From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

In article <10joguh$1v90o$1@paganini.bofh.team>
Stefan Claas <noreply@oc2mx.net> wrote:

Gabx wrote:

Fritz Wuehler wrote:

About this useful tool, I noticed that it offer
six remailer to choose from (frell, yamn, yamn2, yamn3, paranoyam, dirge).
But yamn yamn2 and yamn3 they stay on mixmin.net
server that could be compromised (admin@mixmin.net
or steve@mixmin.net do not answer anymore if you mail it).

You're absolutely right to be concerned.
Servers don't maintain themselves. Someone is:
- Paying for hosting
- Managing infrastructure
- Keeping services online

Someone is maintaining mixmin.net, but hiding. AFAIK
This is the opposite of what privacy infrastructure should do.

Trust requires transparency.
Silence suggests compromise.

Why not phase out YAMN projects and re-configure it with your
sphinx fog nodes? You could configure your MTA with a whitelist,
so that for example only Usenet m2n email addresses and privacy
email providers are allowed, thus not getting into trouble.

Regards
Stefan

Ha! Now these a-hole "anon experts" find that time after time their nonsensically complicated Yanny-Yummy and OmniCrap keeps f'king up
while QSL keeps working for the tekkie ignoramuses like ourselves,
the common user who knows squat about how to even install that luser
OmniYummy onionized shitware.

Thanik you, Richard Christman.

Ha! Now these a-hole "anon experts" find that time after time their nonsensically complicated Yanny-Yummy and OmniCrap keeps f'king up
while QSL keeps working for the tekkie ignoramuses like ourselves,
the common user who knows squat about how to even install that luser
OmniYummy onionized shitware.

Thanik you, Richard Christman.

(Isn't it interesting how we have been told from the beginning to
NEVER trust some web site to anonymize our posts without collecting
our info, but now GabbyMouth wants us to believe his
httpee:yummy/fart site is different? Anyone here remember ellbash and
frog? Same story. Same lie.)

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2