, you are a bit.
You had to ask what a handle of beer is,
Because I had never heard that term
used before for a measure of beer.
The only thing that comes even close is
a stein or a jug of beer, both of which I
have heard plenty of times before
So obviously the brewery
and coroner know more than you,
and as usual the AI doesn't know anything.
but now you're denying what a brewery,
It never says that that term is used in Flinders Island
and the coroner who first used the phrase,
And got it wrong and even google proves that
They used the phrase and defined it,
nothing on Google's going to prove they meant something else.
both say it means. On the basis of an AI response which doesn't
even say specificially where it got its definition from.
More of your stupid bare faced lies with the SOURCES
No evidence which of those it paid attention to, if any.
And the coroner and stoneandwood doesn't either
They're trustworthy sources themselves,
unlike random Reddit threads
which the AI was looking through.--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines
with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
What, that you can't Google?
I can and do google
No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what
you would get from a glorified pachinko machine
There you go, ignoring that again
Yep.
Because even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that terminal stupidity
Nope.
Yep
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range >>>>>>>>>>>>>> given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in range >>>>>>>>>>>> of 425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of beer in >>>>>>>>>> Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that stupid lie
Umm, That was your AI's lie.
You haven't shown that it is a lie
But I'm glad you finally agree it was telling you BS.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Like the USSD definition,
There was no USSD definition
in normal grammar the qualification at the end would only apply to >>>>>>>> the part after the "--".
Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
That doesnt even say what the volume of a handle of beer is
285ml in the NT like I quoted before.
Pity we aren't discussing the NT, as I told you before
Your AI didn't know that.
Corse it did when it mentioned Flinders Island
It also says this which would
suggest such terms also mean less than the 425ml for a schooner
elsewhere in Aus:
"By and large, jugs, pints and schooners are a pretty universally
understood size (except in SA), with most of the smaller options
often having a name unique to the region."
That suggests nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit
artist
Smaller options have the names "unique to the region" such as
handle.
It doesnt say that about the word handle, you pathetic excuse for a
bullshit artist and NO ONE serves options in a container with a handle
And neither does anything else that google turns up
Which blows a fucking great hole in your stupid
claim that google gets it right and grok doesn't
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that
phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has >>>>>>>>>>> been used recently, something google wouldn't have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't apply in >>>>>>>>>> the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC article >>>>>>>>>> was what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
He says while snipping where it said that.
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Pity about the
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted
And replacing it with where talked about something else.
Bullshit it talked about something else
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it could >>>>>>>>>>>> be way off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase was used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate even for >>>>>>>>>>> the NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial Idiot's >>>>>>>>>> source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a >>>>>>>>> bullshit artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the accuracy >>>>>>>>>> of its statement since you can only guess where it might have got >>>>>>>>>> the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the >>>>>>>>> SOURCES
Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,
More of your barefaced lies on the random
which it probably paid attention to instead of better results like >>>>>>>> the brewery I found.
Bullshit it did and it basically said the same
thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml
No, it only talked about the term being used in the NT,
Which isnt where we are discussing,
so is a completely useless result
and for the same 285ml quanity as a "middy" or "pot" in other sates.
Plus it didn't know where you were asking about anyway
Corse it did when it named that explicitly
so shouldn't assume what it "normally means" there.
It didn't assume anything you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
It assumed everything, and clearly got it all wrong.
It didnt get where the term handle was used
wrong, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
And you haven't extablished that the term
handle isnt mostly used for 425-450 ml either
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
You say it did correctly pick the article that prompted your
question:
It clearly did
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-14/pedestrian-death-flinders-island-coroner-dismissal/106562466
So I did a web search for "coronial findings tasmania" and found
the actual coroner's report that had prompted the article here:
https://www.magistratescourt.tas.gov.au/coronerscourt/findings/coronialfindings/2026/Investigation-into-the-death-of-David-Stanley-Bailey-Ruling.pdf
Footnote number 6, on page 3, is of interest:
"6 A handle of beer is 285mls in volume."
Just because that fuckwit got that wrong...
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Have fun listing anywhere that does
Furneaux Tavern where David Bailey was served, of course!
You don't know that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
So your Artificial Idiot lied about the quantity meantin the exact >>>>>> article that prompted your question!
More of your mindless bullshit
Its total quantity would be off by at least 2.52L!
Wrong, as always
An intelligent web search on the other hand helps get you the
actual answer from the source of the article that prompted your
question, instead of that useless AI BS.
The fuckwit coroner actually got it wrong
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Hillarious!
Pathetic!!
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
You had to ask what a handle of beer is,
Because I had never heard that term
used before for a measure of beer.
The only thing that comes even close is
a stein or a jug of beer, both of which I
have heard plenty of times before
So obviously the brewery
The brewery says nothing of the sort
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and coroner know more than you,
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
and as usual the AI doesn't know anything.
Neither does google you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
but now you're denying what a brewery,
It never says that that term is used in Flinders Island
and the coroner who first used the phrase,
And got it wrong and even google proves that
They used the phrase and defined it,
With not a shred of evidence that their definition is correct
nothing on Google's going to prove they meant something else.
But not a shred of evidence that they got it right
both say it means. On the basis of an AI response which doesn't
even say specificially where it got its definition from.
More of your stupid bare faced lies with the SOURCES
No evidence which of those it paid attention to, if any.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
And the coroner and stoneandwood doesn't either
They're trustworthy sources themselves,
Mindless bullshit with the coroner's claim
which can't be substantiated anywhere
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines
with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path
between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
What, that you can't Google?
I can and do google
No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what
you would get from a glorified pachinko machine
There you go, ignoring that again
Yep.
Because even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that terminal stupidity
Nope.
Yep
Glad you agree.
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in >>>>>>>>>>>>> range of 425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of beer >>>>>>>>>>> in
Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that stupid lie
Umm, That was your AI's lie.
You haven't shown that it is a lie
Only a blind man couldn't see what I've shown, or one of your
Artificial Idiots.
But I'm glad you finally agree it was telling you BS.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Like the USSD definition,
There was no USSD definition
in normal grammar the qualification at the end would only apply >>>>>>>>> to
the part after the "--".
Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
That doesnt even say what the volume of a handle of beer is
285ml in the NT like I quoted before.
Pity we aren't discussing the NT, as I told you before
Your AI didn't know that.
Corse it did when it mentioned Flinders Island
But you didn't, to it.
It also says this which would
suggest such terms also mean less than the 425ml for a schooner
elsewhere in Aus:
"By and large, jugs, pints and schooners are a pretty universally
understood size (except in SA), with most of the smaller options
often having a name unique to the region."
That suggests nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit
artist
Smaller options have the names "unique to the region" such as
handle.
It doesn't say that about the word handle, you pathetic excuse for a
bullshit artist and NO ONE serves options in a container with a handle
It's about the quantity, the article actually only says they "may
come with a handle",
but if you ever got out you'd have seenbeer glases with handles before anyway.
It's hillarious how wrong you are,
here's one with "285ml" actually printed on the side!
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/306586746914
And neither does anything else that google turns up
Which blows a fucking great hole in your stupid
claim that google gets it right and grok doesn't
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that >>>>>>>>>>>> phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has >>>>>>>>>>>> been used recently, something google wouldn't have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't apply >>>>>>>>>>> in
the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC article >>>>>>>>>>> was what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
He says while snipping where it said that.
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Pity about the
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted
And replacing it with where talked about something else.
Bullshit it talked about something else
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it could >>>>>>>>>>>>> be way off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase was >>>>>>>>>>>> used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate even >>>>>>>>>>>> for the NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial >>>>>>>>>>> Idiot's source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a >>>>>>>>>> bullshit artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the accuracy >>>>>>>>>>> of its statement since you can only guess where it might have >>>>>>>>>>> got the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the >>>>>>>>>> SOURCES
Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,
More of your barefaced lies on the random
which it probably paid attention to instead of better results >>>>>>>>> like the brewery I found.
Bullshit it did and it basically said the same
thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml
No, it only talked about the term being used in the NT,
Which isnt where we are discussing,
so is a completely useless result
and for the same 285ml quanity as a "middy" or "pot" in other
sates.
Plus it didn't know where you were asking about anyway
Corse it did when it named that explicitly
so shouldn't assume what it "normally means" there.
It didn't assume anything you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
It assumed everything, and clearly got it all wrong.
It didnt get where the term handle was used
wrong, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
Did so too.
And you haven't extablished that the term
handle isnt mostly used for 425-450 ml either
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
Did so too.
You say it did correctly pick the article that prompted your
question:
It clearly did
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-14/pedestrian-death-flinders-island-coroner-dismissal/106562466
So I did a web search for "coronial findings tasmania" and found >>>>>>> the actual coroner's report that had prompted the article here:
https://www.magistratescourt.tas.gov.au/coronerscourt/findings/coronialfindings/2026/Investigation-into-the-death-of-David-Stanley-Bailey-Ruling.pdf
Footnote number 6, on page 3, is of interest:
"6 A handle of beer is 285mls in volume."
Just because that fuckwit got that wrong...
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Have fun listing anywhere that does
Furneaux Tavern where David Bailey was served, of course!
You don't know that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
The coroner knows it.
So your Artificial Idiot lied about the quantity meantin the exact >>>>>>> article that prompted your question!
More of your mindless bullshit
Its total quantity would be off by at least 2.52L!
Wrong, as always
An intelligent web search on the other hand helps get you the
actual answer from the source of the article that prompted your
question, instead of that useless AI BS.
The fuckwit coroner actually got it wrong
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Hillarious!
Pathetic!!
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
You had to ask what a handle of beer is,
Because I had never heard that term
used before for a measure of beer.
The only thing that comes even close is
a stein or a jug of beer, both of which I
have heard plenty of times before
So obviously the brewery
The brewery says nothing of the sort
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
You've clearly forgotten what the brewery said at this point.
and coroner know more than you,
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
and as usual the AI doesn't know anything.
Neither does google you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
but now you're denying what a brewery,
It never says that that term is used in Flinders Island
and the coroner who first used the phrase,
And got it wrong and even google proves that
They used the phrase and defined it,
With not a shred of evidence that their definition is correct
nothing on Google's going to prove they meant something else.
But not a shred of evidence that they got it right
Where's your AI's shred of evidence they meant 425-450ml instead
of 285ml like they said?
both say it means. On the basis of an AI response which doesn't
even say specificially where it got its definition from.
More of your stupid bare faced lies with the SOURCES
No evidence which of those it paid attention to, if any.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
And the coroner and stoneandwood doesn't either
They're trustworthy sources themselves,
Mindless bullshit with the coroner's claim
which can't be substantiated anywhere
Their claim about the meaning of what they said themselves?
Yeah,
and you prove when you say "Mindless bullshit" it doesn't mean
"you're absolutely right", which it obviously really does mean in
this discussion.
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines
with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path
between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
What, that you can't Google?
I can and do google
No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what
you would get from a glorified pachinko machine
There you go, ignoring that again
Yep.
Because even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that terminal stupidity
Nope.
Yep
Glad you agree.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> range of 425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of beer >>>>>>>>>>>> in
Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that stupid lie
Umm, That was your AI's lie.
You haven't shown that it is a lie
Only a blind man couldn't see what I've shown, or one of your
Artificial Idiots.
You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag
But I'm glad you finally agree it was telling you BS.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
Like the USSD definition,
There was no USSD definition
in normal grammar the qualification at the end would only apply >>>>>>>>>> to
the part after the "--".
Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
That doesnt even say what the volume of a handle of beer is
285ml in the NT like I quoted before.
Pity we aren't discussing the NT, as I told you before
Your AI didn't know that.
Corse it did when it mentioned Flinders Island
But you didn't, to it.
Didn't need to, it worked that out for itself
It also says this which would
suggest such terms also mean less than the 425ml for a schooner
elsewhere in Aus:
"By and large, jugs, pints and schooners are a pretty universally
understood size (except in SA), with most of the smaller options
often having a name unique to the region."
That suggests nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit >>>>> artist
Smaller options have the names "unique to the region" such as
handle.
It doesn't say that about the word handle, you pathetic excuse for a
bullshit artist and NO ONE serves options in a container with a handle
It's about the quantity, the article actually only says they "may
come with a handle",
Not with that particular volume they don't
but if you ever got out you'd have seenbeer glases with handles before >> anyway.
Not with that particular volume they don't
It's hillarious how wrong you are,
We'll see...
here's one with "285ml" actually printed on the side!
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/306586746914
Pity that says VINTAGE.
And neither does anything else that google turns up
Which blows a fucking great hole in your stupid
claim that google gets it right and grok doesn't
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that >>>>>>>>>>>>> phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has >>>>>>>>>>>>> been used recently, something google wouldn't have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't apply >>>>>>>>>>>> in
the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC article >>>>>>>>>>>> was what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
He says while snipping where it said that.
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Pity about the
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the state.
Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted
And replacing it with where talked about something else.
Bullshit it talked about something else
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it could >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be way off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase was >>>>>>>>>>>>> used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate even >>>>>>>>>>>>> for the NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial >>>>>>>>>>>> Idiot's source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a >>>>>>>>>>> bullshit artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the accuracy >>>>>>>>>>>> of its statement since you can only guess where it might have >>>>>>>>>>>> got the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the >>>>>>>>>>> SOURCES
Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,
More of your barefaced lies on the random
which it probably paid attention to instead of better results >>>>>>>>>> like the brewery I found.
Bullshit it did and it basically said the same
thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml
No, it only talked about the term being used in the NT,
Which isnt where we are discussing,
so is a completely useless result
and for the same 285ml quanity as a "middy" or "pot" in other >>>>>>>> sates.
Plus it didn't know where you were asking about anyway
Corse it did when it named that explicitly
so shouldn't assume what it "normally means" there.
It didn't assume anything you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
It assumed everything, and clearly got it all wrong.
It didnt get where the term handle was used
wrong, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
Did so too.
Bullshit you ever did
And you haven't extablished that the term
handle isnt mostly used for 425-450 ml either
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
Did so too.
Bullshit you ever did
You say it did correctly pick the article that prompted your
question:
It clearly did
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-14/pedestrian-death-flinders-island-coroner-dismissal/106562466
So I did a web search for "coronial findings tasmania" and found >>>>>>>> the actual coroner's report that had prompted the article here:
https://www.magistratescourt.tas.gov.au/coronerscourt/findings/coronialfindings/2026/Investigation-into-the-death-of-David-Stanley-Bailey-Ruling.pdf
Footnote number 6, on page 3, is of interest:
"6 A handle of beer is 285mls in volume."
Just because that fuckwit got that wrong...
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Have fun listing anywhere that does
Furneaux Tavern where David Bailey was served, of course!
You don't know that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
The coroner knows it.
Nope, just ignorantly CLAIMS that
So your Artificial Idiot lied about the quantity meantin the exact >>>>>>>> article that prompted your question!
More of your mindless bullshit
Its total quantity would be off by at least 2.52L!
Wrong, as always
An intelligent web search on the other hand helps get you the
actual answer from the source of the article that prompted your >>>>>>>> question, instead of that useless AI BS.
The fuckwit coroner actually got it wrong
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Hillarious!
Pathetic!!
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
You had to ask what a handle of beer is,
Because I had never heard that term
used before for a measure of beer.
The only thing that comes even close is
a stein or a jug of beer, both of which I
have heard plenty of times before
So obviously the brewery
The brewery says nothing of the sort
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
You've clearly forgotten what the brewery said at this point.
It never says that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and coroner know more than you,
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
and as usual the AI doesn't know anything.
Neither does google you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
but now you're denying what a brewery,
It never says that that term is used in Flinders Island
and the coroner who first used the phrase,
And got it wrong and even google proves that
They used the phrase and defined it,
With not a shred of evidence that their definition is correct
nothing on Google's going to prove they meant something else.
But not a shred of evidence that they got it right
Where's your AI's shred of evidence they meant 425-450ml instead
of 285ml like they said?
Its in the SOURCES, fuckwit
both say it means. On the basis of an AI response which doesn't
even say specificially where it got its definition from.
More of your stupid bare faced lies with the SOURCES
No evidence which of those it paid attention to, if any.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
And the coroner and stoneandwood doesn't either
They're trustworthy sources themselves,
Mindless bullshit with the coroner's claim
which can't be substantiated anywhere
Their claim about the meaning of what they said themselves?
Yep, they just claim that and never say where they got that
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tools
have
no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines
with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path
between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
What, that you can't Google?
I can and do google
No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what
you would get from a glorified pachinko machine
There you go, ignoring that again
Yep.
Because even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that terminal stupidity
Nope.
Yep
Glad you agree.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> range
given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> range of 425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of >>>>>>>>>>>>> beer
in
Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>> state.
Even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that stupid lie
Umm, That was your AI's lie.
You haven't shown that it is a lie
Only a blind man couldn't see what I've shown, or one of your
Artificial Idiots.
You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag
But I'm glad you finally agree it was telling you BS.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
Like the USSD definition,
There was no USSD definition
in normal grammar the qualification at the end would only apply >>>>>>>>>>> to the part after the "--".
Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
That doesnt even say what the volume of a handle of beer is
285ml in the NT like I quoted before.
Pity we aren't discussing the NT, as I told you before
Your AI didn't know that.
Corse it did when it mentioned Flinders Island
But you didn't, to it.
Didn't need to, it worked that out for itself
It also says this which would
suggest such terms also mean less than the 425ml for a schooner
elsewhere in Aus:
"By and large, jugs, pints and schooners are a pretty universally >>>>>>> understood size (except in SA), with most of the smaller options >>>>>>> often having a name unique to the region."
That suggests nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a
bullshit artist
Smaller options have the names "unique to the region" such as
handle.
It doesn't say that about the word handle, you pathetic excuse for a
bullshit artist and NO ONE serves options in a container with a handle
It's about the quantity, the article actually only says they "may
come with a handle",
Not with that particular volume they don't
but if you ever got out you'd have seenbeer glases with handles
before anyway.
Not with that particular volume they don't
It's hillarious how wrong you are,
We'll see...
here's one with "285ml" actually printed on the side!
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/306586746914
Pity that says VINTAGE.
Wow, your arguments have got even weaker than your AI's nonsense.
That's just too cute to dispute.
And neither does anything else that google turns up
Which blows a fucking great hole in your stupid
claim that google gets it right and grok doesn't
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has >>>>>>>>>>>>>> been used recently, something google wouldn't have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't apply >>>>>>>>>>>>> in
the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC >>>>>>>>>>>>> article
was what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
He says while snipping where it said that.
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>> state.
Pity about the
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>> state.
Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted
And replacing it with where talked about something else.
Bullshit it talked about something else
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be way off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate even >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial >>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiot's source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a >>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the >>>>>>>>>>>>> accuracy
of its statement since you can only guess where it might have >>>>>>>>>>>>> got the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the >>>>>>>>>>>> SOURCES
Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,
More of your barefaced lies on the random
which it probably paid attention to instead of better results >>>>>>>>>>> like the brewery I found.
Bullshit it did and it basically said the same
thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml
No, it only talked about the term being used in the NT,
Which isnt where we are discussing,
so is a completely useless result
and for the same 285ml quanity as a "middy" or "pot" in other >>>>>>>>> sates.
Plus it didn't know where you were asking about anyway
Corse it did when it named that explicitly
so shouldn't assume what it "normally means" there.
It didn't assume anything you pathetic excuse for a bullshit >>>>>>>> artist
It assumed everything, and clearly got it all wrong.
It didnt get where the term handle was used
wrong, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
Did so too.
Bullshit you ever did
And you haven't extablished that the term
handle isnt mostly used for 425-450 ml either
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
Did so too.
Bullshit you ever did
You say it did correctly pick the article that prompted your >>>>>>>>> question:
It clearly did
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-14/pedestrian-death-flinders-island-coroner-dismissal/106562466
So I did a web search for "coronial findings tasmania" and found >>>>>>>>> the actual coroner's report that had prompted the article here:
https://www.magistratescourt.tas.gov.au/coronerscourt/findings/coronialfindings/2026/Investigation-into-the-death-of-David-Stanley-Bailey-Ruling.pdf
Footnote number 6, on page 3, is of interest:
"6 A handle of beer is 285mls in volume."
Just because that fuckwit got that wrong...
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Have fun listing anywhere that does
Furneaux Tavern where David Bailey was served, of course!
You don't know that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
The coroner knows it.
Nope, just ignorantly CLAIMS that
So if you only believe AI BS,
why believe anything else they claim?
So your Artificial Idiot lied about the quantity meantin the >>>>>>>>> exact article that prompted your question!
More of your mindless bullshit
Its total quantity would be off by at least 2.52L!
Wrong, as always
An intelligent web search on the other hand helps get you the >>>>>>>>> actual answer from the source of the article that prompted your >>>>>>>>> question, instead of that useless AI BS.
The fuckwit coroner actually got it wrong
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Hillarious!
Pathetic!!
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
You had to ask what a handle of beer is,
Because I had never heard that term
used before for a measure of beer.
The only thing that comes even close is
a stein or a jug of beer, both of which I
have heard plenty of times before
So obviously the brewery
The brewery says nothing of the sort
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
You've clearly forgotten what the brewery said at this point.
It never says that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and coroner know more than you,
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
and as usual the AI doesn't know anything.
Neither does google you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
but now you're denying what a brewery,
It never says that that term is used in Flinders Island
and the coroner who first used the phrase,
And got it wrong and even google proves that
They used the phrase and defined it,
With not a shred of evidence that their definition is correct
nothing on Google's going to prove they meant something else.
But not a shred of evidence that they got it right
Where's your AI's shred of evidence they meant 425-450ml instead
of 285ml like they said?
Its in the SOURCES, fuckwit
The SOURCES won't tell you what the coroner was thinking when they
said that.
both say it means. On the basis of an AI response which doesn't
even say specificially where it got its definition from.
More of your stupid bare faced lies with the SOURCES
No evidence which of those it paid attention to, if any.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
And the coroner and stoneandwood doesn't either
They're trustworthy sources themselves,
Mindless bullshit with the coroner's claim
which can't be substantiated anywhere
Their claim about the meaning of what they said themselves?
Yep, they just claim that and never say where they got that
So there was no point to you reading the article that prompted your
question to the AI, since it was all just repeating the coroner's
claims anyway.
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tools
have
no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines
with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path
between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
What, that you can't Google?
I can and do google
No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what
you would get from a glorified pachinko machine
There you go, ignoring that again
Yep.
Because even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that terminal stupidity
Nope.
Yep
Glad you agree.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> range
given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> range of 425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> beer
in
Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>>> state.
Even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that stupid lie
Umm, That was your AI's lie.
You haven't shown that it is a lie
Only a blind man couldn't see what I've shown, or one of your
Artificial Idiots.
You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag
But I'm glad you finally agree it was telling you BS.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
Like the USSD definition,
There was no USSD definition
in normal grammar the qualification at the end would only apply >>>>>>>>>>>> to the part after the "--".
Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
That doesnt even say what the volume of a handle of beer is
285ml in the NT like I quoted before.
Pity we aren't discussing the NT, as I told you before
Your AI didn't know that.
Corse it did when it mentioned Flinders Island
But you didn't, to it.
Didn't need to, it worked that out for itself
It also says this which would
suggest such terms also mean less than the 425ml for a schooner >>>>>>>> elsewhere in Aus:
"By and large, jugs, pints and schooners are a pretty universally >>>>>>>> understood size (except in SA), with most of the smaller options >>>>>>>> often having a name unique to the region."
That suggests nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a
bullshit artist
Smaller options have the names "unique to the region" such as
handle.
It doesn't say that about the word handle, you pathetic excuse for a >>>>> bullshit artist and NO ONE serves options in a container with a handle
It's about the quantity, the article actually only says they "may
come with a handle",
Not with that particular volume they don't
but if you ever got out you'd have seenbeer glases with handles
before anyway.
Not with that particular volume they don't
It's hillarious how wrong you are,
We'll see...
here's one with "285ml" actually printed on the side!
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/306586746914
Pity that says VINTAGE.
Wow, your arguments have got even weaker than your AI's nonsense.
You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag
That's just too cute to dispute.
You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag
And neither does anything else that google turns up
Which blows a fucking great hole in your stupid
claim that google gets it right and grok doesn't
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been used recently, something google wouldn't have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't apply >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC >>>>>>>>>>>>>> article
was what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
He says while snipping where it said that.
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>>> state.
Pity about the
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>> state.
Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted
And replacing it with where talked about something else.
Bullshit it talked about something else
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be way off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate even >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiot's source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a >>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> accuracy
of its statement since you can only guess where it might have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> got the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the >>>>>>>>>>>>> SOURCES
Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,
More of your barefaced lies on the random
which it probably paid attention to instead of better results >>>>>>>>>>>> like the brewery I found.
Bullshit it did and it basically said the same
thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml
No, it only talked about the term being used in the NT,
Which isnt where we are discussing,
so is a completely useless result
and for the same 285ml quanity as a "middy" or "pot" in other >>>>>>>>>> sates.
Plus it didn't know where you were asking about anyway
Corse it did when it named that explicitly
so shouldn't assume what it "normally means" there.
It didn't assume anything you pathetic excuse for a bullshit >>>>>>>>> artist
It assumed everything, and clearly got it all wrong.
It didnt get where the term handle was used
wrong, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
Did so too.
Bullshit you ever did
And you haven't extablished that the term
handle isnt mostly used for 425-450 ml either
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
Did so too.
Bullshit you ever did
You say it did correctly pick the article that prompted your >>>>>>>>>> question:
It clearly did
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-14/pedestrian-death-flinders-island-coroner-dismissal/106562466
So I did a web search for "coronial findings tasmania" and found >>>>>>>>>> the actual coroner's report that had prompted the article here:
https://www.magistratescourt.tas.gov.au/coronerscourt/findings/coronialfindings/2026/Investigation-into-the-death-of-David-Stanley-Bailey-Ruling.pdf
Footnote number 6, on page 3, is of interest:
"6 A handle of beer is 285mls in volume."
Just because that fuckwit got that wrong...
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Have fun listing anywhere that does
Furneaux Tavern where David Bailey was served, of course!
You don't know that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
The coroner knows it.
Nope, just ignorantly CLAIMS that
So if you only believe AI BS,
There is no bullshit, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
why believe anything else they claim?
Because I haven't seen AI get anything wrong
So your Artificial Idiot lied about the quantity meantin the >>>>>>>>>> exact article that prompted your question!
More of your mindless bullshit
Its total quantity would be off by at least 2.52L!
Wrong, as always
An intelligent web search on the other hand helps get you the >>>>>>>>>> actual answer from the source of the article that prompted your >>>>>>>>>> question, instead of that useless AI BS.
The fuckwit coroner actually got it wrong
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Hillarious!
Pathetic!!
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
You had to ask what a handle of beer is,
Because I had never heard that term
used before for a measure of beer.
The only thing that comes even close is
a stein or a jug of beer, both of which I
have heard plenty of times before
So obviously the brewery
The brewery says nothing of the sort
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
You've clearly forgotten what the brewery said at this point.
It never says that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and coroner know more than you,
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
and as usual the AI doesn't know anything.
Neither does google you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
but now you're denying what a brewery,
It never says that that term is used in Flinders Island
and the coroner who first used the phrase,
And got it wrong and even google proves that
They used the phrase and defined it,
With not a shred of evidence that their definition is correct
nothing on Google's going to prove they meant something else.
But not a shred of evidence that they got it right
Where's your AI's shred of evidence they meant 425-450ml instead
of 285ml like they said?
Its in the SOURCES, fuckwit
The SOURCES won't tell you what the coroner was thinking when they
said that.
That wasnt about what the coroner meant,
its what the TAVERN meant when they told
the coroner how much he had drank
both say it means. On the basis of an AI response which doesn't >>>>>>>> even say specificially where it got its definition from.
More of your stupid bare faced lies with the SOURCES
No evidence which of those it paid attention to, if any.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
And the coroner and stoneandwood doesn't either
They're trustworthy sources themselves,
Mindless bullshit with the coroner's claim
which can't be substantiated anywhere
Their claim about the meaning of what they said themselves?
Yep, they just claim that and never say where they got that
So there was no point to you reading the article that prompted your
question to the AI, since it was all just repeating the coroner's
claims anyway.
It is in fact doing nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a
bullshit artist
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tools
have
no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines
with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> likely
path
between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
has
already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
What, that you can't Google?
I can and do google
No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what >>>>>>>>>>>> you would get from a glorified pachinko machine
There you go, ignoring that again
Yep.
Because even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that terminal stupidity
Nope.
Yep
Glad you agree.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
I get this page from a brewery by searching for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "handles
of
beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> range
given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> range of 425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beer
in
Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> state.
Even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that stupid lie
Umm, That was your AI's lie.
You haven't shown that it is a lie
Only a blind man couldn't see what I've shown, or one of your
Artificial Idiots.
You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag
But I'm glad you finally agree it was telling you BS.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
Like the USSD definition,
There was no USSD definition
in normal grammar the qualification at the end would only >>>>>>>>>>>>> apply to the part after the "--".
Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
That doesnt even say what the volume of a handle of beer is
285ml in the NT like I quoted before.
Pity we aren't discussing the NT, as I told you before
Your AI didn't know that.
Corse it did when it mentioned Flinders Island
But you didn't, to it.
Didn't need to, it worked that out for itself
It also says this which would
suggest such terms also mean less than the 425ml for a schooner >>>>>>>>> elsewhere in Aus:
"By and large, jugs, pints and schooners are a pretty universally >>>>>>>>> understood size (except in SA), with most of the smaller options >>>>>>>>> often having a name unique to the region."
That suggests nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a
bullshit artist
Smaller options have the names "unique to the region" such as
handle.
It doesn't say that about the word handle, you pathetic excuse for a >>>>>> bullshit artist and NO ONE serves options in a container with a
handle
It's about the quantity, the article actually only says they "may
come with a handle",
Not with that particular volume they don't
but if you ever got out you'd have seenbeer glases with handles
before anyway.
Not with that particular volume they don't
It's hillarious how wrong you are,
We'll see...
here's one with "285ml" actually printed on the side!
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/306586746914
Pity that says VINTAGE.
Wow, your arguments have got even weaker than your AI's nonsense.
You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag
That's just too cute to dispute.
You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag
And neither does anything else that google turns up
Which blows a fucking great hole in your stupid
claim that google gets it right and grok doesn't
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been used recently, something google wouldn't have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apply
in
the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> article
was what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
He says while snipping where it said that.
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> state.
Pity about the
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>> state.
Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted
And replacing it with where talked about something else.
Bullshit it talked about something else
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be way off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even for the NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiot's source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accuracy
of its statement since you can only guess where it might >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
got the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> SOURCES
Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,
More of your barefaced lies on the random
which it probably paid attention to instead of better results >>>>>>>>>>>>> like the brewery I found.
Bullshit it did and it basically said the same
thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml
No, it only talked about the term being used in the NT,
Which isnt where we are discussing,
so is a completely useless result
and for the same 285ml quanity as a "middy" or "pot" in other >>>>>>>>>>> sates.
Plus it didn't know where you were asking about anyway
Corse it did when it named that explicitly
so shouldn't assume what it "normally means" there.
It didn't assume anything you pathetic excuse for a bullshit >>>>>>>>>> artist
It assumed everything, and clearly got it all wrong.
It didnt get where the term handle was used
wrong, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
Did so too.
Bullshit you ever did
And you haven't extablished that the term
handle isnt mostly used for 425-450 ml either
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
Did so too.
Bullshit you ever did
You say it did correctly pick the article that prompted your >>>>>>>>>>> question:
It clearly did
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-14/pedestrian-death-flinders-island-coroner-dismissal/106562466
So I did a web search for "coronial findings tasmania" and >>>>>>>>>>> found
the actual coroner's report that had prompted the article here:
https://www.magistratescourt.tas.gov.au/coronerscourt/findings/coronialfindings/2026/Investigation-into-the-death-of-David-Stanley-Bailey-Ruling.pdf
Footnote number 6, on page 3, is of interest:
"6 A handle of beer is 285mls in volume."
Just because that fuckwit got that wrong...
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Have fun listing anywhere that does
Furneaux Tavern where David Bailey was served, of course!
You don't know that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
The coroner knows it.
Nope, just ignorantly CLAIMS that
So if you only believe AI BS,
There is no bullshit, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
why believe anything else they claim?
Because I haven't seen AI get anything wrong
It was the coroner claiming that, same as everything else in the
article you read.
So your Artificial Idiot lied about the quantity meantin the >>>>>>>>>>> exact article that prompted your question!
More of your mindless bullshit
Its total quantity would be off by at least 2.52L!
Wrong, as always
An intelligent web search on the other hand helps get you the >>>>>>>>>>> actual answer from the source of the article that prompted your >>>>>>>>>>> question, instead of that useless AI BS.
The fuckwit coroner actually got it wrong
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Hillarious!
Pathetic!!
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
You had to ask what a handle of beer is,
Because I had never heard that term
used before for a measure of beer.
The only thing that comes even close is
a stein or a jug of beer, both of which I
have heard plenty of times before
So obviously the brewery
The brewery says nothing of the sort
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
You've clearly forgotten what the brewery said at this point.
It never says that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and coroner know more than you,
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
and as usual the AI doesn't know anything.
Neither does google you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
but now you're denying what a brewery,
It never says that that term is used in Flinders Island
and the coroner who first used the phrase,
And got it wrong and even google proves that
They used the phrase and defined it,
With not a shred of evidence that their definition is correct
nothing on Google's going to prove they meant something else.
But not a shred of evidence that they got it right
Where's your AI's shred of evidence they meant 425-450ml instead
of 285ml like they said?
Its in the SOURCES, fuckwit
The SOURCES won't tell you what the coroner was thinking when they
said that.
That wasnt about what the coroner meant,
its what the TAVERN meant when they told
the coroner how much he had drank
They clearly said he drank 18 285ml "handles".
both say it means. On the basis of an AI response which doesn't >>>>>>>>> even say specificially where it got its definition from.
More of your stupid bare faced lies with the SOURCES
No evidence which of those it paid attention to, if any.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
And the coroner and stoneandwood doesn't either
They're trustworthy sources themselves,
Mindless bullshit with the coroner's claim
which can't be substantiated anywhere
Their claim about the meaning of what they said themselves?
Yep, they just claim that and never say where they got that
So there was no point to you reading the article that prompted your
question to the AI, since it was all just repeating the coroner's
claims anyway.
It is in fact doing nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a
bullshit artist
No doubt you're too lazy to read though the coroner's report and
see it has all the information that the article used.
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tools
have
no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines
with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> likely
path
between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
has
already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
What, that you can't Google?
I can and do google
No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what >>>>>>>>>>>>> you would get from a glorified pachinko machine
There you go, ignoring that again
Yep.
Because even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that terminal stupidity
Nope.
Yep
Glad you agree.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
I get this page from a brewery by searching for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "handles
of
beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> range
given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> range of 425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beer
in
Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state.
Even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that stupid lie
Umm, That was your AI's lie.
You haven't shown that it is a lie
Only a blind man couldn't see what I've shown, or one of your
Artificial Idiots.
You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag
But I'm glad you finally agree it was telling you BS.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
Like the USSD definition,
There was no USSD definition
in normal grammar the qualification at the end would only >>>>>>>>>>>>>> apply to the part after the "--".
Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
That doesnt even say what the volume of a handle of beer is
285ml in the NT like I quoted before.
Pity we aren't discussing the NT, as I told you before
Your AI didn't know that.
Corse it did when it mentioned Flinders Island
But you didn't, to it.
Didn't need to, it worked that out for itself
It also says this which would
suggest such terms also mean less than the 425ml for a schooner >>>>>>>>>> elsewhere in Aus:
"By and large, jugs, pints and schooners are a pretty universally >>>>>>>>>> understood size (except in SA), with most of the smaller options >>>>>>>>>> often having a name unique to the region."
That suggests nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a >>>>>>>>> bullshit artist
Smaller options have the names "unique to the region" such as
handle.
It doesn't say that about the word handle, you pathetic excuse for a >>>>>>> bullshit artist and NO ONE serves options in a container with a >>>>>>> handle
It's about the quantity, the article actually only says they "may
come with a handle",
Not with that particular volume they don't
but if you ever got out you'd have seenbeer glases with handles
before anyway.
Not with that particular volume they don't
It's hillarious how wrong you are,
We'll see...
here's one with "285ml" actually printed on the side!
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/306586746914
Pity that says VINTAGE.
Wow, your arguments have got even weaker than your AI's nonsense.
You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag
That's just too cute to dispute.
You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag
And neither does anything else that google turns up
Which blows a fucking great hole in your stupid
claim that google gets it right and grok doesn't
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been used recently, something google wouldn't have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apply
in
the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> article
was what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
He says while snipping where it said that.
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state.
Pity about the
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>>> state.
Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted
And replacing it with where talked about something else.
Bullshit it talked about something else
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be way off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even for the NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiot's source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accuracy
of its statement since you can only guess where it might >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
got the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SOURCES
Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,
More of your barefaced lies on the random
which it probably paid attention to instead of better results >>>>>>>>>>>>>> like the brewery I found.
Bullshit it did and it basically said the same
thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml
No, it only talked about the term being used in the NT,
Which isnt where we are discussing,
so is a completely useless result
and for the same 285ml quanity as a "middy" or "pot" in other >>>>>>>>>>>> sates.
Plus it didn't know where you were asking about anyway
Corse it did when it named that explicitly
so shouldn't assume what it "normally means" there.
It didn't assume anything you pathetic excuse for a bullshit >>>>>>>>>>> artist
It assumed everything, and clearly got it all wrong.
It didnt get where the term handle was used
wrong, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
Did so too.
Bullshit you ever did
And you haven't extablished that the term
handle isnt mostly used for 425-450 ml either
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
Did so too.
Bullshit you ever did
You say it did correctly pick the article that prompted your >>>>>>>>>>>> question:
It clearly did
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-14/pedestrian-death-flinders-island-coroner-dismissal/106562466
So I did a web search for "coronial findings tasmania" and >>>>>>>>>>>> found
the actual coroner's report that had prompted the article here:
https://www.magistratescourt.tas.gov.au/coronerscourt/findings/coronialfindings/2026/Investigation-into-the-death-of-David-Stanley-Bailey-Ruling.pdf
Footnote number 6, on page 3, is of interest:
"6 A handle of beer is 285mls in volume."
Just because that fuckwit got that wrong...
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Have fun listing anywhere that does
Furneaux Tavern where David Bailey was served, of course!
You don't know that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
The coroner knows it.
Nope, just ignorantly CLAIMS that
So if you only believe AI BS,
There is no bullshit, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
why believe anything else they claim?
Because I haven't seen AI get anything wrong
It was the coroner claiming that, same as everything else in the
article you read.
Duh, but even google can't find any substantiation of that claim
So your Artificial Idiot lied about the quantity meantin the >>>>>>>>>>>> exact article that prompted your question!
More of your mindless bullshit
Its total quantity would be off by at least 2.52L!
Wrong, as always
An intelligent web search on the other hand helps get you the >>>>>>>>>>>> actual answer from the source of the article that prompted your >>>>>>>>>>>> question, instead of that useless AI BS.
The fuckwit coroner actually got it wrong
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Hillarious!
Pathetic!!
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
You had to ask what a handle of beer is,
Because I had never heard that term
used before for a measure of beer.
The only thing that comes even close is
a stein or a jug of beer, both of which I
have heard plenty of times before
So obviously the brewery
The brewery says nothing of the sort
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
You've clearly forgotten what the brewery said at this point.
It never says that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and coroner know more than you,
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
and as usual the AI doesn't know anything.
Neither does google you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
but now you're denying what a brewery,
It never says that that term is used in Flinders Island
and the coroner who first used the phrase,
And got it wrong and even google proves that
They used the phrase and defined it,
With not a shred of evidence that their definition is correct
nothing on Google's going to prove they meant something else.
But not a shred of evidence that they got it right
Where's your AI's shred of evidence they meant 425-450ml instead
of 285ml like they said?
Its in the SOURCES, fuckwit
The SOURCES won't tell you what the coroner was thinking when they
said that.
That wasnt about what the coroner meant,
its what the TAVERN meant when they told
the coroner how much he had drank
They clearly said he drank 18 285ml "handles".
They never said what the volume of the handles is
both say it means. On the basis of an AI response which doesn't >>>>>>>>>> even say specificially where it got its definition from.
More of your stupid bare faced lies with the SOURCES
No evidence which of those it paid attention to, if any.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something
And the coroner and stoneandwood doesn't either
They're trustworthy sources themselves,
Mindless bullshit with the coroner's claim
which can't be substantiated anywhere
Their claim about the meaning of what they said themselves?
Yep, they just claim that and never say where they got that
So there was no point to you reading the article that prompted your
question to the AI, since it was all just repeating the coroner's
claims anyway.
It is in fact doing nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a
bullshit artist
No doubt you're too lazy to read though the coroner's report and
see it has all the information that the article used.
Wrong, as always and it provides no information what
so ever on where they got that volume claim from and
even google can't find that either you pathetic excuse
for a bullshit artist
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tools
have
no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
can't
actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pachinko
machines
with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> likely
path
between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pins
it
has
already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
didnt get as useful a result from google
You just ignored that
What, that you can't Google?
I can and do google
No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you would get from a glorified pachinko machine
There you go, ignoring that again
Yep.
Because even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that terminal stupidity
Nope.
Yep
Glad you agree.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying
something
I get this page from a brewery by searching for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "handles
of
beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> range
given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
But inaccurately states the volume only varies between >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in range of 425-450mL
Bullshit it does
and always matches a schooner.
It doesn't say that either
It says it over and over from the start:
Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie
"18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beer in Australian slang"
"A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"
"So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"
Pity about
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a beer glass with a handle, typically holding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state.
Even you realise that you can never
bullshit your way out of that stupid lie
Umm, That was your AI's lie.
You haven't shown that it is a lie
Only a blind man couldn't see what I've shown, or one of your
Artificial Idiots.
You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag
But I'm glad you finally agree it was telling you BS.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying
something
Like the USSD definition,
There was no USSD definition
in normal grammar the qualification at the end would only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apply to the part after the "--".
Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
That doesnt even say what the volume of a handle of beer is
285ml in the NT like I quoted before.
Pity we aren't discussing the NT, as I told you before
Your AI didn't know that.
Corse it did when it mentioned Flinders Island
But you didn't, to it.
Didn't need to, it worked that out for itself
It also says this which would
suggest such terms also mean less than the 425ml for a schooner >>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere in Aus:
"By and large, jugs, pints and schooners are a pretty
universally
understood size (except in SA), with most of the smaller >>>>>>>>>>> options
often having a name unique to the region."
That suggests nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a >>>>>>>>>> bullshit artist
Smaller options have the names "unique to the region" such as >>>>>>>>> handle.
It doesn't say that about the word handle, you pathetic excuse >>>>>>>> for a
bullshit artist and NO ONE serves options in a container with a >>>>>>>> handle
It's about the quantity, the article actually only says they "may >>>>>>> come with a handle",
Not with that particular volume they don't
but if you ever got out you'd have seenbeer glases with handles >>>>>>> before anyway.
Not with that particular volume they don't
It's hillarious how wrong you are,
We'll see...
here's one with "285ml" actually printed on the side!
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/306586746914
Pity that says VINTAGE.
Wow, your arguments have got even weaker than your AI's nonsense.
You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag
That's just too cute to dispute.
You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag
And neither does anything else that google turns up
Which blows a fucking great hole in your stupid
claim that google gets it right and grok doesn't
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.
But it did accurately work out where I was getting that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been used recently, something google wouldn't have done
Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apply in
the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> article was what prompted your question.
But it did work that out. So much for your
stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty
Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.
Bullshit it does with
He says while snipping where it said that.
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a beer glass with a handle, typically holding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around
425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state.
Pity about the
A "handle" is a common term for a schooner -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> state.
Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted
And replacing it with where talked about something else.
Bullshit it talked about something else
It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be way off.
But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was used
And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even for the NT
Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiot's source is... nothing.
Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit artist
No cites except the very ABC article that
prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accuracy
of its statement since you can only guess where it might >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have got the info from.
Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the SOURCES
Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,
More of your barefaced lies on the random
which it probably paid attention to instead of better >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results like the brewery I found.
Bullshit it did and it basically said the same
thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml
No, it only talked about the term being used in the NT,
Which isnt where we are discussing,
so is a completely useless result
and for the same 285ml quanity as a "middy" or "pot" in other >>>>>>>>>>>>> sates.
Plus it didn't know where you were asking about anyway
Corse it did when it named that explicitly
so shouldn't assume what it "normally means" there.
It didn't assume anything you pathetic excuse for a bullshit >>>>>>>>>>>> artist
It assumed everything, and clearly got it all wrong.
It didnt get where the term handle was used
wrong, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
Did so too.
Bullshit you ever did
And you haven't extablished that the term
handle isnt mostly used for 425-450 ml either
Did so too.
How odd that you can't prove that
Did so too.
Bullshit you ever did
You say it did correctly pick the article that prompted your >>>>>>>>>>>>> question:
It clearly did
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-14/pedestrian-death-flinders-island-coroner-dismissal/106562466
So I did a web search for "coronial findings tasmania" and >>>>>>>>>>>>> found
the actual coroner's report that had prompted the article >>>>>>>>>>>>> here:
https://www.magistratescourt.tas.gov.au/coronerscourt/findings/coronialfindings/2026/Investigation-into-the-death-of-David-Stanley-Bailey-Ruling.pdf
Footnote number 6, on page 3, is of interest:
"6 A handle of beer is 285mls in volume."
Just because that fuckwit got that wrong...
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Have fun listing anywhere that does
Furneaux Tavern where David Bailey was served, of course!
You don't know that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
The coroner knows it.
Nope, just ignorantly CLAIMS that
So if you only believe AI BS,
There is no bullshit, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
why believe anything else they claim?
Because I haven't seen AI get anything wrong
It was the coroner claiming that, same as everything else in the
article you read.
Duh, but even google can't find any substantiation of that claim
So your Artificial Idiot lied about the quantity meantin the >>>>>>>>>>>>> exact article that prompted your question!
More of your mindless bullshit
Its total quantity would be off by at least 2.52L!
Wrong, as always
An intelligent web search on the other hand helps get you the >>>>>>>>>>>>> actual answer from the source of the article that prompted >>>>>>>>>>>>> your question, instead of that useless AI BS.
The fuckwit coroner actually got it wrong
No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle
Hillarious!
Pathetic!!
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying
something
You had to ask what a handle of beer is,
Because I had never heard that term
used before for a measure of beer.
The only thing that comes even close is
a stein or a jug of beer, both of which I
have heard plenty of times before
So obviously the brewery
The brewery says nothing of the sort
you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
You've clearly forgotten what the brewery said at this point.
It never says that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
and coroner know more than you,
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
and as usual the AI doesn't know anything.
Neither does google you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist
but now you're denying what a brewery,
It never says that that term is used in Flinders Island
and the coroner who first used the phrase,
And got it wrong and even google proves that
They used the phrase and defined it,
With not a shred of evidence that their definition is correct
nothing on Google's going to prove they meant something else.
But not a shred of evidence that they got it right
Where's your AI's shred of evidence they meant 425-450ml instead >>>>>>> of 285ml like they said?
Its in the SOURCES, fuckwit
The SOURCES won't tell you what the coroner was thinking when they
said that.
That wasnt about what the coroner meant,
its what the TAVERN meant when they told
the coroner how much he had drank
They clearly said he drank 18 285ml "handles".
They never said what the volume of the handles is
So are you the psychic who knows what the coroner was told by the
tavern and what they decided to make up out of thin air, or do you
think you've found a psychic AI?
Either way any sane person would
see that your Artificial Idiot was obviously just plain wrong about 425-450ml.
both say it means. On the basis of an AI response which doesn't >>>>>>>>>>> even say specificially where it got its definition from.
More of your stupid bare faced lies with the SOURCES
No evidence which of those it paid attention to, if any.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage
Well yes, you are a bit.
Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying
something
And the coroner and stoneandwood doesn't either
They're trustworthy sources themselves,
Mindless bullshit with the coroner's claim
which can't be substantiated anywhere
Their claim about the meaning of what they said themselves?
Yep, they just claim that and never say where they got that
So there was no point to you reading the article that prompted your
question to the AI, since it was all just repeating the coroner's
claims anyway.
It is in fact doing nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a
bullshit artist
No doubt you're too lazy to read though the coroner's report and
see it has all the information that the article used.
Wrong, as always and it provides no information what
so ever on where they got that volume claim from and
even google can't find that either you pathetic excuse
for a bullshit artist
Ah, spinning in circles again.
A typical Rod Speed response to being "done like a dinner".
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 00:53:57 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
10 files (20,373K bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,187 |