From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

What if there was a program that posted bogus but realistic looking
messages to AAM.

Kindly give your pros and cons on the idea.


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

On 12/8/25 02:53, Nomen Nescio wrote:

What if there was a program that posted bogus but realistic looking
messages to AAM.

Kindly give your pros and cons on the idea.

It's already being done. In fact, I would estimate that approx.
80% of AAM content is dummy messages. I know because I send
them. Hourly.

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: Mixmaster 3.1 (OpenPGP module)

jA0EAgMCL90A2+mB/nH/0usBIkZ8tKBCQjINr4npNr/d3Q5tcwbp5MAZHmQjFaE3 4Jq/Mn4WxY+DIaiIHW4t19pO8hXTsnzARrA/3vvMPzl0jninzV0z6QSYR5U1u5/d

If it begins with "jA0E" then it's a dummy.
--
SEC3

My PGP key:
<https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-keyid/C94D423355A83863>
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

In article <187f41e1356f19cc$52237$154483$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
SEC3 <admin@sec3.net> wrote:

On 12/8/25 02:53, Nomen Nescio wrote:

What if there was a program that posted bogus but realistic looking messages to AAM.

Kindly give your pros and cons on the idea.

It's already being done. In fact, I would estimate that approx.
80% of AAM content is dummy messages. I know because I send
them. Hourly.

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: Mixmaster 3.1 (OpenPGP module)

jA0EAgMCL90A2+mB/nH/0usBIkZ8tKBCQjINr4npNr/d3Q5tcwbp5MAZHmQjFaE3 4Jq/Mn4WxY+DIaiIHW4t19pO8hXTsnzARrA/3vvMPzl0jninzV0z6QSYR5U1u5/d

If it begins with "jA0E" then it's a dummy.

I just took a look and see your dummy messages, so it's not a really bad
idea, but it's already being done.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

SEC3 <admin@sec3.net> wrote:

On 12/8/25 02:53, Nomen Nescio wrote:

What if there was a program that posted bogus but realistic looking
messages to AAM.

Kindly give your pros and cons on the idea.

It's already being done. In fact, I would estimate that approx.
80% of AAM content is dummy messages. I know because I send
them. Hourly.

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: Mixmaster 3.1 (OpenPGP module)

jA0EAgMCL90A2+mB/nH/0usBIkZ8tKBCQjINr4npNr/d3Q5tcwbp5MAZHmQjFaE3 >4Jq/Mn4WxY+DIaiIHW4t19pO8hXTsnzARrA/3vvMPzl0jninzV0z6QSYR5U1u5/d

If it begins with "jA0E" then it's a dummy.

If you're posting that spam for no reason then you're either an idiot
or an adversary of anonymous remailing. So what's your reason?

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

What if there was a program that posted bogus but realistic looking
messages to AAM.

Kindly give your pros and cons on the idea.

It's already being done. In fact, I would estimate that approx.
80% of AAM content is dummy messages. I know because I send
them. Hourly.

The first answer was mine "Bad. Unnecessary clutter.". I was
thinking it was referring to the alt.privacy.anon-server news group.
It is a good thing to send dummy messages to AAM. The reason is that
if you are communicating with someone(s) using AAM, you need to
randomly post good dummy messages. If you don't, then every message
you post will be a legitimate message and can be easily tracked by evil
NSA, etc. If they are sitting on your IP and gathering your messages,
they will have to try to decrypt all of them to see which one is valid.
It is only right to put it to those corrupt, Constitution tramplers
who are trying to destroy you.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2