I can login as userMe or as root, if as root I enter
# lightdm
to start the login manager I get
"failed to use bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager,
do you have the right permissions?"
I can login as userMe or as root, if as root I enter
# lightdm
to start the login manager I get
"failed to use bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager,
do you have the right permissions?"
On 2023-06-23 03:58, bad sector wrote:
I can login as userMe or as root, if as root I enter
# lightdm
to start the login manager I get
"failed to use bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager,
do you have the right permissions?"
I don't know about lightdm, but the usual startx will not start by
default because of permissions. It even hints you as to where those permissions are to be changed at your peril.
bad sector wrote:
I can login as userMe or as root, if as root I enter
# lightdm
to start the login manager I get
"failed to use bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager,
do you have the right permissions?"
On my (Leap) system my probable-equivalent file is a link under $home/Desktop, it points to
/usr/share/applications/org.kde.konsole.desktop (I'll let you guess
which display manager I'm using) and that has
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root
ownership / permissions.
(the link is Desktop/org.kde.konsole.desktop)
In case that is not the actual file you need, I also have /usr/share/applications/org.freedesktop.impl.portal.desktop.kde.desktop
and that has the same ownership / permissions as the other file.
Some files in that /usr/share/applications/ directory have in addition execute rights for everyone, but they tend to be applications and I
don't *think* you need or want that in this case.
On 6/23/23 04:56, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2023-06-23 03:58, bad sector wrote:
I can login as userMe or as root, if as root I enter
# lightdm
to start the login manager I get
"failed to use bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager,
do you have the right permissions?"
I don't know about lightdm, but the usual startx will not start by
default because of permissions. It even hints you as to where those
permissions are to be changed at your peril.
been there b4, setuid bits, no joy
I'll simplify: what comands WILL start either X
or a DM capable of launching X using either nouveau
or nvidia *whichever works*?
If I upgrade it it bombs
Also have an image of the bombing upgraded system
On the aroma-trail: the nvidia driver updating has
been very iffy lately on account of what seem to be
server issues. Startx works for root in lo-res so
it's an nvidia problem?
On 2023-06-23 12:23, bad sector wrote:
On 6/23/23 04:56, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2023-06-23 03:58, bad sector wrote:
I can login as userMe or as root, if as root I enter
# lightdm
to start the login manager I get
"failed to use bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager,
do you have the right permissions?"
I don't know about lightdm, but the usual startx will not start by
default because of permissions. It even hints you as to where those
permissions are to be changed at your peril.
been there b4, setuid bits, no joy
I'll simplify: what comands WILL start either X
or a DM capable of launching X using either nouveau
or nvidia *whichever works*?
startx is used, as root, for diagnostics of the graphical driver.
If that works, then try the normal graphical login, which in ancient
lore was "init 5". The syntax still works in Leap.
If that doesn't work, stop and analyze the logs.
...
If I upgrade it it bombs
How do you upgrade? The only supported method is "zypper dup" as root.
Also have an image of the bombing upgraded system
On the aroma-trail: the nvidia driver updating has
been very iffy lately on account of what seem to be
server issues. Startx works for root in lo-res so
it's an nvidia problem?
Absolutely.
On 6/23/23 06:58, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2023-06-23 12:23, bad sector wrote:
On 6/23/23 04:56, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2023-06-23 03:58, bad sector wrote:
I can login as userMe or as root, if as root I enter
# lightdm
to start the login manager I get
"failed to use bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager,
do you have the right permissions?"
I don't know about lightdm, but the usual startx will not start by
default because of permissions. It even hints you as to where those
permissions are to be changed at your peril.
been there b4, setuid bits, no joy
I'll simplify: what comands WILL start either X
or a DM capable of launching X using either nouveau
or nvidia *whichever works*?
startx is used, as root, for diagnostics of the graphical driver.
If that works, then try the normal graphical login, which in ancient
lore was "init 5". The syntax still works in Leap.
How about TW?
I have since backleveled to the earlier TW backup image, the defective upgraded one is backed up however. I can recover to it or open the iso
for eyeballing
If that doesn't work, stop and analyze the logs.
...
If I upgrade it it bombs
How do you upgrade? The only supported method is "zypper dup" as root.
yes, the subject one was like 6000 packages
Also have an image of the bombing upgraded system
On the aroma-trail: the nvidia driver updating has
been very iffy lately on account of what seem to be
server issues. Startx works for root in lo-res so
it's an nvidia problem?
Absolutely.
How to fix, with the nvidia server issues becoming quasi-regular? I need
the nvidia driver because of Google-Earth which alone doesn't do too
good with nouveau. Were it not for this I'd have axed it years ago!
On 2023-06-23 13:53, bad sector wrote:
On 6/23/23 06:58, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2023-06-23 12:23, bad sector wrote:
On 6/23/23 04:56, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2023-06-23 03:58, bad sector wrote:
I can login as userMe or as root, if as root I enter
# lightdm
to start the login manager I get
"failed to use bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager,
do you have the right permissions?"
I don't know about lightdm, but the usual startx will not start
by default because of permissions. It even hints you as to where
those permissions are to be changed at your peril.
been there b4, setuid bits, no joy
I'll simplify: what comands WILL start either X
or a DM capable of launching X using either nouveau
or nvidia *whichever works*?
startx is used, as root, for diagnostics of the graphical driver.
If that works, then try the normal graphical login, which in
ancient lore was "init 5". The syntax still works in Leap.
How about TW?
I don't use TW, but you can test.
Telcontar:~ # which init
/sbin/init
Telcontar:~ # ls /sbin/init
/sbin/init
Telcontar:~ # l /sbin/init
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Mar 28 15:29 /sbin/init -> ../usr/lib/systemd/systemd*
Telcontar:~ #
If init exists, it has to work.
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 15:02:28 +0200
"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
On 2023-06-23 13:53, bad sector wrote:<snip>
On 6/23/23 06:58, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2023-06-23 12:23, bad sector wrote:
On 6/23/23 04:56, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2023-06-23 03:58, bad sector wrote:
I can login as userMe or as root, if as root I enter
# lightdm
to start the login manager I get
"failed to use bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager,
do you have the right permissions?"
I don't know about lightdm, but the usual startx will not start
by default because of permissions. It even hints you as to where
those permissions are to be changed at your peril.
been there b4, setuid bits, no joy
I'll simplify: what comands WILL start either X
or a DM capable of launching X using either nouveau
or nvidia *whichever works*?
startx is used, as root, for diagnostics of the graphical driver.
If that works, then try the normal graphical login, which in
ancient lore was "init 5". The syntax still works in Leap.
How about TW?
I don't use TW, but you can test.
Telcontar:~ # which init
/sbin/init
Telcontar:~ # ls /sbin/init
/sbin/init
Telcontar:~ # l /sbin/init
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Mar 28 15:29 /sbin/init ->
../usr/lib/systemd/systemd*
Telcontar:~ #
If init exists, it has to work.
Hi
In systemd speak....
systemctl isolate multi-user.target (runlevel 3, init 3 etc)
systemctl isolate graphical.target (runlevel 5, init 5 etc)
The above should start the graphical login (or auto login if set)
systemctl set-default multi-user.target (boot to runlevel 3, init 3 etc)
systemctl set-default graphical.target (boot runlevel 5, init 5 etc)
On 2023-06-23 16:29, Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 15:02:28 +0200
"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
On 2023-06-23 13:53, bad sector wrote:<snip>
On 6/23/23 06:58, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2023-06-23 12:23, bad sector wrote:
On 6/23/23 04:56, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2023-06-23 03:58, bad sector wrote:
I can login as userMe or as root, if as root I enter
# lightdm
to start the login manager I get
"failed to use bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager,
do you have the right permissions?"
I don't know about lightdm, but the usual startx will not start
by default because of permissions. It even hints you as to
where those permissions are to be changed at your peril.
been there b4, setuid bits, no joy
I'll simplify: what comands WILL start either X
or a DM capable of launching X using either nouveau
or nvidia *whichever works*?
startx is used, as root, for diagnostics of the graphical driver.
If that works, then try the normal graphical login, which in
ancient lore was "init 5". The syntax still works in Leap.
How about TW?
I don't use TW, but you can test.
Telcontar:~ # which init
/sbin/init
Telcontar:~ # ls /sbin/init
/sbin/init
Telcontar:~ # l /sbin/init
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Mar 28 15:29 /sbin/init ->
../usr/lib/systemd/systemd*
Telcontar:~ #
If init exists, it has to work.
Hi
In systemd speak....
systemctl isolate multi-user.target (runlevel 3, init 3 etc)
systemctl isolate graphical.target (runlevel 5, init 5 etc)
Error: Biological memory full :-P
The above should start the graphical login (or auto login if set)
systemctl set-default multi-user.target (boot to runlevel 3, init 3
etc)
systemctl set-default graphical.target (boot runlevel 5, init 5 etc)
On 6/23/23 06:08, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
bad sector wrote:
I can login as userMe or as root, if as root I enter
# lightdm
to start the login manager I get
"failed to use bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager,
do you have the right permissions?"
On my (Leap) system my probable-equivalent file is a link under
$home/Desktop, it points to
/usr/share/applications/org.kde.konsole.desktop (I'll let you guess
which display manager I'm using) and that has
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root
ownership / permissions.
(the link is Desktop/org.kde.konsole.desktop)
In case that is not the actual file you need, I also have
/usr/share/applications/org.freedesktop.impl.portal.desktop.kde.desktop
and that has the same ownership / permissions as the other file.
Some files in that /usr/share/applications/ directory have in addition
execute rights for everyone, but they tend to be applications and I
don't *think* you need or want that in this case.
The are (otherwise identical) different users on all my systems, several dummy users having their rags in the system partition's /home/dummy
folders (these let me log in when not only the geese fly south). The one that I normally use (let's call me userMe) is a link under /home/userMe pointing to a directory such as tw or Lp on another hard drive.
Now things start to smell bad
The /home/dummy type directories seem to be fully populated
The remote tw folder to which /home/userMe points (or the
Lp one for my Leap system) has only
.desktopfolder in it consisting of
{"resolutions":[{"resx":1920,"resy":1200,"y":50,"w":1920,"h":1200}],"resx":1920,"resy":1200,"y":50,"w":1920,"h":1200,"name":"","bgcolor":"df_transparent","fgcolor":"df_light","textbold":true,"textshadow":true,"items":["Firefox feeds backup.opml;0;0;","trash.desktop;0;0;","Home.desktop;0;0;"],"version":3}
and
.directory in it, consisting of
[Desktop Entry]
Icon=user-desktop
Type=Directory
[Dolphin]
Timestamp=2018,11,13,13,26,15
Version=4
I use KDE with Artix also, similar story but Artix works
(don't know by heart which other distro I have set for KDE)
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 63 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 492939:54:32 |
| Calls: | 840 |
| Files: | 1,302 |
| D/L today: |
4 files (3,972K bytes) |
| Messages: | 252,924 |