I noticed in the current changelog that, for at least three years, it's
been using snapshots of the unreleased 2.50 version. I don't run
current, myself, and my Lisp usage is so rudimentary that the version
likely wouldn't matter at all. Still, I'm curious if anyone knows the background for this change. 2.49 does date back to 2010, but I see other projects sticking with that.
been using snapshots of the unreleased 2.50 version. I don't run
current, myself, and my Lisp usage is so rudimentary that the version
likely wouldn't matter at all. Still, I'm curious if anyone knows the
background for this change. 2.49 does date back to 2010, but I see other
projects sticking with that.
Looking at the ChangeLog when clisp 2.50 was introduced would make me
guess that upgrading to that "beta" version was needed to support a new version of libunistring:
d/clisp-2.50_20220927_acb1266ee-x86_64-1.txz: Upgraded....
Compiled against libunistring-1.1.
However, the libunistring explanation is only a guess from my side, maybe version 2.49 would also work with the new libunistring and the upgrade to 2.50 was a mistake?
*features*(:READLINE :REGEXP :SYSCALLS :I18N :LOOP :COMPILER :CLOS :MOP :CLISP :ANSI-CL
Funny, I just noticed I had a newer, git based clisp compiled outside
pkgsrc on NetBSD, myself. I'd forgotten, but it looked like I was
getting segmentation faults from swank when trying to run slime. But I
was taking a git slime, so maybe I was mixing new wine with old
wineskins. I wonder if anyone on slackware hit anything like this
with 2.49 or if I just made bad decisions when installing slime on
NetBSD. I'll have to try slime again on Slackware 15.0 with clisp
2.49.
Oh, also interesting, is this clisp (pkgsrc/NetBSD) without
libunistring linked still shows :UNICODE among its features. Skimming
the surface of this I remain puzzled:
*features* (:READLINE :REGEXP :SYSCALLS :I18N :LOOP :COMPILER:CLOS :MOP :CLISP :ANSI-CL
:COMMON-LISP :LISP=CL :INTERPRETER :SOCKETS :GENERIC-STREAMS
:LOGICAL-PATHNAMES :SCREEN :FFI :GETTEXT :UNICODE
:BASE-CHAR=CHARACTER :WORD-SIZE=64 :PC386 :UNIX)
Mike Small <smallm@panix.com> writes:
Funny, I just noticed I had a newer, git based clisp compiled outside
pkgsrc on NetBSD, myself. I'd forgotten, but it looked like I was
getting segmentation faults from swank when trying to run slime. But I
was taking a git slime, so maybe I was mixing new wine with old
wineskins. I wonder if anyone on slackware hit anything like this
with 2.49 or if I just made bad decisions when installing slime on
NetBSD. I'll have to try slime again on Slackware 15.0 with clisp
2.49.
Not slackware, but on OpenBSD I have the same problem. Clisp is 2.49
and it crashes with slime, no matter what version. Seems to be a
general problem with 2.49.
Joerg Mertens <joerg-mertens@t-online.de> writes:
Not slackware, but on OpenBSD I have the same problem. Clisp is 2.49
and it crashes with slime, no matter what version. Seems to be a
general problem with 2.49.
Thanks, that's good to know.
I tried it on Slackware 15.0 with 2.49, and slime worked fine, but this
was slime 2.28. So a stable release from a couple of years ago.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 10:48:18 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
3 files (7,546K bytes) |
| Messages: | 265,193 |