From Newsgroup: alt.tv.general-hospital
marika wrote in <HVB4S.18891$
9swf.9111@fx10.iad>:
<snip>
But in thinking about your questions, I go back to that scene at the
gallery.
Ethan asked the art gallery guy not to reveal his identity.
Prodded with the right bribe, he nonetheless outed Ethan. There is
possibly some tidbit in that exchange.
It just adds another layer to the confusion. At least it does for me,
anyway, but I'm easily confused by all of this stuff!
Ethan had paid the NYC gallery owner not to reveal his connection to
Delilah. But when Ava and Alexis showed up at the gallery asking
questions and offering more money, the guy reneged on the agreement.
When Alexis, acting as BLQ's and Chase's adoption lawyer, confronted
Ethan about his connection to Delilah, he told Alexis he was the baby's
father, with the legal rights necessary sign her over to Alexis's
clients. His motive in these actions--bribing the gallery owner and
adopting the baby to BLQ and Chase--was to protect the baby from, as he
told Ava, someone or something far worse than Ava could imagine.
My confusion here arises from the question of why Ethan would have
wanted to conceal his connection to Delilah from Alexis. If Ethan hadn't claimed to be the baby's father, the baby might have ended up being
bounced from foster home to foster home, or adopted to someone Ethan
would know Delilah wouldn't have approved of. If he isn't Phoebe's
father or legal guardian, then he doesn't have the authority to assign
parental rights to anyone. Isn't that where things would have stood if
the NYC gallery owner had kept quiet?
All that said, the person whose DNA Ethan stole from the 1993 cold case
file and must be that of Phoebe's biological father. It would make no
sense at all for him to have made that swap otherwise. Confusion reigns!
--
K
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2