• Don't wast your money going from Agent v7.2 Upgrade to v8?

    From Boolworm Cowboy@bob@nospam.com to alt.usenet.offline-reader.forte-agent,alt.usenet.offline-reader,news.software.readers on Wed Oct 29 15:21:29 2014
    From Newsgroup: alt.usenet.offline-reader

    Don't waste your money going from Agent v7.2 Upgrade to v8. It only caters to those who still send videos, photos, etc. on
    USENET. When its much more practical to post your videos on YouTube, Dailymotion, Vimeo, USTREAM.TV, etc... I think that's
    the only thing saving USENET, is the yo-yos who still send files the old-fashioned way. Yep, a bunch of perverts who share
    X-rated videos because they can't get a live one.

    What blows my mind, why don't they purge out the dead USENET groups, and keep the active ones? There're groups that have had
    no activity in over 5 years, and they're still listed. This gives people a false impression that USENET is dead, when it's
    quite active on specific topics. I've been utilizing Google groups to isolate the active USENET groups, and not waste anymore
    time with the thousands of dead groups.

    Regards,

    Bookworm Cowboy
    Lakeland, Florida


    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Whiskers@catwheezel@operamail.com to alt.usenet.offline-reader.forte-agent,alt.usenet.offline-reader,news.software.readers on Wed Oct 29 21:40:42 2014
    From Newsgroup: alt.usenet.offline-reader

    On 2014-10-29, Boolworm Cowboy <bob@nospam.com> wrote:
    Don't waste your money going from Agent v7.2 Upgrade to v8.

    Does it still allow you to set your line-length at something sane, such
    as 72 or 75 characters?

    It only
    caters to those who still send videos, photos, etc. on USENET. When
    its much more practical to post your videos on YouTube, Dailymotion,
    Vimeo, USTREAM.TV, etc... I think that's the only thing saving USENET,
    is the yo-yos who still send files the old-fashioned way. Yep, a
    bunch of perverts who share X-rated videos because they can't get a
    live one.

    There seems to be quite a lot of activity in the binary groups; enough
    to keep the expensive binary news-servers in business. I have no idea
    what proportion of that activity is "porn" or "piracy".

    What blows my mind, why don't they purge out the dead USENET groups,
    and keep the active ones?

    Who are "they"? The Big Eight Management have a continuous programme of reviewing activity and removing 'dead' groups from the 'authorised list'
    of groups falling within their remit. Whether news-server
    administrators bother to take any action is of course up to them;
    there's little overhead cost in listing empty groups, after all. Google
    Groups of course will not remove their archive of dead groups; they
    might (should, sometimes have) made them 'read only' in their interface.

    Groups outside the Big Eight hierarchies are even less regulated.

    There're groups that have had no activity in
    over 5 years, and they're still listed. This gives people a false
    impression that USENET is dead, when it's quite active on specific
    topics. I've been utilizing Google groups to isolate the active USENET groups, and not waste anymore time with the thousands of dead groups.

    Regards,

    Bookworm Cowboy Lakeland, Florida

    No need to go anywhere near Google; just use your newsreader to look for
    groups on a subject of interest available on your news-server, and
    consider the number of articles shown as an initial guide to activity,
    then go into the likely groups to see if you like what's there. For
    example, on my NSP (Individual.net), a search for *cycling* coughs up

    U 10 rec.sport.unicycling
    U25642 uk.rec.cycling
    U 20 bc.cycling
    U 5 cn.bbs.sport.cycling
    U 8024 uk.rec.cycling.moderated

    (as displayed by my newsreader, slrn). Two groups stand out as "busy"
    (neither of them 'Big Eight', as it happens).
    --
    -- ^^^^^^^^^^
    -- Whiskers
    -- ~~~~~~~~~~
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2