Sorry, remops have o set-up a free of charge nym-network-requester
Stefan Claas <ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Sorry, remops have o set-up a free of charge nym-network-requester
Does the remop have to pay for that in any way?
Anonymous User wrote:
Stefan Claas <ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Sorry, remops have o set-up a free of charge nym-network-requester
Does the remop have to pay for that in any way?
No, the nym-network-requester is free of charge, to send email or Usenet messages from within the Nym Mixnet, when users are using for example Nym Mailer with the free of charge nym-socks5-client. If there is a demand, I
can compile the nym-socks5-client for Windows users, as the Nym team only provides all Nym components, free of charge, for Linux. Remops then have
only to supply their Nym address, so that users can use it as --provider credentials for the nym-socks5-client.
Important, the nym-network-requester run without an extra config is an
open relay, but remops can create a whitelist for reachable domains with
the program.
Stefan Claas wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Stefan Claas <ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Sorry, remops have o set-up a free of charge nym-network-requester
Does the remop have to pay for that in any way?
No, the nym-network-requester is free of charge, to send email or Usenet messages from within the Nym Mixnet, when users are using for example Nym Mailer with the free of charge nym-socks5-client. If there is a demand, I can compile the nym-socks5-client for Windows users, as the Nym team only provides all Nym components, free of charge, for Linux. Remops then have only to supply their Nym address, so that users can use it as --provider credentials for the nym-socks5-client.
Important, the nym-network-requester run without an extra config is an
open relay, but remops can create a whitelist for reachable domains with the program.
But remops need a working MTA for that! The nym-network-requester can not only been used with email or Usenet but with all sorts of Internet services.
Yamn2 Remailer wrote:
Stefan Claas <ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
You see, more and more modern Nym Mixnet innovations are comming
and your are not isolated, like you are with OmniMix. :-)
If you knew how to use OmniMix capabilities, you wouldn't have the
limits you're experiencing.
What capabilities? It supports only smtp(s) and nntp(s), right?
The other big problem with OmniMix is that non-tech or elderly people,
or people with a disabillty, will have a high learning curve with it,
which is not worthwhile, because of modern Nym technolgy they can use.
Not to speak about the very bad UX experience, which does not work
with iOS, Android, macOS and Linux.
I can use OmniMix to get to remote locations when all other methods
are failed for example.
What other methods failed? The Nym Mixnet or VPN nodes supprts
everything.
Nym Mail wrote:
Fritz Wuehler wrote:
Claas, the question was: Is NYM Mixnet usage free of charge?
This reply was sent with NymMail Open Source software, while
using the Nym Mixnet, *free of charge*.
And this reply was sent with Nym Mailer Open Source software,
requiring a NymVPN subscription, or remops setting up a free
of charge Open Source nym-socks5-client to use Nym Mailer with
the Nym Mixnet free of charge too.
As people can see, there is no difference in headers, to not
reveal if someone is using the Nym Mixnet free of charge or
commercially.
Stefan Claas <ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Sorry, remops have o set-up a free of charge nym-network-requester
Does the remop have to pay for that in any way?
Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:snips
https://nym...
..."tickets" are collected by their Mixnet gateways, both entries
end exits:
| ...tokenomics
It's all about rewards, about making money ...
But I think they are behind schedule.
On Fri, 3 Apr 2026 08:12:36 -0000, Stefan Claas wrote:
Nym Mail wrote:
Nym Mail wrote:
Fritz Wuehler wrote:
Claas, the question was: Is NYM Mixnet usage free of charge?
This reply was sent with NymMail Open Source software, while
using the Nym Mixnet, *free of charge*.
And this reply was sent with Nym Mailer Open Source software,
requiring a NymVPN subscription, or remops setting up a free
of charge Open Source nym-socks5-client to use Nym Mailer with
the Nym Mixnet free of charge too.
Sorry, remops have o set-up a free of charge nym-network-requester
and my Nym Mailer server software and users have then to use the nym-socks5-client with the remops server set and the Nyma address
from the remops.
Now I downloaded the Nym socks5 client from https://github.com/nymtech/nym/releases/download/nym-binaries-v2026.6-stilton/nym-socks5-client.
But that's a Linux binary! So are there Windows binaries as well? And
where do I find instructions to connect that proyx server with the Nym network similar to my Tor proxy server?
Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:
Stefan Claas <ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Sorry, remops have o set-up a free of charge nym-network-requester
Does the remop have to pay for that in any way?
https://nym.com/docs/operators/tokenomics/mixnet-rewards#roadmap
tells us that though the current startup phase allows us to decide upon voluntary donations ("naive rewarding") we'll soon be confronted with a
fixed usage costs structure ("fair Mixnet"), where, based on bandwidth
usage, "tickets" are collected by their Mixnet gateways, both entries
end exits:
| We are working on the final architecture of Fair Mixnet tokenomics
| implementation and its detailed documentation. The current design is
| called Naive rewarding. It is an intermediate step, allowing operators
| to migrate to nym-node in Mixnet smart contract and for the first time
| receive delegations and earn rewards for any nym-node functionality, in
| opposite to the past system, where only Mixnodes were able to receive
| delegations and rewards.
|
| Please read the roadmap section below to see the planned development.
Consider that move when deciding upon your involvement in this project.
And here a video particularly about the reward system:
https://www.youtube.com/live/3G1pJqvO2VM?t=725
| This is effectively the full Nym token economics in action. We have
| users paying for the NymVPN by subscriptions. Those subscriptions are
| feeding into a buy order that gets triggered on the market. A buy order
| buys Nym tokens that are then used to reward operators. So we see this
| full virtuous cycle here. So that's what we are all looking forward to. [...]
| Our aim with all these changes in the final vision for nym node rewards
| is that nym nodes are rewarded fairly, that you guys can make a profit
| and it is actually desirable to run a business as a nym infrastructure
| provider. We also would like to create a genuinely thriving independent
| professional community of operators.
It's all about rewards, about making money ...
But I think they are behind schedule.
Nym Mail <noreply@oc2mx.net> wrote:
Nym Mail wrote:
Fritz Wuehler wrote:
Claas, the question was: Is NYM Mixnet usage free of charge?
This reply was sent with NymMail Open Source software, while
using the Nym Mixnet, *free of charge*.
And this reply was sent with Nym Mailer Open Source software,
requiring a NymVPN subscription, or remops setting up a free
of charge Open Source nym-socks5-client to use Nym Mailer with
the Nym Mixnet free of charge too.
As people can see, there is no difference in headers, to not
reveal if someone is using the Nym Mixnet free of charge or
commercially.
Do remops have to pay for Mixnet access?
Anonymous wrote:
On Fri, 3 Apr 2026 08:12:36 -0000, Stefan Claas wrote:
Nym Mail wrote:
Nym Mail wrote:
Fritz Wuehler wrote:
Claas, the question was: Is NYM Mixnet usage free of charge?
This reply was sent with NymMail Open Source software, while
using the Nym Mixnet, *free of charge*.
And this reply was sent with Nym Mailer Open Source software,
requiring a NymVPN subscription, or remops setting up a free
of charge Open Source nym-socks5-client to use Nym Mailer with
the Nym Mixnet free of charge too.
Sorry, remops have o set-up a free of charge nym-network-requester
and my Nym Mailer server software and users have then to use the nym-socks5-client with the remops server set and the Nyma address
from the remops.
Now I downloaded the Nym socks5 client from https://github.com/nymtech/nym/releases/download/nym-binaries-v2026.6-stilton/nym-socks5-client.
But that's a Linux binary! So are there Windows binaries as well? And where do I find instructions to connect that proyx server with the Nym network similar to my Tor proxy server?
I will later today compile the nym-socks5-client for Windows and give
a little instruction how to use it with Nym Mailer and todays comming
Fetch, so that you can use it right away with anonymous email messages
or anonymous Usenet postings (in a.a.m).
P.S. The Nym team provides all Nym components for Linux only.
Yamn Remailer wrote:
Nym Mail <noreply@oc2mx.net> wrote:
Nym Mail wrote:
Fritz Wuehler wrote:
Claas, the question was: Is NYM Mixnet usage free of charge?
This reply was sent with NymMail Open Source software, while
using the Nym Mixnet, *free of charge*.
And this reply was sent with Nym Mailer Open Source software,
requiring a NymVPN subscription, or remops setting up a free
of charge Open Source nym-socks5-client to use Nym Mailer with
the Nym Mixnet free of charge too.
As people can see, there is no difference in headers, to not
reveal if someone is using the Nym Mixnet free of charge or
commercially.
Do remops have to pay for Mixnet access?
No! :-)
Nomen Nescio wrote:
Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:
Stefan Claas <ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Sorry, remops have o set-up a free of charge nym-network-requester
Does the remop have to pay for that in any way?
https://nym.com/docs/operators/tokenomics/mixnet-rewards#roadmap
tells us that though the current startup phase allows us to decide upon
voluntary donations ("naive rewarding") we'll soon be confronted with a
fixed usage costs structure ("fair Mixnet"), where, based on bandwidth
usage, "tickets" are collected by their Mixnet gateways, both entries
end exits:
| We are working on the final architecture of Fair Mixnet tokenomics
| implementation and its detailed documentation. The current design is
| called Naive rewarding. It is an intermediate step, allowing operators
| to migrate to nym-node in Mixnet smart contract and for the first time
| receive delegations and earn rewards for any nym-node functionality, in
| opposite to the past system, where only Mixnodes were able to receive
| delegations and rewards.
|
| Please read the roadmap section below to see the planned development.
Consider that move when deciding upon your involvement in this project.
And here a video particularly about the reward system:
https://www.youtube.com/live/3G1pJqvO2VM?t=725
| This is effectively the full Nym token economics in action. We have
| users paying for the NymVPN by subscriptions. Those subscriptions are
| feeding into a buy order that gets triggered on the market. A buy order >> | buys Nym tokens that are then used to reward operators. So we see this
| full virtuous cycle here. So that's what we are all looking forward to. >> [...]
| Our aim with all these changes in the final vision for nym node rewards
| is that nym nodes are rewarded fairly, that you guys can make a profit
| and it is actually desirable to run a business as a nym infrastructure
| provider. We also would like to create a genuinely thriving independent >> | professional community of operators.
It's all about rewards, about making money ...
But I think they are behind schedule.
I am aware of the Nym token and award system, but I strongly doubt
that the Nym ecosystem will become later only a commercial entity,
where all users have to pay for Nym usage. Even it would be that
case later, the whole project is Open Source and therefore can be
used by everyone, meaning we could establish our own Nym Mixnet,
with our own Network explorer.
Stefan Claas wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:
Stefan Claas <ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Sorry, remops have o set-up a free of charge nym-network-requester
Does the remop have to pay for that in any way?
https://nym.com/docs/operators/tokenomics/mixnet-rewards#roadmap
tells us that though the current startup phase allows us to decide upon voluntary donations ("naive rewarding") we'll soon be confronted with a fixed usage costs structure ("fair Mixnet"), where, based on bandwidth usage, "tickets" are collected by their Mixnet gateways, both entries
end exits:
| We are working on the final architecture of Fair Mixnet tokenomics
| implementation and its detailed documentation. The current design is
| called Naive rewarding. It is an intermediate step, allowing operators | to migrate to nym-node in Mixnet smart contract and for the first time | receive delegations and earn rewards for any nym-node functionality, in | opposite to the past system, where only Mixnodes were able to receive
| delegations and rewards.
|
| Please read the roadmap section below to see the planned development.
Consider that move when deciding upon your involvement in this project.
And here a video particularly about the reward system:
https://www.youtube.com/live/3G1pJqvO2VM?t=725
| This is effectively the full Nym token economics in action. We have
| users paying for the NymVPN by subscriptions. Those subscriptions are | feeding into a buy order that gets triggered on the market. A buy order
| buys Nym tokens that are then used to reward operators. So we see this | full virtuous cycle here. So that's what we are all looking forward to.
[...]
| Our aim with all these changes in the final vision for nym node rewards | is that nym nodes are rewarded fairly, that you guys can make a profit | and it is actually desirable to run a business as a nym infrastructure | provider. We also would like to create a genuinely thriving independent
| professional community of operators.
It's all about rewards, about making money ...
But I think they are behind schedule.
I am aware of the Nym token and award system, but I strongly doubt
that the Nym ecosystem will become later only a commercial entity,
where all users have to pay for Nym usage. Even it would be that
case later, the whole project is Open Source and therefore can be
used by everyone, meaning we could establish our own Nym Mixnet,
with our own Network explorer.
Even if cleared from the payment system the NYM Corp network still bases
on Sphinx, where reply information and thereby sender data are part of transmitted packets. That unsolved problem and thereby severe weakness
is the reason why Type III Mixminion remailing never came to life. But
it may be good enough for that business-minded company to deceive
technically uninformed though privacy-aware customers.
Nomen Nescio wrote:
Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:
Stefan Claas <ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Sorry, remops have o set-up a free of charge nym-network-requester
Does the remop have to pay for that in any way?
https://nym.com/docs/operators/tokenomics/mixnet-rewards#roadmap
tells us that though the current startup phase allows us to decide upon
voluntary donations ("naive rewarding") we'll soon be confronted with a
fixed usage costs structure ("fair Mixnet"), where, based on bandwidth
usage, "tickets" are collected by their Mixnet gateways, both entries
end exits:
| We are working on the final architecture of Fair Mixnet tokenomics
| implementation and its detailed documentation. The current design is
| called Naive rewarding. It is an intermediate step, allowing operators
| to migrate to nym-node in Mixnet smart contract and for the first time
| receive delegations and earn rewards for any nym-node functionality, in
| opposite to the past system, where only Mixnodes were able to receive
| delegations and rewards.
|
| Please read the roadmap section below to see the planned development.
Consider that move when deciding upon your involvement in this project.
And here a video particularly about the reward system:
https://www.youtube.com/live/3G1pJqvO2VM?t=725
| This is effectively the full Nym token economics in action. We have
| users paying for the NymVPN by subscriptions. Those subscriptions are
| feeding into a buy order that gets triggered on the market. A buy order >> | buys Nym tokens that are then used to reward operators. So we see this
| full virtuous cycle here. So that's what we are all looking forward to. >> [...]
| Our aim with all these changes in the final vision for nym node rewards
| is that nym nodes are rewarded fairly, that you guys can make a profit
| and it is actually desirable to run a business as a nym infrastructure
| provider. We also would like to create a genuinely thriving independent >> | professional community of operators.
It's all about rewards, about making money ...
But I think they are behind schedule.
I am aware of the Nym token and award system, but I strongly doubt
that the Nym ecosystem will become later only a commercial entity,
where all users have to pay for Nym usage.
Even it would be that
case later, the whole project is Open Source and therefore can be
used by everyone, meaning we could establish our own Nym Mixnet,
with our own Network explorer.
I am aware of the Nym token and award system, but I strongly doubt
that the Nym ecosystem will become later only a commercial entity,
where all users have to pay for Nym usage.
But that's what they tell us.
Even it would be that
case later, the whole project is Open Source and therefore can be
used by everyone, meaning we could establish our own Nym Mixnet,
with our own Network explorer.
You'd have to strip off all the cryptocurrency ticket part, which also addresses the most obvious weak spot of the system pointing to users.
Stefan Claas wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:
Stefan Claas <ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Sorry, remops have o set-up a free of charge nym-network-requester
Does the remop have to pay for that in any way?
https://nym.com/docs/operators/tokenomics/mixnet-rewards#roadmap
tells us that though the current startup phase allows us to decide upon
voluntary donations ("naive rewarding") we'll soon be confronted with a
fixed usage costs structure ("fair Mixnet"), where, based on bandwidth
usage, "tickets" are collected by their Mixnet gateways, both entries
end exits:
| We are working on the final architecture of Fair Mixnet tokenomics
| implementation and its detailed documentation. The current design is
| called Naive rewarding. It is an intermediate step, allowing operators >>> | to migrate to nym-node in Mixnet smart contract and for the first time >>> | receive delegations and earn rewards for any nym-node functionality, in >>> | opposite to the past system, where only Mixnodes were able to receive
| delegations and rewards.
|
| Please read the roadmap section below to see the planned development.
Consider that move when deciding upon your involvement in this project.
And here a video particularly about the reward system:
https://www.youtube.com/live/3G1pJqvO2VM?t=725
| This is effectively the full Nym token economics in action. We have
| users paying for the NymVPN by subscriptions. Those subscriptions are >>> | feeding into a buy order that gets triggered on the market. A buy order >>> | buys Nym tokens that are then used to reward operators. So we see this >>> | full virtuous cycle here. So that's what we are all looking forward to. >>> [...]
| Our aim with all these changes in the final vision for nym node rewards >>> | is that nym nodes are rewarded fairly, that you guys can make a profit >>> | and it is actually desirable to run a business as a nym infrastructure >>> | provider. We also would like to create a genuinely thriving independent >>> | professional community of operators.
It's all about rewards, about making money ...
But I think they are behind schedule.
I am aware of the Nym token and award system, but I strongly doubt
that the Nym ecosystem will become later only a commercial entity,
where all users have to pay for Nym usage. Even it would be that
case later, the whole project is Open Source and therefore can be
used by everyone, meaning we could establish our own Nym Mixnet,
with our own Network explorer.
Even if cleared from the payment system the NYM Corp network still bases
on Sphinx, where reply information and thereby sender data are part of >transmitted packets. That unsolved problem and thereby severe weakness
is the reason why Type III Mixminion remailing never came to life. But
it may be good enough for that business-minded company to deceive
technically uninformed though privacy-aware customers.
In article <20260405.124750.9aaacdfd@mixmin.net> Yamn2 Remailer wrote:
Stefan Claas wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:
Stefan Claas <ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Sorry, remops have o set-up a free of charge nym-network-requester
Does the remop have to pay for that in any way?
https://nym.com/docs/operators/tokenomics/mixnet-rewards#roadmap
tells us that though the current startup phase allows us to decide upon voluntary donations ("naive rewarding") we'll soon be confronted with a fixed usage costs structure ("fair Mixnet"), where, based on bandwidth usage, "tickets" are collected by their Mixnet gateways, both entries end exits:
| We are working on the final architecture of Fair Mixnet tokenomics
| implementation and its detailed documentation. The current design is | called Naive rewarding. It is an intermediate step, allowing operators
| to migrate to nym-node in Mixnet smart contract and for the first time
| receive delegations and earn rewards for any nym-node functionality, in
| opposite to the past system, where only Mixnodes were able to receive | delegations and rewards.
|
| Please read the roadmap section below to see the planned development.
Consider that move when deciding upon your involvement in this project.
And here a video particularly about the reward system:
https://www.youtube.com/live/3G1pJqvO2VM?t=725
| This is effectively the full Nym token economics in action. We have | users paying for the NymVPN by subscriptions. Those subscriptions are
| feeding into a buy order that gets triggered on the market. A buy order
| buys Nym tokens that are then used to reward operators. So we see this
| full virtuous cycle here. So that's what we are all looking forward to.
[...]
| Our aim with all these changes in the final vision for nym node rewards
| is that nym nodes are rewarded fairly, that you guys can make a profit
| and it is actually desirable to run a business as a nym infrastructure
| provider. We also would like to create a genuinely thriving independent
| professional community of operators.
It's all about rewards, about making money ...
But I think they are behind schedule.
I am aware of the Nym token and award system, but I strongly doubt
that the Nym ecosystem will become later only a commercial entity,
where all users have to pay for Nym usage. Even it would be that
case later, the whole project is Open Source and therefore can be
used by everyone, meaning we could establish our own Nym Mixnet,
with our own Network explorer.
Even if cleared from the payment system the NYM Corp network still bases
on Sphinx, where reply information and thereby sender data are part of transmitted packets. That unsolved problem and thereby severe weakness
is the reason why Type III Mixminion remailing never came to life. But
it may be good enough for that business-minded company to deceive technically uninformed though privacy-aware customers.
They are riding a dead horse. Though selling snake oil in this sector
can still be lucrative, as demonstrated by many other VPN providers.
So, either you're informed, or you're fleeced. It's that simple. ;-)
Fritz Wuehler wrote:
I am aware of the Nym token and award system, but I strongly doubt
that the Nym ecosystem will become later only a commercial entity,
where all users have to pay for Nym usage.
But that's what they tell us.
Please point me to a quote, saying this.
Even it would be that
case later, the whole project is Open Source and therefore can be
used by everyone, meaning we could establish our own Nym Mixnet,
with our own Network explorer.
You'd have to strip off all the cryptocurrency ticket part, which also
addresses the most obvious weak spot of the system pointing to users.
Why does it point to users? Try Nym Mailer, NymMail or Nike and explain
where there is crypto currency involved, when using official Nym components.
It points to operators Nym addresses, running Nym mix nodes or gateways,
for getting rewards, similiar to what Hal Finney proposed long ago.
https://nym.com/docs/network/concepts
Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:
Stefan Claas <ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Sorry, remops have o set-up a free of charge nym-network-requester
Does the remop have to pay for that in any way?
https://nym.com/docs/operators/tokenomics/mixnet-rewards#roadmap
tells us that though the current startup phase allows us to decide upon >voluntary donations ("naive rewarding") we'll soon be confronted with a
fixed usage costs structure ("fair Mixnet"), where, based on bandwidth
usage, "tickets" are collected by their Mixnet gateways, both entries
end exits:
| We are working on the final architecture of Fair Mixnet tokenomics
| implementation and its detailed documentation. The current design is
| called Naive rewarding. It is an intermediate step, allowing operators
| to migrate to nym-node in Mixnet smart contract and for the first time
| receive delegations and earn rewards for any nym-node functionality, in
| opposite to the past system, where only Mixnodes were able to receive
| delegations and rewards.
|
| Please read the roadmap section below to see the planned development.
Consider that move when deciding upon your involvement in this project.
And here a video particularly about the reward system:
https://www.youtube.com/live/3G1pJqvO2VM?t=725
| This is effectively the full Nym token economics in action. We have
| users paying for the NymVPN by subscriptions. Those subscriptions are
| feeding into a buy order that gets triggered on the market. A buy order
| buys Nym tokens that are then used to reward operators. So we see this
| full virtuous cycle here. So that's what we are all looking forward to. >[...]
| Our aim with all these changes in the final vision for nym node rewards
| is that nym nodes are rewarded fairly, that you guys can make a profit
| and it is actually desirable to run a business as a nym infrastructure
| provider. We also would like to create a genuinely thriving independent
| professional community of operators.
It's all about rewards, about making money ...
But I think they are behind schedule.
https://nym.com/docs/network/concepts
On Sun, 2026-04-05 02:44:20 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote:
Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:
Stefan Claas <ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Sorry, remops have o set-up a free of charge nym-network-requester
Does the remop have to pay for that in any way?
https://nym.com/docs/operators/tokenomics/mixnet-rewards#roadmap
tells us that though the current startup phase allows us to decide upon >>voluntary donations ("naive rewarding") we'll soon be confronted with a >>fixed usage costs structure ("fair Mixnet"), where, based on bandwidth >>usage, "tickets" are collected by their Mixnet gateways, both entries
end exits:
Indeed, at 21:27 of the YT video Nym Corp's Chief Strategy
Officer Yaja Brekke reported:
"Tickets effectively represent real world usage of bandwidth of
the network and we'll have those tickets being collected by
gateways, both entry and exit."
I wonder how those user-specific tickets will be collected at
the exit based on user-specific bandwidth usage at that stage
without harming or breaking anonymity?
| We are working on the final architecture of Fair Mixnet tokenomics
| implementation and its detailed documentation. The current design is
| called Naive rewarding. It is an intermediate step, allowing operators
| to migrate to nym-node in Mixnet smart contract and for the first time
| receive delegations and earn rewards for any nym-node functionality, in
| opposite to the past system, where only Mixnodes were able to receive
| delegations and rewards.
|
| Please read the roadmap section below to see the planned development.
Consider that move when deciding upon your involvement in this project.
And here a video particularly about the reward system:
https://www.youtube.com/live/3G1pJqvO2VM?t=725
| This is effectively the full Nym token economics in action. We have
| users paying for the NymVPN by subscriptions. Those subscriptions are
| feeding into a buy order that gets triggered on the market. A buy order >>| buys Nym tokens that are then used to reward operators. So we see this
| full virtuous cycle here. So that's what we are all looking forward to. >>...
| Our aim with all these changes in the final vision for nym node rewards
| is that nym nodes are rewarded fairly, that you guys can make a profit
| and it is actually desirable to run a business as a nym infrastructure
| provider. We also would like to create a genuinely thriving independent >>| professional community of operators.
It's all about rewards, about making money ...
But I think they are behind schedule.
No matter, that offer smells rotten.
Stefan Claas wrote:
https://nym.com/docs/network/concepts
Master of repetitive misrepresentation, we don't want that once again.
There was an extensive discussion about SURBs within the thread
Subject: Meloni su Ramelli: "Tutti devono fare i conti con la vicenda
della sua morte"
Message-ID: <vuqgo1$1744$1@solani.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:29:56 +0200
...
Subject: Single Use Reply Blocks (SURBs)
Message-Id: <20250502.221208.1c0862cc@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
...
where you had your chance.
Its conclusion in MID <89be7c92942c925d762793a63bed2508@dizum.com> was:
Hands off!
Stefan Claas <ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
Stupid Stefan Claas <ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
In article <10qh19c$2cb07$2@news.tcpreset.net> Stefan Claas
<ch1ffr3punk@mix.nym> wrote:
Stefan Claas wrote:
Nym Mail wrote:
In the message body field add all the
required headers you normally
use, when sending anonymous messages,
followed by a blank line
and your message. You do not have to add
headers such as MIME etc.
because the NymMail server handles them,
meaning that you can
include UTF-8 chars in your Subject: too.
Why do you have to add headers in the message body, you may
ask?
NymMail is a global and decentralized anonymous email
infrastruture, powered by the Nym Mixnet, where nym-clients
communicate and where no smtp or nntp is used. This is
handled by the receiving server, using the nym-client too.
Too stupid to implement MIME, which results in a isolated system
incompatible with standard communication methods. Each his own
island.
You fail to understand!!! Modern Anonymity Systems no longer need
outdated RFCs and MIME stuff!!! The server only handles MIME etc.
for old fashioned classic email and Usenet postings, because
NymMail nor Go needs such stuff, because NymMail email messages
have UTF-8 support automatically build in, so that it is also the
reason, when you receive an anonymous NymMail email message that
it no longer contains any headers, like From: Subject: MIME etc.
How cool is that? :-) I say it is super cool, becaue when you send
email messages globally to people, regardless of their language,
the email messages will always been displayed properly and you
have anonymity, due to lack of RFC conform and outdated email
headers. :-)
So you think it's cool to ignore standards out of incompetence
and call it modern, though it's a huge step backwards, and a
step into isolation. Nevertheless, have fun with your crap!
I strongly believe that you are using outdated crap, which can't
keep up with modern Nym Mixnet innovations and that what makes
you angry and force you to reply in such a manner.
Just out of curiosity, how do you handle file attachments?
First of all, we don't need outdated email attachments, because
we can transfer much larger files with another modern Nym Mixnet
tool. :-) https://github.com/rachyandco/wormhole-nym
And the next non-standard wannabe protocol. They simply try to attack established communication methods to make money with their proprietary
bs.
And if we need ssh over the Nym Mixnet:
https://github.com/rachyandco/ssh-nym
You see, more and more modern Nym Mixnet innovations are comming and
your are not isolated, like you are with OmniMix. :-)
BTW, I still wonder why Mixmaster and/or YAMN aren't added to
Tails in a way to use its Tor port for packet forwarding through
Hidden Services. Why on earth is Fritz Wuehler the only one
capable of adding such a Hidden Service to his mail host?
But don't worry as we now have Nym Mailer (with SURB support), NymMail
(SURB support comming too) and Nike, which uses first the Tor Network
and then the Nym Mixnet.
Stefan Claas wrote:
But don't worry as we now have Nym Mailer (with SURB support), NymMail (SURB support comming too) and Nike, which uses first the Tor Network
and then the Nym Mixnet.
Nike can be used on Tails, Whonix, Qubes too (and Android, iOS).
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/Nike
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 07:36:39 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| Messages: | 264,829 |