From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server
Anne Frank <
bounce.me@n2n.oc2mx.net> wrote:
: Alex de Joode wrote:
What's In A Name? <none@example.com> wrote:
: On 17 May 2026, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
:
Back online.
:
: We wish! But alas, no.
There is a concerted attack to fill the mailq. So please be patient a get used to degraded reliability untill the person get's sick of this.
(clean up of un-addressable messages has been sped-up)
:
: A proper postfix installation should handle this automatically,
This is free service, I do believe you have great uptime :) so I guess postfix runs fine normally, I've updated the settings for this 'situation'.
: or ask on the postfix mailing list for help.
Thanks.
: And what about rate-limiting, per IP-address?
I can do that, however I would have to include new IP's for new remailers/pingers etc. As stated earlier, this is low maintenance, if it works, great. If not, not. You get what you pay for :) (nothing ..)
Cheers,
Alex
--
dizum.com - Internet Problem Providers since 1994. (tor|mail2news|remailer)
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2