I've noticed that a few people here and there on the 'tubes are confused by the outcome in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. No cite, but I spotted at least one criticism of the MSM from someone who was wondering why the facts in the case had been suppressed, AKA lied about.Responding to my own post.
I mostly watched Rekieta Law https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbkjX3E0IhuUfPzL0FjSPaw https://www.youtube.com/c/RekietaLaw/playlists there are two playlists related to the trial.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hr-bk6WpFo&list=PLJdwBXWZFqz6cwfG2JxF-nGNCVCWGttAy
and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrvlWZvE9zg&list=PLJdwBXWZFqz7Gmm-1XAt2E9lpwWdAtxPN
I think the trial coverage was interesting because there was a fairly diverse panel of attorneys who were commenting. And also because I think at one point there were 100,000+ people watching this youtube channel streaming live.
I was expecting a hung jury but hoping for an acquittal so I was relieved by the outcome in this trial and I wonder if the prosecutors will face some kind of sanctions for what appear to be ethical violations including a possible Brady violation.
Should we discuss the possibility of Kyle suing certain people who said unflattering things about him?
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 63 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 492981:19:55 |
| Calls: | 840 |
| Files: | 1,301 |
| D/L today: |
2 files (1,660K bytes) |
| Messages: | 265,476 |