• spoiler Tues Dec 2 2025

    From marika@marika5000@gmail.com to alt.tv.general-hospital on Tue Dec 2 20:47:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.general-hospital



    I am not going to say what happened today, especially for people who watch
    only on weekend catchups

    so watch to the end of the episode

    I almost didnrCOt look up

    Anyway, the cops said whoever shot Drew was a professional, no
    crimeofpassion

    That is some professional
    They missed


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From marika@marika5000@gmail.com to alt.tv.general-hospital on Wed Dec 3 16:37:13 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.general-hospital

    marika <marika5000@gmail.com> wrote:


    I am not going to say what happened today, especially for people who watch only on weekend catchups

    so watch to the end of the episode

    I almost didnrCOt look up

    Anyway, the cops said whoever shot Drew was a professional, no
    crimeofpassion

    That is some professional
    They missed




    Did she accept the job?
    If so, was her shooter (shooter 1) interrupted by another shooter (shooter
    2)

    EdwardrCOs gun has been forensically established as the weapon.

    Why would shooter 1 use EdwardrCOs gun, much less have access to it?

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From SteveR@SteveR3333@aol.com to alt.tv.general-hospital on Thu Dec 4 11:28:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.general-hospital

    On 12/3/2025 11:37 AM, marika wrote:
    marika <marika5000@gmail.com> wrote:


    I am not going to say what happened today, especially for people who watch >> only on weekend catchups

    so watch to the end of the episode

    I almost didnrCOt look up

    Anyway, the cops said whoever shot Drew was a professional, no
    crimeofpassion

    That is some professional
    They missed




    Did she accept the job?
    If so, was her shooter (shooter 1) interrupted by another shooter (shooter
    2)

    EdwardrCOs gun has been forensically established as the weapon.

    Why would shooter 1 use EdwardrCOs gun, much less have access to it?


    I did not even consider that question. It is odd that Edward's gun was
    used. Of course, that does make suspicion fall on a family member, which diverts attention and would confuse any investigator. I'd bet that the
    writers had not yet decided who the shooter or shooters were when this
    plot line began.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2