• some (hp) printers & certificates

    From bad sector@forgetski@_INVALID.net to alt.os.linux on Thu Sep 3 09:05:56 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux


    I ran into an issue where my HP laser (wifi M252) would not print for a desktop installation of tumbleweed but would for a virtually identical
    system on my T480 laptop. Both systems had the printer last set up by
    Yast but the Yast printer module had been silently dropped an I was
    unaware that CUPS was now the only printer utility.

    A marathon session with Anthropic's Claude pointed to a self-signed certificate that had expired in 2025 and for some reason had not been
    renewed (I know nothing about printer certificates and care even less!).
    In and of itself this still allowed the T480 to print and THIS led to
    service becoming nixed (I suspect by some 'security' _feature_). I have
    the entire session as pdf but suse-paste wouldn't let me put it up, the
    short of the long being that I had the printer admin page issue itself a
    new self-signed certificate, cleared all buffers and settings and that
    fixed the problem.

    HTH whomever runs into similar.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Thu Sep 3 15:32:37 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Thu, 9/3/2026 9:05 AM, bad sector wrote:

    I ran into an issue where my HP laser (wifi M252) would not print for a desktop installation of tumbleweed but would for a virtually identical system on my T480 laptop. Both systems had the printer last set up by Yast but the Yast printer module had been silently dropped an I was unaware that CUPS was now the only printer utility.

    A marathon session with Anthropic's Claude pointed to a self-signed certificate that had expired in 2025 and for some reason had not been renewed (I know nothing about printer certificates and care even less!). In and of itself this still allowed the T480 to print and THIS led to service becoming nixed (I suspect by some 'security' _feature_).-a I have the entire session as pdf but suse-paste wouldn't let me put it up, the short of the long being that I had the printer admin page issue itself a new self-signed certificate, cleared all buffers and settings and that fixed the problem.

    HTH whomever runs into similar.



    That might have something to do with https to Port 631 of CUPS. It
    is protecting packets exchanged with the CUPS control. I don't think
    the printer is involved there, but I could be wrong.

    https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9/html/configuring_and_using_a_cups_printing_server/configuring-tls-encryption-on-a-cups-server_configuring-printing

    # block diagram - CUPS to printer could need encryption
    - CUPS to web browser could need encryption

    https://www.cups.org/doc/spec-design.html

    I've not heard of any certificate ceremonies for printers themselves,
    so I don't know how any detail like that would work. The printer in
    the diagram, could be Wifi or Ethernet for example, and while not
    practical, the printer could be some distance from the "cupsd" controlling it.

    You could ask your LLM-AI, what paths are encrypted, and what facilities
    are needed for the encryption and remote communications, to work.

    Some printers, are Wifi only, and that's so the printer ink scam can work.
    If your printer has a USB cable as well, there are fewer options for shenanigans.
    And the USB cable protocol does not particularly need "protection".
    Whereas other path-types to the printer (Wifi/Ethernet), could be worthy
    of protection (if the printer is miles away from the CUPSD driving it).

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Fri Sep 4 09:17:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2026-09-03 21:32, Paul wrote:
    On Thu, 9/3/2026 9:05 AM, bad sector wrote:

    I ran into an issue where my HP laser (wifi M252) would not print for a desktop installation of tumbleweed but would for a virtually identical system on my T480 laptop. Both systems had the printer last set up by Yast but the Yast printer module had been silently dropped an I was unaware that CUPS was now the only printer utility.

    A marathon session with Anthropic's Claude pointed to a self-signed certificate that had expired in 2025 and for some reason had not been renewed (I know nothing about printer certificates and care even less!). In and of itself this still allowed the T480 to print and THIS led to service becoming nixed (I suspect by some 'security' _feature_).-a I have the entire session as pdf but suse-paste wouldn't let me put it up, the short of the long being that I had the printer admin page issue itself a new self-signed certificate, cleared all buffers and settings and that fixed the problem.

    HTH whomever runs into similar.



    That might have something to do with https to Port 631 of CUPS. It
    is protecting packets exchanged with the CUPS control. I don't think
    the printer is involved there, but I could be wrong.

    https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9/html/configuring_and_using_a_cups_printing_server/configuring-tls-encryption-on-a-cups-server_configuring-printing

    # block diagram - CUPS to printer could need encryption
    - CUPS to web browser could need encryption

    https://www.cups.org/doc/spec-design.html

    I've not heard of any certificate ceremonies for printers themselves,
    so I don't know how any detail like that would work. The printer in
    the diagram, could be Wifi or Ethernet for example, and while not
    practical, the printer could be some distance from the "cupsd" controlling it.

    It would not surprise me that the printer control web page is also
    https. I have a printer where I can test this, but it is 500 km away
    from here.

    Unrelated: the other day I was trying to access my ISP router.
    It did not accept my password. I thought that the password was
    lost, so I had to do a factory reset to reset the password.
    Still no login. Then I realised I was using http. Switched to
    https and the password was accepted.

    But I have no idea if the protocols used to send print data to the
    printer are encrypted and use a certificate. They should, right? But no
    idea.


    You could ask your LLM-AI, what paths are encrypted, and what facilities
    are needed for the encryption and remote communications, to work.

    Some printers, are Wifi only, and that's so the printer ink scam can work.
    If your printer has a USB cable as well, there are fewer options for shenanigans.
    And the USB cable protocol does not particularly need "protection".
    Whereas other path-types to the printer (Wifi/Ethernet), could be worthy
    of protection (if the printer is miles away from the CUPSD driving it).

    Paul
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ESEfc-Efc+, EUEfc-Efc|;
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bad sector@forgetski@_INVALID.net to alt.os.linux on Fri Sep 4 07:41:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 9/3/26 3:32 PM, Paul wrote:
    On Thu, 9/3/2026 9:05 AM, bad sector wrote:

    I ran into an issue where my HP laser (wifi M252) would not print for a desktop installation of tumbleweed but would for a virtually identical system on my T480 laptop. Both systems had the printer last set up by Yast but the Yast printer module had been silently dropped an I was unaware that CUPS was now the only printer utility.

    A marathon session with Anthropic's Claude pointed to a self-signed certificate that had expired in 2025 and for some reason had not been renewed (I know nothing about printer certificates and care even less!). In and of itself this still allowed the T480 to print and THIS led to service becoming nixed (I suspect by some 'security' _feature_).-a I have the entire session as pdf but suse-paste wouldn't let me put it up, the short of the long being that I had the printer admin page issue itself a new self-signed certificate, cleared all buffers and settings and that fixed the problem.

    HTH whomever runs into similar.



    That might have something to do with https to Port 631 of CUPS. It
    is protecting packets exchanged with the CUPS control. I don't think
    the printer is involved there, but I could be wrong.

    https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9/html/configuring_and_using_a_cups_printing_server/configuring-tls-encryption-on-a-cups-server_configuring-printing

    # block diagram - CUPS to printer could need encryption
    - CUPS to web browser could need encryption

    https://www.cups.org/doc/spec-design.html

    I've not heard of any certificate ceremonies for printers themselves,
    so I don't know how any detail like that would work. The printer in
    the diagram, could be Wifi or Ethernet for example, and while not
    practical, the printer could be some distance from the "cupsd" controlling it.

    You could ask your LLM-AI, what paths are encrypted, and what facilities
    are needed for the encryption and remote communications, to work.

    Some printers, are Wifi only, and that's so the printer ink scam can work.
    If your printer has a USB cable as well, there are fewer options for shenanigans.
    And the USB cable protocol does not particularly need "protection".
    Whereas other path-types to the printer (Wifi/Ethernet), could be worthy
    of protection (if the printer is miles away from the CUPSD driving it).

    Paul

    I thought this was the session copy but it's just a heads-up:

    https://paste.opensuse.org/pastes/c6ed0b7d715f


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bad sector@forgetski@_INVALID.net to alt.os.linux on Fri Sep 4 15:34:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 9/3/26 3:32 PM, Paul wrote:

    That might have something to do with https to Port 631 of CUPS. It
    is protecting packets exchanged with the CUPS control. I don't think
    the printer is involved there, but I could be wrong.

    I think it DID involve port 631 but I never buggered around with CUPS
    before, being spoiled rotten by the Yast printer module which just made
    any printer work, period.

    ....
    Some printers, are Wifi only, and that's so the printer ink scam can work.
    If your printer has a USB cable as well, there are fewer options for shenanigans.
    What scams? Mine 'could' be connected to the desktop with a 4 foot usb
    cable if I could have every other computer and cell-phone served by
    wifi. Not sure if the setup can be such a hybrid...


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sat Sep 5 02:51:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Fri, 9/4/2026 3:34 PM, bad sector wrote:

    What scams?-a Mine 'could' be connected to the desktop with a 4 foot usb cable
    if I could have every other computer and cell-phone served by wifi.
    Not sure if the setup can be such a hybrid...

    Printing via USB is just a greater distance from any InstantInk offers.

    If you were printing from a phone, you should just be able to print,
    no registration or anything, no "HP App". No temptation to fill out
    an "HP Account".

    The printer I've got currently, it printed maybe 20 sheets before
    it ran out of ink, and the replacement (usable) carts cost almost
    as much as the printer. It's a great business model.

    If the printer is connected via WIFI, it could pick up a firmware
    update for itself. And you don't want that. You don't want
    any sort of shenanigans behind your back.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sat Sep 5 08:09:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 02:51:16 -0400, Paul wrote:

    The printer I've got currently, it printed maybe 20 sheets before it
    ran out of ink, and the replacement (usable) carts cost almost as
    much as the printer. It's a great business model.

    When I go to buy a printer, I walk past the ones with the cheap,
    throwaway price, and go look at the ones with decent quality,
    functionality ... and price.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sat Sep 5 04:31:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Sat, 9/5/2026 4:09 AM, Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 02:51:16 -0400, Paul wrote:

    The printer I've got currently, it printed maybe 20 sheets before it
    ran out of ink, and the replacement (usable) carts cost almost as
    much as the printer. It's a great business model.

    When I go to buy a printer, I walk past the ones with the cheap,
    throwaway price, and go look at the ones with decent quality,
    functionality ... and price.


    But those aren't for sale at a local store.
    Only the bad stuff is stacked in piles
    at the local store.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bad sector@forgetski@_INVALID.net to alt.os.linux on Sat Sep 5 13:06:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 9/5/26 4:31 AM, Paul wrote:
    On Sat, 9/5/2026 4:09 AM, Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 02:51:16 -0400, Paul wrote:

    The printer I've got currently, it printed maybe 20 sheets before it
    ran out of ink, and the replacement (usable) carts cost almost as
    much as the printer. It's a great business model.

    When I go to buy a printer, I walk past the ones with the cheap,
    throwaway price, and go look at the ones with decent quality,
    functionality ... and price.


    But those aren't for sale at a local store.
    Only the bad stuff is stacked in piles
    at the local store.

    Paul

    The local store that actually has any printers in stock is like 600 km
    away for me. I bought my first Hp-M252 many years ago, and it went tango-uniform after I fed it some noname but 1/3-price 3rd-world toner.
    The second one I bought has been working more flawlessly than ANY other printer in my 40 or so years of computing! The 'designated' toners do
    cost an arm and a leg though. With I don't even know how many phones and
    at least 4 computers regularly soliciting it I've had it on wifi all the
    time, so far with zero issues except this last one.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sat Sep 5 21:24:34 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2026-09-05 19:06, bad sector wrote:
    On 9/5/26 4:31 AM, Paul wrote:
    On Sat, 9/5/2026 4:09 AM, Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 02:51:16 -0400, Paul wrote:

    The printer I've got currently, it printed maybe 20 sheets before it
    ran out of ink, and the replacement (usable) carts cost almost as
    much as the printer. It's a great business model.

    When I go to buy a printer, I walk past the ones with the cheap,
    throwaway price, and go look at the ones with decent quality,
    functionality ... and price.


    But those aren't for sale at a local store.
    Only the bad stuff is stacked in piles
    at the local store.

    -a-a-a Paul

    The local store that actually has any printers in stock is like 600 km
    away for me. I bought my first Hp-M252 many years ago, and it went tango-uniform after I fed it some noname but 1/3-price 3rd-world toner.
    The second one I bought has been working more flawlessly than ANY other printer in my 40 or so years of computing! The 'designated' toners do
    cost an arm and a leg though. With I don't even know how many phones and
    at least 4 computers regularly soliciting it I've had it on wifi all the time, so far with zero issues except this last one.

    I have an HP Laserjet M209dw, B&W printer, on another location. It is
    actually one of those that want to be registered to a toner replacement program and is on WiFi. But it does not know my name or address, I never registered, so it keeps quiet.

    Actually, after a few years, it is still on the first courtesy
    cartridge. I use it little and it was cheap, refurbished.

    My printer here is on its last cartridges. It is a color model, CP1515n, purchased 2008-09. Via ethernet. Thing is, rubber rollers have hardened
    and can't handle 110 grams paper. So I will replace it soon with another
    one, when the toner is spent.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ESEfc-Efc+, EUEfc-Efc|;
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sun Sep 6 02:03:12 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 04:31:05 -0400, Paul wrote:

    On Sat, 9/5/2026 4:09 AM, Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:

    On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 02:51:16 -0400, Paul wrote:

    The printer I've got currently, it printed maybe 20 sheets before
    it ran out of ink, and the replacement (usable) carts cost almost
    as much as the printer. It's a great business model.

    When I go to buy a printer, I walk past the ones with the cheap,
    throwaway price, and go look at the ones with decent quality,
    functionality ... and price.

    But those aren't for sale at a local store. Only the bad stuff is
    stacked in piles at the local store.

    In my country Efc|Efc+, we have free-market capitalism. Even in the little
    town where I live (i.e. not Auckland), there is a choice of stores
    selling computer-related equipment.

    The irony being, many in Efc|Efc+ would call us rCLsocialistrCY, yet in many ways we have more consumer choice than they do.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bad sector@forgetski@_INVALID.net to alt.os.linux on Sun Sep 6 00:02:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 9/3/26 9:05 AM, bad sector wrote:

    I ran into an issue where my HP laser (wifi M252) would not print for a desktop installation of tumbleweed but would for a virtually identical system on my T480 laptop. Both systems had the printer last set up by
    Yast but the Yast printer module had been silently dropped an I was
    unaware that CUPS was now the only printer utility.

    A marathon session with Anthropic's Claude pointed to a self-signed certificate that had expired in 2025 and for some reason had not been renewed (I know nothing about printer certificates and care even less!).
    In and of itself this still allowed the T480 to print and THIS led to service becoming nixed (I suspect by some 'security' _feature_).-a I have the entire session as pdf but suse-paste wouldn't let me put it up, the short of the long being that I had the printer admin page issue itself a
    new self-signed certificate, cleared all buffers and settings and that
    fixed the problem.

    HTH whomever runs into similar.

    Just did another rabbit-hole run with Claude, at the end of which I had
    a hunch:

    If I connect with usb wifi transceiver wlp17s0u7u1 then the problem does
    not exist.

    If I connect with the Asus x870e-ProArt board's native wifi wlp11s0 then
    on attemting a print I get:

    "Connecting to Printer" ....followed by
    "The printer is unreachable at this time"

    If I disconnect the onboard wlp11s0 and connect with wlp17s0u7u1 then
    the problem is gone again.

    If I then reconnect with the usb wlp17s0u7u1 transceiver then the
    onboard one dies not di9sconect as it shopuld but stays connected and
    behavior is as if it was the only one connected (above).


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bad sector@forgetski@_INVALID.net to alt.os.linux on Sun Sep 6 00:10:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 9/5/26 3:24 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2026-09-05 19:06, bad sector wrote:
    On 9/5/26 4:31 AM, Paul wrote:
    On Sat, 9/5/2026 4:09 AM, Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 02:51:16 -0400, Paul wrote:

    The printer I've got currently, it printed maybe 20 sheets before it >>>>> ran out of ink, and the replacement (usable) carts cost almost as
    much as the printer. It's a great business model.

    When I go to buy a printer, I walk past the ones with the cheap,
    throwaway price, and go look at the ones with decent quality,
    functionality ... and price.


    But those aren't for sale at a local store.
    Only the bad stuff is stacked in piles
    at the local store.

    -a-a-a Paul

    The local store that actually has any printers in stock is like 600 km
    away for me. I bought my first Hp-M252 many years ago, and it went
    tango-uniform after I fed it some noname but 1/3-price 3rd-world
    toner. The second one I bought has been working more flawlessly than
    ANY other printer in my 40 or so years of computing! The 'designated'
    toners do cost an arm and a leg though. With I don't even know how
    many phones and at least 4 computers regularly soliciting it I've had
    it on wifi all the time, so far with zero issues except this last one.

    I have an HP Laserjet M209dw, B&W printer, on another location. It is actually one of those that want to be registered to a toner replacement program and is on WiFi. But it does not know my name or address, I never registered, so it keeps quiet.

    hmmmm, don't remember if I registered mine, it's something I rarely do



    Actually, after a few years, it is still on the first courtesy
    cartridge. I use it little and it was cheap, refurbished.

    My printer here is on its last cartridges. It is a color model, CP1515n, purchased 2008-09. Via ethernet. Thing is, rubber rollers have hardened
    and can't handle 110 grams paper. So I will replace it soon with another one, when the toner is spent.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sun Sep 6 02:20:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Sat, 9/5/2026 10:03 PM, Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 04:31:05 -0400, Paul wrote:

    On Sat, 9/5/2026 4:09 AM, Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:

    On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 02:51:16 -0400, Paul wrote:

    The printer I've got currently, it printed maybe 20 sheets before
    it ran out of ink, and the replacement (usable) carts cost almost
    as much as the printer. It's a great business model.

    When I go to buy a printer, I walk past the ones with the cheap,
    throwaway price, and go look at the ones with decent quality,
    functionality ... and price.

    But those aren't for sale at a local store. Only the bad stuff is
    stacked in piles at the local store.

    In my country Efc|Efc+, we have free-market capitalism. Even in the little town where I live (i.e. not Auckland), there is a choice of stores
    selling computer-related equipment.

    The irony being, many in Efc|Efc+ would call us rCLsocialistrCY, yet in many ways we have more consumer choice than they do.


    HP Smart Tank 6001 Wireless 3-in-1 Color Inkjet Printer, Print/Scan/Copy,12 ppm (2H0B9A)
    $269.99 SAVE $130.00 $CDN

    [Review]

    Run away from HP

    I bought this thinking it could be a better printer, but after less than a year,
    it stopped worked, both printer heads. All the printer cartridges are 70%, we
    didn't even finish to use.

    Apparently that is the Free Market, working for you.

    HP changes one digit on the part number, and that product costs $100 more.
    And for a machine doomed to an early death. To buy ink for all tanks,
    costs over $100.

    There is an HP laser for $660, toner set is 150+181+181+181= $693 $CDN
    No scam there. Just good plain honest value.

    These are items at the computer store, rather than the $100 printers in
    a stack at Walmart.

    *******

    We had a few lasers at work, which were printing 2000 sheets a day.
    How many computer store printers today, could do that ? One of those
    used liquid toner (black particles in kerosene, marked flammable). The
    other one used toner carts. And the toner in that case was the
    dry, non-polymer type.

    Nothing today, short of a "corporate print plant" which is a
    large box costing a fortune, does three hole punch and binding,
    comes remotely close to that.

    You can see in the Review quote at the top of this post, that
    "buying a tank printer because it is a tank printer", doesn't
    have to work. There should be a warranty on that puppy, and
    the owner should make sure to use it.

    Paul


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sun Sep 6 06:56:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Sun, 6 Sep 2026 02:20:16 -0400, Paul wrote:

    On Sat, 9/5/2026 10:03 PM, Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:

    On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 04:31:05 -0400, Paul wrote:

    But those aren't for sale at a local store. Only the bad stuff is
    stacked in piles at the local store.

    In my country Efc|Efc+, we have free-market capitalism. Even in the
    little town where I live (i.e. not Auckland), there is a choice of
    stores selling computer-related equipment.

    The irony being, many in Efc|Efc+ would call us rCLsocialistrCY, yet in many >> ways we have more consumer choice than they do.

    Apparently that is the Free Market, working for you.

    Here <https://www.harveynorman.co.nz/computers/printers-and-office/>
    is the current range of choice from the chain where I bought my
    current printer. The nearest branch is maybe 20 minutes from my front
    door.

    Like I said, itrCOs not the only one.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sun Sep 6 03:13:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Sun, 9/6/2026 12:02 AM, bad sector wrote:
    On 9/3/26 9:05 AM, bad sector wrote:

    I ran into an issue where my HP laser (wifi M252) would not print for a desktop installation of tumbleweed but would for a virtually identical system on my T480 laptop. Both systems had the printer last set up by Yast but the Yast printer module had been silently dropped an I was unaware that CUPS was now the only printer utility.

    A marathon session with Anthropic's Claude pointed to a self-signed certificate that had expired in 2025 and for some reason had not been renewed (I know nothing about printer certificates and care even less!). In and of itself this still allowed the T480 to print and THIS led to service becoming nixed (I suspect by some 'security' _feature_).-a I have the entire session as pdf but suse-paste wouldn't let me put it up, the short of the long being that I had the printer admin page issue itself a new self-signed certificate, cleared all buffers and settings and that fixed the problem.

    HTH whomever runs into similar.

    Just did another rabbit-hole run with Claude, at the end of which I had a hunch:

    If I connect with usb wifi transceiver wlp17s0u7u1 then the problem does not exist.

    If I connect with the Asus x870e-ProArt board's native wifi wlp11s0 then on attemting a print I get:

    "Connecting to Printer"-a ....followed by
    "The printer is unreachable at this time"

    If I disconnect the onboard wlp11s0 and connect with wlp17s0u7u1 then the problem is gone again.

    If I then reconnect-a with the usb wlp17s0u7u1 transceiver then the onboard one dies not di9sconect as it shopuld but stays connected and behavior is as if it was the only one connected (above).


    Are these connections via Wifi Direct, rather than through the router ?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi_Direct

    If you have a router, all the devices should be using the router.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Richard Kettlewell@invalid@invalid.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sun Sep 6 09:31:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    Lawrence DrCOOliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
    On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 04:31:05 -0400, Paul wrote:
    On Sat, 9/5/2026 4:09 AM, Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 02:51:16 -0400, Paul wrote:
    The printer I've got currently, it printed maybe 20 sheets before
    it ran out of ink, and the replacement (usable) carts cost almost
    as much as the printer. It's a great business model.

    When I go to buy a printer, I walk past the ones with the cheap,
    throwaway price, and go look at the ones with decent quality,
    functionality ... and price.

    But those aren't for sale at a local store. Only the bad stuff is
    stacked in piles at the local store.

    In my country Efc|Efc+, we have free-market capitalism. Even in the little town where I live (i.e. not Auckland), there is a choice of stores
    selling computer-related equipment.

    The irony being, many in Efc|Efc+ would call us rCLsocialistrCY, yet in many ways we have more consumer choice than they do.

    IrCOm not sure why the rCLlocal storerCY is the relevant option anyway, the
    USA has online ordering and delivery too.
    --
    https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sun Sep 6 12:51:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2026-09-06 08:20, Paul wrote:
    We had a few lasers at work, which were printing 2000 sheets a day.
    How many computer store printers today, could do that ? One of those
    used liquid toner (black particles in kerosene, marked flammable). The
    other one used toner carts. And the toner in that case was the
    dry, non-polymer type.

    black particles in kerosene! Wow, I had not heard of that one. :-o
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ESEfc-Efc+, EUEfc-Efc|;
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bad sector@forgetski@_INVALID.net to alt.os.linux on Sun Sep 6 07:22:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 9/6/26 3:13 AM, Paul wrote:
    On Sun, 9/6/2026 12:02 AM, bad sector wrote:
    On 9/3/26 9:05 AM, bad sector wrote:

    I ran into an issue where my HP laser (wifi M252) would not print for a desktop installation of tumbleweed but would for a virtually identical system on my T480 laptop. Both systems had the printer last set up by Yast but the Yast printer module had been silently dropped an I was unaware that CUPS was now the only printer utility.

    A marathon session with Anthropic's Claude pointed to a self-signed certificate that had expired in 2025 and for some reason had not been renewed (I know nothing about printer certificates and care even less!). In and of itself this still allowed the T480 to print and THIS led to service becoming nixed (I suspect by some 'security' _feature_).-a I have the entire session as pdf but suse-paste wouldn't let me put it up, the short of the long being that I had the printer admin page issue itself a new self-signed certificate, cleared all buffers and settings and that fixed the problem.

    HTH whomever runs into similar.

    Just did another rabbit-hole run with Claude, at the end of which I had a hunch:

    If I connect with usb wifi transceiver wlp17s0u7u1 then the problem does not exist.

    If I connect with the Asus x870e-ProArt board's native wifi wlp11s0 then on attemting a print I get:

    "Connecting to Printer"-a ....followed by
    "The printer is unreachable at this time"

    If I disconnect the onboard wlp11s0 and connect with wlp17s0u7u1 then the problem is gone again.

    If I then reconnect-a with the usb wlp17s0u7u1 transceiver then the onboard one dies not di9sconect as it shopuld but stays connected and behavior is as if it was the only one connected (above).


    Are these connections via Wifi Direct, rather than through the router ?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi_Direct

    If you have a router, all the devices should be using the router.

    Paul

    Through the router, I had tried WiFi-Direct in desperation but fail to
    see the point of it, it's only about the network connection 'type' and
    nothing else. The two things that surprise me in these non-ai sessions
    are the quality of the response being almost proportional to the size
    and quality of the question, and the lightning speed with which they can become rabbit-hole marathons running around in circles. The possibility
    of there being a driver issue was too far outside the box for the
    legions of logic-gates on a $2 Chinese chip.
    --
    Nolite Te Bastardes Corborondum

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sun Sep 6 08:26:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Sun, 9/6/2026 6:51 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2026-09-06 08:20, Paul wrote:
    We had a few lasers at work, which were printing 2000 sheets a day.
    How many computer store printers today, could do that ? One of those
    used liquid toner (black particles in kerosene, marked flammable). The
    other one used toner carts. And the toner in that case was the
    dry, non-polymer type.

    black particles in kerosene! Wow, I had not heard of that one. :-o


    https://bdsdoc.com/blog/difference-between-a-liquid-and-a-dry-toner-printer/

    "A liquid toner printer uses tiny particles of colored powder, called toner,
    suspended in a liquid carrier - usually a type of oil. This technology is
    typically found in digital presses and commercial printing systems, rather
    than in standard office printers.

    In this process, the liquid toner, composed of extremely small pigmented
    resin particles, is transferred to the paper, where it is fused as the
    carrier liquid evaporates.

    Benefits of Liquid Toner Printing

    Due to these qualities, liquid toner printing is favored in professional and
    commercial settings where print quality is critical. Its strengths include:

    Exceptional color vibrancy and image detail
    Smooth gradients and photographic-quality output
    Minimal fading or smudging
    No warm-up time required
    High-speed production for commercial print jobs
    "

    So that's the basic idea.

    That's not exactly the description for our little printer,
    but it's close enough.

    We couldn't really play with that machine, because the drum
    was supposed to be kept out of room light. The replacement drums
    cost $3000 each, and the person changing that out had to be
    following the instructions. I don't think the poor thing is
    as bad as photographic film -- the warning is not to leave
    room fluorescent lighting on it for eight hours while
    you have a "long lunch". Some of the toner cartridges with
    belts (the "purple belt"), those too had room light warnings
    to not leave them out for too long. I don't recollect anyone
    giving a damn about those, as those might be $100 or so.
    Those could be slapped in a lot faster, so they were
    unlikely to be damaged during install.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sun Sep 6 09:13:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On Sun, 9/6/2026 7:22 AM, bad sector wrote:


    Through the router, I had tried WiFi-Direct in desperation but fail to see the point of it, it's only about the network connection 'type' and nothing else. The two things that surprise me in these non-ai sessions are the quality of the response being almost proportional to the size and quality of the question, and the lightning speed with which they can become rabbit-hole marathons running around in circles. The possibility of there being a driver issue was too far outside the box for the legions of logic-gates on a $2 Chinese chip.


    If you suspect LLM-AI quality issues, you can:

    1) Change the control at the bottom of the screen to "High Reasoning".
    This makes almost no difference to the quality of the answer, but
    it does tend to make the machine more "self-aware". It will admit
    when it seems to be guessing at stuff. There seems to be some sort
    of convergence property it can measure or check. We have no control
    over what the "settings" in the bottom menu say, so there might not even
    be such a choice offered there.

    2) If no control is present, try a statement like this.

    "How many holes does it take to fill the Albert Hall?
    Work slowly and carefully, giving a precise answer."

    as that is supposed to flip the same switch on it. The strategy planner
    examines the second sentence, and concludes High Reasoning is required.

    And yes, there is a delicate balance between providing not enough material
    in a question, and providing too much material.

    If you know the answer to the question, that makes it easier to feed
    keywords into the question. Keywords make nice anchors. If you know nothing about the question you're asking, then salting it with keywords is
    going to be harder to do.

    It never gets into a flap about spelling errors. It never even mentions
    them! Which I find, pretty amazing. Just like when it does OCR, it uses
    the context of the material, to suggest the right spelling choice. It
    also seems to have an uncanny ability to extract things you haven't
    explicitly said. For example, when I asked it to write a computer program,
    it merely assumed I wanted the "best algorithm". It then tells me
    what the best algorithm is... then... it writes a computer program using
    a different/weaker algorithm. I love stuff like that, high comedy for sure.
    But there's no point slapping the machine around, as slapping them
    around, they don't remember that for very long. They don't mind
    giving you the wrong answer twice. If they write an apology,
    they don't really mean it.

    *******

    I don't resort to chat sessions too often.

    I write a detailed question. If it's a flop, I close the
    window. And it might then purge that material when you
    open the window later and "ask a brand new question".

    I find I need to write up the question in a text editor
    first, then I copy/paste into the query box, and use the
    up-arrow icon to submit it. This is intended to make me
    spend more time, crafting the question. Sorta like
    slapping it around, in advance :-)

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sun Sep 6 20:00:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2026-09-06 14:26, Paul wrote:
    On Sun, 9/6/2026 6:51 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2026-09-06 08:20, Paul wrote:
    We had a few lasers at work, which were printing 2000 sheets a day.
    How many computer store printers today, could do that ? One of those
    used liquid toner (black particles in kerosene, marked flammable). The
    other one used toner carts. And the toner in that case was the
    dry, non-polymer type.

    black particles in kerosene! Wow, I had not heard of that one. :-o


    https://bdsdoc.com/blog/difference-between-a-liquid-and-a-dry-toner-printer/

    "A liquid toner printer uses tiny particles of colored powder, called toner,
    suspended in a liquid carrier - usually a type of oil. This technology is
    typically found in digital presses and commercial printing systems, rather
    than in standard office printers.

    In this process, the liquid toner, composed of extremely small pigmented
    resin particles, is transferred to the paper, where it is fused as the
    carrier liquid evaporates.

    Benefits of Liquid Toner Printing

    Due to these qualities, liquid toner printing is favored in professional and
    commercial settings where print quality is critical. Its strengths include:

    Exceptional color vibrancy and image detail
    Smooth gradients and photographic-quality output
    Minimal fading or smudging
    No warm-up time required
    High-speed production for commercial print jobs
    "

    So that's the basic idea.

    Interesting. Curious.


    That's not exactly the description for our little printer,
    but it's close enough.

    We couldn't really play with that machine, because the drum
    was supposed to be kept out of room light. The replacement drums
    cost $3000 each, and the person changing that out had to be
    following the instructions. I don't think the poor thing is
    as bad as photographic film -- the warning is not to leave
    room fluorescent lighting on it for eight hours while
    you have a "long lunch". Some of the toner cartridges with
    belts (the "purple belt"), those too had room light warnings
    to not leave them out for too long. I don't recollect anyone
    giving a damn about those, as those might be $100 or so.
    Those could be slapped in a lot faster, so they were
    unlikely to be damaged during install.

    Paul

    !
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ESEfc-Efc+, EUEfc-Efc|;
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bad sector@forgetski@_INVALID.net to alt.os.linux on Sun Sep 6 16:30:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 9/6/26 9:13 AM, Paul wrote:
    On Sun, 9/6/2026 7:22 AM, bad sector wrote:


    Through the router, I had tried WiFi-Direct in desperation but fail to see the point of it, it's only about the network connection 'type' and nothing else. The two things that surprise me in these non-ai sessions are the quality of the response being almost proportional to the size and quality of the question, and the lightning speed with which they can become rabbit-hole marathons running around in circles. The possibility of there being a driver issue was too far outside the box for the legions of logic-gates on a $2 Chinese chip.


    If you suspect LLM-AI quality issues, you can:

    1) Change the control at the bottom of the screen to "High Reasoning".
    This makes almost no difference to the quality of the answer, but
    it does tend to make the machine more "self-aware". It will admit
    when it seems to be guessing at stuff. There seems to be some sort
    of convergence property it can measure or check. We have no control
    over what the "settings" in the bottom menu say, so there might not even
    be such a choice offered there.

    2) If no control is present, try a statement like this.

    "How many holes does it take to fill the Albert Hall?
    Work slowly and carefully, giving a precise answer."

    as that is supposed to flip the same switch on it. The strategy planner
    examines the second sentence, and concludes High Reasoning is required.

    And yes, there is a delicate balance between providing not enough material
    in a question, and providing too much material.

    If you know the answer to the question, that makes it easier to feed
    keywords into the question. Keywords make nice anchors. If you know nothing about the question you're asking, then salting it with keywords is
    going to be harder to do.

    It never gets into a flap about spelling errors. It never even mentions
    them! Which I find, pretty amazing. Just like when it does OCR, it uses
    the context of the material, to suggest the right spelling choice. It
    also seems to have an uncanny ability to extract things you haven't explicitly said. For example, when I asked it to write a computer program,
    it merely assumed I wanted the "best algorithm". It then tells me
    what the best algorithm is... then... it writes a computer program using
    a different/weaker algorithm. I love stuff like that, high comedy for sure. But there's no point slapping the machine around, as slapping them
    around, they don't remember that for very long. They don't mind
    giving you the wrong answer twice. If they write an apology,
    they don't really mean it.

    hehe, I'm about to hit Claude with a perl script to do ...soon :-)





    *******

    I don't resort to chat sessions too often.

    I write a detailed question. If it's a flop, I close the
    window. And it might then purge that material when you
    open the window later and "ask a brand new question".

    I find I need to write up the question in a text editor
    first, then I copy/paste into the query box, and use the
    up-arrow icon to submit it. This is intended to make me
    spend more time, crafting the question. Sorta like
    slapping it around, in advance :-)

    Paul

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TJ@TJ@noneofyour.business to alt.os.linux on Sun Sep 6 21:18:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2026-09-05 02:51, Paul wrote:
    On Fri, 9/4/2026 3:34 PM, bad sector wrote:

    What scams?-a Mine 'could' be connected to the desktop with a 4 foot usb cable
    if I could have every other computer and cell-phone served by wifi.
    Not sure if the setup can be such a hybrid...

    Printing via USB is just a greater distance from any InstantInk offers.

    If you were printing from a phone, you should just be able to print,
    no registration or anything, no "HP App". No temptation to fill out
    an "HP Account".

    The printer I've got currently, it printed maybe 20 sheets before
    it ran out of ink, and the replacement (usable) carts cost almost
    as much as the printer. It's a great business model.

    If the printer is connected via WIFI, it could pick up a firmware
    update for itself. And you don't want that. You don't want
    any sort of shenanigans behind your back.

    Paul

    The OP's Laserjet M252 is subject to a somewhat similar scam if he
    hasn't turned off the automatic firmware updates. The Color Laserjet
    M254dw that I bought on ebay must have been connected via usb, because
    the auto-update was on but it still had the original 2017 firmware.
    First thing I did was to disable that auto-update "feature" before
    connecting to my network. I connected via Ethernet cable, because it's
    faster than wifi.

    Those periodic firmware updates can prevent aftermarket toner carts from working at all. I think it was in 2022 (pulling that date from memory,
    could be wrong) when HP issued firmware updates to a lot of their
    printers that disabled aftermarket toner carts. There are sites and
    Youtube videos about how to "downgrade" the firmware to before this
    happened.

    Some toner vendors claim their custom cartridge chips will work with any firmware, but fortunately I haven't needed to test that theory yet. The printer warns me these are not Genuine HP, but works with them anyway.

    TJ
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bad sector@forgetski@_INVALID.net to alt.os.linux on Sun Sep 6 22:26:12 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 9/6/26 9:18 PM, TJ wrote:
    On 2026-09-05 02:51, Paul wrote:
    On Fri, 9/4/2026 3:34 PM, bad sector wrote:

    What scams?-a Mine 'could' be connected to the desktop with a 4 foot
    usb cable
    if I could have every other computer and cell-phone served by wifi.
    Not sure if the setup can be such a hybrid...

    Printing via USB is just a greater distance from any InstantInk offers.

    If you were printing from a phone, you should just be able to print,
    no registration or anything, no "HP App". No temptation to fill out
    an "HP Account".

    The printer I've got currently, it printed maybe 20 sheets before
    it ran out of ink, and the replacement (usable) carts cost almost
    as much as the printer. It's a great business model.

    If the printer is connected via WIFI, it could pick up a firmware
    update for itself. And you don't want that. You don't want
    any sort of shenanigans behind your back.

    -a-a-a Paul

    The OP's Laserjet M252 is subject to a somewhat similar scam if he
    hasn't turned off the automatic firmware updates. The Color Laserjet
    M254dw that I bought on ebay must have been connected via usb, because
    the auto-update was on but it still had the original 2017 firmware.
    First thing I did was to disable that auto-update "feature" before connecting to my network. I connected via Ethernet cable, because it's faster than wifi.

    Those periodic firmware updates can prevent aftermarket toner carts from working at all. I think it was in 2022 (pulling that date from memory,
    could be wrong) when HP issued firmware updates to a lot of their
    printers that disabled aftermarket toner carts. There are sites and
    Youtube videos about how to "downgrade" the firmware to before this happened.

    Some toner vendors claim their custom cartridge chips will work with any firmware, but fortunately I haven't needed to test that theory yet. The printer warns me these are not Genuine HP, but works with them anyway.

    TJ


    Thanks, my installed firmware if 2020-10-26 is probably what it had when
    I bought it and there are no outstanding updates at this time. I'll
    downgrade if I ever decide to try 3rd party toners.



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bad sector@forgetski@_INVALID.net to alt.os.linux on Mon Sep 7 10:43:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 9/6/26 12:02 AM, bad sector wrote:
    On 9/3/26 9:05 AM, bad sector wrote:

    I ran into an issue where my HP laser (wifi M252) would not print for
    a desktop installation of tumbleweed but would for a virtually
    identical system on my T480 laptop. Both systems had the printer last
    set up by Yast but the Yast printer module had been silently dropped
    an I was unaware that CUPS was now the only printer utility.

    A marathon session with Anthropic's Claude pointed to a self-signed
    certificate that had expired in 2025 and for some reason had not been
    renewed (I know nothing about printer certificates and care even
    less!). In and of itself this still allowed the T480 to print and THIS
    led to service becoming nixed (I suspect by some 'security'
    _feature_).-a I have the entire session as pdf but suse-paste wouldn't
    let me put it up, the short of the long being that I had the printer
    admin page issue itself a new self-signed certificate, cleared all
    buffers and settings and that fixed the problem.

    HTH whomever runs into similar.

    Just did another rabbit-hole run with Claude, at the end of which I had
    a hunch:

    If I connect with usb wifi transceiver wlp17s0u7u1 then the problem does
    not exist.

    If I connect with the Asus x870e-ProArt board's native wifi wlp11s0 then
    on attemting a print I get:

    "Connecting to Printer"-a ....followed by
    "The printer is unreachable at this time"

    If I disconnect the onboard wlp11s0 and connect with wlp17s0u7u1 then
    the problem is gone again.

    If I then reconnect-a with the usb wlp17s0u7u1 transceiver then the
    onboard one dies not di9sconect as it shopuld but stays connected and behavior is as if it was the only one connected (above).

    In the above I had the id's ack bassward, wlp17s0u7u1 is the on-board
    wifi. My printer was still short on CYAN toner because I wanted to get
    to the bottom of this bullshit before giving it the new cartridge
    waiting on my desk.

    I updated the tumbleweed system but even though the printer panel is set
    up to print B&W if a color toner falls short it simply does not print AT
    ALL. The only thing the printer dialog/annunciator says is that it is
    trying to connect to the printer, but it never does.

    I disconnected the onborad wifi antenna but that wifi remained still not
    only available it couldn't even be removed from the NetworkManager list
    of available transceivers. The ONLY way I can print is by disabling the onboard wifi in BIOS and rebooting. THEN cups gives me printing as it
    should so as far as I can finger it out the problem is with the onboard
    wifi driver AND whatever ELSE it is that makes real control over it 'problematic' (i.e. I have always preferred USB wifi transceivers for
    exactly this reason: their physical removal cannot be overrriden by
    software).

    Although I do not have an answer or a solution at least I think I know
    enough about the issue to do alternative printing if I have to, with
    that I out of the way I swapped out the empty cartridge but the onboard
    device will remain disabled in BIOS.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Mon Sep 7 18:19:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2026-09-07 16:43, bad sector wrote:
    On 9/6/26 12:02 AM, bad sector wrote:
    On 9/3/26 9:05 AM, bad sector wrote:

    I ran into an issue where my HP laser (wifi M252) would not print for
    a desktop installation of tumbleweed but would for a virtually
    identical system on my T480 laptop. Both systems had the printer last
    set up by Yast but the Yast printer module had been silently dropped
    an I was unaware that CUPS was now the only printer utility.

    A marathon session with Anthropic's Claude pointed to a self-signed
    certificate that had expired in 2025 and for some reason had not been
    renewed (I know nothing about printer certificates and care even
    less!). In and of itself this still allowed the T480 to print and
    THIS led to service becoming nixed (I suspect by some 'security'
    _feature_).-a I have the entire session as pdf but suse-paste wouldn't
    let me put it up, the short of the long being that I had the printer
    admin page issue itself a new self-signed certificate, cleared all
    buffers and settings and that fixed the problem.

    HTH whomever runs into similar.

    Just did another rabbit-hole run with Claude, at the end of which I
    had a hunch:

    If I connect with usb wifi transceiver wlp17s0u7u1 then the problem
    does not exist.

    If I connect with the Asus x870e-ProArt board's native wifi wlp11s0
    then on attemting a print I get:

    "Connecting to Printer"-a ....followed by
    "The printer is unreachable at this time"

    If I disconnect the onboard wlp11s0 and connect with wlp17s0u7u1 then
    the problem is gone again.

    If I then reconnect-a with the usb wlp17s0u7u1 transceiver then the
    onboard one dies not di9sconect as it shopuld but stays connected and
    behavior is as if it was the only one connected (above).

    In the above I had the id's ack bassward, wlp17s0u7u1 is the on-board
    wifi. My printer was still short on CYAN toner because I wanted to get
    to the bottom of this bullshit before giving it the new cartridge
    waiting on my desk.

    I updated the tumbleweed system but even though the printer panel is set
    up to print B&W if a color toner falls short it simply does not print AT ALL. The only thing the printer dialog/annunciator says is that it is
    trying to connect to the printer, but it never does.

    I disconnected the onborad wifi antenna but that wifi remained still not only available it couldn't even be removed from the NetworkManager list
    of available transceivers. The ONLY way I can print is by disabling the onboard wifi in BIOS and rebooting. THEN cups gives me printing as it
    should so as far as I can finger it out the problem is with the onboard
    wifi driver AND whatever ELSE it is that makes real control over it 'problematic' (i.e. I have always preferred USB wifi transceivers for exactly this reason: their physical removal cannot be overrriden by software).

    Although I do not have an answer or a solution at least I think I know enough about the issue to do alternative printing if I have to, with
    that I out of the way I swapped out the empty cartridge but the onboard device will remain disabled in BIOS.


    Seems you are using Wi-Fi Direct.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ESEfc-Efc+, EUEfc-Efc|;
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bad sector@forgetski@_INVALID.net to alt.os.linux on Mon Sep 7 14:40:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 9/7/26 12:19 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2026-09-07 16:43, bad sector wrote:
    On 9/6/26 12:02 AM, bad sector wrote:
    On 9/3/26 9:05 AM, bad sector wrote:

    I ran into an issue where my HP laser (wifi M252) would not print
    for a desktop installation of tumbleweed but would for a virtually
    identical system on my T480 laptop. Both systems had the printer
    last set up by Yast but the Yast printer module had been silently
    dropped an I was unaware that CUPS was now the only printer utility.

    A marathon session with Anthropic's Claude pointed to a self-signed
    certificate that had expired in 2025 and for some reason had not
    been renewed (I know nothing about printer certificates and care
    even less!). In and of itself this still allowed the T480 to print
    and THIS led to service becoming nixed (I suspect by some 'security'
    _feature_).-a I have the entire session as pdf but suse-paste
    wouldn't let me put it up, the short of the long being that I had
    the printer admin page issue itself a new self-signed certificate,
    cleared all buffers and settings and that fixed the problem.

    HTH whomever runs into similar.

    Just did another rabbit-hole run with Claude, at the end of which I
    had a hunch:

    If I connect with usb wifi transceiver wlp17s0u7u1 then the problem
    does not exist.

    If I connect with the Asus x870e-ProArt board's native wifi wlp11s0
    then on attemting a print I get:

    "Connecting to Printer"-a ....followed by
    "The printer is unreachable at this time"

    If I disconnect the onboard wlp11s0 and connect with wlp17s0u7u1 then
    the problem is gone again.

    If I then reconnect-a with the usb wlp17s0u7u1 transceiver then the
    onboard one dies not di9sconect as it shopuld but stays connected and
    behavior is as if it was the only one connected (above).

    In the above I had the id's ack bassward, wlp17s0u7u1 is the on-board
    wifi. My printer was still short on CYAN toner because I wanted to get
    to the bottom of this bullshit before giving it the new cartridge
    waiting on my desk.

    I updated the tumbleweed system but even though the printer panel is
    set up to print B&W if a color toner falls short it simply does not
    print AT ALL. The only thing the printer dialog/annunciator says is
    that it is trying to connect to the printer, but it never does.

    I disconnected the onborad wifi antenna but that wifi remained still
    not only available it couldn't even be removed from the NetworkManager
    list of available transceivers. The ONLY way I can print is by
    disabling the onboard wifi in BIOS and rebooting. THEN cups gives me
    printing as it should so as far as I can finger it out the problem is
    with the onboard wifi driver AND whatever ELSE it is that makes real
    control over it 'problematic' (i.e. I have always preferred USB wifi
    transceivers for exactly this reason: their physical removal cannot be
    overrriden by software).

    Although I do not have an answer or a solution at least I think I know
    enough about the issue to do alternative printing if I have to, with
    that I out of the way I swapped out the empty cartridge but the
    onboard device will remain disabled in BIOS.


    Seems you are using Wi-Fi Direct.

    No, it's set to OFF. When it's ON then the NetworkManager display shows
    it explicitly.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jim Diamond@zsd@jdvb.ca to alt.os.linux on Mon Sep 7 22:44:12 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2026-09-07 at 11:43 ADT, bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> wrote:
    On 9/6/26 12:02 AM, bad sector wrote:
    On 9/3/26 9:05 AM, bad sector wrote:

    I ran into an issue where my HP laser (wifi M252) would not print for
    a desktop installation of tumbleweed but would for a virtually
    identical system on my T480 laptop. Both systems had the printer last
    set up by Yast but the Yast printer module had been silently dropped
    an I was unaware that CUPS was now the only printer utility.

    A marathon session with Anthropic's Claude pointed to a self-signed
    certificate that had expired in 2025 and for some reason had not been
    renewed (I know nothing about printer certificates and care even
    less!). In and of itself this still allowed the T480 to print and THIS
    led to service becoming nixed (I suspect by some 'security'
    _feature_).-a I have the entire session as pdf but suse-paste wouldn't
    let me put it up, the short of the long being that I had the printer
    admin page issue itself a new self-signed certificate, cleared all
    buffers and settings and that fixed the problem.

    HTH whomever runs into similar.

    Just did another rabbit-hole run with Claude, at the end of which I had
    a hunch:

    If I connect with usb wifi transceiver wlp17s0u7u1 then the problem does
    not exist.

    If I connect with the Asus x870e-ProArt board's native wifi wlp11s0 then
    on attemting a print I get:

    "Connecting to Printer"-a ....followed by
    "The printer is unreachable at this time"

    If I disconnect the onboard wlp11s0 and connect with wlp17s0u7u1 then
    the problem is gone again.

    If I then reconnect-a with the usb wlp17s0u7u1 transceiver then the
    onboard one dies not di9sconect as it shopuld but stays connected and
    behavior is as if it was the only one connected (above).

    In the above I had the id's ack bassward, wlp17s0u7u1 is the on-board
    wifi. My printer was still short on CYAN toner because I wanted to get
    to the bottom of this bullshit before giving it the new cartridge
    waiting on my desk.

    I updated the tumbleweed system but even though the printer panel is set
    up to print B&W if a color toner falls short it simply does not print AT ALL. The only thing the printer dialog/annunciator says is that it is
    trying to connect to the printer, but it never does.

    I disconnected the onborad wifi antenna but that wifi remained still not only available it couldn't even be removed from the NetworkManager list
    of available transceivers. The ONLY way I can print is by disabling the onboard wifi in BIOS and rebooting. THEN cups gives me printing as it
    should so as far as I can finger it out the problem is with the onboard
    wifi driver AND whatever ELSE it is that makes real control over it 'problematic' (i.e. I have always preferred USB wifi transceivers for exactly this reason: their physical removal cannot be overrriden by software).

    Although I do not have an answer or a solution at least I think I know enough about the issue to do alternative printing if I have to, with
    that I out of the way I swapped out the empty cartridge but the onboard device will remain disabled in BIOS.

    Have you considered just blacklisting the on-board wifi card's driver
    module? (Assuming that the driver is compiled as a module, and it isn't
    the same module as for your USB wifi?)

    Or even booting as normal , and then turning off that wifi (sudo ifconfig
    ... down) and then (if still necessary) sudo modprobe -r ... ?

    Jim

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.os.linux on Tue Sep 8 12:11:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2026-09-08 03:44, Jim Diamond wrote:
    On 2026-09-07 at 11:43 ADT, bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> wrote:
    On 9/6/26 12:02 AM, bad sector wrote:

    Have you considered just blacklisting the on-board wifi card's driver
    module? (Assuming that the driver is compiled as a module, and it isn't
    the same module as for your USB wifi?)

    Or even booting as normal , and then turning off that wifi (sudo ifconfig
    ... down) and then (if still necessary) sudo modprobe -r ... ?



    ip link set wlan0 down
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ESEfc-Efc+, EUEfc-Efc|;
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bad sector@forgetski@_INVALID.net to alt.os.linux on Tue Sep 8 06:18:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 9/7/26 9:44 PM, Jim Diamond wrote:
    On 2026-09-07 at 11:43 ADT, bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> wrote:
    On 9/6/26 12:02 AM, bad sector wrote:
    On 9/3/26 9:05 AM, bad sector wrote:

    I ran into an issue where my HP laser (wifi M252) would not print for
    a desktop installation of tumbleweed but would for a virtually
    identical system on my T480 laptop. Both systems had the printer last
    set up by Yast but the Yast printer module had been silently dropped
    an I was unaware that CUPS was now the only printer utility.

    A marathon session with Anthropic's Claude pointed to a self-signed
    certificate that had expired in 2025 and for some reason had not been
    renewed (I know nothing about printer certificates and care even
    less!). In and of itself this still allowed the T480 to print and THIS >>>> led to service becoming nixed (I suspect by some 'security'
    _feature_).-a I have the entire session as pdf but suse-paste wouldn't >>>> let me put it up, the short of the long being that I had the printer
    admin page issue itself a new self-signed certificate, cleared all
    buffers and settings and that fixed the problem.

    HTH whomever runs into similar.

    Just did another rabbit-hole run with Claude, at the end of which I had
    a hunch:

    If I connect with usb wifi transceiver wlp17s0u7u1 then the problem does >>> not exist.

    If I connect with the Asus x870e-ProArt board's native wifi wlp11s0 then >>> on attemting a print I get:

    "Connecting to Printer"-a ....followed by
    "The printer is unreachable at this time"

    If I disconnect the onboard wlp11s0 and connect with wlp17s0u7u1 then
    the problem is gone again.

    If I then reconnect-a with the usb wlp17s0u7u1 transceiver then the
    onboard one dies not di9sconect as it shopuld but stays connected and
    behavior is as if it was the only one connected (above).

    In the above I had the id's ack bassward, wlp17s0u7u1 is the on-board
    wifi. My printer was still short on CYAN toner because I wanted to get
    to the bottom of this bullshit before giving it the new cartridge
    waiting on my desk.

    I updated the tumbleweed system but even though the printer panel is set
    up to print B&W if a color toner falls short it simply does not print AT
    ALL. The only thing the printer dialog/annunciator says is that it is
    trying to connect to the printer, but it never does.

    I disconnected the onborad wifi antenna but that wifi remained still not
    only available it couldn't even be removed from the NetworkManager list
    of available transceivers. The ONLY way I can print is by disabling the
    onboard wifi in BIOS and rebooting. THEN cups gives me printing as it
    should so as far as I can finger it out the problem is with the onboard
    wifi driver AND whatever ELSE it is that makes real control over it
    'problematic' (i.e. I have always preferred USB wifi transceivers for
    exactly this reason: their physical removal cannot be overrriden by
    software).

    Although I do not have an answer or a solution at least I think I know
    enough about the issue to do alternative printing if I have to, with
    that I out of the way I swapped out the empty cartridge but the onboard
    device will remain disabled in BIOS.

    Have you considered just blacklisting the on-board wifi card's driver
    module? (Assuming that the driver is compiled as a module, and it isn't
    the same module as for your USB wifi?)

    Or even booting as normal , and then turning off that wifi (sudo ifconfig
    ... down) and then (if still necessary) sudo modprobe -r ... ?

    Jim
    No, not really my level, but I gues it would do the same result. The
    thing is that my 'level' doesn't even help me pinpoint the real cause
    but it could be that it's CUPS that amplifies an ensuing stall/hang
    problem i.e. both seem to have issues, the driver will soon be fully developed. I was wondering how I could simulate a low toner after
    swapping in the new one but wasn't smart enough to keep the old one to
    do exactly that :-)


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TJ@TJ@noneofyour.business to alt.os.linux on Tue Sep 8 08:33:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 2026-09-07 14:40, bad sector wrote:
    Seems you are using Wi-Fi Direct.

    No, it's set to OFF. When it's ON then the NetworkManager display shows
    it explicitly.

    Could it be trying to use some sort of driverless protocol, like
    Airprint or IPP Everywhere? CUPS has been moving toward driverless
    printing for years.

    TJ
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bad sector@forgetski@_INVALID.net to alt.os.linux on Tue Sep 8 11:29:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 9/8/26 8:33 AM, TJ wrote:
    On 2026-09-07 14:40, bad sector wrote:
    Seems you are using Wi-Fi Direct.

    No, it's set to OFF. When it's ON then the NetworkManager display
    shows it explicitly.

    Could it be trying to use some sort of driverless protocol, like
    Airprint or IPP Everywhere? CUPS has been moving toward driverless
    printing for years.

    TJ

    The printer driver's doing fine, been working for many years, the shit
    hit the fan when I realised that the onboard wifi was finally working
    but unaware that it was still very buggy. I'd been using a USB
    transceiver and Yast was setting up CUPS for me: zero issues, even with
    low toner cartridges. The printer would just alert me and I would tell
    it to keep on trucking for another XYZ number of pages. Then I enabled
    the onboard wifi and Yast got dumped at about the same time so there I
    was now also having to find out how to handle CUPS.

    As far as I've been able to understand the wifi driver is bad, it and
    CUPS run into a problem and cause a comms hang which the otherwise fault
    free but defensive printer then blacklists with extreme prejudice.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2