From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order
On Friday, May 22, 2020 at 2:10:17 PM UTC-4, jack wrote:
Reneging on the plea done under oath, could be perjury.
This guy certainly views things that way. Although I think this guy has TDS.
If Flynn Wins, Flynn Loses
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNZSwafPAFc
Related: But there's a different view of what Sullivan is up to.
What Sanctions can Judge Sullivan face? Robert Barnes Explains - Viva Frei Vlawg HIGHLIGHT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akY4ns-1qu4 https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/21/appeal-court-flynn-judge-273967 "Appeal Court orders Flynn judge to explain himself"
"Proceedings on Flynn's effort to undo his guilty plea were underway when Attorney General William Barr opted to abandon the prosecution, citing documents he said were newly unearthed and showed improper motivations for the FBI's initial interview with Flynn rCo a contention vehemently rejected by the former officials involved in the decision."
I wonder what Jack would do if he wanted to drop charges against a defendant and the judge did something like what Sullivan did. The closest I can remember to this is a judge imposing a much harsher sentence after a plea deal.
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2