• Re: USA Still Survives After WH UFC Match

    From c186282@c186282@nnada.net to talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh on Wed Jun 17 02:31:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

    On 6/16/26 22:12, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110suep$1hril$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-06-16 17:15, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110snmk$1g7od$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-06-16 13:22, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110s6bj$1be6k$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-06-16 10:53, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110rvv2$193n7$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-06-16 09:59, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110qhn4$ricf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
    says...

    On 2026-06-15 20:29, c186282 wrote:
    Amazing - the MSM was talking like that'd be
    the total end of the nation ... like a giant
    meteor would fall or Covid+++ plague take hold
    or space aliens would blast us to atoms-a :-)

    I bet you can't produce ONE QUOTE that says anything like that. >>>>>>>>>
    And I bet if he does you will run away like you always do.
    So far, the one running is NoBody.

    He's made more than a dozen posts since I posted my bet.

    So? Who are you to demand anything?


    I'm not "demanding".

    I'm NOTING for my amusement.

    You don't even know the difference between a question and
    a suggestion.


    I know the difference just fine, thanks.

    I also know that a lot of questions assume things as fact that aren't. >>>>
    Your question:

    "Who are you to demand anything?"

    Assumes the existence of demand.

    Well assuming is what you do best.


    You are unfamiliar with English.

    Let me help:

    Your question:

    "Who are you to demand anything?"

    ...contains an assumption of fact.

    To wit: that I was demanding something.

    A simple question I asked. A simple answer would have been
    fine but you had to jack it around again.


    IGNORE their "demands" :-)

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh on Wed Jun 17 07:48:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

    In article <110svs1$1i7i2$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-06-16 19:12, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110suep$1hril$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-06-16 17:15, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110snmk$1g7od$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-06-16 13:22, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110s6bj$1be6k$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-06-16 10:53, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110rvv2$193n7$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-06-16 09:59, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110qhn4$ricf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>> says...

    On 2026-06-15 20:29, c186282 wrote:
    Amazing - the MSM was talking like that'd be
    the total end of the nation ... like a giant
    meteor would fall or Covid+++ plague take hold
    or space aliens would blast us to atomsa :-)

    I bet you can't produce ONE QUOTE that says anything like that. >>>>>>>>>
    And I bet if he does you will run away like you always do.
    So far, the one running is NoBody.

    He's made more than a dozen posts since I posted my bet.

    So? Who are you to demand anything?


    I'm not "demanding".

    I'm NOTING for my amusement.

    You don't even know the difference between a question and
    a suggestion.


    I know the difference just fine, thanks.

    I also know that a lot of questions assume things as fact that aren't. >>>>
    Your question:

    "Who are you to demand anything?"

    Assumes the existence of demand.

    Well assuming is what you do best.


    You are unfamiliar with English.

    Let me help:

    Your question:

    "Who are you to demand anything?"

    ...contains an assumption of fact.

    To wit: that I was demanding something.

    A simple question I asked. A simple answer would have been
    fine but you had to jack it around again.


    You asked a simple question that assumes something that isn't true.

    I didn't "demand" anything of anyone.

    :-)

    You did and now you lie about it.
    --

    Trans women are really just men.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan Bond@bondrock@ifx.net to talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh on Wed Jun 17 14:41:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

    On 6/17/2026 6:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110svs1$1i7i2$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-06-16 19:12, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110suep$1hril$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-06-16 17:15, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110snmk$1g7od$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-06-16 13:22, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110s6bj$1be6k$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-06-16 10:53, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110rvv2$193n7$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-06-16 09:59, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <110qhn4$ricf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>> says...

    On 2026-06-15 20:29, c186282 wrote:
    Amazing - the MSM was talking like that'd be
    the total end of the nation ... like a giant
    meteor would fall or Covid+++ plague take hold
    or space aliens would blast us to atoms-a :-)

    I bet you can't produce ONE QUOTE that says anything like that. >>>>>>>>>>>
    And I bet if he does you will run away like you always do. >>>>>>>>>> So far, the one running is NoBody.

    He's made more than a dozen posts since I posted my bet.

    So? Who are you to demand anything?


    I'm not "demanding".

    I'm NOTING for my amusement.

    You don't even know the difference between a question and
    a suggestion.


    I know the difference just fine, thanks.

    I also know that a lot of questions assume things as fact that aren't. >>>>>>
    Your question:

    "Who are you to demand anything?"

    Assumes the existence of demand.

    Well assuming is what you do best.


    You are unfamiliar with English.

    Let me help:

    Your question:

    "Who are you to demand anything?"

    ...contains an assumption of fact.

    To wit: that I was demanding something.

    A simple question I asked. A simple answer would have been
    fine but you had to jack it around again.


    You asked a simple question that assumes something that isn't true.

    I didn't "demand" anything of anyone.

    :-)

    You did and

    No, he didn't. Stop lying.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2