We have never seen Isaiah do anything medically questionable.
With that in mind, it seems absurd for the ADA to pursue CurtisA vendetta.
There is no reason to believe he would ignore a person in need of medical attention. Of course, former cop Curtis will dig up just the right evidence to implicate Isaiah.
marika wrote in <EQLMR.9$QD1.6@fx13.iad>:
We have never seen Isaiah do anything medically questionable.
With that in mind, it seems absurd for the ADA to pursue Curtis-A vendetta.
The absurdity is that the DA's office isn't an investigative body.
Curtis should have taken his silly suspicions to a cop, not to an ADA.
When Cullum tried to get Turner to turn over the evidence to him from
the investigation into his shooting, she shut him down just on those grounds--the DA isn't an investigative body. So if Turner is aware of
that, why did she call Isaiah into her office to question him instead of telling Curtis to take his concerns to the police? It's not Turner's job
to question suspects or persons of interest, or even to decide who those suspects or persons of interest are.
There is no reason to believe he would ignore a person in need of medical
attention. Of course, former cop Curtis will dig up just the right evidence >> to implicate Isaiah.
Of course! And if he can't find any, he'll just make some up, or worse, ignore the need for evidence and dole out punishment to Isaiah himself.
I've never really liked Curtis, but only because he's always been such a judgy, self-righteous hypocrite. Now tho, he's really ventured around
the bend into psycho territory, telling Jordan that since the law won't
hand justice down to Isaiah for what he did to Jordan, he'll do it
himself. Poor Isaiah, whose only crime is his questionable taste in
women, will end up regretting the day he became involved with a psycho's wife.
The additional irony here is that he is familiar with law enforcement procedures, having been a private detective, and Jordan was a cop. Of course, she didnAt really understand her job then either, having falsified evidence against Cyrus. Deja vu all over again.
marika wrote in <EQLMR.9$QD1.6@fx13.iad>:
We have never seen Isaiah do anything medically questionable.
With that in mind, it seems absurd for the ADA to pursue CurtisrCO vendetta.
The absurdity is that the DA's office isn't an investigative body.
Curtis should have taken his silly suspicions to a cop, not to an ADA.
When Cullum tried to get Turner to turn over the evidence to him from
the investigation into his shooting, she shut him down just on those grounds--the DA isn't an investigative body. So if Turner is aware of
that, why did she call Isaiah into her office to question him instead of telling Curtis to take his concerns to the police? It's not Turner's job
to question suspects or persons of interest, or even to decide who those suspects or persons of interest are.
There is no reason to believe he would ignore a person in need of medical
attention. Of course, former cop Curtis will dig up just the right evidence >> to implicate Isaiah.
Of course! And if he can't find any, he'll just make some up, or worse, ignore the need for evidence and dole out punishment to Isaiah himself.
I've never really liked Curtis, but only because he's always been such a judgy, self-righteous hypocrite. Now tho, he's really ventured around
the bend into psycho territory, telling Jordan that since the law won't
hand justice down to Isaiah for what he did to Jordan, he'll do it
himself. Poor Isaiah, whose only crime is his questionable taste in
women, will end up regretting the day he became involved with a psycho's wife.
On 5/17/2026 2:31 PM, Kaitlin wrote:
marika wrote in <EQLMR.9$QD1.6@fx13.iad>:
We have never seen Isaiah do anything medically questionable.
With that in mind, it seems absurd for the ADA to pursue CurtisA vendetta.
The absurdity is that the DA's office isn't an investigative body.
Curtis should have taken his silly suspicions to a cop, not to an ADA.
When Cullum tried to get Turner to turn over the evidence to him from
the investigation into his shooting, she shut him down just on those
grounds--the DA isn't an investigative body. So if Turner is aware of
that, why did she call Isaiah into her office to question him instead of
telling Curtis to take his concerns to the police? It's not Turner's job
to question suspects or persons of interest, or even to decide who those
suspects or persons of interest are.
In New York, at least, the DA's office does sometimes do investigative
work. In my county, the DA's office has its own investigator on staff,
who will actively investigate for various reasons, such as filling in information not obtained by the police agency involved. The public
defender has an investigator on staff too.
There is no reason to believe he would ignore a person in need of medical >>> attention. Of course, former cop Curtis will dig up just the right evidence >>> to implicate Isaiah.
Of course! And if he can't find any, he'll just make some up, or worse,
ignore the need for evidence and dole out punishment to Isaiah himself.
I've never really liked Curtis, but only because he's always been such a
judgy, self-righteous hypocrite. Now tho, he's really ventured around
the bend into psycho territory, telling Jordan that since the law won't
hand justice down to Isaiah for what he did to Jordan, he'll do it
himself. Poor Isaiah, whose only crime is his questionable taste in
women, will end up regretting the day he became involved with a psycho's
wife.
Agreed. My dislike of Curtis's character keeps increasing. He's become unhinged, absolutely certain Isaiah is guilty based on evidence so
flimsy a judge correctly refused to sign a warrant based on it. Curtis
has obviously dismissed completely any possibility that he is wrong.
Even though Isaiah has never given the slightest hint he'd act like that. Didn't Curtis and Jordan fabricate evidence back in the day because they "knew" a defendant was guilty but could not get enough legit evidence against him? I'm also guessing that's where this plot line is going, as
you suggested. And today's episode adds another twist to this mess.
SteveR wrote in <10ugmse$3095i$1@dont-email.me>:
On 5/17/2026 2:31 PM, Kaitlin wrote:
marika wrote in <EQLMR.9$QD1.6@fx13.iad>:
We have never seen Isaiah do anything medically questionable.
With that in mind, it seems absurd for the ADA to pursue CurtisrCO vendetta.
The absurdity is that the DA's office isn't an investigative body.
Curtis should have taken his silly suspicions to a cop, not to an ADA.
When Cullum tried to get Turner to turn over the evidence to him from
the investigation into his shooting, she shut him down just on those
grounds--the DA isn't an investigative body. So if Turner is aware of
that, why did she call Isaiah into her office to question him instead of >>> telling Curtis to take his concerns to the police? It's not Turner's job >>> to question suspects or persons of interest, or even to decide who those >>> suspects or persons of interest are.
In New York, at least, the DA's office does sometimes do investigative
work. In my county, the DA's office has its own investigator on staff,
who will actively investigate for various reasons, such as filling in
information not obtained by the police agency involved. The public
defender has an investigator on staff too.
That's true in my state, too, and probably in most other states as well.
The DAs in my state have peace officers on their staff with authority to
make arrests, etc, but their purpose isn't to initiate investigations,
it's to support DAs in prosecution of cases. Sounds like a subtle distinction, but in practice, it really isn't. IAC, Turner is a lawyer,
not a cop, and would have no authority herself to determine persons of interest or suspects in either Cullum's shooting or in Jordan's
accident. Tho maybe she would in NY?
There is no reason to believe he would ignore a person in need of medical >>>> attention. Of course, former cop Curtis will dig up just the right evidence
to implicate Isaiah.
Of course! And if he can't find any, he'll just make some up, or worse,
ignore the need for evidence and dole out punishment to Isaiah himself.
I've never really liked Curtis, but only because he's always been such a >>> judgy, self-righteous hypocrite. Now tho, he's really ventured around
the bend into psycho territory, telling Jordan that since the law won't
hand justice down to Isaiah for what he did to Jordan, he'll do it
himself. Poor Isaiah, whose only crime is his questionable taste in
women, will end up regretting the day he became involved with a psycho's >>> wife.
Agreed. My dislike of Curtis's character keeps increasing. He's become
unhinged, absolutely certain Isaiah is guilty based on evidence so
flimsy a judge correctly refused to sign a warrant based on it. Curtis
has obviously dismissed completely any possibility that he is wrong.
Even though Isaiah has never given the slightest hint he'd act like that.
Didn't Curtis and Jordan fabricate evidence back in the day because they
"knew" a defendant was guilty but could not get enough legit evidence
against him? I'm also guessing that's where this plot line is going, as
you suggested. And today's episode adds another twist to this mess.
The fabricated evidence thing you're thinking of could be Curtis's and Jordan's attempt to frame Taggart** for something or other because Cyrus
put them up to it. Wasn't Cyrus blackmailing Jordan? Or maybe he had kidnapped TJ and was using that as leverage to get Jordan to do his
dirty work. I have only a vague recollection of all of that, but you're right. This Isaiah thing won't be Curtis's or Jordan's first fake
evidence rodeo, so to speak.
**Remember Taggart? The father who raised Trina who has now become
chopped liver, or at least nothing more than a footnote, in favor of
Curtis.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 52:00:22 |
| Calls: | 1,101 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,339 |
| Messages: | 276,090 |