From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 09:51:50 +0100, you wrote:

On 09 Jan 2026, Nym Mailer <noreply@oc2mx.net> posted some news:guy70a4dby0tdf34vajbl@oc2mx.net:

Hi QSL users,

DEL

Remember, Nym Mailer and NymVPN is much much easier to use
than QSL with outdated and 30 years old TypeII technology.

Horseshit! QSL/Tor still is secure if you follow the correct
instructions.

Tell me when and where it was supposedly "broken". It still has all
the security needed by the average poster who is not a terrorist or
criminal. Yeah, there is Super-Duper Paranoid new stuff, but it's
for the SUPER-PARANOIDS only.

It doesn't matter what you use if the exit needlessly blocks groups, which
it does using the above.

That's the whole point of being anonymous isn't it? Being able to post in
a group of assholes who WILL and DO stalk you and your employer, or those associated with you? They get frustrated when they can't and have fits.

That is the simple reason I use anon. However, when doing an very
negative opinion post concerning some consumer item, I am protected
from the company's lawyers. So, far, QSL/Tor have never failed to
protect me.

BTW, your subject is referencing something approximately eighteen (18) to thirteen (13) years old, and long since addressed. There are other similar "attack Tor" projects ongoing involving qauntum computing and AI, neither
of which are accomplishing much at this point. They are receptacles of attention for government funding however, and receiving it. Ironic since governments use it just like we do.

I'll trust QSL/Tor until that quantum and AI stuff are a sufficient
cause for alarm. For now, their just fantasy.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

Q-User once wrote:

On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 09:51:50 +0100, you wrote:

On 09 Jan 2026, Nym Mailer <noreply@oc2mx.net> posted some news:guy70a4dby0tdf34vajbl@oc2mx.net:

Hi QSL users,

DEL

Remember, Nym Mailer and NymVPN is much much easier to use
than QSL with outdated and 30 years old TypeII technology.

Horseshit! QSL/Tor still is secure if you follow the correct
instructions.

Tell me when and where it was supposedly "broken". It still has all
the security needed by the average poster who is not a terrorist or criminal. Yeah, there is Super-Duper Paranoid new stuff, but it's
for the SUPER-PARANOIDS only.

Oh my god, when will you QSL users understand that an ISP and their TLAs
can *exactly* see when *you* have sent Type II packets through the Tor
network? This does not mean that they will automatically knock at your
door, when doing some "anon" mailing. You simply move into their large
database for later reference, in case it's required.

BTW. Nym users, which are many many thousands, are average users too.
They only enjoy modern technology and the Nym team is great with all
it's new developments and Nym software components are all open source.

Last but not least, try to use a 'References:' header with the <Message-ID> from the posting you like to reply.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

Nym Mailer wrote:

Last but not least, try to use a 'References:' header with the <Message-ID> from the posting you like to reply.

+1
--
https://yamn.virebent.art
https://news.tcpreset.net http://lsbvtvxe2sfws3rmg2i3y3jqow3bwoicjwlwe5cxvxsyhrlll5q4ejyd.onion/ http://e2mjj44t3eauxra2rmrlpn7vbd6whziypccfehlrlgnnvgr6xwp5lrad.onion/ gemini://n5ry24fweklbn562o7fnyefanygtwxlgi7aevn26huuxqlsftxy5ljqd.onion/
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

Q-User wrote:

I'll trust QSL/Tor until that quantum and AI stuff are a sufficient
cause for alarm. For now, their just fantasy.

This is exactly what's true about anonymity, good job, applause.
The NSA will notify you when quantum shit ai becomes a problem, to speak like you do. For now, keep on using useless encryption and fake anonymity, since you only post bullshit on Usenet. You're not a terrorist, right?

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2