So this paper claims that the "Many Worlds" theory
is correct and we can communicate between realities.
https://uapro.tumblr.com/post/808399883009736704
I'm calling bullshit.
On 2/12/2026 8:44 PM, JTEM wrote:
So this paper claims that the "Many Worlds" theory
is correct and we can communicate between realities.
https://uapro.tumblr.com/post/808399883009736704
I'm calling bullshit.
Next time don't link to a news article;
On 2/13/26 12:09 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 2/12/2026 8:44 PM, JTEM wrote:
So this paper claims that the "Many Worlds" theory
is correct and we can communicate between realities.
https://uapro.tumblr.com/post/808399883009736704
I'm calling bullshit.
Next time don't link to a news article;
I didn't.
Next time don't pretend that you EVER EVEN ONCE read a
paper & somehow understood it. You've never correctly
interpreted usenet posts typed out in front of you. You
persistently react with unrelated tangents & just plain
idiocy:-a URLs to God-knows-what that you can't map to
anything being discussed.
I linked to a Youtube video together with an explanation
for why it's bullshit.
The Youtube video gives it a '4' on their bull(shit) meter,
and that's honestly generous.
So you got the information -- "The Gist of it" -- and you
got WHY it's bullshit.
If you want to hold the paper in front of yoou & pretend
that you're reading it, maybe move your eyes some, you go
right ahead. But you'll just make a complete fool of yourself
again... as always.
Have a blessed day!
If a scientific claim isn't published in a peer-reviewed scientific
journal, then it is at least suspect of being nonsense.
On 2/13/2026 12:59 PM, JTEM wrote:
On 2/13/26 12:09 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 2/12/2026 8:44 PM, JTEM wrote:
So this paper claims that the "Many Worlds" theory
is correct and we can communicate between realities.
https://uapro.tumblr.com/post/808399883009736704
I'm calling bullshit.
Next time don't link to a news article;
I didn't.
Next time don't pretend that you EVER EVEN ONCE read a
paper & somehow understood it. You've never correctly
interpreted usenet posts typed out in front of you. You
persistently react with unrelated tangents & just plain
idiocy:-a URLs to God-knows-what that you can't map to
anything being discussed.
I linked to a Youtube video together with an explanation
for why it's bullshit.
The Youtube video gives it a '4' on their bull(shit) meter,
and that's honestly generous.
So you got the information -- "The Gist of it" -- and you
got WHY it's bullshit.
If you want to hold the paper in front of yoou & pretend
that you're reading it, maybe move your eyes some, you go
right ahead. But you'll just make a complete fool of yourself
again... as always.
Have a blessed day!
If a scientific claim isn't published in a peer-reviewed scientific
journal, then it is at least suspect of being nonsense.
On 2/13/26 8:08 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
If a scientific claim isn't published in a peer-reviewed scientific
journal, then it is at least suspect of being nonsense.
So you need a high priest to bestow "Truth" upon you, the
unwashed masses. You can't think, not until after something
you need to believe is an authority tells you what to think.
I know.
This has a lot to do with why I call you a moron. It's
because you are.
Oh, sure, like you
On 2/13/2026 11:31 PM, JTEM wrote:
On 2/13/26 8:08 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
If a scientific claim isn't published in a peer-reviewed scientific
journal, then it is at least suspect of being nonsense.
So you need a high priest to bestow "Truth" upon you, the
unwashed masses. You can't think, not until after something
you need to believe is an authority tells you what to think.
I know.
This has a lot to do with why I call you a moron. It's
because you are.
Oh, sure, like you are going to enroll in some
On 2/14/26 9:27 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
Oh, sure, like you
Oh, sure, like you don't always avoid topics -- anything posted -- in
favor of making stupid demands for different "Cites" that you could
have found on your own, AND A LOT QUICKER, if you ever bothered...
You're mentally ill. You're a classic Narcissistic Personality Disorder
head case.
-a-a-a-a ...you were probably raised by one, who socialized you to be
this head case, and you can't see it because, of course, as a raging narcissist you're a victim.
Gotta protect that narrative, huh?
What you're posting
On 2/20/26 7:13 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
What you're posting
Do you have any idea?
Seriously. You never reply. You REACT but you can't reply.
In order to reply you'd need to both READ and GRASP what I
said. As a severely mentally ill person suffering from a
debilitating case of narcissism, you just make demands in
an attempt to obstruct, at best. Or mindlessly rant like
you're doing now....
The Youtube video explains the claim:-a Communication across
the multiverse. But it's wrong. Mostly because it's based
on an unrealistic model for the Multiverse.
There are no "Different" universes, as far as we're
concerned. There can't be. It's literally impossible for
there to be any other universes... for us.
Time and space are products of our existence. They are
literally part of our universe. They only exists BECAUSE
we are inside this universe. If you could leave our
universe there would be nothing.
Nothing.
Without time, there would be no moment for anything to
exist within, INCLUDING OUR UNIVERSE!-a And there would be
no space for it to occupy anyway! No, because SpaceTime
is part of the fabric OF OUR UNIVERSE. So leave this
universe and there is nothing. There isn't even this
universe.
The Multiverse isn't "Different" universes. It's this one
and only universe in it's every potential state.
Not EVERY state but every POTENTIAL state.
But it's one universe.
AND, there's no reason why two beings can't co exist and
even meet, both knowing slightly different realities....
Einstein predicts this!
And, you are a mentally unhinged troll.
Regardless of what you are claiming about me, the truth is that neither
of us are physicists, and so
On 2/22/2026 10:33 AM, JTEM wrote:
On 2/20/26 7:13 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
What you're posting
Do you have any idea?
Seriously. You never reply. You REACT but you can't reply.
In order to reply you'd need to both READ and GRASP what I
said. As a severely mentally ill person suffering from a
debilitating case of narcissism, you just make demands in
an attempt to obstruct, at best. Or mindlessly rant like
you're doing now....
The Youtube video explains the claim:-a Communication across
the multiverse. But it's wrong. Mostly because it's based
on an unrealistic model for the Multiverse.
There are no "Different" universes, as far as we're
concerned. There can't be. It's literally impossible for
there to be any other universes... for us.
Time and space are products of our existence. They are
literally part of our universe. They only exists BECAUSE
we are inside this universe. If you could leave our
universe there would be nothing.
Nothing.
Without time, there would be no moment for anything to
exist within, INCLUDING OUR UNIVERSE!-a And there would be
no space for it to occupy anyway! No, because SpaceTime
is part of the fabric OF OUR UNIVERSE. So leave this
universe and there is nothing. There isn't even this
universe.
The Multiverse isn't "Different" universes. It's this one
and only universe in it's every potential state.
Not EVERY state but every POTENTIAL state.
But it's one universe.
AND, there's no reason why two beings can't co exist and
even meet, both knowing slightly different realities....
Einstein predicts this!
And, you are a mentally unhinged troll.
Regardless of what you are claiming about me, the truth is that neither
of us are physicists, and so unless you can point to a published paper
by an expert, you are just engaging in idle, meaningless speculation.
Passer outre.
Dawn
On 2/22/26 8:07 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
Regardless of what you are claiming about me, the truth is that
neither of us are physicists, and so
You're quite insane. I never claimed that your Narcissistic Personality Disorder is the extant of your mental problems, only the most apparent
and relevant here...
Now, back on the topic your mental disorder(s) are causing you to
obstruct...
There's only one universe. The terms "Multiverse" isn't applied to
something different. It's a new/better way of conceptualizing our
universe.
There is no other universes to communicate with!
There's only one universe. The terms "Multiverse" isn't applied to
something different. It's a new/better way of conceptualizing our
universe.
There is no other universes to communicate with!
Well. Not "Dawn." They said I was mean to, "Whatever that
batshit crazy, hairy ass crack is calling itself today."
Then they called me an "Asshole" and told me to be nice to
the basket case.
"Can I still call it a narcissistic personality disorder on
parade?" I asked.
"NO!" They insisted. "No matter how true that is, and it is
true, you need to pretend that they're almost normal." There
was a slight pause... "Or else," they told me.
So here's an edited version:
There's only one universe. The terms "Multiverse" isn't applied to
something different. It's a new/better way of conceptualizing our
universe.
There is no other universes to communicate with!
The "Multiverse" isn't some DIFFERENT place, a DIFFERENT universe.
It's this one and the same universe as per the delayed choice
quantum eraser experiment, or even Einstein's Simultaneity.
Einstein:-a "Two people can make two different observations OF THE
SAME THING and they both are right."
*That*, my precious hairy ass crack, is "The Multiverse."
On 2/24/2026 1:41 PM, JTEM wrote:
Well. Not "Dawn." They said I was mean to, "Whatever that
batshit crazy, hairy ass crack is calling itself today."
Then they called me an "Asshole" and told me to be nice to
the basket case.
"Can I still call it a narcissistic personality disorder on
parade?" I asked.
"NO!" They insisted. "No matter how true that is, and it is
true, you need to pretend that they're almost normal." There
was a slight pause... "Or else," they told me.
So here's an edited version:
There's only one universe. The terms "Multiverse" isn't applied to
something different. It's a new/better way of conceptualizing our
universe.
There is no other universes to communicate with!
The "Multiverse" isn't some DIFFERENT place, a DIFFERENT universe.
It's this one and the same universe as per the delayed choice
quantum eraser experiment, or even Einstein's Simultaneity.
Einstein:-a "Two people can make two different observations OF THE
SAME THING and they both are right."
*That*, my precious hairy ass crack, is "The Multiverse."
Are you serious?!-a Here's ET's policy:
https://www.eternal-september.org/index.php?showpage=abuse
And, so, I'm surprised by all of this!-a I did not think that simply
being rude to another poster would be sufficient to get "der Stiefel" at ET?!
Dawn
P.S.-a I hope that ET's admins are reading this, because, if you are
lying about this JTEM, you deserve to get kicked.
P.S.-a I hope that ET's admins are reading this, because, if you are
lying about this JTEM, you deserve to get kicked.
servers don't read anything without being asked too
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 59 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 18:40:46 |
| Calls: | 810 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,287 |
| D/L today: |
10 files (21,017K bytes) |
| Messages: | 193,863 |