On 29/5/2026 9:54 pm, Noddy wrote:
ROTFL :)The question is not whether Gina has influence over One Nation, the
You're a fucking idiot :)
question is how much.
Same applies to all political parties and their donors, if they weren't getting anything for their money then they have no reason to donate.
On 29/05/2026 6:11 am, Noddy wrote:
The LNP's worst enemy are themselves. Bad for democracy when you have
an ineffective shambles of an "opposition"... but apparently that is
a concept too difficult for dumb and dumber to grasp.
So what you seem to be saying here is that the current appalling
performance of the Albanese Labor government is the *Liberals* fault?
Is that what you get from what I said in plain clear English? Really?
For fuck's sake, and you talk about people being dumb :)
You're not just dumb, you're a fucking retard pal.
On 30/05/2026 12:55 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 29/05/2026 4:57 pm, Axel wrote:
Xeno wrote:
Whilst Labor and the Coalition are not currently facing immediate
extinction, though the Libs seem rather close, history shows
established parties can indeed fade from view. For example, the
Nationalist Party of Australia collapsed entirely in the 30s, and
the United Australia Party collapsed in the 40s before being
replaced by the modern Liberal Party
the DLP. remember them?
The DLP were never a major political party :)
according to Google AI they had significant political influence
"The Democratic Labor Party (DLP) was highly successful at wielding
structural political influence, despite rarely winning seats in the
lower house. Emerging from a major Australian Labor Party (ALP) split
in 1955, the DLPrCOs greatest success lay in its ability to keep the ALP
out of federal power for two decades while extracting major political
concessions"
B. A. Santamaria was even more unhinged than the orange harpy.
Noddy wrote:
On 30/05/2026 12:56 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
Actually the Teals are/were a short spurt of feminism. At the last
by- election Monique Ryan only just managed to hold onto her seat.
Now they're talking about joining forces to create a party,
presumably because they've collectively realised that they are a
useless irrelevance that is incapable of any kind of achievement :)
they get more benefits as a party
Like what?
money, staff, offices, allowances, etc.,
Noddy wrote:
On 30/05/2026 12:59 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
You were doing no such thing at all, you moron. You were expressing
an *opinion*, and your opinion is *not* fact no matter how much you
want it to be.
you really are stupid. what I said was entirely factual
If what you said was "factual" Felix, then it should be a cinch for
you to cite a credible source that shows that .
In your own time will be fine.....
nice snipping apu..
here's what I actually said..
"well you better get used to it, because if the polls are right, ON will
be the opposition. that's if they don't win government, of course"
note I never said 'One Nation is going to oust the Liberals as the major opposition party at the next election".-a maybe a trip to specsavers is
in order for you? or else you just lied.
Axel wrote:
nice snipping apu..
here's what I actually said..
"well you better get used to it, because if the polls are right, ON
will be the opposition. that's if they don't win government, of course"
note I never said "One Nation is going to oust the Liberals as the
major opposition party at the next election".-a maybe a trip to
specsavers is in order for you? or else you just lied.
reposted to insert missing text
On 30/05/2026 9:50 am, Keithr0 wrote:
On 30/05/2026 12:55 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 29/05/2026 4:57 pm, Axel wrote:
Xeno wrote:
Whilst Labor and the Coalition are not currently facing immediate >>>>>> extinction, though the Libs seem rather close, history shows
established parties can indeed fade from view. For example, the
Nationalist Party of Australia collapsed entirely in the 30s, and >>>>>> the United Australia Party collapsed in the 40s before being
replaced by the modern Liberal Party
the DLP. remember them?
The DLP were never a major political party :)
according to Google AI they had significant political influence
"The Democratic Labor Party (DLP) was highly successful at wielding
structural political influence, despite rarely winning seats in the
lower house. Emerging from a major Australian Labor Party (ALP) split
in 1955, the DLPrCOs greatest success lay in its ability to keep the
ALP out of federal power for two decades while extracting major
political concessions"
B. A. Santamaria was even more unhinged than the orange harpy.
Yep. He was a fruit loop. When he wasn't hiding behind the clergy to
dodge the draft.
Keithr0 wrote:
On 30/05/2026 12:55 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:B. A. Santamaria was even more unhinged than the orange harpy.
On 29/05/2026 4:57 pm, Axel wrote:
Xeno wrote:
Whilst Labor and the Coalition are not currently facing immediate >>>>>> extinction, though the Libs seem rather close, history shows
established parties can indeed fade from view. For example, the
Nationalist Party of Australia collapsed entirely in the 30s, and >>>>>> the United Australia Party collapsed in the 40s before being
replaced by the modern Liberal Party
the DLP. remember them?
The DLP were never a major political party :)
according to Google AI they had significant political influence
"The Democratic Labor Party (DLP) was highly successful at wielding
structural political influence, despite rarely winning seats in the
lower house. Emerging from a major Australian Labor Party (ALP) split
in 1955, the DLPrCOs greatest success lay in its ability to keep the
ALP out of federal power for two decades while extracting major
political concessions"
the DLP were the mick version of the Democrats
On 29/5/2026 9:54 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 29/05/2026 10:15 am, Axel wrote:The question is not whether Gina has influence over One Nation, the
Noddy wrote:
On 27/05/2026 11:48 pm, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 27/05/2026 11:16 pm, Axel wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/4086018598363940
Jesus Christ you are gullible :)
what in what she said do you find so disagreeable?
I watched as far as her answering "No" to the question of whether
Rinehart was an influence and that was enough.
then you are uninformed and unqualified to comment
ROTFL :)
You're a fucking idiot :)
question is how much.
Same applies to all political parties and their donors, if they
weren't getting anything for their money then they have no reason to
donate.
On 29/05/2026 9:15 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 28/05/2026 10:02 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/5/2026 7:22 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 28/05/2026 12:54 pm, Clocky wrote:Seems to me that the people who keep saying things like "the
On 28/05/2026 6:40 am, Daryl wrote:
I'd put her chances at very low but the biggest problem is that >>>>>>> she will takes votes away from the Liberals making it easier for >>>>>>> Labor to retain Govt.
The best hope for getting rid of Labor would be ON and Lib
swapping first preferences.
Why on earth would you want to get rid of Labor when the
"opposition" is a complete and utter shitshow at present.
ROTFL :) You know who Anthony Albanese is and what position he
holds, right?
For fuck's sake. Comedy gold from the moron who claimed that Keven
Rudd saved us from the global financial crisis with "sounds
financial management" :)
opposition is a complete and utter shitshow at present" are Labor
supporters doing what Labor usually does.
Especially this clogwog dickhead. He makes pro Labor comment at
every opportunity, but drops them like a hot spud when you claim he
is a supporter :)
yep
Nope, I simply made a pro-democracy comment pertaining to the current reality of the situation.
On 30/05/2026 9:44 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 30/05/2026 12:56 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
Actually the Teals are/were a short spurt of feminism. At the last
by- election Monique Ryan only just managed to hold onto her seat.
Now they're talking about joining forces to create a party,
presumably because they've collectively realised that they are a
useless irrelevance that is incapable of any kind of achievement :)
they get more benefits as a party
Like what?
money, staff, offices, allowances, etc.,
Take a moment to explain how they get more than what they get now just
by being a "party"?
On 30/05/2026 9:49 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 30/05/2026 12:59 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
You were doing no such thing at all, you moron. You were
expressing an *opinion*, and your opinion is *not* fact no matter
how much you want it to be.
you really are stupid. what I said was entirely factual
If what you said was "factual" Felix, then it should be a cinch for
you to cite a credible source that shows that .
In your own time will be fine.....
nice snipping apu..
here's what I actually said..
"well you better get used to it, because if the polls are right, ON
will be the opposition. that's if they don't win government, of course"
There was no snipping. That's what you said, and that's what I was
replying to.
note I never said 'One Nation is going to oust the Liberals as the
major opposition party at the next election".-a maybe a trip to
specsavers is in order for you? or else you just lied.
I asked post a credible cite that shows that the *polls* are showing
that One Nation is going to oust the Liberals as the opposition.
Over to you.
Clocky wrote:
On 29/05/2026 9:15 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 28/05/2026 10:02 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/5/2026 7:22 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 28/05/2026 12:54 pm, Clocky wrote:Seems to me that the people who keep saying things like "the
On 28/05/2026 6:40 am, Daryl wrote:
I'd put her chances at very low but the biggest problem is that >>>>>>>> she will takes votes away from the Liberals making it easier for >>>>>>>> Labor to retain Govt.
The best hope for getting rid of Labor would be ON and Lib
swapping first preferences.
Why on earth would you want to get rid of Labor when the
"opposition" is a complete and utter shitshow at present.
ROTFL :) You know who Anthony Albanese is and what position he
holds, right?
For fuck's sake. Comedy gold from the moron who claimed that Keven >>>>>> Rudd saved us from the global financial crisis with "sounds
financial management" :)
opposition is a complete and utter shitshow at present" are Labor
supporters doing what Labor usually does.
Especially this clogwog dickhead. He makes pro Labor comment at
every opportunity, but drops them like a hot spud when you claim he
is a supporter :)
yep
Nope, I simply made a pro-democracy comment pertaining to the current
reality of the situation.
in this instance maybe. but your posting history shows you often make pro-Labor comments, yet deny being a Labor supporter.
On 29/05/2026 10:06 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
well you better get used to it, because if the polls are right, ON
will be the opposition. that's if they don't win government, of course
There are 150 seats in the Federal lower house of Parliament Felix,
and in order to win government a party must win 76 of them. One
Nation currently holds a grand total of 2 seats.
For them to win government they would need to hold the two they
currently have and win 74 additional seats. If you think that has
even the most remote shit-show of a chance of happening then you're
bat shit fucking crazy.
I was stating a fact dipshit, not making a prediction or expressing a
view of likely outcome, or a hope of an outcome, or a wish or personal
opinion for what should happen. but it's ok, we know you can't cope
with facts
You were doing no such thing at all, you moron. You were expressing an *opinion*, and your opinion is *not* fact no matter how much you want it
to be.
On 30/05/2026 1:23 pm, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 29/05/2026 9:15 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 28/05/2026 10:02 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/5/2026 7:22 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 28/05/2026 12:54 pm, Clocky wrote:Seems to me that the people who keep saying things like "the
On 28/05/2026 6:40 am, Daryl wrote:
I'd put her chances at very low but the biggest problem is
that she will takes votes away from the Liberals making it
easier for Labor to retain Govt.
The best hope for getting rid of Labor would be ON and Lib
swapping first preferences.
Why on earth would you want to get rid of Labor when the
"opposition" is a complete and utter shitshow at present.
ROTFL :) You know who Anthony Albanese is and what position he
holds, right?
For fuck's sake. Comedy gold from the moron who claimed that
Keven Rudd saved us from the global financial crisis with
"sounds financial management" :)
opposition is a complete and utter shitshow at present" are Labor >>>>>> supporters doing what Labor usually does.
Especially this clogwog dickhead. He makes pro Labor comment at
every opportunity, but drops them like a hot spud when you claim
he is a supporter :)
yep
Nope, I simply made a pro-democracy comment pertaining to the
current reality of the situation.
in this instance maybe. but your posting history shows you often make
pro-Labor comments, yet deny being a Labor supporter.
How am I a Labor supporter when I have never once voted Labor?
Makes no sense.
On 29/5/2026 10:05 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 29/05/2026 10:06 am, Axel wrote:Well, it has to said at this juncture, that what you present as
Noddy wrote:
well you better get used to it, because if the polls are right, ON
will be the opposition. that's if they don't win government, of
course
There are 150 seats in the Federal lower house of Parliament Felix,
and in order to win government a party must win 76 of them. One
Nation currently holds a grand total of 2 seats.
For them to win government they would need to hold the two they
currently have and win 74 additional seats. If you think that has
even the most remote shit-show of a chance of happening then you're
bat shit fucking crazy.
I was stating a fact dipshit, not making a prediction or expressing
a view of likely outcome, or a hope of an outcome, or a wish or
personal opinion for what should happen. but it's ok, we know you
can't cope with facts
You were doing no such thing at all, you moron. You were expressing
an *opinion*, and your opinion is *not* fact no matter how much you
want it to be.
*facts* are invariably your *lies*.
Xeno wrote:
On 29/5/2026 10:05 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 29/05/2026 10:06 am, Axel wrote:Well, it has to said at this juncture, that what you present as
Noddy wrote:
well you better get used to it, because if the polls are right, ON >>>>>> will be the opposition. that's if they don't win government, of
course
There are 150 seats in the Federal lower house of Parliament Felix, >>>>> and in order to win government a party must win 76 of them. One
Nation currently holds a grand total of 2 seats.
For them to win government they would need to hold the two they
currently have and win 74 additional seats. If you think that has
even the most remote shit-show of a chance of happening then you're >>>>> bat shit fucking crazy.
I was stating a fact dipshit, not making a prediction or expressing
a view of likely outcome, or a hope of an outcome, or a wish or
personal opinion for what should happen. but it's ok, we know you
can't cope with facts
You were doing no such thing at all, you moron. You were expressing
an *opinion*, and your opinion is *not* fact no matter how much you
want it to be.
*facts* are invariably your *lies*.
true. he believes whatever he thinks is fact (the truth). he states his opinions so emphatically he presents them as fact
On 30/05/2026 1:23 pm, Axel wrote:
in this instance maybe. but your posting history shows you often make
pro-Labor comments, yet deny being a Labor supporter.
How am I a Labor supporter when I have never once voted Labor?
On 30/05/2026 12:36 pm, Noddy wrote:
B. A. Santamaria was even more unhinged than the orange harpy.
Yep. He was a fruit loop. When he wasn't hiding behind the clergy to
dodge the draft.
Ironically, after dodging the draft in WWII, he was all for conscripting kids to go to Vietnam.
Noddy wrote:
they get more benefits as a party
Like what?
money, staff, offices, allowances, etc.,
Take a moment to explain how they get more than what they get now just
by being a "party"?
Google AI does it for me..
Noddy wrote:
here's what I actually said..
"well you better get used to it, because if the polls are right, ON
will be the opposition. that's if they don't win government, of course"
There was no snipping. That's what you said, and that's what I was
replying to.
note I never said 'One Nation is going to oust the Liberals as the
major opposition party at the next election".-a maybe a trip to
specsavers is in order for you? or else you just lied.
I asked post a credible cite that shows that the *polls* are showing
that One Nation is going to oust the Liberals as the opposition.
Over to you.
do your own research. go look up the polls yourself. I just repeated
what has been reported in the media.
Xeno wrote:
Well, it has to said at this juncture, that what you present as
*facts* are invariably your *lies*.
true. he believes whatever he thinks is fact (the truth). he states his opinions so emphatically he presents them as fact
On 30/05/2026 7:34 pm, Axel wrote:
true. he believes whatever he thinks is fact (the truth). he statesEverybody believes that whatever they think is fact (the truth). Why
his opinions so emphatically he presents them as fact
would they believe that their own thoughts are false (even though they
may be)?
Daryl wrote:
The question is not whether Gina has influence over One Nation, the
question is how much.
Same applies to all political parties and their donors, if they
weren't getting anything for their money then they have no reason to
donate.
except if their interests align. just because PH may have policies that favor Gina, or that Gina agrees with or approves off, like oil and gas exploration for example, that's not evidence PH is being influenced by
Gina or is beholden to her, it's just a reason why Gina would want to
help her party get elected.
On 30/05/2026 7:34 pm, Axel wrote:
Xeno wrote:Everybody believes that whatever they think is fact (the truth). Why
On 29/5/2026 10:05 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 29/05/2026 10:06 am, Axel wrote:Well, it has to said at this juncture, that what you present as
Noddy wrote:
well you better get used to it, because if the polls are right, >>>>>>> ON will be the opposition. that's if they don't win government, >>>>>>> of course
There are 150 seats in the Federal lower house of Parliament
Felix, and in order to win government a party must win 76 of
them. One Nation currently holds a grand total of 2 seats.
For them to win government they would need to hold the two they
currently have and win 74 additional seats. If you think that has >>>>>> even the most remote shit-show of a chance of happening then
you're bat shit fucking crazy.
I was stating a fact dipshit, not making a prediction or
expressing a view of likely outcome, or a hope of an outcome, or a
wish or personal opinion for what should happen. but it's ok, we
know you can't cope with facts
You were doing no such thing at all, you moron. You were expressing
an *opinion*, and your opinion is *not* fact no matter how much you
want it to be.
*facts* are invariably your *lies*.
true. he believes whatever he thinks is fact (the truth). he states
his opinions so emphatically he presents them as fact
would they believe that their own thoughts are false (even though they
may be)?
On 30/05/2026 6:36 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 30/05/2026 1:23 pm, Axel wrote:
in this instance maybe. but your posting history shows you often make
pro-Labor comments, yet deny being a Labor supporter.
How am I a Labor supporter when I have never once voted Labor?
ROTFL :)
The bullshit comes flying in thick and fast :)
On 30/5/2026 8:52 pm, Noddy wrote:
You have to be an Australian citizen to vote so maybe what he said wasHow am I a Labor supporter when I have never once voted Labor?
ROTFL :)
The bullshit comes flying in thick and fast :)
true, not only did he not vote for Labor he didn't vote for anyone
because he wasn't entitled??
Keithr0 wrote:
Everybody believes that whatever they think is fact (the truth). Why
would they believe that their own thoughts are false (even though they
may be)?
but sensible ppl are willing to accept that they may be wrong, or simply that there are things they don't know or understand that are relevant. Egoists like noddy don't allow for that.
Clocky wrote:
On 30/05/2026 1:23 pm, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 29/05/2026 9:15 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 28/05/2026 10:02 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/5/2026 7:22 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 28/05/2026 12:54 pm, Clocky wrote:Seems to me that the people who keep saying things like "the
On 28/05/2026 6:40 am, Daryl wrote:
I'd put her chances at very low but the biggest problem is >>>>>>>>>> that she will takes votes away from the Liberals making it >>>>>>>>>> easier for Labor to retain Govt.
The best hope for getting rid of Labor would be ON and Lib >>>>>>>>>> swapping first preferences.
Why on earth would you want to get rid of Labor when the
"opposition" is a complete and utter shitshow at present.
ROTFL :) You know who Anthony Albanese is and what position he >>>>>>>> holds, right?
For fuck's sake. Comedy gold from the moron who claimed that
Keven Rudd saved us from the global financial crisis with
"sounds financial management" :)
opposition is a complete and utter shitshow at present" are Labor >>>>>>> supporters doing what Labor usually does.
Especially this clogwog dickhead. He makes pro Labor comment at
every opportunity, but drops them like a hot spud when you claim
he is a supporter :)
yep
Nope, I simply made a pro-democracy comment pertaining to the
current reality of the situation.
in this instance maybe. but your posting history shows you often make
pro-Labor comments, yet deny being a Labor supporter.
How am I a Labor supporter when I have never once voted Labor?
Makes no sense.
why do you keep defending them?
On 30/05/2026 5:29 pm, Axel wrote:
How am I a Labor supporter when I have never once voted Labor?
Makes no sense.
why do you keep defending them?
I don't, you just perceive anything left of far right as "leftie" and
assume the rest.
August 2010:
--
I like to live in a reasonably liveable society, with decent social services and essential services. To that end I prefer Labor, I only wish their vision was realised with more restraint and better economic management. A 7b gap between what Hockey and Abbott announced doesn't fill me with much confidence that the current Liberal clowns would do any better a job at managing the economy.
--
14-8-2010
Federally funded main roads. But the Libs simply don't spend on any level, (unless it's ego feeding bell towers) Barnett put a stop to our new
hospital - a major project to replace the existing facility which is hopelessly inadequate because it's old and it's servicing an ever increasing population. Armadale got theirs, thanks to Labor, and it's been a massive boon for the area.
--
25-8
Your definition of broke is interesting because it's truly absurd when our
economy is one of the strongest in the world and that is largely due to
strong economic management.
--
Completely O.T. Craig Thomson
24-5-2012
It's just part of the Liberal/Murdoch campaign to drive him out any way they can. Some unnamed and unidentifiable whore getting 60k for talking shit on camera is hardly credible journalism and proves absolutely nothing.
--
It does on the face of it, but having dealt with "fair" work before and the that it took years and there is a question of the link with Thomson with the one who investigated him... I'm not even so sure that the report has much merit.
The issue is that you swallow the agenda filled algorithm fed far right rubbish wholesale and and perceive any attack on that as supporting
Labor or the watermelons. That's a you problem.
On 30/05/2026 5:29 pm, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 30/05/2026 1:23 pm, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 29/05/2026 9:15 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 28/05/2026 10:02 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/5/2026 7:22 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 28/05/2026 12:54 pm, Clocky wrote:Seems to me that the people who keep saying things like "the
On 28/05/2026 6:40 am, Daryl wrote:
I'd put her chances at very low but the biggest problem is >>>>>>>>>>> that she will takes votes away from the Liberals making it >>>>>>>>>>> easier for Labor to retain Govt.
The best hope for getting rid of Labor would be ON and Lib >>>>>>>>>>> swapping first preferences.
Why on earth would you want to get rid of Labor when the
"opposition" is a complete and utter shitshow at present.
ROTFL :) You know who Anthony Albanese is and what position he >>>>>>>>> holds, right?
For fuck's sake. Comedy gold from the moron who claimed that >>>>>>>>> Keven Rudd saved us from the global financial crisis with
"sounds financial management" :)
opposition is a complete and utter shitshow at present" are
Labor supporters doing what Labor usually does.
Especially this clogwog dickhead. He makes pro Labor comment at >>>>>>> every opportunity, but drops them like a hot spud when you claim >>>>>>> he is a supporter :)
yep
Nope, I simply made a pro-democracy comment pertaining to the
current reality of the situation.
in this instance maybe. but your posting history shows you often
make pro-Labor comments, yet deny being a Labor supporter.
How am I a Labor supporter when I have never once voted Labor?
Makes no sense.
why do you keep defending them?
I don't, you just perceive anything left of far right as "leftie" and
assume the rest.
The issue is that you swallow the agenda filled algorithm fed far
right rubbish wholesale and and perceive any attack on that as
supporting Labor or the watermelons. That's a you problem.
Keithr0 wrote:
On 30/05/2026 7:34 pm, Axel wrote:
Xeno wrote:Everybody believes that whatever they think is fact (the truth). Why
On 29/5/2026 10:05 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 29/05/2026 10:06 am, Axel wrote:Well, it has to said at this juncture, that what you present as
Noddy wrote:
well you better get used to it, because if the polls are right, >>>>>>>> ON will be the opposition. that's if they don't win government, >>>>>>>> of course
There are 150 seats in the Federal lower house of Parliament
Felix, and in order to win government a party must win 76 of
them. One Nation currently holds a grand total of 2 seats.
For them to win government they would need to hold the two they >>>>>>> currently have and win 74 additional seats. If you think that has >>>>>>> even the most remote shit-show of a chance of happening then
you're bat shit fucking crazy.
I was stating a fact dipshit, not making a prediction or
expressing a view of likely outcome, or a hope of an outcome, or a >>>>>> wish or personal opinion for what should happen. but it's ok, we
know you can't cope with facts
You were doing no such thing at all, you moron. You were expressing >>>>> an *opinion*, and your opinion is *not* fact no matter how much you >>>>> want it to be.
*facts* are invariably your *lies*.
true. he believes whatever he thinks is fact (the truth). he states
his opinions so emphatically he presents them as fact
would they believe that their own thoughts are false (even though they
may be)?
but sensible ppl are willing to accept that they may be wrong, or simply that there are things they don't know or understand that are relevant. Egoists like noddy don't allow for that.
On 29/05/2026 4:57 pm, Axel wrote:
Xeno wrote:
Whilst Labor and the Coalition are not currently facing immediate
extinction, though the Libs seem rather close, history shows
established parties can indeed fade from view. For example, the
Nationalist Party of Australia collapsed entirely in the 30s, and the
United Australia Party collapsed in the 40s before being replaced by
the modern Liberal Party
the DLP. remember them?
The DLP were never a major political party :)
Noddy wrote:
On 30/05/2026 12:59 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
You were doing no such thing at all, you moron. You were expressing
an *opinion*, and your opinion is *not* fact no matter how much you
want it to be.
you really are stupid. what I said was entirely factual
If what you said was "factual" Felix, then it should be a cinch for
you to cite a credible source that shows that .
In your own time will be fine.....
nice snipping apu..
here's what I actually said..
"well you better get used to it, because if the polls are right, ON will
be the opposition. that's if they don't win government, of course"
note I never said 'One Nation is going to oust the Liberals as the major opposition party at the next election".-a maybe a trip to specsavers is
in order for you? or else you just lied.
On 30/05/2026 12:55 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:B. A. Santamaria was even more unhinged than the orange harpy.
On 29/05/2026 4:57 pm, Axel wrote:
Xeno wrote:
Whilst Labor and the Coalition are not currently facing immediate
extinction, though the Libs seem rather close, history shows
established parties can indeed fade from view. For example, the
Nationalist Party of Australia collapsed entirely in the 30s, and
the United Australia Party collapsed in the 40s before being
replaced by the modern Liberal Party
the DLP. remember them?
The DLP were never a major political party :)
according to Google AI they had significant political influence
"The Democratic Labor Party (DLP) was highly successful at wielding
structural political influence, despite rarely winning seats in the
lower house. Emerging from a major Australian Labor Party (ALP) split
in 1955, the DLPrCOs greatest success lay in its ability to keep the ALP
out of federal power for two decades while extracting major political
concessions"
Keithr0 wrote:
On 30/05/2026 12:55 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:B. A. Santamaria was even more unhinged than the orange harpy.
On 29/05/2026 4:57 pm, Axel wrote:
Xeno wrote:
Whilst Labor and the Coalition are not currently facing immediate >>>>>> extinction, though the Libs seem rather close, history shows
established parties can indeed fade from view. For example, the
Nationalist Party of Australia collapsed entirely in the 30s, and >>>>>> the United Australia Party collapsed in the 40s before being
replaced by the modern Liberal Party
the DLP. remember them?
The DLP were never a major political party :)
according to Google AI they had significant political influence
"The Democratic Labor Party (DLP) was highly successful at wielding
structural political influence, despite rarely winning seats in the
lower house. Emerging from a major Australian Labor Party (ALP) split
in 1955, the DLPrCOs greatest success lay in its ability to keep the
ALP out of federal power for two decades while extracting major
political concessions"
the DLP were the mick version of the Democrats
Google AI summary
"The Australian Democrats are a registered Australian political party founded in 1977 by former Liberal minister Don Chipp. Historically, they were Australia's most successful minor party and a dominant force in the Senate for over two decades. However, they lost all parliamentary representation following the 2007 federal election.
Core Identity and Ideology
The Slogan: Their founding mission, coined by Don Chipp, is to "keep the bastards honest," aiming to hold major parties accountable.
Political Position: Centrist and socially liberal.
Policy Focus: They emphasize evidence-informed policy, environmental sustainability (they were AustraliarCOs original environmental party), integrity, and civil liberties.
Historical Significance
Balance of Power: From 1981 through the early 2000s, they held the
balance of power in the Australian Senate, frequently negotiating or blocking major legislation.
Trailblazers: They were the first Australian party to have a female parliamentary leader and featured several female leaders, including
Janine Haines, Cheryl Kernot, Natasha Stott Despoja, and Meg Lees.
Current Status
While they currently hold no seats in the Australian Parliament, the
party has retained its official Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) registration and is actively running campaigns to rebuild their presence
in Australian politics
On 30/05/2026 9:50 am, Keithr0 wrote:
On 30/05/2026 12:55 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 29/05/2026 4:57 pm, Axel wrote:
Xeno wrote:
Whilst Labor and the Coalition are not currently facing immediate >>>>>> extinction, though the Libs seem rather close, history shows
established parties can indeed fade from view. For example, the
Nationalist Party of Australia collapsed entirely in the 30s, and >>>>>> the United Australia Party collapsed in the 40s before being
replaced by the modern Liberal Party
the DLP. remember them?
The DLP were never a major political party :)
according to Google AI they had significant political influence
"The Democratic Labor Party (DLP) was highly successful at wielding
structural political influence, despite rarely winning seats in the
lower house. Emerging from a major Australian Labor Party (ALP) split
in 1955, the DLPrCOs greatest success lay in its ability to keep the
ALP out of federal power for two decades while extracting major
political concessions"
B. A. Santamaria was even more unhinged than the orange harpy.
Yep. He was a fruit loop. When he wasn't hiding behind the clergy to
dodge the draft.
On 30/05/2026 9:49 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 30/5/2026 8:52 pm, Noddy wrote:
You have to be an Australian citizen to vote so maybe what he said wasHow am I a Labor supporter when I have never once voted Labor?
ROTFL :)
The bullshit comes flying in thick and fast :)
true, not only did he not vote for Labor he didn't vote for anyone
because he wasn't entitled??
He's been here 40 years. If he hasn't become a citizen by now he should
be kicked the fuck out :)
On 30/05/2026 9:27 pm, Axel wrote:
Keithr0 wrote:
Everybody believes that whatever they think is fact (the truth). Why
would they believe that their own thoughts are false (even though
they may be)?
but sensible ppl are willing to accept that they may be wrong, or
simply that there are things they don't know or understand that are
relevant. Egoists like noddy don't allow for that.
The problem with you Felix is that you think you're always right and
that everyone who disagrees with you is an idiot, and we've seen *many* examples of that being the case.
We saw it during the "Monster cables" debate, where virtually every
single person here disagreed with your ridiculous claims that the things were high quality items that produced results that no other product
could deliver. Despite being told how that was technically impossible,
you refused to accept it and instead insisted that you were correct
while never *once* offering up any credible source to support your view.
And of course we saw it most laughably during the "tyre debate" where
you showed pictures of your cracked and illegal Magna tyres and were
told by all and sundry that they were fucked and well past their use-by date, but you insisted that every person who said so was wrong,
including the two tyre fitters you went to as it happens, and ignored everyone and continued to use those tyres for some time after asking
about them.
About a year, wasn't it?
There have been many more cases. Ludicrous things about the first
shitheap MG you bought, or how you thought your old Holden was capable
of 99 miles per hour in second gear. All ridiculous claims made by
someone (namely you) who has no fucking idea of what you're talking
about, and when people disagree with you that's when you get cunty and
storm off.
You do it time and again, and the most amusing part about it all (for
us, not you) is that you seem to be too stupid to learn from it and doom yourself to repeat it.
Over and over :)
On 31/5/2026 12:22 am, Noddy wrote:
On 30/05/2026 9:49 pm, Daryl wrote:It is a personal choice to be either a citizen or a permanent resident.
On 30/5/2026 8:52 pm, Noddy wrote:
You have to be an Australian citizen to vote so maybe what he saidHow am I a Labor supporter when I have never once voted Labor?
ROTFL :)
The bullshit comes flying in thick and fast :)
was true, not only did he not vote for Labor he didn't vote for
anyone because he wasn't entitled??
He's been here 40 years. If he hasn't become a citizen by now he
should be kicked the fuck out :)
The government gives migrants the option because some cannot give up
their birth citizenship while others do not want to. My wife, for
instance, is a *dual citizen*. Had she not been able to retain her birth citizenship, I would have advised her to remain as a permanent resident
of Australia.
On 30/5/2026 9:50 am, Keithr0 wrote:
On 30/05/2026 12:55 am, Axel wrote:
Noddy wrote:B. A. Santamaria was even more unhinged than the orange harpy.
On 29/05/2026 4:57 pm, Axel wrote:
Xeno wrote:
Whilst Labor and the Coalition are not currently facing immediate >>>>>> extinction, though the Libs seem rather close, history shows
established parties can indeed fade from view. For example, the
Nationalist Party of Australia collapsed entirely in the 30s, and >>>>>> the United Australia Party collapsed in the 40s before being
replaced by the modern Liberal Party
the DLP. remember them?
The DLP were never a major political party :)
according to Google AI they had significant political influence
"The Democratic Labor Party (DLP) was highly successful at wielding
structural political influence, despite rarely winning seats in the
lower house. Emerging from a major Australian Labor Party (ALP) split
in 1955, the DLPrCOs greatest success lay in its ability to keep the
ALP out of federal power for two decades while extracting major P
political concessions"
I seem to recall he had a regular spot on TV back in the days..
On 30/05/2026 9:27 pm, Axel wrote:
Keithr0 wrote:
Everybody believes that whatever they think is fact (the truth). Why
would they believe that their own thoughts are false (even though
they may be)?
but sensible ppl are willing to accept that they may be wrong, or
simply that there are things they don't know or understand that are
relevant. Egoists like noddy don't allow for that.
The problem with you Felix is that you think you're always right and
that everyone who disagrees with you is an idiot,
On 30/05/2026 10:33 pm, Noddy wrote:
The problem with you Felix is that you think you're always right and
that everyone who disagrees with you is an idiot,
Put your projector away son.
On 1/06/2026 6:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 30/05/2026 10:33 pm, Noddy wrote:
The problem with you Felix is that you think you're always right and
that everyone who disagrees with you is an idiot,
Put your projector away son.
Go fuck yourself, you labor loving lunatic.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 69 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 10:05:33 |
| Calls: | 895 |
| Files: | 1,320 |
| Messages: | 280,627 |