From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism
eye posted:
https://baopu81.wordpress.com/2026/08/10/the-early-daoist-milieu-a-hypothetical-reconstruction/
<< begin quote from above >>
The Warring States world
was deeply enmeshed in rCymantic artsrCO (shushu uo+*io),
local rCysacrificerCO (jisi tN!tNC), and the management
of rCyghosts and spiritsrCO (guishen o4+tNR).
The Early Daoist Milieu did not exist in a secular vacuum,
but the Laozi and Zhuangzi exhibit a deliberate,
polemical distance from these practices.
Both the Zhuangzi (ch. 23, Gengsang Chu o|UuiauNU)
and the Guanzi (Neiye (oaouN!) chapter) ask:
rCLCan you know good and bad fortune without divination?rCY (*a+taioiLt!<*CitfNoEeoc|E|AN+f).
The answer is yesrCothrough internal cultivation.
The adept who has achieved inner emptiness and stillness
no longer needs to consult tortoise shells or yarrow stalks;
their alignment with cosmic patterns renders external divination unnecessary.
<< end of quote from above >>
One is reminded of DDJ 38 where
after a long list of what occurs after
Dao and De are lost, 'mantic arts' appear.
Daoism, Daojia being viewed distinct from Daojiao,
seems to have been a bit different early on
from what emerged later on.
- thanks! Cheers!
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2