From Newsgroup: alt.sport.horse-racing

Anyone have any mathematical betting systems they care to share? (Not handicapping methods). Might be a fun discussion if anyone is still here.

Ionsalu NOT invited. Better he stay on "mute".
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.sport.horse-racing

On Friday, July 1, 2022 at 4:21:32 PM UTC+3, TPayne wrote:

Anyone have any mathematical betting systems they care to share? (Not handicapping methods). Might be a fun discussion if anyone is still here.

Ionsalu NOT invited. Better he stay on "mute".

Narcochiloco:
[Belated] Happy New Year to you!
You had no choice. In the end, you joined the mathematical cult of Ion rCLParpaluckrCY Saliu. He is the founder of betting mathematics. There are no MATHEMATICAL betting systems rCo except for ParpaluckrCOs systems.
And thatrCOs the point of contention for you and other mouth-foaming, jealous krooks. rCLThere ainrCOt no mathematics in betting, gambling, in general,rCY the likes of you mouth-foam vociferously.
As for handicapping, one can simply follow the tote. But the rCLfavoriterCY wins in less than 30% of races. Alas! Most races are for 6 or fewer nags!
Ion Saliu (royalty name: Parpaluck)
Founder of Equestrian Mathematics
The Best Horse Bettor in History
rCo https://saliu.com/horseracing.html
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.sport.horse-racing

On 7/7/2022 4:02 AM, Ion Saliu wrote:

On Friday, July 1, 2022 at 4:21:32 PM UTC+3, TPayne wrote:

Anyone have any mathematical betting systems they care to share? (Not
handicapping methods). Might be a fun discussion if anyone is still here.

Ionsalu NOT invited. Better he stay on "mute".

Narcochiloco:

[Belated] Happy New Year to you!

You had no choice. In the end, you joined the mathematical cult of Ion rCLParpaluckrCY Saliu. He is the founder of betting mathematics. There are no MATHEMATICAL betting systems rCo except for ParpaluckrCOs systems.

And thatrCOs the point of contention for you and other mouth-foaming, jealous krooks. rCLThere ainrCOt no mathematics in betting, gambling, in general,rCY the likes of you mouth-foam vociferously.

As for handicapping, one can simply follow the tote. But the rCLfavoriterCY wins in less than 30% of races. Alas! Most races are for 6 or fewer nags!

Ion Saliu (royalty name: Parpaluck)
Founder of Equestrian Mathematics
The Best Horse Bettor in History
rCo https://saliu.com/horseracing.html

If you had any brains, you'd realize that if you KNOW the favorite wins
30% of the time, that fact can be the basis of a successful mathematical system. I do admit though, that there are NUMEROUS pitfalls to ANY mathematical system, the best that can be hoped for is an attempt to
slightly alter them.

--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.sport.horse-racing

On Sunday, July 10, 2022 at 3:29:24 PM UTC+3, TPayne wrote:

On 7/7/2022 4:02 AM, Ion Saliu wrote:

On Friday, July 1, 2022 at 4:21:32 PM UTC+3, TPayne wrote:

Anyone have any mathematical betting systems they care to share? (Not
handicapping methods). Might be a fun discussion if anyone is still here. >>
Ionsalu NOT invited. Better he stay on "mute".

Narcochiloco:

[Belated] Happy New Year to you!

You had no choice. In the end, you joined the mathematical cult of Ion rCLParpaluckrCY Saliu. He is the founder of betting mathematics. There are no MATHEMATICAL betting systems rCo except for ParpaluckrCOs systems.

And thatrCOs the point of contention for you and other mouth-foaming, jealous krooks. rCLThere ainrCOt no mathematics in betting, gambling, in general,rCY the likes of you mouth-foam vociferously.

As for handicapping, one can simply follow the tote. But the rCLfavoriterCY wins in less than 30% of races. Alas! Most races are for 6 or fewer nags!

Ion Saliu (royalty name: Parpaluck)
Founder of Equestrian Mathematics
The Best Horse Bettor in History
rCo https://saliu.com/horseracing.html

If you had any brains, you'd realize that if you KNOW the favorite wins
30% of the time, that fact can be the basis of a successful mathematical system. I do admit though, that there are NUMEROUS pitfalls to ANY mathematical system, the best that can be hoped for is an attempt to slightly alter them.

Narcochiloco:
IF you had brains rCo yourCOd know the difference between odds and house edge. When the favorite wins, the payout is 1/1 at best; but the odds are 1/3. The house edge is far worse than in roulette. The mathematical systems for such disadvantages are not for a decrepit critter like you.
IrCOve always been open to other gamblersrCO ideas. Like this rCyLOGIC Horse Betting SystemrCO by a member of my forums:
rCo https://saliu.com/bbs/messages/649.html

Ion Saliu (royalty name: Parpaluck)
rCo Founder of Equestrian Mathematics
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.sport.horse-racing

On 7/12/2022 4:35 AM, Ion Saliu wrote:

When the favorite wins, the payout is 1/1 at best;

Totally ridiculous statement by the supposedly "expert"!


--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.sport.horse-racing

On Friday, July 22, 2022 at 5:34:39 PM UTC+3, TPayne wrote:

On 7/12/2022 4:35 AM, Ion Saliu wrote:

When the favorite wins, the payout is 1/1 at best;

Totally ridiculous statement by the supposedly "expert"!

Narcochiloco:
I said: rCLIF you had brainsrCY. Evidently, you donrCOt. The rCLat best 1-to-1rCY is an average. Just go one day to an Off-Track Wagering (OTW) parlor. Look around at several races rCo but do you have rCLeyesrCY? The most races, the rCyfavouriterCO wins are 6 nags or under. In a majority of such cases, the favorite is rCyodds-onrCO; something like 4/5, or even 3/5rCa
Look on, rCycochiloco!
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.sport.horse-racing

On 7/27/2022 5:54 AM, Ion Saliu wrote:

On Friday, July 22, 2022 at 5:34:39 PM UTC+3, TPayne wrote:

On 7/12/2022 4:35 AM, Ion Saliu wrote:

When the favorite wins, the payout is 1/1 at best;

Totally ridiculous statement by the supposedly "expert"!

Narcochiloco:

I said: rCLIF you had brainsrCY. Evidently, you donrCOt. The rCLat best 1-to-1rCY is an average. Just go one day to an Off-Track Wagering (OTW) parlor. Look around at several races rCo but do you have rCLeyesrCY? The most races, the rCyfavouriterCO wins are 6 nags or under. In a majority of such cases, the favorite is rCyodds-onrCO; something like 4/5, or even 3/5rCa

Look on, rCycochiloco!

Bullshit. And by the way genius, even if you are correct (you are not) profitable wagering IS possible.

If you have any extra time, Idiot, brush up on your Spanish. "cochiloco"
means "Siesta".

--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.sport.horse-racing

On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 7:05:16 PM UTC+3, TPayne wrote:

On 7/27/2022 5:54 AM, Ion Saliu wrote:

On Friday, July 22, 2022 at 5:34:39 PM UTC+3, TPayne wrote:

On 7/12/2022 4:35 AM, Ion Saliu wrote:

When the favorite wins, the payout is 1/1 at best;

Totally ridiculous statement by the supposedly "expert"!

Narcochiloco:

I said: rCLIF you had brainsrCY. Evidently, you donrCOt. The rCLat best 1-to-1rCY is an average. Just go one day to an Off-Track Wagering (OTW) parlor. Look around at several races rCo but do you have rCLeyesrCY? The most races, the rCyfavouriterCO wins are 6 nags or under. In a majority of such cases, the favorite is rCyodds-onrCO; something like 4/5, or even 3/5rCa

Look on, rCycochiloco!

Bullshit. And by the way genius, even if you are correct (you are not) profitable wagering IS possible.

If you have any extra time, Idiot, brush up on your Spanish. "cochiloco" means "Siesta".

Narcochiloco:
Indeed, rCLprofitable wagering IS possiblerCY even with a simple system like the rCLFREE LOGICrCY. But, the caveat. I said: rCLIF you had brainsrCY. Obviously, you ainrCOt got any!
Wake up, rCLkrazy pigrCY (i.e., rCLcochi(no) locorCY)! BBRRRRRRRRAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2