Wins and Losses For Trump Today as USSC Rules
From
c186282@c186282@nnada.net to
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump on Tue Jun 30 11:41:35 2026
From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa
The Court decided that states can bar trannies from
sports - BUT another recent decision said they could
not be barred from EMPLOYMENT for being trannies.
Public schools - yea, easy call, but beyond that
sports can often be paid JOBS.
I Think this decision just caused another problem.
One justice (Gorsuch?) offered some weird rationale
why the two rulings didn't compete, but it was so
convoluted that may just be bullshit.
The other big decision - birthright citizenship.
In this case the court, rightly I think, ruled
that a clearly-worded constitutional amendment
means exactly what it says. Nothing in there
about slaves or whatever - just straight-up
language.
So, we're kinda stuck with 'birthright' - and NO
NO NO I don't want the present-day pols to start
editing the constitution !!!
'Birthright' made sense when it was writ. The USA
still had lots of empty land and not enough people
to make good money from it. Ergo we WANTED floods
of immigrants and their eventual kiddies too.
If we don't want birthers then we need to find ways
to keep 'em away before any babies pop out. Hmmm,
"birthing barges" - hospital ships - anchored just
outside US waters ??? Better screening of 'visitors'
will also be needed.
In any case, the USSC is *not* just a rubber-stamp
for Trump policy. Sometimes he make a good argument,
sometimes not.
If the lefties STUFF the court, then it WILL be a
rubber-stamp - anything commie will be 'justified'
on demand.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2