1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. alt.privacy.anon-server

  • Is news.tcpreset.net adding 'X-No-Archive: yes' to all posts?

    From Anonymous@anonymous@nowhere.invalid to alt.privacy.anon-server on Sun Aug 2 21:32:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    It looks that way.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nomen Nescio@nobody@dizum.com to alt.privacy.anon-server on Mon Aug 3 04:54:08 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    On 02 Aug 2026, Anonymous <anonymous@nowhere.invalid> posted some news:114or2r$di8$1@paganini.bofh.team:

    It looks that way.

    Doesn't matter. It's ignored by all but the most pedantic news server operators.

    Waste of bits really.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gabx@victor@virebent.tcpreset to alt.privacy.anon-server on Mon Aug 3 13:47:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    Nomen Nescio wrote:
    Doesn't matter. It's ignored by all but the most pedantic news server operators.

    It is there because some archives still observe it,
    as well as for historical reasons.

    Waste of bits really.


    Maybe ! :)

    Gabx
    --
    https://contact.virebent.art
    https://www.virebent.art
    https://news.tcpreset.net
    https://jabber.tcpreset.net
    https://virebent.noblogs.org/
    https://infosec.exchange/@virebent
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Librarian2025@librarian2025@cock.li to alt.privacy.anon-server on Mon Aug 3 07:54:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server


    Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> writes:

    On 02 Aug 2026, Anonymous <anonymous@nowhere.invalid> posted some news:114or2r$di8$1@paganini.bofh.team:

    It looks that way.

    Doesn't matter. It's ignored by all but the most pedantic news server operators.

    Most pedantic ones follow RFCs, and RFCs say nothing about X-No-Archive.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2