1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. alt.privacy.anon-server

  • Let's see if this gets through...

    From Whoever@anon@internet.invalid to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.free.newsservers,alt.privacy.anon-server on Sat Sep 26 12:07:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    There never was a legitimate reason to ban anonymous posting to this group. Make it possible only through a Tor hidden service, or M2N. Maybe require a hashcash PoW before a post is accepted.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nomen Nescio@nobody@dizum.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.free.newsservers,alt.privacy.anon-server on Sat Sep 26 23:24:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    In article <20260926.120750.c864d42c@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
    Whoever <anon@internet.invalid> wrote:

    There never was a legitimate reason to ban anonymous posting to this group. Make it possible only through a Tor hidden service, or M2N. Maybe require a hashcash PoW before a post is accepted.

    What? Anonymous posting has never been banned in any of these groups.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nomen Nescio@nobody@dizum.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.free.newsservers,alt.privacy.anon-server on Sun Sep 27 10:10:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    On 26 Sep 2026, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> posted some news:caaadf7e7242b873e42685c794e5dff1@dizum.com:

    In article <20260926.120750.c864d42c@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
    Whoever <anon@internet.invalid> wrote:

    There never was a legitimate reason to ban anonymous posting to this
    group. Make it possible only through a Tor hidden service, or M2N.
    Maybe require a hashcash PoW before a post is accepted.

    What? Anonymous posting has never been banned in any of these groups.

    Don't be too sure.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2