Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
Gemini got it right--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 15:57:10 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
Rubbish! It can compose Elizabethan sonnets in 15 seconds.
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 15:57:10 +1100, "Rod Speed"Elizabethans did that for you already.
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Has never heard of Dezi FreemanRubbish! It can compose Elizabethan sonnets in 15 seconds.
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
Gemini got it right
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
Gemini got it right
Rod Speed wroteNope
Has never heard of Dezi Freemanwrong!
.........................................................The stupid thing told me that there was no one well known with that nameAnd now delivers this. can't even manage a consistent line in bullshit
Dezi Freeman
Dezi Freeman is an Australian rules football player known for her time > in the AFL WomenrCOs (AFLW) competition.
Key details:
Full name: Dezi Freeman
Sport: Australian Rules Football
League: AFL WomenrCOs (AFLW)
Position: Typically played as a midfielder/forward
Notable team: Collingwood Football Club
Career highlights:
Drafted into the AFLW and played for Collingwood during the early > seasons of the competition.
Known for her athleticism and ability to impact games both in midfield > and attack.
Part of the leaguerCOs formative years as womenrCOs Australian football > rapidly expanded in popularity.
If you want, I can go deeper into her stats, career timeline, or what > sherCOs doing after football.
.........................................................
wtf? lol!Yeah completely fucked
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2Gemini got it rightyep!
Rod Speed wrote
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
Gemini got it right
Presumably training data is more than 7 months old
Axel <none@not.here> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
wrong!
Nope
.........................................................
Dezi Freeman
Dezi Freeman is an Australian rules football player known for her
time in the AFL WomenrCOs (AFLW) competition.
Key details:
Full name: Dezi Freeman
Sport: Australian Rules Football
League: AFL WomenrCOs (AFLW)
Position: Typically played as a midfielder/forward
Notable team: Collingwood Football Club
Career highlights:
Drafted into the AFLW and played for Collingwood during the early
seasons of the competition.
Known for her athleticism and ability to impact games both in
midfield and attack.
Part of the leaguerCOs formative years as womenrCOs Australian football
rapidly expanded in popularity.
If you want, I can go deeper into her stats, career timeline, or what
sherCOs doing after football.
.........................................................
The stupid thing told me that there was no one well known with that name
And now delivers this. can't even manage a consistent line in bullshit https://chatgpt.com/share/69cc5c50-e5a0-8322-9c1e-ad20c96d6356
--wtf? lol!
Yeah completely fucked
Gemini got it right
yep!
Ozix <ozix@xizo.am> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
aGemini got it right
Presumably training data is more than 7 months old
Any decent AI should be up to date
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 15:57:10 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
Rubbish! It can compose Elizabethan sonnets in 15 seconds.
Elizabethans did that for you already.
On 1 Apr 2026 08:02:12 +1000, not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd
Kev) wrote:
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote:Not like this...
On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 15:57:10 +1100, "Rod Speed"Elizabethans did that for you already.
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Has never heard of Dezi FreemanRubbish! It can compose Elizabethan sonnets in 15 seconds.
Hello, may I have a sonnet chiding a troll called "Rod" imploring him
to change his insulting and rude behavior, and suggesting he seek help
via a contemplative order in Tibet?
Rod, once you cast your barbs with careless glee,
Your words like pebbles hurled at passing minds;
They splash, then sink, yet ripple through the sea
Of days, unsettling the gentler kinds.
What sport is found in jabs that leave a bruise,
Or wit that sharpens only to belittle?
A louder sneer is still a weaker muse;
True strength speaks firm, yet keeps its compass little.
Consider paths where quieter hearts roamrCo
Where breath is taught to listen, not to fight;
In TibetrCOs heights, contemplative rites call home
The scattered self to patience, depth, and light.
So trade the trollrCOs quick spark for kinder range;
In tending calm, you may yet find your change.
Peter Jason wrote:Didn't work though.
On 1 Apr 2026 08:02:12 +1000, not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd
Kev) wrote:
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote:Not like this...
On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 15:57:10 +1100, "Rod Speed"Elizabethans did that for you already.
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Has never heard of Dezi FreemanRubbish! It can compose Elizabethan sonnets in 15 seconds.
Hello, may I have a sonnet chiding a troll called "Rod" imploring him
to change his insulting and rude behavior, and suggesting he seek help
via a contemplative order in Tibet?
Rod, once you cast your barbs with careless glee,
Your words like pebbles hurled at passing minds;
They splash, then sink, yet ripple through the sea
Of days, unsettling the gentler kinds.
What sport is found in jabs that leave a bruise,
Or wit that sharpens only to belittle?
A louder sneer is still a weaker muse;
True strength speaks firm, yet keeps its compass little.
Consider paths where quieter hearts roamu
Where breath is taught to listen, not to fight;
In TibetAs heights, contemplative rites call home
The scattered self to patience, depth, and light.
So trade the trollAs quick spark for kinder range;
In tending calm, you may yet find your change.
LOL
Ozix <ozix@xizo.am> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
-aGemini got it right
Presumably training data is more than 7 months old
Any decent AI should be up to date
Rod Speed wrote
Ozix <ozix@xizo.am> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
Gemini got it right
Presumably training data is more than 7 months old
Any decent AI should be up to date
GIGO
OR
Garbage in = AI slop out
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Ozix <ozix@xizo.am> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
-aGemini got it right
Presumably training data is more than 7 months old
-aAny decent AI should be up to date
GIGO
Doesnt explain why Gemini got it right
OR
Garbage in = AI slop out
Doesnt explain why Gemini got it right
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Ozix <ozix@xizo.am> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
Gemini got it right
Presumably training data is more than 7 months old
Any decent AI should be up to date
GIGO
Doesnt explain why Gemini got it right
OR
Garbage in = AI slop out
Doesnt explain why Gemini got it right
Thousand monkeys with typewriters ..........
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Ozix <ozix@xizo.am> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
-aGemini got it right
Presumably training data is more than 7 months old
-aAny decent AI should be up to date
GIGO
-aDoesnt explain why Gemini got it right
OR
Garbage in = AI slop out
-aDoesnt explain wh y Gemini got it right
Thousand monkeys with typewriters ..........
Doesnt explain why Gemini got it right
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Ozix <ozix@xizo.am> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
Gemini got it right
Presumably training data is more than 7 months old
Any decent AI should be up to date
GIGO
Doesnt explain why Gemini got it right
OR
Garbage in = AI slop out
Doesnt explain wh y Gemini got it right
Thousand monkeys with typewriters ..........
Doesnt explain why Gemini got it right
Real intelligences think, artificial intelligences don't,
they just take keywords from your prompt andthen go looking in the
data that they have been given for something relevant.
Obviously, ChatGPT hadn't been told about Dezi Freeman,
but, at least, it didn't just make something up as some"AI"s have been known to do when they can't find real data.
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Ozix <ozix@xizo.am> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
-aGemini got it right
Presumably training data is more than 7 months old
-aAny decent AI should be up to date
GIGO
-aDoesnt explain why Gemini got it right
OR
Garbage in = AI slop out
-aDoesnt explain wh y Gemini got it right
Thousand monkeys with typewriters ..........
-aDoesnt explain why Gemini got it right
Real intelligences think, artificial intelligences don't,
I only asked Gemini for the data, I didnt ask it to think
they just take-a-a keywords from your prompt andthen go-a-a looking in the >> data that they have been given for something relevant.
Gemini clearly didnt just look at what it had been
given, it went looking for the data I had asked for
Obviously, ChatGPT hadn't been told-a-a about Dezi Freeman,
Gemini hadn't been either, but clearly
was quite capable of finding it for itself.
but, at least, it didn't just make something up as-a-a some"AI"s have
been known to do when they can't find real data.
ChatGPT is clearly incapable of finding that very easy to find data
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Ozix <ozix@xizo.am> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
Gemini got it right
Presumably training data is more than 7 months old
Any decent AI should be up to date
GIGO
Doesnt explain why Gemini got it right
OR
Garbage in = AI slop out
Doesnt explain wh y Gemini got it right
Thousand monkeys with typewriters ..........
Doesnt explain why Gemini got it right
Real intelligences think, artificial intelligences don't,
I only asked Gemini for the data, I didnt ask it to think
they just take keywords from your prompt andthen go looking in the >>> data that they have been given for something relevant.
Gemini clearly didnt just look at what it had been
given, it went looking for the data I had asked for
They both went looking for the data that you asked for in the data that they had.
In this case Gemini had the data that you were looking for,
ChatGPT didn't for whatever reason.
Obviously, ChatGPT hadn't been told about Dezi Freeman,
Gemini hadn't been either, but clearly
was quite capable of finding it for itself.
Exactly how do you know the mechanism by which either of them work?
but, at least, it didn't just make something up as some"AI"s have
been known to do when they can't find real data.
ChatGPT is clearly incapable of finding that very easy to find data
Gawd, nothing changes, once you have an idea no matter how wrong in your head, it's impossible to shift it.
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Ozix <ozix@xizo.am> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
Gemini got it right
Presumably training data is more than 7 months old
Any decent AI should be up to date
GIGO
Doesnt explain why Gemini got it right
OR
Garbage in = AI slop out
Doesnt explain wh y Gemini got it right
Thousand monkeys with typewriters ..........
Doesnt explain why Gemini got it right
Real intelligences think, artificial intelligences don't,
I only asked Gemini for the data, I didnt ask it to think
they just take-a-a keywords from your prompt andthen go-a-a looking in >>>> the data that they have been given for something relevant.
Gemini clearly didnt just look at what it had been
given, it went looking for the data I had asked for
They both went looking for the data that you asked for in the data
that they had.
More of your mindless bullshit, Gemini clearly
kept collecting data given that it was completely
up to date with his execution
In this case Gemini had the data that you were looking for,
It clearly keeps collecting data
ChatGPT didn't for whatever reason.
Because its fucked by design
Obviously, ChatGPT hadn't been told-a-a about Dezi Freeman,
Gemini hadn't been either, but clearly
was quite capable of finding it for itself.
Exactly how do you know the mechanism by which either of them work?
Clearly Gemini does keep checking for new data
And clearly ChatGPT doesnt bother because its fucked by design
but, at least, it didn't just make something up as-a-a some"AI"s have >>>> been known to do when they can't find real data.
ChatGPT is clearly incapable of finding that very easy to find data
Gawd, nothing changes, once you have an idea no matter how wrong in
your head, it's impossible to shift it.
You havent shown that there is anything wrong with what I said,
you pathetic excuse for a fuckwit pommy bullshit artist
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Ozix <ozix@xizo.am> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Has never heard of Dezi Freeman
Gemini got it right
Presumably training data is more than 7 months old
Any decent AI should be up to date
GIGO
Doesnt explain why Gemini got it right
OR
Garbage in = AI slop out
Doesnt explain wh y Gemini got it right
Thousand monkeys with typewriters ..........
Doesnt explain why Gemini got it right
Real intelligences think, artificial intelligences don't,
I only asked Gemini for the data, I didnt ask it to think
they just take keywords from your prompt andthen go looking in >>>>> the data that they have been given for something relevant.
Gemini clearly didnt just look at what it had been
given, it went looking for the data I had asked for
They both went looking for the data that you asked for in the data
that they had.
More of your mindless bullshit, Gemini clearly
kept collecting data given that it was completely
up to date with his execution
In this case Gemini had the data that you were looking for,
It clearly keeps collecting data
ChatGPT didn't for whatever reason.
Because its fucked by design
Obviously, ChatGPT hadn't been told about Dezi Freeman,
Gemini hadn't been either, but clearly
was quite capable of finding it for itself.
Exactly how do you know the mechanism by which either of them work?
Clearly Gemini does keep checking for new data
And clearly ChatGPT doesnt bother because its fucked by design
but, at least, it didn't just make something up as some"AI"s have >>>>> been known to do when they can't find real data.
ChatGPT is clearly incapable of finding that very easy to find data
Gawd, nothing changes, once you have an idea no matter how wrong in
your head, it's impossible to shift it.
You havent shown that there is anything wrong with what I said,
you pathetic excuse for a fuckwit pommy bullshit artist
Rod raises the white flag
goodbye.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 03:51:42 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
686 files (6,939M bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,528 |