Thought I'd post this TAR-related article as it could easily pertain to Survivor. This is a crazy story. Not only do they want $8 million, they
want the season to be reedited. _______________________________________________________________________
The Amazing Case: Paramount, Bruckheimer & Disney Hit With $8M
Defamation Suit By rCyAmazing RacerCO Contestants Jonathan Towns & Ana Towns
By Dominic Patten
March 5, 2026 10:03am
The rough ride contestants Jonathan Towns and Ana Towns had on the CBS competition series The Amazing Race last year has now turned into a
legal brawl between the couple and the showrCOs producers.
Accusing Paramount, CBS and producers ABC Signature (now 20th
Television, part of Disney Television Studios) and Jerry Bruckheimer
Films of rigging the series and unleashing a rCLsmear strategy so
audacious and immoral that would shock the conscience of even the most cynical propagandist,rCY the Season 37 participants are looking for $8 million and more in damages as part of a defamation suit.
rCLThe gravamen of this action is not a dispute over legitimate editorial judgment or discretion,rCY reads the jury-seeking complaint filed
Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court by the Townses, who are
representing themselves.
rCLThe claims asserted herein arise from a calculated and sustained course of conduct in which Defendants, possessing the evidentiary materials necessary to depict Plaintiff Jonathan Towns accurately and completely,
made the deliberate determination to suppress those materials and to substitute in their place a constructed, false, and highly damaging portrayal rCo one manufactured through the systematic juxtaposition of decontextualized footage, the willful omission of material exculpatory
and humanizing content, the disproportionate inclusion of narratively irrelevant but inflammatory content, and the sustained and asymmetric application of editorial standards that were applied to no other
participant in the production,rCY the complaint adds.
rCLThe resulting broadcast, disseminated to tens of millions of viewers on
a nationally distributed television network, falsely portrayed Jonathan Towns, a private individual with no antecedent public profile, as a
morally depraved, brutal and abusive spouse.rCY
As anyone knows who watched Season 37rCOs episodes, which ran March 5-May
15 of last year, the clearly stressed out Towns duo ended up coming
third in the competition. Since appearing on TAR, where he was
reprimanded more than once for his name-calling and demeaning attitude towards Ana Towns, Jonathan has been diagnosed as having autism spectrum disorder, their 25-page complaint asserts.
Citing a rCLmeltdownrCY and rCLclear emotional anguishrCY by Jonathan Towns during the May-June 2024 shooting of the Phil Keoghan-hosted series, the filing alleges that producers, including EP Keoghan, did little to
nothing to help the contestant. What TAR producers did do, according to
the suit, is convince the couple there was nothing underhanded going on
and to not quit the show. What they also did, the filing claims, was
paint a portrait of Jonathan Towns as someone engaging in rCLintentional emotional abuse toward his spouse.rCY
rCLThe foregoing portrayal is not susceptible of characterization as the product of subjective editorial interpretation or the legitimate
exercise of creative discretion,rCY the March 4-filed complaint states. rCLDefendants possessed the evidentiary materials necessary to tell an accurate and complete story. Their determination not to do so, and to substitute in place of accuracy a false and damaging characterization, constitutes the publication of a false statement of fact within the
meaning of applicable California law.rCY
Not only do the Townses want $8 million from Paramount and pals, the
couple is seeking a court injunction compelling producers to re-edit the show with rCLappropriate disclaimersrCY of Jonathan TownsrCO condition. In what may be a first for the dirty business and messy sausage-making of unscripted TV, the pair also want a public apology for how they were depicted.
Neither ParamountrCOs CBS nor 20th Television, which absorbed ABC
Signature in fall 2024, have responded to DeadlinerCOs request for comment on the complaint or claims. It seems they are trying to track down the
suit, I hear.
As for The Amazing Race, the globetrotting challenges continue, with the show renewed for Season 39 in January.
Source: https://deadline.com/2026/03/amazing-race-lawsuit-defamation-towns-1236744917/
On 3/5/2026 4:20 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Thought I'd post this TAR-related article as it could easily pertain
to Survivor. This is a crazy story. Not only do they want $8 million,
they want the season to be reedited.
_______________________________________________________________________
The Amazing Case: Paramount, Bruckheimer & Disney Hit With $8M
Defamation Suit By rCyAmazing RacerCO Contestants Jonathan Towns & Ana Towns >>
By Dominic Patten
March 5, 2026 10:03am
The rough ride contestants Jonathan Towns and Ana Towns had on the CBS
competition series The Amazing Race last year has now turned into a
legal brawl between the couple and the showrCOs producers.
Accusing Paramount, CBS and producers ABC Signature (now 20th
Television, part of Disney Television Studios) and Jerry Bruckheimer
Films of rigging the series and unleashing a rCLsmear strategy so
audacious and immoral that would shock the conscience of even the most
cynical propagandist,rCY the Season 37 participants are looking for $8
million and more in damages as part of a defamation suit.
rCLThe gravamen of this action is not a dispute over legitimate
editorial judgment or discretion,rCY reads the jury-seeking complaint
filed Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court by the Townses, who are
representing themselves.
rCLThe claims asserted herein arise from a calculated and sustained
course of conduct in which Defendants, possessing the evidentiary
materials necessary to depict Plaintiff Jonathan Towns accurately and
completely, made the deliberate determination to suppress those
materials and to substitute in their place a constructed, false, and
highly damaging portrayal rCo one manufactured through the systematic
juxtaposition of decontextualized footage, the willful omission of
material exculpatory and humanizing content, the disproportionate
inclusion of narratively irrelevant but inflammatory content, and the
sustained and asymmetric application of editorial standards that were
applied to no other participant in the production,rCY the complaint adds.
rCLThe resulting broadcast, disseminated to tens of millions of viewers
on a nationally distributed television network, falsely portrayed
Jonathan Towns, a private individual with no antecedent public
profile, as a morally depraved, brutal and abusive spouse.rCY
As anyone knows who watched Season 37rCOs episodes, which ran March 5-
May 15 of last year, the clearly stressed out Towns duo ended up
coming third in the competition. Since appearing on TAR, where he was
reprimanded more than once for his name-calling and demeaning attitude
towards Ana Towns, Jonathan has been diagnosed as having autism
spectrum disorder, their 25-page complaint asserts.
Citing a rCLmeltdownrCY and rCLclear emotional anguishrCY by Jonathan Towns >> during the May-June 2024 shooting of the Phil Keoghan-hosted series,
the filing alleges that producers, including EP Keoghan, did little to
nothing to help the contestant. What TAR producers did do, according
to the suit, is convince the couple there was nothing underhanded
going on and to not quit the show. What they also did, the filing
claims, was paint a portrait of Jonathan Towns as someone engaging in
rCLintentional emotional abuse toward his spouse.rCY
rCLThe foregoing portrayal is not susceptible of characterization as the
product of subjective editorial interpretation or the legitimate
exercise of creative discretion,rCY the March 4-filed complaint states.
rCLDefendants possessed the evidentiary materials necessary to tell an
accurate and complete story. Their determination not to do so, and to
substitute in place of accuracy a false and damaging characterization,
constitutes the publication of a false statement of fact within the
meaning of applicable California law.rCY
Not only do the Townses want $8 million from Paramount and pals, the
couple is seeking a court injunction compelling producers to re-edit
the show with rCLappropriate disclaimersrCY of Jonathan TownsrCO condition. >> In what may be a first for the dirty business and messy sausage-making
of unscripted TV, the pair also want a public apology for how they
were depicted.
Neither ParamountrCOs CBS nor 20th Television, which absorbed ABC
Signature in fall 2024, have responded to DeadlinerCOs request for
comment on the complaint or claims. It seems they are trying to track
down the suit, I hear.
As for The Amazing Race, the globetrotting challenges continue, with
the show renewed for Season 39 in January.
Source: https://deadline.com/2026/03/amazing-race-lawsuit-defamation-
towns-1236744917/
Not sure why they are bringing this case, given all the waivers they
sign before going on the show, unless it's just to get some publicity. Legally, they really don't have a leg to stand on, since the show was
just showing actual interactions between the couple.
On 3/5/2026 4:22 PM, Rick wrote:
On 3/5/2026 4:20 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Thought I'd post this TAR-related article as it could easily pertain
to Survivor. This is a crazy story. Not only do they want $8 million,
they want the season to be reedited.
_______________________________________________________________________
The Amazing Case: Paramount, Bruckheimer & Disney Hit With $8M
Defamation Suit By rCyAmazing RacerCO Contestants Jonathan Towns & Ana Towns
By Dominic Patten
March 5, 2026 10:03am
The rough ride contestants Jonathan Towns and Ana Towns had on the
CBS competition series The Amazing Race last year has now turned into
a legal brawl between the couple and the showrCOs producers.
Accusing Paramount, CBS and producers ABC Signature (now 20th
Television, part of Disney Television Studios) and Jerry Bruckheimer
Films of rigging the series and unleashing a rCLsmear strategy so
audacious and immoral that would shock the conscience of even the
most cynical propagandist,rCY the Season 37 participants are looking
for $8 million and more in damages as part of a defamation suit.
rCLThe gravamen of this action is not a dispute over legitimate
editorial judgment or discretion,rCY reads the jury-seeking complaint
filed Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court by the Townses, who are
representing themselves.
rCLThe claims asserted herein arise from a calculated and sustained
course of conduct in which Defendants, possessing the evidentiary
materials necessary to depict Plaintiff Jonathan Towns accurately and
completely, made the deliberate determination to suppress those
materials and to substitute in their place a constructed, false, and
highly damaging portrayal rCo one manufactured through the systematic
juxtaposition of decontextualized footage, the willful omission of
material exculpatory and humanizing content, the disproportionate
inclusion of narratively irrelevant but inflammatory content, and the
sustained and asymmetric application of editorial standards that were
applied to no other participant in the production,rCY the complaint adds. >>>
rCLThe resulting broadcast, disseminated to tens of millions of viewers >>> on a nationally distributed television network, falsely portrayed
Jonathan Towns, a private individual with no antecedent public
profile, as a morally depraved, brutal and abusive spouse.rCY
As anyone knows who watched Season 37rCOs episodes, which ran March 5-
May 15 of last year, the clearly stressed out Towns duo ended up
coming third in the competition. Since appearing on TAR, where he was
reprimanded more than once for his name-calling and demeaning
attitude towards Ana Towns, Jonathan has been diagnosed as having
autism spectrum disorder, their 25-page complaint asserts.
Citing a rCLmeltdownrCY and rCLclear emotional anguishrCY by Jonathan Towns
during the May-June 2024 shooting of the Phil Keoghan-hosted series,
the filing alleges that producers, including EP Keoghan, did little
to nothing to help the contestant. What TAR producers did do,
according to the suit, is convince the couple there was nothing
underhanded going on and to not quit the show. What they also did,
the filing claims, was paint a portrait of Jonathan Towns as someone
engaging in rCLintentional emotional abuse toward his spouse.rCY
rCLThe foregoing portrayal is not susceptible of characterization as
the product of subjective editorial interpretation or the legitimate
exercise of creative discretion,rCY the March 4-filed complaint states. >>> rCLDefendants possessed the evidentiary materials necessary to tell an
accurate and complete story. Their determination not to do so, and to
substitute in place of accuracy a false and damaging
characterization, constitutes the publication of a false statement of
fact within the meaning of applicable California law.rCY
Not only do the Townses want $8 million from Paramount and pals, the
couple is seeking a court injunction compelling producers to re-edit
the show with rCLappropriate disclaimersrCY of Jonathan TownsrCO condition.
In what may be a first for the dirty business and messy
sausage-making of unscripted TV, the pair also want a public apology
for how they were depicted.
Neither ParamountrCOs CBS nor 20th Television, which absorbed ABC
Signature in fall 2024, have responded to DeadlinerCOs request for
comment on the complaint or claims. It seems they are trying to track
down the suit, I hear.
As for The Amazing Race, the globetrotting challenges continue, with
the show renewed for Season 39 in January.
Source: https://deadline.com/2026/03/amazing-race-lawsuit-defamation-
towns-1236744917/
Not sure why they are bringing this case, given all the waivers they
sign before going on the show, unless it's just to get some publicity.
Legally, they really don't have a leg to stand on, since the show was
just showing actual interactions between the couple.
The husband sounds crazy. I never watched the season but I'm seeing
comments online from people who have that are saying he was very abusive toward his wife on the race. Now they are saying because he's autistic
they deserve a new edit and $8 million. If they were to win that would
be the end of reality TV.
On 3/5/2026 6:50 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
On 3/5/2026 4:22 PM, Rick wrote:
On 3/5/2026 4:20 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Thought I'd post this TAR-related article as it could easily pertain
to Survivor. This is a crazy story. Not only do they want $8
million, they want the season to be reedited.
_______________________________________________________________________ >>>> The Amazing Case: Paramount, Bruckheimer & Disney Hit With $8M
Defamation Suit By rCyAmazing RacerCO Contestants Jonathan Towns & Ana >>>> Towns
By Dominic Patten
March 5, 2026 10:03am
The rough ride contestants Jonathan Towns and Ana Towns had on the
CBS competition series The Amazing Race last year has now turned
into a legal brawl between the couple and the showrCOs producers.
Accusing Paramount, CBS and producers ABC Signature (now 20th
Television, part of Disney Television Studios) and Jerry Bruckheimer
Films of rigging the series and unleashing a rCLsmear strategy so
audacious and immoral that would shock the conscience of even the
most cynical propagandist,rCY the Season 37 participants are looking
for $8 million and more in damages as part of a defamation suit.
rCLThe gravamen of this action is not a dispute over legitimate
editorial judgment or discretion,rCY reads the jury-seeking complaint >>>> filed Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court by the Townses, who
are representing themselves.
rCLThe claims asserted herein arise from a calculated and sustained
course of conduct in which Defendants, possessing the evidentiary
materials necessary to depict Plaintiff Jonathan Towns accurately
and completely, made the deliberate determination to suppress those
materials and to substitute in their place a constructed, false, and
highly damaging portrayal rCo one manufactured through the systematic >>>> juxtaposition of decontextualized footage, the willful omission of
material exculpatory and humanizing content, the disproportionate
inclusion of narratively irrelevant but inflammatory content, and
the sustained and asymmetric application of editorial standards that
were applied to no other participant in the production,rCY the
complaint adds.
rCLThe resulting broadcast, disseminated to tens of millions of
viewers on a nationally distributed television network, falsely
portrayed Jonathan Towns, a private individual with no antecedent
public profile, as a morally depraved, brutal and abusive spouse.rCY
As anyone knows who watched Season 37rCOs episodes, which ran March 5- >>>> May 15 of last year, the clearly stressed out Towns duo ended up
coming third in the competition. Since appearing on TAR, where he
was reprimanded more than once for his name-calling and demeaning
attitude towards Ana Towns, Jonathan has been diagnosed as having
autism spectrum disorder, their 25-page complaint asserts.
Citing a rCLmeltdownrCY and rCLclear emotional anguishrCY by Jonathan Towns
during the May-June 2024 shooting of the Phil Keoghan-hosted series,
the filing alleges that producers, including EP Keoghan, did little
to nothing to help the contestant. What TAR producers did do,
according to the suit, is convince the couple there was nothing
underhanded going on and to not quit the show. What they also did,
the filing claims, was paint a portrait of Jonathan Towns as someone
engaging in rCLintentional emotional abuse toward his spouse.rCY
rCLThe foregoing portrayal is not susceptible of characterization as
the product of subjective editorial interpretation or the legitimate
exercise of creative discretion,rCY the March 4-filed complaint
states. rCLDefendants possessed the evidentiary materials necessary to >>>> tell an accurate and complete story. Their determination not to do
so, and to substitute in place of accuracy a false and damaging
characterization, constitutes the publication of a false statement
of fact within the meaning of applicable California law.rCY
Not only do the Townses want $8 million from Paramount and pals, the
couple is seeking a court injunction compelling producers to re-edit
the show with rCLappropriate disclaimersrCY of Jonathan TownsrCO
condition. In what may be a first for the dirty business and messy
sausage-making of unscripted TV, the pair also want a public apology
for how they were depicted.
Neither ParamountrCOs CBS nor 20th Television, which absorbed ABC
Signature in fall 2024, have responded to DeadlinerCOs request for
comment on the complaint or claims. It seems they are trying to
track down the suit, I hear.
As for The Amazing Race, the globetrotting challenges continue, with
the show renewed for Season 39 in January.
Source: https://deadline.com/2026/03/amazing-race-lawsuit-
defamation- towns-1236744917/
Not sure why they are bringing this case, given all the waivers they
sign before going on the show, unless it's just to get some
publicity. Legally, they really don't have a leg to stand on, since
the show was just showing actual interactions between the couple.
The husband sounds crazy. I never watched the season but I'm seeing
comments online from people who have that are saying he was very
abusive toward his wife on the race. Now they are saying because he's
autistic they deserve a new edit and $8 million. If they were to win
that would be the end of reality TV.
But there is literally no better defense than the truth, and the show
can honestly state they were just showing actual interactions between
the couple.
He wasn't so much abusive as he was just a major jerk toward his wife.
As bad as he was, it didn't come close to Jonathan and Victoria from
Season 6, where Jonathan was so overtly abusive that even Phil had to
say something to him.
On 3/5/2026 5:31 PM, Rick wrote:
On 3/5/2026 6:50 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
On 3/5/2026 4:22 PM, Rick wrote:
On 3/5/2026 4:20 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Thought I'd post this TAR-related article as it could easily pertain >>>>> to Survivor. This is a crazy story. Not only do they want $8
million, they want the season to be reedited.
_______________________________________________________________________
Source: https://deadline.com/2026/03/amazing-race-lawsuit-
defamation- towns-1236744917/
Not sure why they are bringing this case, given all the waivers they
sign before going on the show, unless it's just to get some
publicity. Legally, they really don't have a leg to stand on, since
the show was just showing actual interactions between the couple.
The husband sounds crazy. I never watched the season but I'm seeing
comments online from people who have that are saying he was very
abusive toward his wife on the race. Now they are saying because he's
autistic they deserve a new edit and $8 million. If they were to win
that would be the end of reality TV.
But there is literally no better defense than the truth, and the show
can honestly state they were just showing actual interactions between
the couple.
I'm not saying they have a case.
He wasn't so much abusive as he was just a major jerk toward his wife.
As bad as he was, it didn't come close to Jonathan and Victoria from
Season 6, where Jonathan was so overtly abusive that even Phil had to
say something to him.
I was going to mention Jonathan and Victoria but couldn't think of their >names. Those were the glory days for TAR.
On Thu, 5 Mar 2026 19:00:38 -0700, Brian Smith <dcg_brian@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/5/2026 5:31 PM, Rick wrote:
On 3/5/2026 6:50 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
On 3/5/2026 4:22 PM, Rick wrote:
On 3/5/2026 4:20 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Thought I'd post this TAR-related article as it could easily pertain >>>>>> to Survivor. This is a crazy story. Not only do they want $8
million, they want the season to be reedited.
_______________________________________________________________________
Source: https://deadline.com/2026/03/amazing-race-lawsuit-
defamation- towns-1236744917/
Not sure why they are bringing this case, given all the waivers they >>>>> sign before going on the show, unless it's just to get some
publicity. Legally, they really don't have a leg to stand on, since
the show was just showing actual interactions between the couple.
Yeah, it's hard to see this case going very far.
The husband sounds crazy. I never watched the season but I'm seeing
comments online from people who have that are saying he was very
abusive toward his wife on the race. Now they are saying because he's
autistic they deserve a new edit and $8 million. If they were to win
that would be the end of reality TV.
But there is literally no better defense than the truth, and the show
can honestly state they were just showing actual interactions between
the couple.
I'm not saying they have a case.
He wasn't so much abusive as he was just a major jerk toward his wife.
As bad as he was, it didn't come close to Jonathan and Victoria from
Season 6, where Jonathan was so overtly abusive that even Phil had to
say something to him.
I was going to mention Jonathan and Victoria but couldn't think of their
names. Those were the glory days for TAR.
"My ox is broken"
On Thu, 5 Mar 2026 19:00:38 -0700, Brian Smith <dcg_brian@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/5/2026 5:31 PM, Rick wrote:
On 3/5/2026 6:50 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
On 3/5/2026 4:22 PM, Rick wrote:
On 3/5/2026 4:20 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Thought I'd post this TAR-related article as it could easily pertain >>>>>> to Survivor. This is a crazy story. Not only do they want $8
million, they want the season to be reedited.
_______________________________________________________________________
Source: https://deadline.com/2026/03/amazing-race-lawsuit-
defamation- towns-1236744917/
Not sure why they are bringing this case, given all the waivers they >>>>> sign before going on the show, unless it's just to get some
publicity. Legally, they really don't have a leg to stand on, since
the show was just showing actual interactions between the couple.
Yeah, it's hard to see this case going very far.
The husband sounds crazy. I never watched the season but I'm seeing
comments online from people who have that are saying he was very
abusive toward his wife on the race. Now they are saying because he's
autistic they deserve a new edit and $8 million. If they were to win
that would be the end of reality TV.
But there is literally no better defense than the truth, and the show
can honestly state they were just showing actual interactions between
the couple.
I'm not saying they have a case.
He wasn't so much abusive as he was just a major jerk toward his wife.
As bad as he was, it didn't come close to Jonathan and Victoria from
Season 6, where Jonathan was so overtly abusive that even Phil had to
say something to him.
I was going to mention Jonathan and Victoria but couldn't think of their
names. Those were the glory days for TAR.
"My ox is broken"
On 3/6/2026 6:48 AM, shawn wrote:
On Thu, 5 Mar 2026 19:00:38 -0700, Brian Smith <dcg_brian@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/5/2026 5:31 PM, Rick wrote:
On 3/5/2026 6:50 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
On 3/5/2026 4:22 PM, Rick wrote:
On 3/5/2026 4:20 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Thought I'd post this TAR-related article as it could easily pertain >>>>>>> to Survivor. This is a crazy story. Not only do they want $8
million, they want the season to be reedited.
_______________________________________________________________________ >>
Source: https://deadline.com/2026/03/amazing-race-lawsuit-
defamation- towns-1236744917/
Not sure why they are bringing this case, given all the waivers they >>>>>> sign before going on the show, unless it's just to get some
publicity. Legally, they really don't have a leg to stand on, since >>>>>> the show was just showing actual interactions between the couple.
Yeah, it's hard to see this case going very far.
The husband sounds crazy. I never watched the season but I'm seeing
comments online from people who have that are saying he was very
abusive toward his wife on the race. Now they are saying because he's >>>>> autistic they deserve a new edit and $8 million. If they were to win >>>>> that would be the end of reality TV.
But there is literally no better defense than the truth, and the show
can honestly state they were just showing actual interactions between
the couple.
I'm not saying they have a case.
He wasn't so much abusive as he was just a major jerk toward his wife. >>>> As bad as he was, it didn't come close to Jonathan and Victoria from
Season 6, where Jonathan was so overtly abusive that even Phil had to
say something to him.
I was going to mention Jonathan and Victoria but couldn't think of their >>> names. Those were the glory days for TAR.
"My ox is broken"
I thought it was Colin who said that. TAR5?
On 3/6/2026 6:48 AM, shawn wrote:
On Thu, 5 Mar 2026 19:00:38 -0700, Brian Smith <dcg_brian@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/5/2026 5:31 PM, Rick wrote:
On 3/5/2026 6:50 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
On 3/5/2026 4:22 PM, Rick wrote:
On 3/5/2026 4:20 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Thought I'd post this TAR-related article as it could easily pertain >>>>>>> to Survivor. This is a crazy story. Not only do they want $8
million, they want the season to be reedited.
_______________________________________________________________________ >>
Source: https://deadline.com/2026/03/amazing-race-lawsuit-
defamation- towns-1236744917/
Not sure why they are bringing this case, given all the waivers they >>>>>> sign before going on the show, unless it's just to get some
publicity. Legally, they really don't have a leg to stand on, since >>>>>> the show was just showing actual interactions between the couple.
Yeah, it's hard to see this case going very far.
The husband sounds crazy. I never watched the season but I'm seeing
comments online from people who have that are saying he was very
abusive toward his wife on the race. Now they are saying because he's >>>>> autistic they deserve a new edit and $8 million. If they were to win >>>>> that would be the end of reality TV.
But there is literally no better defense than the truth, and the show
can honestly state they were just showing actual interactions between
the couple.
I'm not saying they have a case.
He wasn't so much abusive as he was just a major jerk toward his wife. >>>> As bad as he was, it didn't come close to Jonathan and Victoria from
Season 6, where Jonathan was so overtly abusive that even Phil had to
say something to him.
I was going to mention Jonathan and Victoria but couldn't think of their >>> names. Those were the glory days for TAR.
"My ox is broken"
I thought it was Colin who said that. TAR5?
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 01:27:45 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
10 files (20,373K bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,187 |