• CAUGHT! NASA changes data and peer review isn't

    From JTEM@jtem01@gmail.com to alt.global-warming,alt.paranormal,sci.skeptic on Thu Feb 12 22:49:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal


    DISCLAIMER:

    This isn't about the Gwobull Warbling hoax. Not directly.
    But it does establish AS FACT key points that the Useful
    Idiots deny are possible. And they are...

    #1. NASA fudges their data, sometimes for the worst, most
    trivial reasons.

    It's petty!

    "Oh no, NASA wouldn't fudge their data for a massive
    global scam like AGW. They only do it for the most trivial,
    absolute most petty reasons!"


    #2. Peer Review is a joke.

    It's "Gate Keeping." He uses the term in the video, which
    is ironic, because they didn't even bother with the so called
    "Peer Review." They just rejected him!



    So here's an actual example where NASA corrupted their own
    data -- pure fraud -- AND an actual example where a "Peer
    Reviewed" journal refused a paper that was scientifically
    valid:

    https://youtu.be/J6hWZ6azItI?si=bPF9MTeY35E9HxGB


    This is massive fuel for the conspiracy buffs, too. This is
    a fascinating topic -- interstellar objects entering our
    solar system -- and NASA changed their data, corrupted their
    own data to hide them. AND THEN a "Peer Reviewed" journal
    decided these were of zero interest to anyone and refused to
    so much as entertain the paper!

    NOTE: Officially, humans have only recently discovered our
    first ever interstellar object. AND THEN, after discovering
    that VERY FIRST ONE, figured out that an earlier object had
    to be interstellar as well. So this is CUTTING EDGE!

    2017.

    Our study of interstellar objects BEGINS in 2017.

    3.

    Officially, we have only ever discovered 3.

    This is ALL NEW! This is absolute CUTTING EDGE and NASA is
    corrupting their own data to hide them, and a so called
    "Peer Review" journal is dismissing them as uninteresting!

    Either they're hiding something (conspiracy theory) or these
    are the most foul, petty, close minded idiots on earth, and
    you Gwobull Warblers have them up on a pedestal!

    Which is it?

    One of them has to be true. Pick one. Defend your position.



    And, oh: STOP pretending that NASA would ever "Report"
    bullshit and pretend it's science!

    And STOP pretending that "Peer Review" is Latin for
    "Integrity."
    --
    https://jtem.tumblr.com/

    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2