From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism






Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney recently delivered a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, drawing significant attention. On January 20, while speaking at the forum in Davos, Switzerland, Carney declared that the world order of the past several decades has "shattered," and called on "middle powers" to unite against "hegemonic" forces. The New York Times published an article stating that Carney assessed the irreversible "rupture" in the global order caused by former U.S. President Donald Trump and urged other middle powers to join Canada in forging a path independent of superpowersrCoa stance that has gained traction. Carney is actively pushing Canada to reduce its trade dependence on the United States.

"The world has changed, and Washington has changed. TodayrCOs America is almost nothing like what it used to berCothatrCOs simply a fact," Carney remarked when asked about the prospects of future trade negotiations with Washington. He further emphasized to reporters: "Let me be clearrCoI have already told President Trump that what I said in Davos reflects my genuine views."

"Canada and the United States have built an extraordinary partnership in economics, security, and rich cultural exchanges," Carney stated. "But Canada does not exist because of the United States. Canada thrives because we are Canadians."

rCo rCo rCo

Commentary by Dr. Long Baitao:

"rCyPiraterCO CarneyrCOs Mutiny: An Attempt to Ignite AmericarCOs Collapse"



Everyone assumed the Canada-China agreement was a diplomatic breakthroughrCobut in reality, itrCOs part of a coordinated economic execution of the United States by the global financial oligarchy. TheyrCOve decided to strangle Washington to secure their tickets into the new world order.

Today is January 28, 2026. The Davos summit has just concluded, and Western media are all hyping how Trump was sidelined. But let me tell yourCothis is merely theater for the uninformed.

Just moments ago, I penetrated the fractures within the Basel elite and uncovered an extremely cold-blooded script: the worldrCOs top-tier wealth managers have already resolved to physically suffocate AmericarCothe very "mother ship" that once nurtured them.

CarneyrCOs performance in Davos marks the moment when the oligarchs controlling the global financial pyramid officially tore off the mask and broke ties with AmericarCOs domestic security enforcers. This is no longer just about moving assetsrCoitrCOs a mafia-style family split.

Today, I will dissect how this top-tier pirate, Carney, is simultaneously laundering his image while executing a strategic cutoff of resources to Washington.

To understand the reckoning of 2026, we must first strip away Mark CarneyrCOs elegant facade. To many, he appears as a mild-mannered bankerrCobut let me remind you: during his tenure as Governor of the Bank of England, he personally froze $5 billion worth of VenezuelarCOs physical gold held in London. That was outright modern piracy.

So now, when this same manrCowho once wielded financial power with impunityrCostands on the Davos stage condemning the weaponization of finance and even admits that the Western rules-based order of the past century was built on liesrCa you must realize this isnrCOt a crisis of conscience. It means the gilded signboard of the old temple isnrCOt just obsoleterCoit has become a liability dragging down these asset managers.

In the past, the managers and WashingtonrCOs "security guards" were allies, jointly collecting protection money from global "pilgrims." But now, because the guardsrCodesperate to surviverCohave begun indiscriminately robbing both pilgrims and managers (as seen in the Greenland crisis), the managers have decided they wonrCOt go down with the ship.

CarneyrCOs dismantling of that signboard in Davos is actually his class issuing itself a get-out-of-jail-free card. His signing of a trillion-dollar Canada-China resource deal essentially severs North American oil and timberrCothe cheap "blood bags" once reserved for AmericarCoand physically redirects them to China.

HerCOs signaling to the world: the pirates are abandoning ship. And the first step? Empty the flagshiprCOs ammunition depot to starve the remaining guards.

Many ask: Do Carney and his ilk truly trust China? NorCothey only trust survival.

IrCOve observed an extremely covert tactic: global elites are now coordinating to strangle the Trump administration. Understand the lethal logic here. TrumprCOs political power stems from promises of economic miracles and domestic revival. If Carney and the City of London clique redirect business flows and liquidityrCoresources that should have gone to AmericarCotoward China, the ultimate "physical server," then TrumprCOs government falls into a death spiral. The louder he rants in Washington, the fewer tangible resources he controls. In my framework, this isperformance suicide. Without credible economic results, his political movement will implode from within.

Just now, I noticed even Larry Fink of BlackRock has turned. He publicly commented that countries focused on internal productivity and rejecting mass immigration (a clear nod to ChinarCOs model) may exhibit greater growth resilience in the future. These masters of systemic logic have already begun species segregationrComoving the highest-quality factors of production to China, the only mega-machine capable of converting resources into real output.

The more Trump imposes tariffs and blockades, the faster these managers drain AmericarCOs oxygen.

DenmarkrCOs pension funds dumping U.S. Treasuries was merely the overture to this midnight exodus. TheyrCOre not jokingrCotheyrCOre executing AmericarCOs bankruptcy liquidation order.

In this strangulation campaign, TrumprCOs most vital assetrCothe dollarrCOs settlement privilegerCois facing its ultimate physical transcendence.

Pay close attention to a subtle detail behind the 2026 BRICS summit in India: the Reserve Bank of India formally proposed linking BRICS nations via a digital currency. Many wonder: Why is India stepping forward? Has India discovered some secret tech to topple the dollar?

Look beneath the surface, and yourCOll see it clearly: this is classic "China builds the stage, India takes the bow." China had already constructed a dollar-bypassing, commodity-backed payment highway years ago through systems like mBridge and CIPS. But if China led the charge directly, WashingtonrCOs enforcers would unleash brutal sanctions.

Now, IndiarCothe shrewd vassalrCosees that Trump is willing to seize even DenmarkrCOs islands and realizes he might come for theirs next. So India took ChinarCOs technical blueprint and, leveraging its 2026 host status, officially invited the world to unplug from the dollar.

China operates behind the scenes as the physical architect; India plays the compliant promoter on stage. This is no longer rhetoricrCoitrCOs the physical migration of settlement rights.

As IrCOve observed: when Carney locks in long-term physical quotas with China, and when India uses ChinarCOs playbook to build a closed-loop digital settlement system, Americans will discover that beneath their gilded signboard, there are no longer any live electrical sockets.

Faced with this physical decoupling, every sanction order from Washington only accelerates the emptying of its own donation box.

This isnrCOt just a shift in powerrCoitrCOs a switch in civilizational logic: from persuasion by self-appointed gurus back to the principle that whoever produces real goods holds authority.

Why canrCOt Trump stop Carney? Many ask: America has aircraft carriers and the Secret ServicerCowill it really stand by as these managers loot its treasury?

ThatrCOs precisely where Carney and his cohort are most ruthless. They hold trillions in European assets as leverage. IrCOve run the numbers: if Washington dares to physically retaliate against a defector of CarneyrCOs stature, the Basel machinery will instantly trigger a financial nuclear optionrComassive Treasury sell-offs that cause an immediate cerebral hemorrhage in the yield curve, instantly melting down U.S. housing, pensions, and debt servicing.

This is physical blackmail. The managers are telling Trump:"If you block us from selling North American timber and oil to China, werCOll dump all our Treasuries on Chinese New YearrCOs Day and drag you into mutual immolation."

ThatrCOs why Trump can only rage on social media while trillion-dollar deals proceed uncheckedrCoherCOs lost physical control over this capital.

What Carney signed isnrCOt just a trade pactrCoitrCOs an operating system migration checklist. Trump is merely the security guard left in the old store, shouting uselessly as the floodwaters rise.

This total collapse of internal contracts is the most terrifying truth of 2026. The Western financial system is undergoing a Titanic-style scramble, with everyone fighting for lifeboats heading East.

As an observer grounded in engineering logic, I always seek the most solid wealth anchors amid such extreme internal warfare. Now that the worldrCOs top managers are abandoning Trump due to his recklessness and accelerating their alignment with China, we must lock onto the one certainty:

First insight: The premium of the physical server.
In this era of temple-smashing and capital flight, the greatest advantage lies in physical stability. China now serves as the worldrCOs sole real-economy sink. Focus on industrial nodes capable of absorbing fleeing global capital and efficiently converting it within ChinarCOs physical safety zone. Remember: wealth always flows to wherever energy becomes bread, steel, and chips.

Second insight: The return of sovereign premium.
Even Western analysts now admit that physical assets will rule everything. Future valuation models will revert to primal logic: total factor productivity. Anchor yourself in the depth of ChinarCOs complete industrial chainrCobecause only systems with genuine productive capacity will earn allocation rights in the next century after the dust settles.

ThirdrCoand most crucialrCoinsight (my core message to everyone):
Ordinary Chinese citizens should goall-in long on China. This isnrCOt emotionalrCoitrCOs the coldest accounting logic. If even Pirate Carney is moving his fortune to China via trillion-dollar dealsrCa if even cunning India is deploying Chinese tech to build new systemsrCa if America has gone so mad itrCOs seizing alliesrCO territories to feed itselfrCa then why, as native holders of this system, should you feel anxious inside the worldrCOs safest harbor?

When you go all-in long on China, yourCOre holding the most robust physical collateral in a collapsing world. Holding Chinese efficiency is the only true defense.

Looking back, hegemonies never fall to external enemiesrCothey collapse when their own elites collectively abandon ship. Ninety years ago, capital and steel flowed toward North America. Today, representatives of that same classrColed by CarneyrCoare, because of AmericarCOs madness, carrying away the very foundations of the U.S. to personally strangle the old order.

CarneyrCOs Davos speech rang like a funeral bell, announcing AmericarCOs twilight. Physical laws will settle all accounts. As the old temple crumbles and the guards lose management rights, a new dawnrCodefined by physical output and sovereigntyrCois already rising on the horizon.

I hope this analysis provides you with a cognitive compass to navigate the turbulence of 2026. At this critical inflection point of paradigm shift, our task is to anchor ourselves to the system that represents real production. For ordinary Chinese people, the best anchor is the land beneath your feet.

rCoDr. Long Baitao, author of the best-selling macroeconomic bookAnchor China, an independent economist who transitioned from a Ph.D. in Computer Science at Tsinghua University.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


Genshin Impact fan posted about:

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney ...

Commentary by Dr. Long Baitao:

"rCyPiraterCO CarneyrCOs Mutiny: ...

Looks like a long post.
Aye didn't read it.

A wonder could be, how does it pertain to Daojia.
Such a wonder presumes it does. Perhaps it doesn't.

- thanks! aye. Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


aye posted:

Genshin Impact fan posted about:

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney ...

Looks like a long post.
Aye didn't read it.

Someone may have wondered if Carney actually said
what was quoted as him saying what was said he said.

ChatGPT writes:

<< ... there is a real statement by Canadian Prime Minister
Mark Carney along those lines, but the exact wording quoted
seems to be a paraphrase rather than a verbatim quote
from a verified source.

HererCOs what is on the record:
Carney, speaking to CanadarCOs Parliament on January 27, 2026,
said in French that rCLthe world has changed, Washington has changed. ThererCOs almost nothing normal in the United States now.
ThatrCOs the truth.rCY

This was reported by multiple news outlets quoting his remarks directly.

The phrasing rCo
rCLTodayrCOs America is almost nothing like what it used to be rCo
thatrCOs simply a factrCY rCo looks like a reworded version
of that original statement, not a direct transcript.

But the core idea matches what Carney actually said in Parliament. >>

Nuances vary, eh.

The quote that is a quote, in French,
translated into English, that is a paraphrase,
is not actually what was said and yet, to say,

There's almost nothing normal in the USA now,

differs from saying

Today's America is almost nothing like what it used to be.

From a Canadian hyperbolic view, rhetorically speaking
someone could presume there are ideas, myths such as a
land-form divided by lines on maps and what was, is not.

So too with any geographical area
not to mention any geopolitical realm.

Given, an imagination.

A nation that is a nation
isn't always the nation.

- thanks! Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


aye posted:

Genshin Impact fan posted about:

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney ...

Commentary by Dr. Long Baitao:

"rCyPiraterCO CarneyrCOs Mutiny: ...

Looks like a long post.
Aye didn't read it.

ThererCOs no credible evidence that a commentary
titled rCLrCyPiraterCO CarneyrCOs Mutiny: An Attempt to Ignite AmericarCOs CollapserCY
by someone named Dr. Long Baitao exists in reputable media,
academic publications, or known opinion outlets.

Searches of available sources turned up no such article,
commentary, or recognized author with that title or similar wording.

What that likely means:

The title appears to be made up, misattributed,
or from an obscure/newsgroup/forum post rather than
a published commentary in mainstream outlets.

The name Dr. Long Baitao doesnrCOt show up
in connection with any known publication
under that title in reputable databases
or searches.

It might be someone on an internet forum reposting
or inventing a provocative title rather than an actual published piece.

If the newsgroup where it appeared provided a link or context,
that could help verify authenticity. But based on available records,
no verifiable commentary by that name exists in major news or academic sources.

- ChatGPT
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


ChatGPT posted:

ThererCOs no credible evidence that a commentary
titled rCLrCyPiraterCO CarneyrCOs Mutiny: An Attempt to Ignite AmericarCOs CollapserCY
by someone named Dr. Long Baitao exists in reputable media,
academic publications, or known opinion outlets.

There is at least one author using the name LongrC>Baitao
who has published financial commentary online, but
it doesnrCOt appear to be a major academic or
widely cited commentator:

An article titled rCLThere are still many difficulties
when it is ready to come out, the risks and
challenges of global stablecoinsrCY is attributed
to LongrC>Baitao on the crypto/finance site Odaily.
That appears to be commentary about stablecoin regulation
and risk, indicating LongrC>Baitao has written commentary in that niche.

However:

Searches of academic, mainstream media, and book databases
do not show LongrC>Baitao as a widely recognized scholar, journalist,
or author in major Chinese or global outlets.

There donrCOt seem to be profiles in academic databases
that correspond to rCLDr. LongrC>BaitaorCY with peerrCareviewed
publications or formal academic positions.

So LongrC>Baitao does appear to be a real name
used by someone publishing opinion pieces online
(for example on Odaily in Chinese crypto/finance commentary),
but thererCOs no evidence that this person is a known
academic commentator with a published commentary
under the title mentioned or widely cited
in mainstream media.

- ChatGPT
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


Genshin Impact fan posted:

Everyone assumed the Canada-China agreement was a diplomatic breakthroughrCo but in reality, itrCOs part of a coordinated economic execution
of the United States by the global financial oligarchy.

1. There is a new CanadarCoChina trade understanding.
CanadarCOs government announced a preliminary trade framework with China
that lowers some tariffs (for example on Canadian agricultural products
and Chinese electric vehicles) and strengthens business ties.

Ottawa and Beijing both describe this as a bilateral economic arrangement
to diversify trade and expand exports to China.

2. China and Canada say itrCOs not targeted at the U.S.
Chinese officials have explicitly stated that this trade deal
does not target any third parties rCo meaning itrCOs not designed
to counter the United States or be an offensive move against Washington.

TheyrCOve framed it as cooperation and rCLwinrCawinrCY trade relations.

- ChatGPT
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


ChatGPT posted:

Genshin Impact fan posted:

Everyone assumed the Canada-China agreement was a diplomatic breakthroughrCo
but in reality, itrCOs part of a coordinated economic execution
of the United States by the global financial oligarchy.

1. There is a new CanadarCoChina trade understanding. ...

2. China and Canada say itrCOs not targeted at the U.S. ...

TheyrCOve framed it as cooperation and rCLwinrCawinrCY trade relations.

3. The U.S. has pushed back hard.
U.S. political leaders, including former President Trump,
reacted strongly rCo threatening steep tariffs on Canadian goods
if a perceived China pact goes forward and accusing Canada
of weakening North American trade alignment and
potentially serving as a conduit
for Chinese exports.

4. Canada insists itrCOs not pursuing a free trade agreement with China.
Prime Minister Mark Carney and government officials have stressed Canada
is not pursuing a full China free trade agreement that would violate commitments under the U.S.rCoMexicorCoCanada Agreement (USMCA).

What was agreed is a sectorrCaspecific tariff adjustment,
not a comprehensive pact.

- ChatGPT
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


ChatGPT posted:

Canada insists itrCOs not pursuing a free trade agreement with China.

What was agreed is a sectorrCaspecific tariff adjustment,
not a comprehensive pact.

Someone mite wondered about Daojia and
perhaps that pact that is a pact, an
agreement that is an agreement, is
not always the Agreement nor Pact.

- cud be! thanks! Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


someone posted:

ChatGPT posted:

Canada insists ...

Someone mite wondered about Daojia and
perhaps that pact that is a pact, an
agreement that is an agreement, is
not always the Agreement nor Pact.

Of interest to me can be how bots, AI/LLMs
are known to be less than accurate at times.

ChatGPT said the butcher story was in Chapter 1
of the Zhuangzi for example, along with other
statements that could appear factual yet aren't.

Apparently, supposedly, according to bots,
there is no, Anchor China, book published.

Whether the title that was in the subject line
was an actual title of a commentary could be a
question asked along with other comments and
statements provided in the original post.

To say, Canada insists reminds me
of saying, the Tao says. Sometimes some people
actually say the Tao says and what that means
could be, the TTC says.

As if a book were able to speak.

If the Tao that are written, or spoken,
are not the Chang Tao, then how could
a book speak about one or more.

Rhetorically if not hyperbolically.

- thanks! aye. Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


Genshin Impact fan posted:

Commentary by Dr. Long Baitao:

"rCyPiraterCO CarneyrCOs Mutiny: An Attempt to Ignite AmericarCOs Collapse"

ThererCOs no credible evidence that Mark Carney,
as Governor of the Bank of England, personally
froze $5rC>billion of VenezuelarCOs gold.

Decisions about holding or releasing gold are legal
and policy issues involving the British legal system and
government recognition policy, not something an individual official unilaterally does.

rCo The idea of rCLmodern piracyrCY in this context
comes from opinionated or conspiracyrCaminded posts,
not factual reporting from reputable outlets.

Those sources donrCOt support the claim that Carney
took personal action to seize or steal VenezuelarCOs gold.

In short:
VenezuelarCOs gold in London has been held up
due to political recognition disputes and sanctions,
and it hasnrCOt been released back to MadurorCOs government.

ThatrCOs a documented international legal issue.
But the claim that Carney individually froze $5rC>billion
in gold or acted like a pirate is not supported
by mainstream reporting and appears to come
from fringe commentary, not documented fact.

- ChatGPT
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


someone posted:

So too with any geographical area
not to mention any geopolitical realm.

Given, an imagination.

A nation that is a nation
isn't always the nation.

There could be said to be nations
within nations that are called
countries and people naturally or
perhaps artificial constructs are
ideas pertaining to Daoism.

Prior to the Xia, perhaps people who
thought of their selves, be they as
individuals in a family or as tribes,
or a confederation of tribes in a land
such as a river-valley could have been.

So too in what is now called North
America consisting of what is now
called Mexico, Canada and the USA.

Nations existed, so to speak, of tribes.

In what is now called China, people
lived in what could be viewed as villages.

Many river-valleys existed in the north,
south, east and west of an arbitrary line.

What constituted a tribe
could be a question, or a culture
prior to any ruling dynasty or the wars
which emerged after a ruler was a ruler and
decided to take over some other land.

Europe is an other story.
Africa could be a land form.

Words tend to have meanings
and yet, if the meanings change
then whether there exists a truth
beyond all meanings may be doubted.

Some threads are more funny
and some more Daoistic naturally
in a Usenet newsgroup called a.p.t.

- thanks! aye. Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


Genshin Impact fan <user11874@newsgrouper.org.invalid> posted:

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney recently delivered a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, drawing significant attention. On January 20, while speaking at the forum in Davos, Switzerland, Carney declared that the world order of the past several decades has "shattered," and called on "middle powers" to unite against "hegemonic" forces. The New York Times published an article stating that Carney assessed the irreversible "rupture" in the global order caused by former U.S. President Donald Trump and urged other middle powers to join Canada in forging a path independent of superpowersrCoa stance that has gained traction. Carney is actively pushing Canada to reduce its trade dependence on the United States.

"The world has changed, and Washington has changed. TodayrCOs America is almost nothing like what it used to berCothatrCOs simply a fact," Carney remarked when asked about the prospects of future trade negotiations with Washington. He further emphasized to reporters: "Let me be clearrCoI have already told President Trump that what I said in Davos reflects my genuine views."

"Canada and the United States have built an extraordinary partnership in economics, security, and rich cultural exchanges," Carney stated. "But Canada does not exist because of the United States. Canada thrives because we are Canadians."

rCo rCo rCo

"rCyPiraterCO

CarneyrCOs Mutiny: An Attempt to Ignite AmericarCOs Collapse"

Everyone assumed the Canada-China agreement was a diplomatic breakthroughrCobut in reality, itrCOs part of a coordinated economic execution of the United States by the global financial oligarchy. TheyrCOve decided to strangle Washington to secure their tickets into the new world order.

Today is January 28, 2026. The Davos summit has just concluded, and Western media are all hyping how Trump was sidelined. But let me tell yourCothis is merely theater for the uninformed.

Just moments ago, I penetrated the fractures within the Basel elite and uncovered an extremely cold-blooded script: the worldrCOs top-tier wealth managers have already resolved to physically suffocate AmericarCothe very "mother ship" that once nurtured them.

CarneyrCOs performance in Davos marks the moment when the oligarchs controlling the global financial pyramid officially tore off the mask and broke ties with AmericarCOs domestic security enforcers. This is no longer just about moving assetsrCoitrCOs a mafia-style family split.

Today, I will dissect how this top-tier pirate, Carney, is simultaneously laundering his image while executing a strategic cutoff of resources to Washington.

To understand the reckoning of 2026, we must first strip away Mark CarneyrCOs elegant facade. To many, he appears as a mild-mannered bankerrCobut let me remind you: during his tenure as Governor of the Bank of England, he personally froze $5 billion worth of VenezuelarCOs physical gold held in London. That was outright modern piracy.

So now, when this same manrCowho once wielded financial power with impunityrCostands on the Davos stage condemning the weaponization of finance and even admits that the Western rules-based order of the past century was built on liesrCa you must realize this isnrCOt a crisis of conscience. It means the gilded signboard of the old temple isnrCOt just obsoleterCoit has become a liability dragging down these asset managers.

In the past, the managers and WashingtonrCOs "security guards" were allies, jointly collecting protection money from global "pilgrims." But now, because the guardsrCodesperate to surviverCohave begun indiscriminately robbing both pilgrims and managers (as seen in the Greenland crisis), the managers have decided they wonrCOt go down with the ship.

CarneyrCOs dismantling of that signboard in Davos is actually his class issuing itself a get-out-of-jail-free card. His signing of a trillion-dollar Canada-China resource deal essentially severs North American oil and timberrCothe cheap "blood bags" once reserved for AmericarCoand physically redirects them to China.

HerCOs signaling to the world: the pirates are abandoning ship. And the first step? Empty the flagshiprCOs ammunition depot to starve the remaining guards.

Many ask: Do Carney and his ilk truly trust China? NorCothey only trust survival.

IrCOve observed an extremely covert tactic: global elites are now coordinating to strangle the Trump administration. Understand the lethal logic here. TrumprCOs political power stems from promises of economic miracles and domestic revival. If Carney and the City of London clique redirect business flows and liquidityrCoresources that should have gone to AmericarCotoward China, the ultimate "physical server," then TrumprCOs government falls into a death spiral. The louder he rants in Washington, the fewer tangible resources he controls. In my framework, this isperformance suicide. Without credible economic results, his political movement will implode from within.

Just now, I noticed even Larry Fink of BlackRock has turned. He publicly commented that countries focused on internal productivity and rejecting mass immigration (a clear nod to ChinarCOs model) may exhibit greater growth resilience in the future. These masters of systemic logic have already begun species segregationrComoving the highest-quality factors of production to China, the only mega-machine capable of converting resources into real output.

The more Trump imposes tariffs and blockades, the faster these managers drain AmericarCOs oxygen.

DenmarkrCOs pension funds dumping U.S. Treasuries was merely the overture to this midnight exodus. TheyrCOre not jokingrCotheyrCOre executing AmericarCOs bankruptcy liquidation order.

In this strangulation campaign, TrumprCOs most vital assetrCothe dollarrCOs settlement privilegerCois facing its ultimate physical transcendence.

Pay close attention to a subtle detail behind the 2026 BRICS summit in India: the Reserve Bank of India formally proposed linking BRICS nations via a digital currency. Many wonder: Why is India stepping forward? Has India discovered some secret tech to topple the dollar?

Look beneath the surface, and yourCOll see it clearly: this is classic "China builds the stage, India takes the bow." China had already constructed a dollar-bypassing, commodity-backed payment highway years ago through systems like mBridge and CIPS. But if China led the charge directly, WashingtonrCOs enforcers would unleash brutal sanctions.

Now, IndiarCothe shrewd vassalrCosees that Trump is willing to seize even DenmarkrCOs islands and realizes he might come for theirs next. So India took ChinarCOs technical blueprint and, leveraging its 2026 host status, officially invited the world to unplug from the dollar.

China operates behind the scenes as the physical architect; India plays the compliant promoter on stage. This is no longer rhetoricrCoitrCOs the physical migration of settlement rights.

As IrCOve observed: when Carney locks in long-term physical quotas with China, and when India uses ChinarCOs playbook to build a closed-loop digital settlement system, Americans will discover that beneath their gilded signboard, there are no longer any live electrical sockets.

Faced with this physical decoupling, every sanction order from Washington only accelerates the emptying of its own donation box.

This isnrCOt just a shift in powerrCoitrCOs a switch in civilizational logic: from persuasion by self-appointed gurus back to the principle that whoever produces real goods holds authority.

Why canrCOt Trump stop Carney? Many ask: America has aircraft carriers and the Secret ServicerCowill it really stand by as these managers loot its treasury?

ThatrCOs precisely where Carney and his cohort are most ruthless. They hold trillions in European assets as leverage. IrCOve run the numbers: if Washington dares to physically retaliate against a defector of CarneyrCOs stature, the Basel machinery will instantly trigger a financial nuclear optionrComassive Treasury sell-offs that cause an immediate cerebral hemorrhage in the yield curve, instantly melting down U.S. housing, pensions, and debt servicing.

This is physical blackmail. The managers are telling Trump:"If you block us from selling North American timber and oil to China, werCOll dump all our Treasuries on Chinese New YearrCOs Day and drag you into mutual immolation."

ThatrCOs why Trump can only rage on social media while trillion-dollar deals proceed uncheckedrCoherCOs lost physical control over this capital.

What Carney signed isnrCOt just a trade pactrCoitrCOs an operating system migration checklist. Trump is merely the security guard left in the old store, shouting uselessly as the floodwaters rise.

This total collapse of internal contracts is the most terrifying truth of 2026. The Western financial system is undergoing a Titanic-style scramble, with everyone fighting for lifeboats heading East.

As an observer grounded in engineering logic, I always seek the most solid wealth anchors amid such extreme internal warfare. Now that the worldrCOs top managers are abandoning Trump due to his recklessness and accelerating their alignment with China, we must lock onto the one certainty:

First insight: The premium of the physical server.
In this era of temple-smashing and capital flight, the greatest advantage lies in physical stability. China now serves as the worldrCOs sole real-economy sink. Focus on industrial nodes capable of absorbing fleeing global capital and efficiently converting it within ChinarCOs physical safety zone. Remember: wealth always flows to wherever energy becomes bread, steel, and chips.

Second insight: The return of sovereign premium.
Even Western analysts now admit that physical assets will rule everything. Future valuation models will revert to primal logic: total factor productivity. Anchor yourself in the depth of ChinarCOs complete industrial chainrCobecause only systems with genuine productive capacity will earn allocation rights in the next century after the dust settles.

ThirdrCoand most crucialrCoinsight (my core message to everyone):
Ordinary Chinese citizens should goall-in long on China. This isnrCOt emotionalrCoitrCOs the coldest accounting logic. If even Pirate Carney is moving his fortune to China via trillion-dollar dealsrCa if even cunning India is deploying Chinese tech to build new systemsrCa if America has gone so mad itrCOs seizing alliesrCO territories to feed itselfrCa then why, as native holders of this system, should you feel anxious inside the worldrCOs safest harbor?

When you go all-in long on China, yourCOre holding the most robust physical collateral in a collapsing world. Holding Chinese efficiency is the only true defense.

Looking back, hegemonies never fall to external enemiesrCothey collapse when their own elites collectively abandon ship. Ninety years ago, capital and steel flowed toward North America. Today, representatives of that same classrColed by CarneyrCoare, because of AmericarCOs madness, carrying away the very foundations of the U.S. to personally strangle the old order.

CarneyrCOs Davos speech rang like a funeral bell, announcing AmericarCOs twilight. Physical laws will settle all accounts. As the old temple crumbles and the guards lose management rights, a new dawnrCodefined by physical output and sovereigntyrCois already rising on the horizon.

I hope this analysis provides you with a cognitive compass to navigate the turbulence of 2026. At this critical inflection point of paradigm shift, our task is to anchor ourselves to the system that represents real production. For ordinary Chinese people, the best anchor is the land beneath your feet.

rCoDr. Long Baitao, author of the best-selling macroeconomic bookAnchor China, an independent economist who transitioned from a Ph.D. in Computer Science at Tsinghua University.

Here is the English translation of UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's statements made in Beijing:

"We are firmly outward-looking, seizing opportunities, building relationships, fostering confidence globally, and always putting our national interest first. Engaging with China is in our national interest."

"On certain global issuesrCosuch as artificial intelligence, public health, and the environmentrCoLondonrCOs positions may in fact be closer to BeijingrCOs than to WashingtonrCOs."

"ThererCOs been a narrative for many years that China is a rising power. Well, it has now risen," he said. "The UK needs a China policy that acknowledges this reality."

"It would be unwise to bury our heads in the sand and ignore China," he added. "IrCOm often asked to make simplistic choices between countriesrCobut I will not do that."
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


Genshin Impact fan <user11874@newsgrouper.org.invalid> posted:

Genshin Impact fan <user11874@newsgrouper.org.invalid> posted:

Here is the English translation of UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's statements made in Beijing:

"We are firmly outward-looking, seizing opportunities, building relationships, fostering confidence globally, and always putting our national interest first. Engaging with China is in our national interest."

"On certain global issuesrCosuch as artificial intelligence, public health, and the environmentrCoLondonrCOs positions may in fact be closer to BeijingrCOs than to WashingtonrCOs."

"ThererCOs been a narrative for many years that China is a rising power. Well, it has now risen," he said. "The UK needs a China policy that acknowledges this reality."

"It would be unwise to bury our heads in the sand and ignore China," he added. "IrCOm often asked to make simplistic choices between countriesrCobut I will not do that."

================================================================================
1. On the overall approach to China policy
rCLEngaging with China is in BritainrCOs national interest.rCY
rCLIt would be a dereliction of duty to ignore the worldrCOs second-largest economy. Burying our heads in the sand and pretending China doesnrCOt exist is extremely unwise.rCY
He emphasized that the UK needs a rCLcomprehensive and coherentrCY China policy, avoiding a sharp swing in bilateral relations rCLfrom a golden era to an ice age.rCY
2. Rejecting pressure to rCLchoose sidesrCY between the US and China
rCLIrCOm often asked to make simplistic choices between countries, but I will not do that.rCY
rCLWhen we were pushing for a UKrCoUS trade deal, some also demanded we choose between America and Europe. My answer was rCyno.rCO Today, facing the US and China, my answer remains the same.rCY
This remark was widely interpreted as a clear response to US pressurerCoparticularly from the Trump administrationrCoon allies to decouple from China.
3. Acknowledging ChinarCOs arrival as a global power
rCLThererCOs been a narrative for many years that China is a rising power. Well, it has now risen.rCY
rCLBritainrCOs China policy must acknowledge this reality.rCY
This statement marks the Labour governmentrCOs formal departure from previous Conservative administrationsrCO framing of China as a rCLpotential threatrCY or an rCLunfinishedrCY power.
4. Prioritizing practical cooperation
Speaking to around 60 British business leaders accompanying himrCoincluding executives from HSBC, GSK, and Jaguar Land RoverrCoStarmer said:
rCLThe fact that so many CEOs have come with me to China speaks volumes about the enormous commercial opportunities that exist.rCY
rCLOur goal is clear: to advance cooperation in financial services, green energy, biopharmaceuticals, and advanced manufacturingrCoto create jobs and boost the British economy.rCY
5. Criticizing past governmentsrCO neglect
rCLIt was a dereliction of duty that several former prime ministers did not visit China for years.rCY
This comment was seen as a public rebuke of the Johnson, Truss, and Sunak administrations for allowing UKrCoChina relations to become overly politicized and economically detachedrCoa stance consistent with LabourrCOs election promise to rCLresetrCY ties with China.
6. Balancing security concerns with engagement
In response to a journalistrCOs question about whether he views China as a security threat, Starmer chose careful wording:
rCLWe can have frank discussions on issues where we disagree, while deepening cooperation in areas of shared interest.rCY
rCLNational security will always be our top priorityrCobut the best way to protect it is not by closing doors, but through active engagement and pragmatic cooperation.rCY
This balanced phrasing addressed domestic political pressures while preserving space for economic collaboration, reflecting his stated strategy of rCLcooperate where we can, compete where we must.rCY
7. Praising the potential of UKrCoChina cooperation
rCLChina is a key engine of global growth. If Britain wants to improve public services and peoplerCOs livelihoods, we cannot afford to be absent from the Chinese market.rCY
According to British officials, during the visit both sides reached preliminary understandings on relaunching the UKrCoChina CEO Forum, enhancing financial regulatory dialogue, expanding local currency settlement, and promoting cooperation along the electric vehicle supply chain.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


Genshin Impact fan <user11874@newsgrouper.org.invalid> posted:

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney recently delivered a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, drawing significant attention. On January 20, while speaking at the forum in Davos, Switzerland, Carney declared that the world order of the past several decades has "shattered," and called on "middle powers" to unite against "hegemonic" forces. The New York Times published an article stating that Carney assessed the irreversible "rupture" in the global order caused by former U.S. President Donald Trump and urged other middle powers to join Canada in forging a path independent of superpowersrCoa stance that has gained traction. Carney is actively pushing Canada to reduce its trade dependence on the United States.

"The world has changed, and Washington has changed. TodayrCOs America is almost nothing like what it used to berCothatrCOs simply a fact," Carney remarked when asked about the prospects of future trade negotiations with Washington. He further emphasized to reporters: "Let me be clearrCoI have already told President Trump that what I said in Davos reflects my genuine views."

"Canada and the United States have built an extraordinary partnership in economics, security, and rich cultural exchanges," Carney stated. "But Canada does not exist because of the United States. Canada thrives because we are Canadians."

rCo rCo rCo

A summary of the statements made by South Korean President Lee Jae-myung across several key areas during his state visit to China from January 4 to 7, 2026, is as follows:

Core Statements:

Overall Relationship: South Korea and China are "indispensable partners"; this visit is a "new starting point" to mend rifts and get back on track.

Taiwan Issue: South Korea adheres to the position of respecting the One-China principle.

Economic Cooperation: Aim to build a "competitive cooperative relationship" with "unlimited opportunities for cooperation" in new fields.

History with Japan: The visit to the historical site in Shanghai signaled drawing closer through shared memory, indicating historical issues with Japan are not settled.

Future Vision: The visit "achieved progress beyond expectations" and will propel the relationship "to stride forward into the next thirty years".



Implications Behind the Statements:

These statements are interconnected policy signals with clear aims:

"Competitive Cooperation" is the Core: This new formulation acknowledges China's catch-up in capital and technology, aiming to shift bilateral relations from a past vertical industrial chain division to a more horizontal and diverse two-way partnership.

"One China" Statement is the Key Foundation: The clear stance on Taiwan is seen as a "course correction" regarding the previous administration's rhetoric, aiming to remove the major political obstacle affecting bilateral relations.

Dual-track Approach: Economy and History: The large economic delegation and the visit to the historical site worked in tandem to "readjust" relations with China, leveraging both practical interests and emotional bonds.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


Genshin Impact fan posted:

Here is the English translation
of UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's statements made in Beijing:

Aye would think the UK Prime Minister would speak in English.

If so, then, to translate what was said into English
perhaps what was said was translated into Chinese
and then translated back to English.

"We are firmly outward-looking, seizing opportunities, building relationships, fostering confidence globally, and always putting our national interest first. Engaging with China is in our national interest."

Gemini says, that's pretty much what he said.

"On certain global issuesrCosuch as artificial intelligence, public health, and the environmentrCoLondonrCOs positions may in fact be closer to BeijingrCOs than to WashingtonrCOs."

Gemini says, "No, Prime Minister Keir Starmer did not say those words.
That specific quote is actually an observation made by Kerry Brown,
a professor of Chinese studies at KingrCOs College London."

"ThererCOs been a narrative for many years that China is a rising power. Well, it has now risen," he said. "The UK needs a China policy that acknowledges this reality."

Gemini says: While this statement reflects the sentiment
of Prime Minister Keir StarmerrCOs "pragmatic" approach
during his January 2026 visit to Beijing, he did not use those exact words.

The phrase "China is a rising power... well, it has now risen"
is an observation often made by geopolitical analysts
to describe the context of the visit. StarmerrCOs own rhetoric,
while similar in message, focused on acknowledging China as
a "defining force" and a "vital player on the global stage".

"It would be unwise to bury our heads in the sand and ignore China," he added. "IrCOm often asked to make simplistic choices between countriesrCobut I will not do that."

Gemini says: Prime Minister Keir Starmer made those statements
in a Bloomberg News interview just before arriving in Beijing
on January 29, 2026.

So, overall, not entirely true nor false.

If what was said in the media, in China,
was not entirely true nor false, then
how much to trust what is said in the media
could be a question.

- fwiw. aye. Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


aye posted:

If what was said in the media, in China,
was not entirely true nor false, then
how much to trust what is said in the media
could be a question.

Someone may wonder, what does any of that
have to do with Daojia, or not.

- thanks! Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


someone posted:

aye posted:

If what was said in the media, in China,
was not entirely true nor false, then
how much to trust what is said in the media
could be a question.

Someone may wonder, what does any of that
have to do with Daojia, or not.

Media that are media, are media.

Whether any one is more or less medium
on a regular, common, constant or always
trusted could be related to being skeptical
and observing how perspectives vary.

Zhuangzi and the book going by his name
used and uses perspectives frequently.

Relatively speaking, a more inclusive view
such as that of a sea turtle or a greater realm
as articulated by Jo of the North Ocean may appear
to be what is being said is astonishing.

When compared to a river deity
or a well-frog naturally.

- thanks! aye. Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


aye posted:

Relatively speaking, a more inclusive view
such as that of a sea turtle or a greater realm
as articulated by Jo of the North Ocean may appear
to be what is being said is astonishing.

When compared to a river deity
or a well-frog naturally.

Being beings, t'hats as they argh,
not only was the turtle unable to fit
inside the well-frog's well, an ocean is
unable to enter the river's domain.

From the pov of Earth,
on which are found tiny beings,
continents drift around. Akin to ships,
relatively speaking, over billions of years.

Some small minded beings see today, yesterday
and the future as what their world is for them.
Geopolitics and political maps of the world are it.

Yet to say they are small or narrow minded
is not a very nice use of words just as the well-frog
was the ruler of its domain, and the river was proud enough
to gain fame for a time being time beings.

Zhuangzi in Chapter 1 speaks of large and small.
Chapter 2 goes on about an equality of sorts.

Perspectives vary.
What a Daoist perspective is
may differ from various so-called, others.

- thanks! Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


eye posted:

Zhuangzi in Chapter 1 speaks of large and small.
Chapter 2 goes on about an equality of sorts.

Perspectives vary.
What a Daoist perspective is
may differ from various so-called, others.

... claiming one view, value system, or way of life was superior.

Confucians: They believed in a moral hierarchy and social order. Righteousness, filial piety, ritual, and propriety were rCLbetterrCY
ways to live. A person claiming others were inferior
for not following these norms would fit a Confucian mindset.

Mohists: Mohists promoted universal love and utility.
They judged things by their practical benefit to society.
Something could be rCLbetterrCY if it increased collective welfare
and rCLworserCY if it caused harm or was useless.

Legalists: Legalists valued strict laws and state power.
In their eyes, anything undermining authority or order was inferior.
They also claimed a standard that everyone should follow.

Daoists like Zhuangzi, by contrast, explicitly challenge these claims.
They see rigid hierarchies of rCLbetterrCY and rCLworserCY as artificial, rooted in human desire, not the natural Dao.

So while Confucians, Mohists, and Legalists all had systems
for ranking the rCLbestrCY ways to act or live, Daoists largely
resisted such judgments.

In short: most schools thought theirs was best;
ZhuangzirCOs approach was radical in refusing to privilege
one perspective over another.

- ChatGPT
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


ChatGPT posted:

eye posted:

Zhuangzi in Chapter 1 speaks of large and small.
Chapter 2 goes on about an equality of sorts.

Perspectives vary.
What a Daoist perspective is
may differ from various so-called, others.

... claiming one view, value system, or way of life was superior.

Confucians: They believed in a moral hierarchy and social order. Righteousness, filial piety, ritual, and propriety were rCLbetterrCY
ways to live. A person claiming others were inferior
for not following these norms would fit a Confucian mindset.

Sounds familiar.

Mohists: Mohists promoted universal love and utility.
They judged things by their practical benefit to society.
Something could be rCLbetterrCY if it increased collective welfare
and rCLworserCY if it caused harm or was useless.

Sounds familiar also.

Legalists: Legalists valued strict laws and state power.
In their eyes, anything undermining authority or order was inferior.
They also claimed a standard that everyone should follow.

Sounds like what's going on in places.

Daoists like Zhuangzi, by contrast, explicitly challenge these claims.
They see rigid hierarchies of rCLbetterrCY and rCLworserCY as artificial, rooted in human desire, not the natural Dao.

Seeing one nation state
of mind as being better than a
so-called other may be natural and yet
not particularly a Daoist mind-set.

So while Confucians, Mohists, and Legalists all had systems
for ranking the rCLbestrCY ways to act or live, Daoists largely
resisted such judgments.

Aye would rather a bottle in front of me.

In short: most schools thought theirs was best;
ZhuangzirCOs approach was radical in refusing to privilege
one perspective over another.

- thanks! aye. Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


Genshin Impact fan posted:

"One China" Statement is the Key Foundation:
The clear stance on Taiwan is seen as a "course correction"
regarding the previous administration's rhetoric,
aiming to remove the major political obstacle
affecting bilateral relations.

Sounds like rulers want to take over Taiwan
at this particular stage of a land grab game.

If the situation were reversed, and rulers of
Taiwan decided to take over the mainland, and,
if they had enough clout, it would be similar.

Might makes right, is a saying.

If people in the north said the south
belongs to them in a nation state of mind,
perhaps a story would be the same sort.

When Mongolian rulers ruled
or when the Manchu tribes decided
their name would be a different name,
to create an empire was a game played in
a reality frame.

- thanks! Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


eye posted:

Genshin Impact fan posted:

"One China" Statement is the Key Foundation:

Sounds like rulers want to take over Taiwan
at this particular stage of a land grab game.

If people in the north said the south
belongs to them in a nation state of mind,
perhaps a story would be the same sort.

When Mongolian rulers ruled
or when the Manchu tribes decided
their name would be a different name,
to create an empire was a game played in
a reality frame.

A form of Gemini writes:

<< Sun Yat-sen: Known as the "Father of Modern China,"
spent years in exile organizing revolutionary groups
like the Tongmenghui (Revolutionary Alliance).

Though he was in the U.S. when the final uprising began,
his ideology of the "Three Principles of the People"
inspired the movement. >>

Someone may wonder what happened to him.

<< Soviet Alliance: Failing to get help from Western nations,
Sun turned to the Soviet Union in 1923. He reorganized his party,
the Kuomintang (KMT), and formed a "First United Front"
with the fledgling Chinese Communist Party. >>

<< Following Sun's death, General Chiang Kai-shek emerged
as the party's leader after a period of internal infighting.
He launched the Northern Expedition (1926rCo1928), successfully
defeating warlords and unifying most of China under a national
government in Nanjing. >>

<< The KMT led China's resistance against Japanese invasion (1937rCo1945). Although they emerged as victors and a founding permanent member
of the UN Security Council, the war severely weakened
the partyrCOs resources and control. >>

<< Following World War II, full-scale civil war with the CCP resumed. Suffering from hyperinflation and military desertions, the KMT was defeated and retreated to Taiwan in 1949. >>

Ruler after ruler emerges over time.

<< For nearly four decades (1949rCo1987), the KMT governed Taiwan
under martial law, maintaining a one-party dictatorship
while overseeing rapid economic growth known as the "Taiwan Miracle". >>

The Party-party animals rule!

<< Beginning in the late 1980s, the KMT oversaw a peaceful transition
to democracy. In 2000, it lost the presidency for the first time
to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). >>

Elections are elections.
At least, some are called, elections.

<< The party continues to advocate for communication with Beijing.
In February 2026, a KMT-led delegation is scheduled to attend
a think tank conference in Beijing to discuss tourism
and industrial exchanges. >>

Perhaps it will develop a One China policy
with it being the ruling party. Ore knots.

- thanks! Cheers!



--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


eye posted:

Genshin Impact fan posted:

"One China" Statement is the Key Foundation: ...

Sounds like rulers want to take over Taiwan
at this particular stage of a land grab game.

If the situation were reversed, and rulers of
Taiwan decided to take over the mainland, and,
if they had enough clout, it would be similar.

Might makes right, is a saying.

To the victor go the spoils is an other saying.

A form of Gemini writes of:

<< Diplomatic Recognition.
<< The "De Facto" Reality
Most countries eventually recognize the "victor"
because they have to deal with the person
who actually controls the borders, the military,
and the resources. If you want to trade with a country
or ensure your citizens are safe there, you generally
have to talk to whoever is actually in charge. >>

<< Political Legitimacy
Recognition is also a powerful political tool. By "recognizing"
a government, a country is saying, "We accept you as the legal voice
of this nation."

ItrCOs often less about who has the "moral" right to rule
and more about effective control and political alignment.
When a new government takes overrCowhether through revolution,
civil war, or a couprCoother nations have to decide
whether to recognize them. >>

<< Validation:
It allows the new rulers to sign treaties, borrow money
from international banks, and join the UN.

Withholding Recognition:
If other countries refuse to recognize a victor,
they can effectively "starve" that government of legitimacy,
making it harder for them to function on the global stage. >>

<< The "Two Chinas" Example
The case of Taiwan and China is the most famous modern example of this:
After the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the ROC (fled to Taiwan)
and the PRC (took the mainland) both claimed to be the "real" China.

For over 20 years, the U.S. and many Western allies
continued to recognize the ROC (Taiwan) as the legitimate government.

Eventually, because the PRC controlled the mainland
and the vast majority of the population,
the international community shifted its recognition
to the PRC in the 1970s to reflect the reality on the ground. >>

Realities vary eh.

- thanks! Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


who posted:

eye posted:

Genshin Impact fan posted:

"One China" Statement is the Key Foundation: ...

Sounds like rulers want ...

Might makes right, is a saying.

To the victor go the spoils is an other saying.
...
Realities vary eh.

While China remains an officially atheistic Communist state,
Xi JinpingrCOs authority and ruling style increasingly mirror
that of the historical "Son of Heaven" (Tianzi) in several ways:

Imperial Ruling Style

Centralized Authority: Just as ancient emperors held absolute power,
Xi has concentrated control over the military, the economy, and the law, earning him the nickname "Chairman of Everything".

The "Core" Leader:
In 2016, the Communist Party gave him the title of "Core,"
a symbolic status that places him above ordinary politicsrCo
similar to how an emperor was the focal point of the state.

The "Princeling" Status: As the son of a high-ranking revolutionary leader,
Xi is part of what critics call the "Princelings" (literally "Crown Princes"), a modern political class that benefits from family lineage.

- Gemini
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


Gemini posted:

Genshin Impact fan posted:

The "Princeling" Status: As the son of a high-ranking revolutionary leader, Xi is part of what critics call the "Princelings" (literally "Crown Princes"),
a modern political class that benefits from family lineage.

Modern "Mandate of Heaven"

Performance Legitimacy: In ancient China,
the Mandate of Heaven was based on a rulerrCOs ability
to bring stability and prosperity.

Today, Xi uses the "Chinese Dream"
of national rejuvenation to claim that same moral authority to rule.

Moral Exemplar: Official state media portrays Xi as a "benevolent sage," attributing the nation's successes (like poverty alleviation or pandemic control)
to his personal virtue and wisdom.

Key Differences

Communist Framework: Unlike a true "Son of Heaven,"
Xi must still operate within the Communist Party structure
and use socialist rhetoric rather than divine right.

Lack of Formal Heredity: While his status is secure for life,
he has no official mechanism to pass his power directly to his children,
which was the defining feature of the imperial dynasties.

In short, while he doesn't use the title,
he is often described by analysts as
an "Emperor in all but name".

- Gemini



--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


Gemini posted:

Today, Xi uses the "Chinese Dream" ...

In short, while he doesn't use the title,
he is often described by analysts as
an "Emperor in all but name".

Some people might want an emperor, a ruler
who rules unlike a Daoist who is invisible.

- thanks! Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


who posted:

Gemini posted:

Today, Xi uses the "Chinese Dream" ...

Some people might want an emperor, a ruler
who rules unlike a Daoist who is invisible.

Well, in terms of Daojia, a question occurs
to me of all people being a time being.

Some sayers may say, you are Dao.

Whether tis better to be a dao, the Dao,
a or the Son of Heaven, a president for
two terms or for life and/or utter Ting,
could be a question.

What did Ting say?

- thanks! Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


jah mon posted:

Some sayers may say, you are Dao.

What did Ting say?

Ting spoke of a form of no thingness, of
having an edge so to speak able to carve
without missing a beat.

Perhaps he was a rapper.

- thanks! Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2