From Newsgroup: alt.tv.general-hospital

Congresswoman Willow P Tait has the brain of a planarian flatworm. Days
after Sidwell disappeared it finally dawned on the little ninny that her
supply of stroke jabs had been cut off. Which begs the question of why
she would drag him up to the hospital for an appointment, when at any
minute he could recover from his "stroke."

And why have Felicia tell Willow she had applied for access to
communications devices for the locked-in on Drew's behalf, then in the
next breath tell her that it could take quite a long while for approval
to come through? If that was meant to show Willow in a flop sweat, too
late. She's been in a flop sweat since she started playing whack-a-mole
trying to keep her drugging scheme contained. So, I refuse to get worked
up over communications devices until Liz or Felicia show up with them at
Drew's door and he starts spelling SOS instead of blinking it.

As for Willow pitching herself into the lake and claiming Tracy had
pushed her, Willow and Chase were both squawking about Tracy having
assaulted a "sitting congresswoman," the implication being that Tracy
should be charged for that crime (which carries a greater penalty)
rather than for assault of a member of the general public. Willow: "She attacked ME, a sitting congresswoman!" Chase: She attacked a sitting congresswoman!" Sitting congresswoman, my patootie. The only place that
fake congresswoman should be sitting is on a jail bunk.

It was really quite rich for BLQ to accuse Tracy of entrapping Willow
for behavior she's done in the past when BLQ is actively plotting to
frame Willow something she hadn't done. If you ask me, framing someone
for something they hadn't done seems sorta worse than entrapping them
into repeating something that they had. Not sure why BLQ felt the need
to argue a false point with Tracy in the first place. Why not just tell
Tracy what she was planning to do? Knowing Tracy, she would have been
all in.
--
K
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.tv.general-hospital

On 6/21/2026 3:03 PM, Kaitlin wrote:

Congresswoman Willow P Tait has the brain of a planarian flatworm. Days
after Sidwell disappeared it finally dawned on the little ninny that her supply of stroke jabs had been cut off. Which begs the question of why
she would drag him up to the hospital for an appointment, when at any
minute he could recover from his "stroke."

And why have Felicia tell Willow she had applied for access to
communications devices for the locked-in on Drew's behalf, then in the
next breath tell her that it could take quite a long while for approval
to come through? If that was meant to show Willow in a flop sweat, too
late. She's been in a flop sweat since she started playing whack-a-mole trying to keep her drugging scheme contained. So, I refuse to get worked
up over communications devices until Liz or Felicia show up with them at Drew's door and he starts spelling SOS instead of blinking it.

At least Willow did not make up another nonsense excuse as to why she's
not willing to have Drew be able to communicate better. It seems odd
that having eye-blinked SOS not one of the characters has pushed harder
for Drew to start using a letter board or something similar. Especially
given the generally overly intrusive personalities of the main
characters. Wasn't Felicia one of the people he blinked at?

As for Willow pitching herself into the lake and claiming Tracy had
pushed her, Willow and Chase were both squawking about Tracy having
assaulted a "sitting congresswoman," the implication being that Tracy
should be charged for that crime (which carries a greater penalty)
rather than for assault of a member of the general public. Willow: "She attacked ME, a sitting congresswoman!" Chase: She attacked a sitting congresswoman!" Sitting congresswoman, my patootie. The only place that
fake congresswoman should be sitting is on a jail bunk.

The implication that it's somehow a worse offense because Willow is a
member of Congress seems like a stretch. It's not as if Tracy and Willow
were arguing *because* Willow is in Congress. It's purely personal. And
you are so right! Willow certainly does not seem to spend any time
actually in Congress, sitting or not.

It was really quite rich for BLQ to accuse Tracy of entrapping Willow
for behavior she's done in the past when BLQ is actively plotting to
frame Willow something she hadn't done. If you ask me, framing someone
for something they hadn't done seems sorta worse than entrapping them
into repeating something that they had. Not sure why BLQ felt the need
to argue a false point with Tracy in the first place. Why not just tell
Tracy what she was planning to do? Knowing Tracy, she would have been
all in.

Agreed. Tracy probably would praise Brook Lyn for her clever plan. Not
that I see it actually working. Even if the PC Police run with the
flimsy evidence against Willow, which is probable, won't that just super-charge Chase's savior complex regarding Willow? Especially as she tearfully professes her innocence to Chase? I see this plan backfiring.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.tv.general-hospital

SteveR wrote in <111gtma$33vrn$1@dont-email.me>:

On 6/21/2026 3:03 PM, Kaitlin wrote:

<snip>

It was really quite rich for BLQ to accuse Tracy of entrapping Willow
for behavior she's done in the past when BLQ is actively plotting to
frame Willow something she hadn't done. If you ask me, framing someone
for something they hadn't done seems sorta worse than entrapping them
into repeating something that they had. Not sure why BLQ felt the need
to argue a false point with Tracy in the first place. Why not just tell
Tracy what she was planning to do? Knowing Tracy, she would have been
all in.

Agreed. Tracy probably would praise Brook Lyn for her clever plan. Not
that I see it actually working. Even if the PC Police run with the
flimsy evidence against Willow, which is probable, won't that just super-charge Chase's savior complex regarding Willow? Especially as she tearfully professes her innocence to Chase? I see this plan backfiring.

What a great point! Of course Chase would rush to Willow's defense. And
no doubt he would succeed in proving her innocent because no crime was committed other than by Jordan, whose distracted driving caused the
incident. There's no way of proving that the driver of the oncoming car
saw Jordan run off the road and crash. The only person making a huge
deal of it is Curtis, for the sole purpose of sticking it to Isaiah.

If the writers wanted to have someone falsely accused of a crime, you'd
think they would have come up with an actual crime with real evidence
that could be presented at trial. Instead, the person who caused the
accident and her passenger are the only ones squawking about being "left
to die," and those two really don't know and can't prove that that's
true.

As for Jordan, you would think she would be at least a little hesitant
to back up Curtis's spurious accusations against Isaiah. After all, if
it hadn't been for Isaiah, Curtis might not have given up on Portia so
hastily, and Jordan wouldn't have "won" him back. Of course, it won't be
long before he dumps her yet again for failing to inform him of
something that's totally none of his business.
--
K
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2