• @invalid.com

    From SEC3@admin@sec3.net to alt.privacy.anon-server on Sun May 24 12:19:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    I've noticed recent somebody trying to send through the
    mailrelay.archiade.net
    relay service.

    They are using the bogus From address somebody@invalid.com

    These emails won't be delivered. Postfix won't allow it
    because invalid.com is, well, invalid. By design. It doesn't have
    an A record. It's deliberably designed for testing purposes and
    is intended to fail.

    I personally would recommend @anonymous.com
    But anything with an A record would work.

    dig A dontcuminme.com

    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    dontcuminme.com. 600 IN A 52.20.84.62

    That one would work perfectly :)
    --
    SEC3

    My PGP key:
    <https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-keyid/C94D423355A83863>

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gabx@gabx@victor.virebent to alt.privacy.anon-server on Sun May 24 18:36:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    SEC3 wrote:

    I've noticed recent somebody trying to send through the mailrelay.archiade.net
    relay service.

    They are using the bogus From address somebody@invalid.com

    These emails won't be delivered. Postfix won't allow it
    because invalid.com is, well, invalid. By design. It doesn't have
    an A record. It's deliberably designed for testing purposes and
    is intended to fail.

    I personally would recommend @anonymous.com
    But anything with an A record would work.

    dig A dontcuminme.com

    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    dontcuminme.com. 600 IN A 52.20.84.62

    That one would work perfectly :)


    [NEW]
    smtp://qee4i7sags6phsvb2yodwecfj7noimfhhalsjktsvikrwotxzis3raad.onion

    Best Regards
    Gabx
    --
    _______________________________
    https://contact.virebent.art
    https://www.virebent.art
    https://archives.virebent.art
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gab Virebent@gabriel1@virebent.art to alt.privacy.anon-server on Sun May 24 17:36:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    On Sun, 24 May 2026 18:36:58 0200, Gabx <gabx@victor.virebent> wrote:

    [NEW]
    smtp://qee4i7sags6phsvb2yodwecfj7noimfhhalsjktsvikrwotxzis3raad.onion

    Its name is RASMUS.

    Gabx

    --- Digital Signature --- b0aWbxAt+mPAzGblPoCWi/ZswovaDWlW0QLnraYYlqCC4O9zPLZiUezXshS5i3y2zVinLO6gLUcpde81bwzYBw==

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From SEC3@admin@sec3.net to alt.privacy.anon-server on Sun May 24 17:56:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    On 5/24/26 12:36, Gabx wrote:

    [NEW]
    smtp://qee4i7sags6phsvb2yodwecfj7noimfhhalsjktsvikrwotxzis3raad.onion

    Thank you. That onion is alreasy listed at my relays list.

    <https://www.sec3.net/misc/mail-relays.txt>
    --
    SEC3

    My PGP key:
    <https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-keyid/C94D423355A83863>
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nomen Nescio@nobody@dizum.com to alt.privacy.anon-server on Mon May 25 00:52:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    In article <10uv9fj$1q37e$1@news.tcpreset.net>
    Gabx <gabx@victor.virebent> wrote:

    SEC3 wrote:

    I've noticed recent somebody trying to send through the mailrelay.archiade.net
    relay service.

    They are using the bogus From address somebody@invalid.com

    These emails won't be delivered. Postfix won't allow it
    because invalid.com is, well, invalid. By design. It doesn't have
    an A record. It's deliberably designed for testing purposes and
    is intended to fail.

    I personally would recommend @anonymous.com
    But anything with an A record would work.

    dig A dontcuminme.com

    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    dontcuminme.com. 600 IN A 52.20.84.62

    That one would work perfectly :)


    [NEW]
    smtp://qee4i7sags6phsvb2yodwecfj7noimfhhalsjktsvikrwotxzis3raad.onion

    Best Regards
    Gabx

    Nice, thanks.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nomen Nescio@nobody@dizum.com to alt.privacy.anon-server on Mon May 25 14:08:31 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    In article <10uv9fj$1q37e$1@news.tcpreset.net>
    Gabx <gabx@victor.virebent> wrote:


    [NEW]
    smtp://qee4i7sags6phsvb2yodwecfj7noimfhhalsjktsvikrwotxzis3raad.onion


    It sens to send fine, but sending tests to the dizum and neodome m2n
    servers never show up.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gabx@mail2news@virebent.invalid to alt.privacy.anon-server on Mon May 25 21:05:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    If you see this message, I solved it!

    :)
    --
    Gabx


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gabx@mail2news@virebent.invalid to alt.privacy.anon-server on Mon May 25 21:14:47 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    All emails have been delivered

    - mail2news@dizum.com raA sent via smtp.dizum.com
    - remailer@dizum.com (x2)

    The SMTP_BIN variable was empty.
    Now hardcoded in smtp_tor script.

    Auguri ! ;)
    --
    Gabx


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From darwin@darwin@com.invalid to alt.privacy.anon-server on Tue May 26 07:55:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    On 25 May 2026, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> posted some news:95fab38b163bdb5dfde15260bda538b7@dizum.com:

    In article <10uv9fj$1q37e$1@news.tcpreset.net>
    Gabx <gabx@victor.virebent> wrote:


    [NEW]
    smtp://qee4i7sags6phsvb2yodwecfj7noimfhhalsjktsvikrwotxzis3raad.onion


    It sens to send fine, but sending tests to the dizum and neodome m2n
    servers never show up.

    You're not doing something right then.

    Maybe check with the domain owner for further assistance.

    <https://web.archive.org/web/20190330003841/http://invalid.com/>

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nomen Nescio@nobody@dizum.com to alt.privacy.anon-server on Wed May 27 00:25:41 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    In article <20260525211445.6243440125@qee4i7sags6phsvb2yodwecfj7noimfhhalsjktsvikrwotxzis3raad.onion>
    Gabx <mail2news@virebent.invalid> wrote:

    All emails have been delivered

    - mail2news@dizum.com raA sent via smtp.dizum.com
    - remailer@dizum.com (x2)

    The SMTP_BIN variable was empty.
    Now hardcoded in smtp_tor script.

    Auguri ! ;)


    Working now, thanks again.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nomen Nescio@nobody@dizum.com to alt.privacy.anon-server on Wed May 27 03:59:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    In article <2d13eeb793fad88a9296e9762729c0df@dizum.com>
    darwin <darwin@com.invalid> wrote:

    On 25 May 2026, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> posted some news:95fab38b163bdb5dfde15260bda538b7@dizum.com:

    In article <10uv9fj$1q37e$1@news.tcpreset.net>
    Gabx <gabx@victor.virebent> wrote:


    [NEW]
    smtp://qee4i7sags6phsvb2yodwecfj7noimfhhalsjktsvikrwotxzis3raad.onion


    It sens to send fine, but sending tests to the dizum and neodome m2n servers never show up.

    You're not doing something right then.

    Incorrect assumption.

    Gabx posted about a fix to his SMTP code, and it's working now.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nomen Nescio@nobody@dizum.com to alt.privacy.anon-server on Wed May 27 17:51:22 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    On 26 May 2026, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> posted some news:132f69863b48fa2af985b3eed4ea87cd@dizum.com:

    In article <2d13eeb793fad88a9296e9762729c0df@dizum.com>
    darwin <darwin@com.invalid> wrote:

    On 25 May 2026, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> posted some
    news:95fab38b163bdb5dfde15260bda538b7@dizum.com:

    In article <10uv9fj$1q37e$1@news.tcpreset.net>
    Gabx <gabx@victor.virebent> wrote:


    [NEW]
    smtp://qee4i7sags6phsvb2yodwecfj7noimfhhalsjktsvikrwotxzis3raad.oni
    on


    It sens to send fine, but sending tests to the dizum and neodome
    m2n servers never show up.

    You're not doing something right then.

    Incorrect assumption.

    Gabx posted about a fix to his SMTP code, and it's working now.

    You're all retards.

    https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2606.html

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2