From Newsgroup: aus.cars


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0
--
Linux Mint 22.3

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

On 13/09/2026 5:11 pm, Axel wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

please stop crosposting your ot shit.


--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

lindsay wrote:

On 13/09/2026 5:11 pm, Axel wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

please stop crosposting your ot shit.

I couldn't be arsed seeing what newsreader you're using, but if you
can't manage to ignore Xposting, can you make a rule in your nreader to,
eg. Delete post where Subject = "OT:[wildcard character]"
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

alvey wrote:

lindsay wrote:

On 13/09/2026 5:11 pm, Axel wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

please stop crosposting your ot shit.

I couldn't be arsed seeing what newsreader you're using, but if you
can't manage to ignore Xposting, can you make a rule in your nreader
to, eg. Delete post where Subject = "OT:[wildcard character]"

that would delete all posts with OT: prefix
--
Linux Mint 22.3

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

On 13/09/2026 5:11 pm, Axel wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

Stop cross posting you fucking useless flog. It's quite simple here
Felix. If you want to post this inane shit into other groups, then fuck
off and post them there.
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars



On 13/9/2026 8:36 pm, Noddy wrote:

On 13/09/2026 5:11 pm, Axel wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

Stop cross posting you fucking useless flog. It's quite simple here
Felix. If you want to post this inane shit into other groups, then fuck
off and post them there.

The policeman of aus.cars speaks! Expecting others to tremble at your
*tone* Darren? Hate to break it to you - you've been defanged. Best you
can manage now is a hillbilly grin!
--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

Axel <none@not.here> wrote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

I'm not convinced that Hitler would have won the
war in europe by successfully occupying Russia
give that he never had the fuel to do that and the
immense size of russia

The author did get it right that there was no possibility
of Hitler winning against the USA even if the attack on
Pearl Harbor had succeeded in wiping out all the
aircraft carriers unless the USA had decided to tell
the japs that if they wanted hawaii they were welcome
to it and had decided not to go to war. But that would
have been politically impossible
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 02:13:44 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Axel <none@not.here> wrote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

I'm not convinced that Hitler would have won the
war in europe by successfully occupying Russia
give that he never had the fuel to do that and the
immense size of russia

The author did get it right that there was no possibility
of Hitler winning against the USA even if the attack on
Pearl Harbor had succeeded in wiping out all the
aircraft carriers unless the USA had decided to tell
the japs that if they wanted hawaii they were welcome
to it and had decided not to go to war. But that would
have been politically impossible

The only hope of Hitler/Napoleon winning was to quit while ahead then
negotiate for a favorable outcome.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Axel <none@not.here> wrote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

I'm not convinced that Hitler would have won the
war in europe by successfully occupying Russia
give that he never had the fuel to do that and the
immense size of russia

The only hope of Hitler/Napoleon winning was to quitwhile ahead then negotiate for a favorable outcome.

Its very far from clear that the russians were into negotiation

The author did get it right that there was no possibility
of Hitler winning against the USA even if the attack on
Pearl Harbor had succeeded in wiping out all the
aircraft carriers unless the USA had decided to tell
the japs that if they wanted hawaii they were welcome
to it and had decided not to go to war. But that would
have been politically impossible

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

Rod Speed wrote:

Axel <none@not.here> wrote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

I'm not convinced that Hitler would have won the
war in europe by successfully occupying Russia
give that he never had the fuel to do that and the
immense size of russia

according to the scenario he had occupied Europe and the UK so he would
have had enormous resources

The author did get it right that there was no possibility
of Hitler winning against the USA even if the attack on
Pearl Harbor had succeeded in wiping out all the
aircraft carriers unless the USA had decided to tell
the japs that if they wanted hawaii they were welcome
to it and had decided not to go to war. But that would
have been politically impossible

--
Linux Mint 22.3

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

On Sun, 13 Sep 2026 17:11:33 +1000, Axel <none@not.here> wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

Sound like Albanese Labor's plan
oHunger Plano a.

The architect was an agriculture official named Herbert Backe
[BACK-eh], and the logic was coldly practical. Germany wanted the food
grown in the Soviet breadbasket to feed its own army and people, so
the plan diverted that food westward. The planners wrote the number
down: 20 to 30 million people in the occupied East were expected to
starve. The Nazis understood that going in. It was the point of the
policy.

The destruction of food in Australia happening now
Tasmania and Riverina (goodbye Rod and his neighbors)

The heart of a massive, brewing political and social crisis in
regional Australia.
Many rural communities, agricultural advocates, and economists share frustration, arguing that sacrificing prime, food-producing
agricultural land just to generate corporate carbon credits is
incredibly short-sighted.
This exact tensionuoften called the "Food vs. Carbon" debate is
causing a major political backlash across the country for several
critical reasons:1.
The threat to food security australiaAs premium agricultural zones,
like the NSW Riverina or the Tasmanian agricultural flats, have taken generations of farming families to develop, clear, and optimize for
food production.
When a foreign investment firm uses taxpayer-backed subsidies to buy a functional, productive dairy or grain farm and carpets it in a pinus
radiata monoculture, that land is effectively locked out of the food
supply chain for decades.
Critics argue that during a time of global food insecurity and rising
grocery prices, taking highly productive Australian soil out of
rotation to act as a "Pollution sink" for heavy industries is a
dangerous policy failure .2.
Sucking regional communities dry the damage isn't just to the soil it fundamentally alters the fabric of regional towns.
The "Ghost town" effect:
a traditional broadacre, dairy, or irrigated crop farm employs local
workers, uses local mechanics, buys from local grain merchants, and
supports local schools.
The forestry reality:
once a carbon-credit pine plantation is planted, it requires almost
zero labor or local input for the first 15 to 25 years until harvest.
The local families leave, businesses close, and vibrant rural
communities slowly hollow out
.3.
Subsidizing the destruction of local agriculture what infuriates local
farmers the most is the unfair playing field created by the Australian
carbon credit unit (accu) scheme and entities like the clean energy
finance corporation (cefc).Local farming families who want to produce
food cannot compete at auction against global multi-billion-dollar
asset managers.

Because these foreign firms are backed by government green subsidies
and the promise of lucrative carbon offsets, they can easily outbid
local farmers, artificially driving up the price of farmland and
locking young Australian farmers out of the market
--
Petzl

Our Australian commonwealth has survived numerous recessions, one
major depression, and two world wars.
Doubt if it will survive under a Albanese Labor Government.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

Axel wrote:

alvey wrote:

lindsay wrote:

On 13/09/2026 5:11 pm, Axel wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

please stop crosposting your ot shit.

I couldn't be arsed seeing what newsreader you're using, but if you
can't manage to ignore Xposting, can you make a rule in your nreader
to, eg. Delete post where Subject = "OT:[wildcard character]"

that would delete all posts with OT: prefix

Well, yes. If he wanted to only block your "OT"s he'd have to add,
"{and] Where Author is/contains 'felix'".

Why he can't just ignore them is... curious
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

Noddy wrote:

On 13/09/2026 5:11 pm, Axel wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

Stop cross posting you fucking useless flog. It's quite simple here
Felix. If you want to post this inane shit into other groups, then fuck
off and post them there.

Awwww diddums.

I don't like you posting your lies and petulant abuse here, so why don't
*you* fuck off?
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

alvey wrote:

Axel wrote:

alvey wrote:

lindsay wrote:

On 13/09/2026 5:11 pm, Axel wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

please stop crosposting your ot shit.

I couldn't be arsed seeing what newsreader you're using, but if you
can't manage to ignore Xposting, can you make a rule in your nreader
to, eg. Delete post where Subject = "OT:[wildcard character]"

that would delete all posts with OT: prefix

Well, yes. If he wanted to only block your "OT"s he'd have to add,
"{and] Where Author is/contains 'felix'".

no, Axel

Why he can't just ignore them is... curious

applies to anyone who complains about other's posts. some ppl just want something to complain about
--
Linux Mint 22.3

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

Axel <none@not.here> wrote

Rod Speed wrote

Axel <none@not.here> wrote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

I'm not convinced that Hitler would have won the
war in europe by successfully occupying Russia
give that he never had the fuel to do that and the
immense size of russia

according to the scenario he had occupied Europe andthe UK so he would have had enormous resources

He would have got bugger all resources from britain
once the USA was no longer supplying the UK and
his problem was primarily a lack of FUEL and there
was fuck all of that from the UK and europe

The author did get it right that there was no possibility
of Hitler winning against the USA even if the attack on
Pearl Harbor had succeeded in wiping out all the
aircraft carriers unless the USA had decided to tell
the japs that if they wanted hawaii they were welcome
to it and had decided not to go to war. But that would
have been politically impossible

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars



On 14/9/2026 1:00 pm, alvey wrote:

Axel wrote:

alvey wrote:

lindsay wrote:

On 13/09/2026 5:11 pm, Axel wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

please stop crosposting your ot shit.

I couldn't be arsed seeing what newsreader you're using, but if you
can't manage to ignore Xposting, can you make a rule in your nreader
to, eg. Delete post where Subject = "OT:[wildcard character]"

that would delete all posts with OT: prefix

Well, yes. If he wanted to only block your "OT"s he'd have to add,
"{and] Where Author is/contains 'felix'".

Why he can't just ignore them is... curious

Curious? Not really. Darren wants a fall guy to direct attention away
from himself. Felix is who he has chosen. It is that simple.
--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote

Axel <none@not.here> wrote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

Sound like Albanese Labor's plan
rCLHunger PlanrCY rCa.

Then you need a new hearing aid or your first hearing aid

The architect was an agriculture official named Herbert Backe
[BACK-eh], and the logic was coldly practical. Germany wanted the food> grown in the Soviet breadbasket to feed its own army and people, so
the plan diverted that food westward. The planners wrote the number
down: 20 to 30 million people in the occupied East were expected to
starve. The Nazis understood that going in. It was the point of the
policy.

Nothing even remotely like that in this country

The destruction of food in Australia happening now
Tasmania and Riverina (goodbye Rod and his neighbors)

That is complete and utter mindless pig ignorant bullshit
Nothing even remotely like that is happening in the MIA
and even the Farrer electorate only produces about 4%
of the food produced in the country anyway. Tasmania
produces fuck all and none of what it produces has
been replaced by pine plantations and none of the pine
plantations there has been done by the Albo govt

The heart of a massive, brewing political and social crisis in
regional Australia.

Complete and utter bullshit

Many rural communities, agricultural advocates, and economists share frustration, arguing that sacrificing prime, food-producing
agricultural land just to generate corporate carbon credits is
incredibly short-sighted.

Complete and utter bullshit

This exact tensionrCooften called the "Food vs. Carbon" debate

There is no such debate

is causing a major political backlash acrossthe country for several > critical reasons:

BULLSHIT

1.
The threat to food security australiarCOs premium agricultural zones,
like the NSW Riverina or the Tasmanian agricultural flats, have taken generations of farming families to develop, clear, and optimize for
food production.

None of that has been removed and replaced by pine plantations
for carbon credits.

When a foreign investment firm uses taxpayer-backed subsidies

The subsidy is in fact sweet fuck all

to buy a functional, productive dairy or grainfarm and carpets it in a > pinus radiata monoculture,

None of that is happening in either region
And NO ONE does pine plantations on irrigation
land, its MUCH too valuable for that

that land is effectively locked out ofthe food supply chain for decades.

That doesn't happen

Critics argue that during a time of global food insecurity and rising
grocery prices, taking highly productive Australian soil out of
rotation to act as a "Pollution sink" for heavy industries is a
dangerous policy failure .

That isn't happening here

2.
Sucking regional communities dry

Nothing like that is happening

the damage isn't just to the soil it
fundamentally alters the fabric of regional towns.
The "Ghost town" effect:

Just another silly little fantasy and isnt happening

a traditional broadacre, dairy, or irrigated crop farm employs local workers, uses local mechanics, buys from local grain merchants, and
supports local schools.

And NONE of that is being replaced by pine plantations

The forestry reality:
once a carbon-credit pine plantation is planted, it requires almost
zero labor or local input for the first 15 to 25 years until harvest.

More pig ignorant bullshit
Pine plantations are ALWAYS over planted and later
thinned LONG before harvest so you get decent
straight trees at harvest, you pig ignorant clown

The local families leave, businesses close, and vibrant rural
communities slowly hollow out

That hasn't happened anywhere where there are pine plantations

.3.
Subsidizing the destruction of local agriculture what infuriates local> farmers the most is the unfair playing field created by the Australian> carbon credit unit (accu) scheme and entities like the clean energy
finance corporation (cefc).Local farming families who want to produce
food cannot compete at auction against global multi-billion-dollar
asset managers.

More complete and utter pig ignorant bullshit
Farming land has in fact increased a hell
of a lot where there a NO pine plantations

Because these foreign firms are backed by governmentgreen subsidies > and the promise of lucrative carbon offsets,

Those subsidys are in fact sweet fuck all and are in fact
available for food trees like almonds and olive trees you
pig ignorant clown

they can easily outbid local farmers,

More complete and utter pig ignorant bullshit
and there is nothing even remotely like that
happening here

artificially driving up the price of farmland and
locking young Australian farmers out of the market

More complete and utter pig ignorant bullshit
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

On 14-Sep-26 1:05 PM, alvey wrote:

Noddy wrote:

On 13/09/2026 5:11 pm, Axel wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

Stop cross posting you fucking useless flog. It's quite simple here
Felix. If you want to post this inane shit into other groups, then
fuck off and post them there.

Awwww diddums.

I don't like you posting your lies and petulant abuse here, so why don't *you* fuck off?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I for one, (However, I`M sure there are others) don`t give a flying fuck
what your *preferences* are. ( one of them is well known but.. Efnu)
--
Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea--Massive,
difficult to redirect, awe inspiring, entertaining and a source of mind boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it!!!!. Gene Spafford
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: aus.cars

On 14/09/2026 1:00 pm, alvey wrote:

Axel wrote:

alvey wrote:

lindsay wrote:

On 13/09/2026 5:11 pm, Axel wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II9QtBSJUq0

please stop crosposting your ot shit.

I couldn't be arsed seeing what newsreader you're using, but if you
can't manage to ignore Xposting, can you make a rule in your nreader
to, eg. Delete post where Subject = "OT:[wildcard character]"

that would delete all posts with OT: prefix

Well, yes. If he wanted to only block your "OT"s he'd have to add,
"{and] Where Author is/contains 'felix'".

Why he can't just ignore them is... curious

For blocking cross postings - totally useless.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2