• How to abort OmniMix action

    From Anonymous User@noreply@dirge.harmsk.com to alt.privacy.anon-server on Sun Apr 19 09:01:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    Hello,

    is there a way to stop processing of an outgoing mail message in case I
    pressed my mail / news client's send button accidentally?

    Thanks!

    Keep on with that great tool!

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From noreply@noreply@mixmin.net to alt.privacy.anon-server on Sun Apr 19 15:34:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    On Sun, 19 Apr 2026 09:01:29 -0400, Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote in <20260419.090129.08a977e7@dirge.harmsk.com>:
    is there a way to stop processing of an outgoing mail message in case I >pressed my mail / news client's send button accidentally?

    not sure if omnimix provides its own "immediately terminate sending
    outgoing messages" option apart from clicking the "stop tor" button,
    but because i always use tor browser, simply closing tor browser is
    the surest way to instantly disconnect . . . but that only works if
    none of the copies "mail was sent in x chunks" got through, because
    of the strong overall reliability of the anonymous remailer network
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Anonymous User@noreply@dirge.harmsk.com to alt.privacy.anon-server on Sun Apr 19 12:01:37 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    In article <20260419.153452.414f9ef7@mixmin.net> D wrote:
    On Sun, 19 Apr 2026 09:01:29 -0400, Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> >wrote in <20260419.090129.08a977e7@dirge.harmsk.com>:
    is there a way to stop processing of an outgoing mail message in case I >>pressed my mail / news client's send button accidentally?

    not sure if omnimix provides its own "immediately terminate sending
    outgoing messages" option apart from clicking the "stop tor" button,
    but because i always use tor browser, simply closing tor browser is
    the surest way to instantly disconnect . . . but that only works if
    none of the copies "mail was sent in x chunks" got through, because
    of the strong overall reliability of the anonymous remailer network

    That's exactly how I also stop unintentional transmissions. When
    sending anonymous messages OM always starts with a time-consuming
    retrieval of MX server addresses of all entry remailers involved before
    packet delivery starts. That's the period where the "Stop Tor" button
    is your kill switch.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From noreply@noreply@mixmin.net to alt.privacy.anon-server on Sun Apr 19 18:24:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    On Sun, 19 Apr 2026 12:01:37 -0400, Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:
    In article <20260419.153452.414f9ef7@mixmin.net> D wrote:
    On Sun, 19 Apr 2026 09:01:29 -0400, Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> >>wrote in <20260419.090129.08a977e7@dirge.harmsk.com>:
    is there a way to stop processing of an outgoing mail message in case I >>>pressed my mail / news client's send button accidentally?

    not sure if omnimix provides its own "immediately terminate sending >>outgoing messages" option apart from clicking the "stop tor" button,
    but because i always use tor browser, simply closing tor browser is
    the surest way to instantly disconnect . . . but that only works if
    none of the copies "mail was sent in x chunks" got through, because
    of the strong overall reliability of the anonymous remailer network

    That's exactly how I also stop unintentional transmissions. When
    sending anonymous messages OM always starts with a time-consuming
    retrieval of MX server addresses of all entry remailers involved before >packet delivery starts. That's the period where the "Stop Tor" button
    is your kill switch.

    if omnimix requires using tor in order to make this "stop the presses"
    feature available to users, it seems by design to encourage tor usage
    when using anonymous remailers, probably everyone is using tor anyway, https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html estimates
    about four million tor users worldwide, tor helps omnimix work better

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Anonymous User@noreply@dirge.harmsk.com to alt.privacy.anon-server on Sun Apr 19 17:36:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    D <noreply@mixmin.net> wrote:
    On Sun, 19 Apr 2026 12:01:37 -0400, Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:
    In article <20260419.153452.414f9ef7@mixmin.net> D wrote:
    On Sun, 19 Apr 2026 09:01:29 -0400, Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com>
    wrote in <20260419.090129.08a977e7@dirge.harmsk.com>:
    is there a way to stop processing of an outgoing mail message in case I >>>>pressed my mail / news client's send button accidentally?

    not sure if omnimix provides its own "immediately terminate sending >>>outgoing messages" option apart from clicking the "stop tor" button,
    but because i always use tor browser, simply closing tor browser is
    the surest way to instantly disconnect . . . but that only works if
    none of the copies "mail was sent in x chunks" got through, because
    of the strong overall reliability of the anonymous remailer network

    That's exactly how I also stop unintentional transmissions. When
    sending anonymous messages OM always starts with a time-consuming
    retrieval of MX server addresses of all entry remailers involved before >>packet delivery starts. That's the period where the "Stop Tor" button
    is your kill switch.

    if omnimix requires using tor in order to make this "stop the presses" >feature available to users, it seems by design to encourage tor usage
    when using anonymous remailers, probably everyone is using tor anyway, >https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html estimates
    about four million tor users worldwide, tor helps omnimix work better

    So there's no reason to pull the network plug. :-)

    Thanks to both of you!

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nomen Nescio@nobody@dizum.com to alt.privacy.anon-server on Tue Apr 21 03:39:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    On 19 Apr 2026, Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> posted some news:20260419.090129.08a977e7@dirge.harmsk.com:

    Hello,

    is there a way to stop processing of an outgoing mail message in case I pressed my mail / news client's send button accidentally?

    Thanks!

    Keep on with that great tool!

    You can try killing Tor, but chances are one chunk escaped by the time you begin intervention.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joe Fretzl@jfretzl@nowhere.invalid to alt.privacy.anon-server on Wed Apr 22 08:31:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    On 20 Apr 2026, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> posted some news:3e3b7b558e8d291c6762deadc49393dd@dizum.com:

    On 19 Apr 2026, Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> posted some news:20260419.090129.08a977e7@dirge.harmsk.com:

    Hello,

    is there a way to stop processing of an outgoing mail message in case
    I pressed my mail / news client's send button accidentally?

    Thanks!

    Keep on with that great tool!

    You can try killing Tor, but chances are one chunk escaped by the time
    you begin intervention.

    +1

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Anonymous User@noreply@dirge.harmsk.com to alt.privacy.anon-server on Wed Apr 22 19:15:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
    On 19 Apr 2026, Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> posted some >news:20260419.090129.08a977e7@dirge.harmsk.com:

    Hello,

    is there a way to stop processing of an outgoing mail message in case I
    pressed my mail / news client's send button accidentally?

    Thanks!

    Keep on with that great tool!

    You can try killing Tor, but chances are one chunk escaped by the time you >begin intervention.

    The Log list immediately tells you whether any chunks were sent.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J@J@M to alt.privacy.anon-server on Thu Apr 23 03:13:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    On Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:15:10 -0400, Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:
    Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
    On 19 Apr 2026, Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> posted some >>news:20260419.090129.08a977e7@dirge.harmsk.com:
    is there a way to stop processing of an outgoing mail message in case I
    pressed my mail / news client's send button accidentally?

    You can try killing Tor, but chances are one chunk escaped by the time you >>begin intervention.

    The Log list immediately tells you whether any chunks were sent.

    and follow-up corrections are commonplace . . . also, when not in use,
    stopping omnimix ("stop" button) quote: "stops the omnimix nntp, smtp,
    pop3, http, and dns server" is another more preemptive way to prevent
    sending messages . . . and usenet is very casual and informal (almost
    entirely troll farm/botnet auto-ignore "nothing burger"), which makes
    it easy for usenet contributors to work routinely in an uninterrupted
    and very relaxed atmosphere, so if you post something with some minor
    error, leave it for your readers, lurkers, researchers, to figure out
    on their own . . . the only serious thing on earth is death and taxes

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J@J@M to alt.privacy.anon-server on Sat Apr 25 15:50:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    On Sun, 19 Apr 2026 09:01:29 -0400, Anonymous User wrote:
    is there a way to stop processing of an outgoing mail message in case I pressed my mail / news client's send button accidentally?

    p.s. mouse-over tool tip on the omnimix "simulate" button displays:

    re/starts the omnimix http and dns server in
    normal and the nntp, smtp and pop3 server in
    simulation mode.
    with nntp and smtp no anonymous messages
    are sent, instead an error is returned to the
    client. the pop3 proxy sends rset before quit
    to remove all deletion marks, that may previously
    be set by the client.

    this "simulate" mode prevents sending, but keeps localhost open for
    newsreader clients to continue reading from nntp newsservers, turns
    indicator lights and tray icon yellow, click "start" to send, click
    "simulate" to prevent (no need to stop tor which is always enabled)

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Anonymous User@noreply@dirge.harmsk.com to alt.privacy.anon-server on Sun Apr 26 05:53:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    D <J@M> wrote:
    On Sun, 19 Apr 2026 09:01:29 -0400, Anonymous User wrote:
    is there a way to stop processing of an outgoing mail message in case I
    pressed my mail / news client's send button accidentally?

    p.s. mouse-over tool tip on the omnimix "simulate" button displays:

    re/starts the omnimix http and dns server in
    normal and the nntp, smtp and pop3 server in
    simulation mode.
    with nntp and smtp no anonymous messages
    are sent, instead an error is returned to the
    client. the pop3 proxy sends rset before quit
    to remove all deletion marks, that may previously
    be set by the client.

    this "simulate" mode prevents sending, but keeps localhost open for >newsreader clients to continue reading from nntp newsservers, turns
    indicator lights and tray icon yellow, click "start" to send, click >"simulate" to prevent (no need to stop tor which is always enabled)

    That's very helpful while testing OM's internal message processing.
    But servers have to finish processing of pending messages before they
    finally switch to simulation mode.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J@J@M to alt.privacy.anon-server on Sun Apr 26 18:47:47 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    On Sun, 26 Apr 2026 05:53:51 -0400, Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:
    D <J@M> wrote:
    On Sun, 19 Apr 2026 09:01:29 -0400, Anonymous User wrote:
    is there a way to stop processing of an outgoing mail message in case I
    pressed my mail / news client's send button accidentally?

    p.s. mouse-over tool tip on the omnimix "simulate" button displays:

    re/starts the omnimix http and dns server in
    normal and the nntp, smtp and pop3 server in
    simulation mode.
    with nntp and smtp no anonymous messages
    are sent, instead an error is returned to the
    client. the pop3 proxy sends rset before quit
    to remove all deletion marks, that may previously
    be set by the client.

    this "simulate" mode prevents sending, but keeps localhost open for >>newsreader clients to continue reading from nntp newsservers, turns >>indicator lights and tray icon yellow, click "start" to send, click >>"simulate" to prevent (no need to stop tor which is always enabled)

    That's very helpful while testing OM's internal message processing.
    But servers have to finish processing of pending messages before they
    finally switch to simulation mode.

    i've never used omnimix in "simulate" mode, it's either "start" or "stop",
    but this mouse-over tool tip, omnimix > stateint > del > "never" displays:

    >never<
    deletion of the remailer packet pool before/after mixmaster/yamn calls.
    the remailer pool directory ('mix\pool'), where mixmaster and yamn put
    newly created packets, are routinely cleared before and after processing to
    avoid unauthorized access.
    but keeping those files may be useful in high security settings where
    messages composed on an isolated offline computer are there converted
    into encrypted remailer packets, which then, to be forwarded to the remailer
    network, can be transferred to an online computer on a removable device.
    at the offline computer select 'never' and switch to simulation mode to
    avoid unsuccessful sending attempts while creating remailer packets. then
    move those files to the online system's remailer pool folder, where you have
    to select 'after' instead of 'always' to keep the injected files for delivery
    e.g. with the next processed (dummy) message.
    default: always

    (using Tor Browser 15.0.10) https://www.danner-net.de/omom/tutorremailoffline.htm
    OmniMix * Tutorial * Remailing * Offline Encoding PreviousTopNext
    There may be situations where it's impossible to rule out that the online >computer system is compromized, and where it may even bear unacceptable risks >to move the portable OmniMix system with all its executables back and forth >between that online computer and the hardened offline device where your secret >messages reside.
    In such cases it would be favourable to install a second OmniMix instance on >that insular device in order to create all encryption protected remailer >packets there without having to fear being bugged. The resulting text files are
    then safely transferred to the online computer on a removable device and from >there forwarded to the remailer network.
    To get that working you first you have to ensure that at the offline computer >all relevant remailer statistics text files are up-to-date. So copy at least >the Mixmaster and Yamn statistics files mlist.txt.raw_mix and >pubring.mix.raw_mix resp. mlist2.txt.raw_yam and pubring.mix.raw_yam from your >online system's 'mix' folder to the offline installation. Then, as the remailer
    pool directory of the OmniMix system ('mix\pool'), in which Mixmaster and Yamn >store newly created packets, is routinely cleared before and after processing >to avoid unauthorized access, further adjustments have to be made to get hold >of these files. Go to the StateInt tab and change Del(ete) to 'Never' to keep >newly created remailer packets after processing. Now switch to Simulation Mode >to avoid unsuccessful mailing attempts and send your messages to OmniMix to >convert them into remailer packets.
    Finally relocate all the resulting files to the online system's remailer pool >folder, where you have to select Del(ete) 'After' instead of 'Always' to >preserve the injected files for delivery e.g. with the next processed (dummy) >message.
    Be aware that with Del(ete) set to 'Before' or 'Never' your remailer chunks >remain undeleted even after closing OmniMix! So take care.
    [end quoted plain text]

    so while in "simulate" mode, messages are processed into mailable packets,
    but those packets are not sent, e.g., by selecting "simulate", and "never" delete packets (temporarily stored in "...\omnimix\mix\pool\"), then send
    a test message, and after the nntp posting error, unmailed packets appear
    in the pool folder . . . but i'm only a casual user of omnimix, anonymous remailers, and so forth . . . another way to stop sending is to press and
    hold the power button, or, cut the power, flick the switch, pull the plug

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nomen Nescio@nobody@dizum.com to alt.privacy.anon-server on Wed Apr 29 23:47:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

    On 19 Apr 2026, Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> posted some news:20260419.090129.08a977e7@dirge.harmsk.com:

    Hello,

    is there a way to stop

    Yes, keep your trousers up and buttoned.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2