From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal


So, how do you describe a ghosts?

A foggy apparition?

A disarticulated limb or head?

A cold spot?

Noises?

A 100% normal appearing human that is later discovered
to have died years ago?

Objects moving or breaking, doors opening?

Etc.

Ghost are commonly described as ALL OF THE ABOVE!

Hmm. If an animal was described with such wildly
varying descriptions you'd conclude that people were
seeing different animals. That, more than one animal
was being given the same label...

Why not ghosts? Why suddenly change the rules for
ghosts?

What I'm saying is that for pretty much another other
thing, stepping away from the topic of the supernatural,
the many varied descriptions of ghosts would EXCLUDE a
single phenomenon at play.

Yes, something that appears invisible and passes through
solid matter would be a different phenomena than
something that looks like an ordinary person and interacts
with the world as a real person would.

Two different things. And between them spans a number of
other very different things...

The simpleton approach would be to shout "They don't
exist" and leave it at that. But, that is objectively
false in many cases.

There are noises. People do feel cold spots. There are
EMFs detected. EVPs are recorded. Multiple witnesses do
report the same sighting... on & on.

The experiences are real and in countless cases external
in origins. All I'm saying is that there's more than one
explanation.

More than two explanations.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 9/12/2025 1:18 pm, JTEM wrote:

So, how do you describe a ghosts?

Until I meet one... no I don't wanna meet one. :)
--
@~@ Simplicity is Beauty! Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch!
/ v \ May the Force and farces be with you! Live long and prosper!!
/( _ )\ https://sites.google.com/site/changmw/
^ ^ https://github.com/changmw/changmw
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 12/8/2025 11:18 PM, JTEM wrote:

So, how do you describe a ghosts?

A foggy apparition?

A disarticulated limb or head?

A cold spot?

Noises?

A 100% normal appearing human that is later discovered
to have died years ago?

Objects moving or breaking, doors opening?

Etc.

Ghost are commonly described as ALL OF THE ABOVE!

Hmm. If an animal was described with such wildly
varying descriptions you'd conclude that people were
seeing different animals. That, more than one animal
was being given the same label...

Why not ghosts? Why suddenly change the rules for
ghosts?

What I'm saying is that for pretty much another other
thing, stepping away from the topic of the supernatural,
the many varied descriptions of ghosts would EXCLUDE a
single phenomenon at play.

Yes, something that appears invisible and passes through
solid matter would be a different phenomena than
something that looks like an ordinary person and interacts
with the world as a real person would.

Two different things. And between them spans a number of
other very different things...

The simpleton approach would be to shout "They don't
exist" and leave it at that. But, that is objectively
false in many cases.

There are noises. People do feel cold spots. There are
EMFs detected. EVPs are recorded. Multiple witnesses do
report the same sighting... on & on.

The experiences are real and in countless cases external
in origins. All I'm saying is that there's more than one
explanation.

More than two explanations.

Simple. There are no ghosts. If you disagree, cite the peer-reviewed
paper, preferably, from Science, Nature, Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, or some other society or at least reputable journal
(such as the New England Journal of Medicine.)

Dawn

P.S. Don't hop on your conspiracy bandwagon; I have too much going on
today to deal with that!
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

JTEM wrote:

So, how do you describe a ghosts?

A foggy apparition?

A disarticulated limb or head?

A cold spot?

Noises?

A 100% normal appearing human that is later discovered
to have died years ago?

Objects moving or breaking, doors opening?

Etc.

Ghost are commonly described as ALL OF THE ABOVE!

Hmm. If an animal was described with such wildly
varying descriptions you'd conclude that people were
seeing different animals. That, more than one animal
was being given the same label...

Why not ghosts? Why suddenly change the rules for
ghosts?

What I'm saying is that for pretty much another other
thing, stepping away from the topic of the supernatural,
the many varied descriptions of ghosts would EXCLUDE a
single phenomenon at play.

Yes, something that appears invisible and passes through
solid matter would be a different phenomena than
something that looks like an ordinary person and interacts
with the world as a real person would.

Two different things. And between them spans a number of
other very different things...

The simpleton approach would be to shout "They don't
exist" and leave it at that. But, that is objectively
false in many cases.

There are noises. People do feel cold spots. There are
EMFs detected. EVPs are recorded. Multiple witnesses do
report the same sighting... on & on.

The experiences are real and in countless cases external
in origins. All I'm saying is that there's more than one
explanation.

More than two explanations.

i am open to there being remnants of kind... problem is trillions
of creatures have lived and died and i dont see any remnants.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 12/8/2025 11:18 PM, JTEM wrote:

There are noises. People do feel cold spots. There are
EMFs detected. EVPs are recorded. Multiple witnesses do
report the same sighting... on & on.

The experiences are real and in countless cases external
in origins. All I'm saying is that there's more than one
explanation.

More than two explanations.

Simple.-a There are no ghosts.

wow gosh the stereotypical reaction of a narcissist i am so
surprised maybe shocked oh yes i am shocked oh my oh my what
a surprise...

The topic wasn't whether or not ghosts are real or what people
were actually experiencing. You don't know this because you're
an idiot.

Okay, back to what I was saying: People describe many different
things and call them all "Ghosts." Why? Why are they all under
the same umbrella term? If people offered such wildly different
descriptions for "an" animal, we'd all assume that they were
seeing different animals. So why do we throw away the rules for
"Ghosts?"
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 11/12/2025 1:12 am, jojo wrote:

i am open to there being remnants of kind... problem is trillions
of creatures have lived and died and i dont see any remnants.

Easy explaination: you are not relevant to them! ;)
--
@~@ Simplicity is Beauty! Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch!
/ v \ May the Force and farces be with you! Live long and prosper!!
/( _ )\ https://sites.google.com/site/changmw/
^ ^ https://github.com/changmw/changmw
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 10/12/2025 11:46 pm, Dawn Flood wrote:

Simple. There are no ghosts. If you disagree, cite the peer-reviewed
paper, preferably, from Science, Nature, Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, or some other society or at least reputable journal (such as the New England Journal of Medicine.)

Wave-particle duality might explain why ghosts are translucent and go
through solid objects? :)
--
@~@ Simplicity is Beauty! Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch!
/ v \ May the Force and farces be with you! Live long and prosper!!
/( _ )\ https://sites.google.com/site/changmw/
^ ^ https://github.com/changmw/changmw
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 12/10/2025 10:22 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

On 10/12/2025 11:46 pm, Dawn Flood wrote:

Simple.-a There are no ghosts.-a If you disagree, cite the peer-reviewed
paper, preferably, from Science, Nature, Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, or some other society or at least reputable journal
(such as the New England Journal of Medicine.)

Wave-particle duality might explain why ghosts are translucent and go through solid objects? :)

No. Per the de Broglie equation, ++ = h/mv, anything with a wavelength
must have energy, and if something has energy, it would be detectable.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

On 11/12/2025 1:09 pm, Dawn Flood wrote:

On 12/10/2025 10:22 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

Wave-particle duality might explain why ghosts are translucent
and go
through solid objects? :)

No.-a Per the de Broglie equation, ++ = h/mv, anything with a
wavelength
must have energy, and if something has energy, it would be
detectable.

By "translucent" I meant you still could partially see it,
partially visible. :)

that is plasma, ghosts might be a different form of plasma with
particles that do not interact with fermions and bosons.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 11/12/2025 11:43 pm, Dawn Flood wrote:

Only light can pull that off! If ghosts emit light that our eyes can
see, then a CCD should be able to record that EMR, also!!

And hence all those ghosty photos? :)
--
@~@ Simplicity is Beauty! Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch!
/ v \ May the Force and farces be with you! Live long and prosper!!
/( _ )\ https://sites.google.com/site/changmw/
^ ^ https://github.com/changmw/changmw
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 12/10/2025 10:22 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

On 10/12/2025 11:46 pm, Dawn Flood wrote:

Simple.-a There are no ghosts.-a If you disagree, cite the peer-reviewed >>> paper, preferably, from Science, Nature, Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, or some other society or at least reputable journal >>> (such as the New England Journal of Medicine.)

Wave-particle duality might explain why ghosts are translucent and go
through solid objects? :)

No.-a Per the de Broglie equation, ++ = h/mv, anything with a wavelength must have energy, and if something has energy, it would be detectable.

you do and you're not
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 12/11/2025 7:16 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

On 11/12/2025 1:09 pm, Dawn Flood wrote:

On 12/10/2025 10:22 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

Wave-particle duality might explain why ghosts are translucent and go
through solid objects? :)

No.-a Per the de Broglie equation, ++ = h/mv, anything with a wavelength >>> must have energy, and if something has energy, it would be detectable.

By "translucent" I meant you still could partially see it, partially
visible. :)

Only light can pull that off!-a If ghosts emit light that our eyes can
see, then a CCD should be able to record that EMR, also!!

it can't detect spiritual
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 12/11/2025 10:07 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

On 11/12/2025 11:43 pm, Dawn Flood wrote:

Only light can pull that off!-a If ghosts emit light that our eyes can
see, then a CCD should be able to record that EMR, also!!

And hence all those ghosty photos? :)

Show me a single one.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 12/12/2025 5:21 am, Dawn Flood wrote:

On 12/11/2025 10:07 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

And hence all those ghosty photos? :)

Show me a single one.

Youtube! Or Google Search with A.I.! ;)
--
@~@ Simplicity is Beauty! Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch!
/ v \ May the Force and farces be with you! Live long and prosper!!
/( _ )\ https://sites.google.com/site/changmw/
^ ^ https://github.com/changmw/changmw
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 12/12/2025 5:21 am, Dawn Flood wrote:

On 12/11/2025 10:07 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

On 11/12/2025 11:43 pm, Dawn Flood wrote:

Only light can pull that off!-a If ghosts emit light that our eyes can
see, then a CCD should be able to record that EMR, also!!

And hence all those ghosty photos? :)

Show me a single one.

BTW, ghosts, orbs and UFOs are quite similar in nature. ;)
--
@~@ Simplicity is Beauty! Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch!
/ v \ May the Force and farces be with you! Live long and prosper!!
/( _ )\ https://sites.google.com/site/changmw/
^ ^ https://github.com/changmw/changmw
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 12/11/2025 9:10 AM, jojo wrote:

Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

On 11/12/2025 1:09 pm, Dawn Flood wrote:

On 12/10/2025 10:22 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

Wave-particle duality might explain why ghosts are
translucent and go
through solid objects? :)

No.-a Per the de Broglie equation, ++ = h/mv, anything with a
wavelength
must have energy, and if something has energy, it would be
detectable.

By "translucent" I meant you still could partially see it,
partially visible. :)

that is plasma, ghosts might be a different form of plasma with
particles that do not interact with fermions and bosons.

Jojo,

A plasma is a state of matter where all of the electrons have
been ionized; it's what is going on at the center of our Sun and
other stars.

Dawn

lets say, after we die, a phase transition occur where the built
up entropy within our brains gets converted into some form of
blob that no longer interacts with normal matter..

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 12/12/2025 8:15 AM, jojo wrote:

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 12/11/2025 9:10 AM, jojo wrote:

Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

On 11/12/2025 1:09 pm, Dawn Flood wrote:

On 12/10/2025 10:22 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

Wave-particle duality might explain why ghosts are translucent and go >>>>>> through solid objects? :)

No.-a Per the de Broglie equation, ++ = h/mv, anything with a wavelength >>>>> must have energy, and if something has energy, it would be detectable. >>>>

By "translucent" I meant you still could partially see it, partially
visible. :)

that is plasma, ghosts might be a different form of plasma with
particles that do not interact with fermions and bosons.

Jojo,

A plasma is a state of matter where all of the electrons have been
ionized; it's what is going on at the center of our Sun and other stars.

Dawn

lets say, after we die, a phase transition occur where the built up
entropy within our brains gets converted into some form of blob that no longer interacts with normal matter..

That would be fun!!

Dawn
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 12/12/25 9:15 AM, jojo wrote:

lets say, after we die, a phase transition occur where the built up
entropy within our brains gets converted into some form of blob that no longer interacts with normal matter..

You're describing a leftist.

Remember: A liberal Democrat is against the death penalty. A leftist
wants people executed for thought crimes.

Just ask Charlie Kirk!
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 12/12/2025 4:18 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 12/12/25 9:15 AM, jojo wrote:

lets say, after we die, a phase transition occur where the built up
entropy within our brains gets converted into some form of blob that
no longer interacts with normal matter..

You're describing a leftist.

Remember:-a A liberal Democrat is against the death penalty. A leftist
wants people executed for thought crimes.

Just ask Charlie Kirk!

Charlie Kirk is dead, and no, leftists, such as myself, oppose all
executions, whether judicial or extrajudicial.

Dawn
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

JTEM wrote:

On 12/12/25 9:15 AM, jojo wrote:

lets say, after we die, a phase transition occur where the
built up entropy within our brains gets converted into some
form of blob that no longer interacts with normal matter..

You're describing a leftist.

Remember:-a A liberal Democrat is against the death penalty. A
leftist
wants people executed for thought crimes.

Just ask Charlie Kirk!

i was actually describing best case realistic scenario for post
death phenomenon.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2