• =?UTF-8?Q?OT_The_Times_Elections_Expos=C3=A9_is_STUNNING_=2D_Viva_Fr?= =?UTF-8?Q?ei_Vlawg?=

    From the...@bigmailbox.net@theget@bigmailbox.net to alt.tv.law-and-order on Sun Feb 7 19:06:08 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
    The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election


    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jack@johnrstobo@gmail.com to alt.tv.law-and-order on Mon Feb 8 12:59:40 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 10:06:09 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
    The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    "'Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,' says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. 'But itrCOs massively important for the country to understand that it didnrCOt happen accidentally. The system didnrCOt work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.'"
    And you and that Youtuber have a problem with this? Nobody read past the headline?
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From the...@bigmailbox.net@theget@bigmailbox.net to alt.tv.law-and-order on Tue Feb 9 16:11:42 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 3:59:41 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 10:06:09 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
    The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    "'Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,' says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. 'But itrCOs massively important for the country to understand that it didnrCOt happen accidentally. The system didnrCOt work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.'"

    And you and that Youtuber have a problem with this? Nobody read past the headline?
    If you don't want to watch the video that is of course up to you. I still say that it's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content. It might even be fair to say that your post suggests to me that I've succeeded in considering how someone who is left of me might interpret the article. Now I'm curious to know if you can put yourself in someone else's shoes and try to imagine how I or "that youtuber" view that content.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jack@johnrstobo@gmail.com to alt.tv.law-and-order on Thu Feb 11 09:25:38 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 7:11:43 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 3:59:41 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 10:06:09 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
    The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    "'Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,' says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. 'But itrCOs massively important for the country to understand that it didnrCOt happen accidentally. The system didnrCOt work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.'"

    And you and that Youtuber have a problem with this? Nobody read past the headline?
    If you don't want to watch the video that is of course up to you. I still say that it's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content. It might even be fair to say that your post suggests to me that I've succeeded in considering how someone who is left of me might interpret the article. Now I'm curious to know if you can put yourself in someone else's shoes and try to imagine how I or "that youtuber" view that content.
    Yes, I've been listening for two days now how the Capitol rioters felt they were acting at Trump's command.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From the...@bigmailbox.net@theget@bigmailbox.net to alt.tv.law-and-order on Fri Feb 19 08:04:41 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 12:25:39 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 7:11:43 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 3:59:41 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 10:06:09 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
    The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    "'Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,' says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. 'But itrCOs massively important for the country to understand that it didnrCOt happen accidentally. The system didnrCOt work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.'"

    And you and that Youtuber have a problem with this? Nobody read past the headline?
    If you don't want to watch the video that is of course up to you. I still say that it's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content. It might even be fair to say that your post suggests to me that I've succeeded in considering how someone who is left of me might interpret the article. Now I'm curious to know if you can put yourself in someone else's shoes and try to imagine how I or "that youtuber" view that content.
    Yes, I've been listening for two days now how the Capitol rioters felt they were acting at Trump's command.
    Are you alluding to the trial of Trump's second impeachment? Were there witnesses saying this?
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John R. Stobo II@jrs9@columbia.edu to alt.tv.law-and-order on Fri Feb 19 12:52:08 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    On Friday, February 19, 2021 at 11:04:42 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 12:25:39 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 7:11:43 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 3:59:41 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 10:06:09 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
    The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    "'Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,' says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. 'But itrCOs massively important for the country to understand that it didnrCOt happen accidentally. The system didnrCOt work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.'"

    And you and that Youtuber have a problem with this? Nobody read past the headline?
    If you don't want to watch the video that is of course up to you. I still say that it's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content. It might even be fair to say that your post suggests to me that I've succeeded in considering how someone who is left of me might interpret the article. Now I'm curious to know if you can put yourself in someone else's shoes and try to imagine how I or "that youtuber" view that content.
    Yes, I've been listening for two days now how the Capitol rioters felt they were acting at Trump's command.
    Are you alluding to the trial of Trump's second impeachment? Were there witnesses saying this?
    Did you not watch any of the trial? That this was done over and over was shown quite clearly. Even showed one guy shouting Trump's tweet over a bullhorn in the middle of the scuffling.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jack@johnrstobo@gmail.com to alt.tv.law-and-order on Sat Feb 20 12:09:00 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    On Friday, February 19, 2021 at 11:04:42 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 12:25:39 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 7:11:43 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 3:59:41 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 10:06:09 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
    The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    "'Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,' says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. 'But itrCOs massively important for the country to understand that it didnrCOt happen accidentally. The system didnrCOt work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.'"

    And you and that Youtuber have a problem with this? Nobody read past the headline?
    If you don't want to watch the video that is of course up to you. I still say that it's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content. It might even be fair to say that your post suggests to me that I've succeeded in considering how someone who is left of me might interpret the article. Now I'm curious to know if you can put yourself in someone else's shoes and try to imagine how I or "that youtuber" view that content.
    Yes, I've been listening for two days now how the Capitol rioters felt they were acting at Trump's command.
    Are you alluding to the trial of Trump's second impeachment? Were there witnesses saying this?
    Yes, video of this was shown at the trial; in particular there was one 'fine fellow' yelling a Trump tweet thru a bullhorn at his fellow rioters.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From the...@bigmailbox.net@theget@bigmailbox.net to alt.tv.law-and-order on Wed Mar 3 05:54:46 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 3:09:01 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Friday, February 19, 2021 at 11:04:42 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 12:25:39 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 7:11:43 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 3:59:41 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 10:06:09 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
    The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    "'Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,' says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. 'But itrCOs massively important for the country to understand that it didnrCOt happen accidentally. The system didnrCOt work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.'"

    And you and that Youtuber have a problem with this? Nobody read past the headline?
    If you don't want to watch the video that is of course up to you. I still say that it's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content. It might even be fair to say that your post suggests to me that I've succeeded in considering how someone who is left of me might interpret the article. Now I'm curious to know if you can put yourself in someone else's shoes and try to imagine how I or "that youtuber" view that content.
    Yes, I've been listening for two days now how the Capitol rioters felt they were acting at Trump's command.
    Are you alluding to the trial of Trump's second impeachment? Were there witnesses saying this?
    Yes, video of this was shown at the trial; in particular there was one 'fine fellow' yelling a Trump tweet thru a bullhorn at his fellow rioters.
    I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jack@johnrstobo@gmail.com to alt.tv.law-and-order on Thu Mar 4 08:07:09 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    On Wednesday, March 3, 2021 at 8:54:47 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 3:09:01 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Friday, February 19, 2021 at 11:04:42 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 12:25:39 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 7:11:43 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 3:59:41 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 10:06:09 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
    The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    "'Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,' says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. 'But itrCOs massively important for the country to understand that it didnrCOt happen accidentally. The system didnrCOt work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.'"

    And you and that Youtuber have a problem with this? Nobody read past the headline?
    If you don't want to watch the video that is of course up to you. I still say that it's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content. It might even be fair to say that your post suggests to me that I've succeeded in considering how someone who is left of me might interpret the article. Now I'm curious to know if you can put yourself in someone else's shoes and try to imagine how I or "that youtuber" view that content.
    Yes, I've been listening for two days now how the Capitol rioters felt they were acting at Trump's command.
    Are you alluding to the trial of Trump's second impeachment? Were there witnesses saying this?
    Yes, video of this was shown at the trial; in particular there was one 'fine fellow' yelling a Trump tweet thru a bullhorn at his fellow rioters.
    I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    so I guess you did not watch the impeachment hearing or the trial that followed. Or another case of when you don't have an answer, just troll away.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From the...@bigmailbox.net@theget@bigmailbox.net to alt.tv.law-and-order on Tue Mar 9 16:26:47 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 11:07:10 AM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 3, 2021 at 8:54:47 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 3:09:01 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Friday, February 19, 2021 at 11:04:42 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 12:25:39 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 7:11:43 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 3:59:41 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 10:06:09 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
    The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    "'Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,' says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. 'But itrCOs massively important for the country to understand that it didnrCOt happen accidentally. The system didnrCOt work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.'"

    And you and that Youtuber have a problem with this? Nobody read past the headline?
    If you don't want to watch the video that is of course up to you. I still say that it's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content. It might even be fair to say that your post suggests to me that I've succeeded in considering how someone who is left of me might interpret the article. Now I'm curious to know if you can put yourself in someone else's shoes and try to imagine how I or "that youtuber" view that content.
    Yes, I've been listening for two days now how the Capitol rioters felt they were acting at Trump's command.
    Are you alluding to the trial of Trump's second impeachment? Were there witnesses saying this?
    Yes, video of this was shown at the trial; in particular there was one 'fine fellow' yelling a Trump tweet thru a bullhorn at his fellow rioters.
    I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    so I guess you did not watch the impeachment hearing or the trial that followed. Or another case of when you don't have an answer, just troll away.
    I didn't watch the impeachment hearing or the trial that followed. I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jack@johnrstobo@gmail.com to alt.tv.law-and-order on Thu Mar 11 09:58:54 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 7:26:48 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 11:07:10 AM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 3, 2021 at 8:54:47 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 3:09:01 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Friday, February 19, 2021 at 11:04:42 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 12:25:39 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 7:11:43 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 3:59:41 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 10:06:09 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
    The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    "'Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,' says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. 'But itrCOs massively important for the country to understand that it didnrCOt happen accidentally. The system didnrCOt work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.'"

    And you and that Youtuber have a problem with this? Nobody read past the headline?
    If you don't want to watch the video that is of course up to you. I still say that it's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content. It might even be fair to say that your post suggests to me that I've succeeded in considering how someone who is left of me might interpret the article. Now I'm curious to know if you can put yourself in someone else's shoes and try to imagine how I or "that youtuber" view that content.
    Yes, I've been listening for two days now how the Capitol rioters felt they were acting at Trump's command.
    Are you alluding to the trial of Trump's second impeachment? Were there witnesses saying this?
    Yes, video of this was shown at the trial; in particular there was one 'fine fellow' yelling a Trump tweet thru a bullhorn at his fellow rioters.
    I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    so I guess you did not watch the impeachment hearing or the trial that followed. Or another case of when you don't have an answer, just troll away.
    I didn't watch the impeachment hearing or the trial that followed. I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    Please, just pathetic. If you are interested look at the tapes yourself.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From the...@bigmailbox.net@theget@bigmailbox.net to alt.tv.law-and-order on Tue Mar 16 20:44:21 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 12:58:55 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 7:26:48 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 11:07:10 AM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 3, 2021 at 8:54:47 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 3:09:01 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Friday, February 19, 2021 at 11:04:42 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 12:25:39 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 7:11:43 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 3:59:41 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 10:06:09 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/ The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    "'Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,' says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. 'But itrCOs massively important for the country to understand that it didnrCOt happen accidentally. The system didnrCOt work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.'"

    And you and that Youtuber have a problem with this? Nobody read past the headline?
    If you don't want to watch the video that is of course up to you. I still say that it's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content. It might even be fair to say that your post suggests to me that I've succeeded in considering how someone who is left of me might interpret the article. Now I'm curious to know if you can put yourself in someone else's shoes and try to imagine how I or "that youtuber" view that content.
    Yes, I've been listening for two days now how the Capitol rioters felt they were acting at Trump's command.
    Are you alluding to the trial of Trump's second impeachment? Were there witnesses saying this?
    Yes, video of this was shown at the trial; in particular there was one 'fine fellow' yelling a Trump tweet thru a bullhorn at his fellow rioters.
    I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    so I guess you did not watch the impeachment hearing or the trial that followed. Or another case of when you don't have an answer, just troll away.
    I didn't watch the impeachment hearing or the trial that followed. I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    Please, just pathetic. If you are interested look at the tapes yourself.
    Please, just pathetic. Please answer the question if you can.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jack@johnrstobo@gmail.com to alt.tv.law-and-order on Wed Mar 17 13:45:40 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-4, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 12:58:55 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 7:26:48 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 11:07:10 AM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 3, 2021 at 8:54:47 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 3:09:01 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Friday, February 19, 2021 at 11:04:42 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 12:25:39 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 7:11:43 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 3:59:41 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 10:06:09 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/ The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    "'Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,' says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. 'But itrCOs massively important for the country to understand that it didnrCOt happen accidentally. The system didnrCOt work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.'"

    And you and that Youtuber have a problem with this? Nobody read past the headline?
    If you don't want to watch the video that is of course up to you. I still say that it's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content. It might even be fair to say that your post suggests to me that I've succeeded in considering how someone who is left of me might interpret the article. Now I'm curious to know if you can put yourself in someone else's shoes and try to imagine how I or "that youtuber" view that content.
    Yes, I've been listening for two days now how the Capitol rioters felt they were acting at Trump's command.
    Are you alluding to the trial of Trump's second impeachment? Were there witnesses saying this?
    Yes, video of this was shown at the trial; in particular there was one 'fine fellow' yelling a Trump tweet thru a bullhorn at his fellow rioters.
    I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    so I guess you did not watch the impeachment hearing or the trial that followed. Or another case of when you don't have an answer, just troll away.
    I didn't watch the impeachment hearing or the trial that followed. I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    Please, just pathetic. If you are interested look at the tapes yourself.
    Please, just pathetic. Please answer the question if you can.
    Why should I do your work for you? The tapes are there to watch and I'm sure that you watched the proceedings live. Can't imagine that you didn't.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From the...@bigmailbox.net@theget@bigmailbox.net to alt.tv.law-and-order on Sun Mar 28 13:27:49 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    On Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 4:45:41 PM UTC-4, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-4, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 12:58:55 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 7:26:48 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 11:07:10 AM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 3, 2021 at 8:54:47 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 3:09:01 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Friday, February 19, 2021 at 11:04:42 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 12:25:39 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 7:11:43 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 3:59:41 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 10:06:09 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
    The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    "'Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,' says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. 'But itrCOs massively important for the country to understand that it didnrCOt happen accidentally. The system didnrCOt work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.'"

    And you and that Youtuber have a problem with this? Nobody read past the headline?
    If you don't want to watch the video that is of course up to you. I still say that it's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content. It might even be fair to say that your post suggests to me that I've succeeded in considering how someone who is left of me might interpret the article. Now I'm curious to know if you can put yourself in someone else's shoes and try to imagine how I or "that youtuber" view that content.
    Yes, I've been listening for two days now how the Capitol rioters felt they were acting at Trump's command.
    Are you alluding to the trial of Trump's second impeachment? Were there witnesses saying this?
    Yes, video of this was shown at the trial; in particular there was one 'fine fellow' yelling a Trump tweet thru a bullhorn at his fellow rioters.
    I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    so I guess you did not watch the impeachment hearing or the trial that followed. Or another case of when you don't have an answer, just troll away.
    I didn't watch the impeachment hearing or the trial that followed. I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    Please, just pathetic. If you are interested look at the tapes yourself.
    Please, just pathetic. Please answer the question if you can.
    Why should I do your work for you? The tapes are there to watch and I'm sure that you watched the proceedings live. Can't imagine that you didn't.
    What did Trump say to precipitate an insurrection.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jack@johnrstobo@gmail.com to alt.tv.law-and-order on Thu Apr 1 08:43:46 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    On Sunday, March 28, 2021 at 4:27:50 PM UTC-4, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 4:45:41 PM UTC-4, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-4, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 12:58:55 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 7:26:48 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 11:07:10 AM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 3, 2021 at 8:54:47 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 3:09:01 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Friday, February 19, 2021 at 11:04:42 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 12:25:39 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 7:11:43 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 3:59:41 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 10:06:09 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
    The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    "'Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,' says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. 'But itrCOs massively important for the country to understand that it didnrCOt happen accidentally. The system didnrCOt work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.'"

    And you and that Youtuber have a problem with this? Nobody read past the headline?
    If you don't want to watch the video that is of course up to you. I still say that it's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content. It might even be fair to say that your post suggests to me that I've succeeded in considering how someone who is left of me might interpret the article. Now I'm curious to know if you can put yourself in someone else's shoes and try to imagine how I or "that youtuber" view that content.
    Yes, I've been listening for two days now how the Capitol rioters felt they were acting at Trump's command.
    Are you alluding to the trial of Trump's second impeachment? Were there witnesses saying this?
    Yes, video of this was shown at the trial; in particular there was one 'fine fellow' yelling a Trump tweet thru a bullhorn at his fellow rioters.
    I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    so I guess you did not watch the impeachment hearing or the trial that followed. Or another case of when you don't have an answer, just troll away.
    I didn't watch the impeachment hearing or the trial that followed. I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    Please, just pathetic. If you are interested look at the tapes yourself.
    Please, just pathetic. Please answer the question if you can.
    Why should I do your work for you? The tapes are there to watch and I'm sure that you watched the proceedings live. Can't imagine that you didn't.
    What did Trump say to precipitate an insurrection.
    Give it up.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From the...@bigmailbox.net@theget@bigmailbox.net to alt.tv.law-and-order on Sat Apr 10 05:25:55 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.law-and-order

    On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 11:43:47 AM UTC-4, jack wrote:
    On Sunday, March 28, 2021 at 4:27:50 PM UTC-4, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 4:45:41 PM UTC-4, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-4, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 12:58:55 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 7:26:48 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 11:07:10 AM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 3, 2021 at 8:54:47 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 3:09:01 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Friday, February 19, 2021 at 11:04:42 AM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 12:25:39 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 7:11:43 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 3:59:41 PM UTC-5, jack wrote:
    On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 10:06:09 PM UTC-5, the...@bigmailbox.net wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx6OfAdl-UU


    I've posted this link in another thread, but putting it here again as a convenience. It's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content.
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
    The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    "'Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,' says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. 'But itrCOs massively important for the country to understand that it didnrCOt happen accidentally. The system didnrCOt work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.'"

    And you and that Youtuber have a problem with this? Nobody read past the headline?
    If you don't want to watch the video that is of course up to you. I still say that it's interesting to read while considering how someone on the other side of the political spectrum might view the content. It might even be fair to say that your post suggests to me that I've succeeded in considering how someone who is left of me might interpret the article. Now I'm curious to know if you can put yourself in someone else's shoes and try to imagine how I or "that youtuber" view that content.
    Yes, I've been listening for two days now how the Capitol rioters felt they were acting at Trump's command.
    Are you alluding to the trial of Trump's second impeachment? Were there witnesses saying this?
    Yes, video of this was shown at the trial; in particular there was one 'fine fellow' yelling a Trump tweet thru a bullhorn at his fellow rioters.
    I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    so I guess you did not watch the impeachment hearing or the trial that followed. Or another case of when you don't have an answer, just troll away.
    I didn't watch the impeachment hearing or the trial that followed. I wonder if you can tell me exactly what Trump said to precipitate the "insurrection" and if you can provide a source? TIA.
    Please, just pathetic. If you are interested look at the tapes yourself.
    Please, just pathetic. Please answer the question if you can.
    Why should I do your work for you? The tapes are there to watch and I'm sure that you watched the proceedings live. Can't imagine that you didn't.
    What did Trump say to precipitate an insurrection.
    Give it up.
    Why should I give it up? It was a fairly simple question. Why not answer it? BTW, what have those "insurrectionists" been tried for?
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2