From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal
The Old Testament of the bible is a back-dated hoax!
CAMELS!
The bible doesn't just require the presence
of Camels, it requires that they were a
measure of wealth, a possession which bestowed
status on it's owner. The story of Abraham has
the Pharaoh giving him camels, and the context
makes clear that these are lavish gifts. But
this culture did not exist in Egypt and the
Levant until the Persian conquest. The stories
could not possible date to that time, as the writers
would have known that the camels had only
recently arrived if they were living back
then. No, the writers had to live so long
after the fact that there was no cultural
memory of a time when camels weren't present.
According to the bible, if taken seriously,
Abraham entered Egypt sometime around 4,000 years
ago. Problem is that Abraham, the culture he
depicted, the culture inside of Egypt his story
depicts, could not have existed until maybe AFTER
600 BC(e).
Camels aren't native to the region. And in the
entire region -- Egypt, up through the Levant &
on into Anatolia -- there's maybe six examples of
anything "Camel" found over a span of THOUSANDS
of years!
I've got to tell you, some of this evidence is
exceptionally weak! Maybe it's a depiction of
a camel, maybe it's a dog... a goat... donkey.
...the bible as the king of Egypt treating
camels as a symbol of status & wealth, gifting
them to Abraham. But this is impossible. Again,
it wouldn't have been until AFTER 600 BC(E), the
Babylonian conquest, the Nabataeans traders, when
camels entered the culture!
Abraham had to be written from 1,400 years AFTER
the time attributed to him!
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2