From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

On 2026-04-28 13:44, c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

It'll get thrown out quickly.

"86" doesn't automatically mean "kill".
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

Alan wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS:

On 2026-04-28 13:44, c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

Kash thinking he's getting shitcanned by Trump, so he's again
attacking Trump's imaginary enemy.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

It'll get thrown out quickly.

"86" doesn't automatically mean "kill".

The trump-humpers are the biggest Chicken Little snowflakes.

The Trumps are the biggest Chicken Little snowflakes.
--
Be careful when a loop exits to the same place from side and bottom.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

Really? How?
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

On 2026-04-29 06:01:37 +0000, Gronk said:

c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

Really? How?

A new wave of bogus indictments was predicted after Pam Bondi was 86'd,
oops, I mean fired by Trump.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

On 2026-04-29, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote:

c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

Really? How?

I gotta agree with you. This is a snooze, dog and pony show for sure.
The Republicans are inept at following through on prosecutions.
I suspect this will be another failure either on purpose or due to ineptness. --
pothead

"Often imitated, never duplicated."




--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

super70s wrote:

On 2026-04-29 06:01:37 +0000, Gronk said:

c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

Really? How?

A new wave of bogus indictments was predicted after Pam Bondi was 86'd, >oops, I mean fired by Trump.

Comey's indictmenmt means America can sleep safely.

Thank God for the Government.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

On 4/29/26 16:09, pothead wrote:

On 2026-04-29, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote:

c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

Really? How?

I gotta agree with you. This is a snooze, dog and pony show for sure.
The Republicans are inept at following through on prosecutions.
I suspect this will be another failure either on purpose or due to ineptness.

It's just political tit-4-tat ... Comey and friends
thought they could get away with it clean - live
high on their Soros donations.

Let them experience what a vendetta feels like.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

On 2026-04-28 13:44, c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

'Of course, not every Republican was so ready to endorse the charges.

rCLIf itrCOs just down to one picture and a piece of sand, doesnrCOt sound appropriate to me,rCY Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., whorCOs retiring at the end
of this term, told MS NOW. rCLIf the entire case is premised on rCy86 47rCO written in conch shells on the sands of a North Carolina beach, that
looks like itrCOs pretty weak.rCY

Tillis said he went rCLto the end of the internetrCY and concluded that, rCLI canrCOt find any example where it represents a threat.rCY

Ultimately, Tillis said, this was about rCLa picture in the sand.rCY

rCLIs that really the level of pettiness that werCOre at now?rCY he asked.'
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

On 2026-04-28 21:20:41 +0000, Alan said:

On 2026-04-28 13:44, c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

It'll get thrown out quickly.

"86" doesn't automatically mean "kill".

Trump started yammering about how it meant "the mafia" and "murders"
the same day he posts an AI meme of himself (or maybe it was real who
knows) threatening Iran by standing in the desert holding an automatic
rifle and wearing sunglasses.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

Alan wrote:

On 2026-04-28 13:44, c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

It'll get thrown out quickly.

"86" doesn't automatically mean "kill".

Comey is an evil super criminal and we're lucky that Trump's saving America from him.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

In article <10svvqj$pk46$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...

On 2026-04-28 13:44, c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

'Of course, not every Republican was so ready to endorse the charges.

?If it?s just down to one picture and a piece of sand, doesn?t sound appropriate to me,? Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who?s retiring at the end
of this term, told MS NOW. ?If the entire case is premised on ?86 47? written in conch shells on the sands of a North Carolina beach, that
looks like it?s pretty weak.?

Tillis said he went ?to the end of the internet? and concluded that, ?I can?t find any example where it represents a threat.?

Ultimately, Tillis said, this was about ?a picture in the sand.?

?Is that really the level of pettiness that we?re at now?? he asked.'

I think posting 8647 was pretty petty. But since they went
after Trump turnabout is fair play.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

On 2026-04-30 13:47, Skeeter wrote:

In article <10svvqj$pk46$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...

On 2026-04-28 13:44, c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

'Of course, not every Republican was so ready to endorse the charges.

?If it?s just down to one picture and a piece of sand, doesn?t sound
appropriate to me,? Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who?s retiring at the end
of this term, told MS NOW. ?If the entire case is premised on ?86 47?
written in conch shells on the sands of a North Carolina beach, that
looks like it?s pretty weak.?

Tillis said he went ?to the end of the internet? and concluded that, ?I
can?t find any example where it represents a threat.?

Ultimately, Tillis said, this was about ?a picture in the sand.?

?Is that really the level of pettiness that we?re at now?? he asked.'

I think posting 8647 was pretty petty. But since they went
after Trump turnabout is fair play.

LOL

Trump's looking bad in the polls, and suddenly he's "shot" at in
Pennsylvania.

Trump's war is going badly and his ballroom is being heavily criticized
and suddenly there's an incident at an event he's avoided attending for
years.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

super70s wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS:

On 2026-04-28 21:20:41 +0000, Alan said:

On 2026-04-28 13:44, c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

It'll get thrown out quickly.

"86" doesn't automatically mean "kill".

Trump started yammering about how it meant "the mafia" and "murders"
the same day he posts an AI meme of himself (or maybe it was real who
knows) threatening Iran by standing in the desert holding an automatic
rifle and wearing sunglasses.

Comey's lawyers can point to the "8646" T-shirts and why didn't
they go after the t-shirt makers and their purchasers.

Also the "8647" T-shirts.

Poor Todd Blanche... interim AG pushed around by a madman.

He and Bondi might share Guiliani's fate.
--
And miles to go before I sleep.
-- Robert Frost
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

In article <10t0g5b$v74r$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...

On 2026-04-30 13:47, Skeeter wrote:

In article <10svvqj$pk46$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...

On 2026-04-28 13:44, c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

'Of course, not every Republican was so ready to endorse the charges.

?If it?s just down to one picture and a piece of sand, doesn?t sound
appropriate to me,? Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who?s retiring at the end
of this term, told MS NOW. ?If the entire case is premised on ?86 47?
written in conch shells on the sands of a North Carolina beach, that
looks like it?s pretty weak.?

Tillis said he went ?to the end of the internet? and concluded that, ?I
can?t find any example where it represents a threat.?

Ultimately, Tillis said, this was about ?a picture in the sand.?

?Is that really the level of pettiness that we?re at now?? he asked.'

I think posting 8647 was pretty petty. But since they went
after Trump turnabout is fair play.

LOL

Trump's looking bad in the polls, and suddenly he's "shot" at in Pennsylvania.

Trump's war is going badly and his ballroom is being heavily criticized
and suddenly there's an incident at an event he's avoided attending for years.

And? You and your foil hat. You assume but never actually
prove anything.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

On 2026-05-01 08:08, Skeeter wrote:

In article <10t0g5b$v74r$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...

On 2026-04-30 13:47, Skeeter wrote:

In article <10svvqj$pk46$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...

On 2026-04-28 13:44, c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

'Of course, not every Republican was so ready to endorse the charges.

?If it?s just down to one picture and a piece of sand, doesn?t sound
appropriate to me,? Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who?s retiring at the end >>>> of this term, told MS NOW. ?If the entire case is premised on ?86 47?
written in conch shells on the sands of a North Carolina beach, that
looks like it?s pretty weak.?

Tillis said he went ?to the end of the internet? and concluded that, ?I >>>> can?t find any example where it represents a threat.?

Ultimately, Tillis said, this was about ?a picture in the sand.?

?Is that really the level of pettiness that we?re at now?? he asked.'

I think posting 8647 was pretty petty. But since they went
after Trump turnabout is fair play.

LOL

Trump's looking bad in the polls, and suddenly he's "shot" at in
Pennsylvania.

Trump's war is going badly and his ballroom is being heavily criticized
and suddenly there's an incident at an event he's avoided attending for
years.

And? You and your foil hat. You assume but never actually
prove anything.

Again, the irony.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

On 2026-05-01 13:39:37 +0000, Chris Ahlstrom said:

super70s wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS:

On 2026-04-28 21:20:41 +0000, Alan said:

On 2026-04-28 13:44, c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

It'll get thrown out quickly.

"86" doesn't automatically mean "kill".

Trump started yammering about how it meant "the mafia" and "murders"
the same day he posts an AI meme of himself (or maybe it was real who
knows) threatening Iran by standing in the desert holding an automatic
rifle and wearing sunglasses.

Comey's lawyers can point to the "8646" T-shirts and why didn't
they go after the t-shirt makers and their purchasers.

Also the "8647" T-shirts.

Poor Todd Blanche... interim AG pushed around by a madman.

He'll have to live in infamy over this for a few decades after Trump is
dead and gone. This and defending Trump over Epstein when he was
Trump's personal lawyer.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.445e6fe2221a89a398b59a@usnews.blocknews.net:

And? You and your foil hat. You assume but never actually
prove anything.

What have YOU ever proven?



"The media demanded that Trump take a cognitive test.
He did and he passed."
"Skeeter", Feb 14 2026. There is no proof Trump ever
took such a test much less that he "passed".
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

On 2026-05-01 11:18, Mitchell Holman wrote:

Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.445e6fe2221a89a398b59a@usnews.blocknews.net:

And? You and your foil hat. You assume but never actually
prove anything.

What have YOU ever proven?

Or even supported?

"The media demanded that Trump take a cognitive test.
He did and he passed."
"Skeeter", Feb 14 2026. There is no proof Trump ever
took such a test much less that he "passed".

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

In article <10t2jdv$1g63s$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...

On 2026-05-01 08:08, Skeeter wrote:

In article <10t0g5b$v74r$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...

On 2026-04-30 13:47, Skeeter wrote:

In article <10svvqj$pk46$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...

On 2026-04-28 13:44, c186282 wrote:

Yep.

Patel just laid it out on TV news.

He thought this was over ... but after Saturday night
it's suddenly very relevant again.

'Of course, not every Republican was so ready to endorse the charges. >>>>
?If it?s just down to one picture and a piece of sand, doesn?t sound >>>> appropriate to me,? Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who?s retiring at the end >>>> of this term, told MS NOW. ?If the entire case is premised on ?86 47? >>>> written in conch shells on the sands of a North Carolina beach, that >>>> looks like it?s pretty weak.?

Tillis said he went ?to the end of the internet? and concluded that, ?I >>>> can?t find any example where it represents a threat.?

Ultimately, Tillis said, this was about ?a picture in the sand.?

?Is that really the level of pettiness that we?re at now?? he asked.' >>>

I think posting 8647 was pretty petty. But since they went
after Trump turnabout is fair play.

LOL

Trump's looking bad in the polls, and suddenly he's "shot" at in
Pennsylvania.

Trump's war is going badly and his ballroom is being heavily criticized
and suddenly there's an incident at an event he's avoided attending for
years.

And? You and your foil hat. You assume but never actually
prove anything.

Again, the irony.

That is your white flag again. We knew it was coming.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

In article <XnsB43F86A6CC751629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...

Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.445e6fe2221a89a398b59a@usnews.blocknews.net:

And? You and your foil hat. You assume but never actually
prove anything.

What have YOU ever proven?

He says as he avoids the fact that he lied about owning a
Tesla.

"The media demanded that Trump take a cognitive test.
He did and he passed."
"Skeeter", Feb 14 2026. There is no proof Trump ever
took such a test much less that he "passed".

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

In article <10t2qsq$1i02d$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...

On 2026-05-01 11:18, Mitchell Holman wrote:

Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.445e6fe2221a89a398b59a@usnews.blocknews.net:

And? You and your foil hat. You assume but never actually
prove anything.

What have YOU ever proven?

Or even supported?

Your love for Hollowman is noted. But guess what? He don't
like you. What do you think I am supposed to support?

"The media demanded that Trump take a cognitive test.
He did and he passed."
"Skeeter", Feb 14 2026. There is no proof Trump ever
took such a test much less that he "passed".

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.445ea88cced3a28698b5ad@usnews.blocknews.net:

In article <XnsB43F86A6CC751629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...

Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.445e6fe2221a89a398b59a@usnews.blocknews.net:

And? You and your foil hat. You assume but never actually
prove anything.

What have YOU ever proven?

He says as he avoids the fact that he lied about owning a
Tesla.

Show us proof I lied about that.

Not to praise Elon Musk, but it is
most reliable car I have owned.

"The media demanded that Trump take a cognitive test.
He did and he passed."
"Skeeter", Feb 14 2026. There is no proof Trump ever
took such a test much less that he "passed".

Well? Post the proof of your claim.


--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

In article <XnsB43FD314245B8629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...

Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.445ea88cced3a28698b5ad@usnews.blocknews.net:

In article <XnsB43F86A6CC751629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...

Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.445e6fe2221a89a398b59a@usnews.blocknews.net:

And? You and your foil hat. You assume but never actually
prove anything.

What have YOU ever proven?

He says as he avoids the fact that he lied about owning a
Tesla.

Show us proof I lied about that.

Not to praise Elon Musk, but it is
most reliable car I have owned.

You have and never will own one.

"The media demanded that Trump take a cognitive test.
He did and he passed."
"Skeeter", Feb 14 2026. There is no proof Trump ever
took such a test much less that he "passed".

Well? Post the proof of your claim.

You claimed you owned one. Prove it.


--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2