• How to tell if you are a severe narcissistic personality disorder

    From JTEM@jtem01@gmail.com to sci.skeptic,alt.atheism,alt.global-warming,alt.paranormal on Mon Mar 16 07:25:45 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal


    This is useful for any topic where people tend to
    be biased -- everything from ghosts to GWOBULL
    WARBLING.

    And, yes, even UFOs...

    So you're on usenet. It's been pointed out to you a
    number of times that you are severely fucked up. But,
    you're non too bright, no you're not, so you're not
    sure. One way you can test your mental health (lack
    there of) is to look at your overuse of the "Cite!"
    demand...

    #1. Were you specific? Did you spell out exactly
    what you are challenging, and why?

    Hint: This is excessively unlikely.

    #2. Is it pertinent? Does it even matter one way
    or the other, whatever thing you're obsessing over
    as an excuse to block conversation; does it matter
    to anyone's point?

    Hint: Not a chance.

    A great example is just now, with the basket case
    that posts under the "Dawn" alter, amongst others.
    It's demanding a cite and although they are not at
    all clear as to WHAT specifically they are challenging,
    they do imply that it's how long sulfur remains in
    the upper atmosphere. And, no, it can't matter but
    sulfur emissions are 24/7. Even if sulfur fell out of
    the sky after a few minutes, or seconds, it couldn't
    matter BECAUSE the amount in the atmosphere is the
    same OR HIGHER. The more coal civilization burns, for
    example, the more sulfur.

    #3. Did you perform a rudimentary Google search
    yourself?

    Hint: Doubtful.

    In the above example of the troll that sometimes
    posts as "Dawn," amongst other alters, they claimed
    to have checked Google A.I. but, for what? The
    fact that sulfur emissions only occur on Wednesdays?
    No. their "Research" was limited to cherry picking a
    lifespan for sulfur considerably longer than their
    previously cherry picked length, and claiming it's
    shorter than the one that I offered thus... what?
    What could it possibly mean either way?

    That there's zero sulfur emissions for years on end?

    What? Because it's not how long sulfur stays in the
    atmosphere, which was my ultimate point, it's that
    there's always sulfur in the atmosphere and it's
    growing.

    Sulfur is a climate cooler. It's not the only climate
    cooling property of our fossil fuels but it is the
    major climate cooler. And all that matters is that we
    are pumping out TONS of the stuff, humanity, cooling
    the planet. AND THIS explains why it's so cool right
    now.

    "Cool." Not "Warm" but "Cool."

    "Climate" is not a constant. It fluctuates, it's
    subject to regular cycles as well as random events
    (like asteroid impacts, volcanoes and, long
    term, plate tectonics).

    The earth WAS in a warm period called "The Medieval
    Warm Period." Then THAT ended and the earth entered
    a new period called "The Little Ice Age." And then
    THAT ended in the 1800s and we should have warmed
    back up to what was seen during the Medieval Warm
    Period BUT WE DIDN'T!

    It warmed. It's warmer than during The Little Ice
    Age, but not by a lot, not by enough. It's cooler
    than it was prior to The Little Ice Age. And the
    most obvious reason for that is our use of fossil
    fuels. And, the biggest culprit in our fossil fuels,
    what is responsible for the most cooling is sulfur.

    Regardless of subject, you've got to deconstruct the
    problem. You need to... oh, hell, forget it. If I
    need to spell anything out here you're probably a
    waste of time anyway.
    --
    https://jtem.tumblr.com/

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2