Yamn2 Remailer <noreply@mixmin.net> wrote in >news:20260916.072549.9f486b85@mixmin.net:
That would mean that
a) OmniMix can post through tcpreset, which I doubt,
and
It certainly can. Just change the m2n gateway on the Anon tab. That's >where it begins. Use any combo of legacy m2n servers, post sails right
on thru no dupes. Any decent news client works okay.
Add tcpreset to the group, you can get an occasional dupe if another
server posts the article first. If tcpreset posts first, no dupes.
Why is that bible spam originating from tcpreset only posted here?
Just somebody being a knucklehead to piss off Gabx.
Fritz Wuehler tales:
you have to decide whether those 5 sent copies are sufficient to get
the
job done, as retries may result in duplicate Usenet articles, which
Gab
doesn't tolerate.
I don't like these double posts too.
Fritz Wuehler wrote:
you have to decide whether those 5 sent copies are sufficient to get
the job done, as retries may result in duplicate Usenet articles,
which Gab doesn't tolerate.
That's an incorrect assumption because many people will not know to
look in a log to see what happened. If their news client reports that the post did not succeed they will simply send it again.
Suspect the above isn't all that is happening here.
This seems to be a faulty combination, random dupes.
"mail2news-at-dizum.com,mail2news-at-neodome.net,mail2news-at- mixmin.net,mail2news-at-tcpreset.net"
The below, no dupes.
"mail2news-at-dizum.com,mail2news-at-neodome.net,mail2news-at-
mixmin.net"
I hope nobody tolerates that !
Thanks for the infos by the way.
Another interesting observation.
Why are the reported dupes occurring primarily in a.p.a-s?
On 15 Sep 2026, anon <noreply@mixmin.net> posted some news:20260915.220918.153cacf6@mixmin.net:
Fritz Wuehler wrote:
you have to decide whether those 5 sent copies are sufficient to
get the job done, as retries may result in duplicate Usenet
articles, which Gab doesn't tolerate.
That's an incorrect assumption because many people will not know to
look in a log to see what happened. If their news client reports
that the post did not succeed they will simply send it again.
Suspect the above isn't all that is happening here.
This seems to be a faulty combination, random dupes.
"mail2news-at-dizum.com,mail2news-at-neodome.net,mail2news-at-
mixmin.net,mail2news-at-tcpreset.net"
The below, no dupes.
"mail2news-at-dizum.com,mail2news-at-neodome.net,mail2news-at-
mixmin.net"
I hope nobody tolerates that !
Thanks for the infos by the way.
Another interesting observation.
Why are the reported dupes occurring primarily in a.p.a-s?
'cause people are assholes.
anon tales:
Fritz Wuehler wrote:
you have to decide whether those 5 sent copies are sufficient to
get
the job done, as retries may result in duplicate Usenet articles,
which Gab doesn't tolerate.
That's an incorrect assumption because many people will not know to
look
in a log to see what happened. If their news client reports that the
post did not succeed they will simply send it again.
Suspect the above isn't all that is happening here.
This seems to be a faulty combination, random dupes.
"mail2news-at-dizum.com,mail2news-at-neodome.net,mail2news-at-
mixmin.net,mail2news-at-tcpreset.net"
The below, no dupes.
"mail2news-at-dizum.com,mail2news-at-neodome.net,mail2news-at-
mixmin.net"
I hope nobody tolerates that !
Thanks for the infos by the way.
Another interesting observation.
Why are the reported dupes occurring primarily in a.p.a-s?
It's because omnimix users never had so manies m2n gateways. They are
idiots, click send repeatedly as donkeys without any clue of what a
m2n is or remailers.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 122:41:36 |
| Calls: | 1,194 |
| Files: | 1,352 |
| Messages: | 290,379 |