• Three people are dead at the Bite of Seattle - then 5 hours silence

    From a425couple@a425couple@hotmail.com to seattle.politics,alt.law-enforcement,or.politics,ca.politics,fl.politics on Tue Jul 28 12:01:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

    I'm a retired police manager. The points raised in this are very
    fair and valid. Especially:
    "But Calkins made a point that reframes this. A chiefrCOs first job is to train subordinates so the operation runs when the chief is away. Chiefs
    get to take breaks. They get to have surgery. They get to go on
    vacation. What they donrCOt get to do is leave a department that canrCOt communicate with the public during a mass casualty event."
    DO BETTER!

    from
    https://mynorthwest.com/kiro-opinion/bite-of-seattle-shooting-2/4260960

    Harger: Three people are dead at the Bite of Seattle. A two-year-old was
    shot. The city deserved better than what came next
    Jul 28, 2026, 6:45 AM

    bite of seattle dead two-year-old shot...
    The U.S. flag flies at half staff as cleanup continues at the Space
    Needle the day after a shooting at Seattle Center during the Bite of
    Seattle food festival, Monday, July 27, 2026. (Photo: Lindsey Wasson,
    The Associated Press)
    7
    BY CHARLIE HARGER
    Host, Seattle's Morning News
    Do better.

    Two words. Because this is a city that deserves answers, and clarity,
    and transparency. And right now, werCOre not getting that.

    It was a beautiful day in Seattle. The Bite of Seattle, by all accounts,
    had been uneventful. Hundreds of thousands of people from around the
    region. Good food, the Seattle Center, families. A summer Sunday in one
    of the most beautiful cities in America.

    And then gunfire broke out. People died rCo three of them.

    Police now say at least two people were shooting at each other in the
    middle of Seattle Center, in broad daylight, surrounded by families. A 19-year-old man, who investigators believe was one of the shooters, was
    killed at the scene. A 44-year-old man was killed. A 56-year-old woman
    died at Harborview after surgery.

    Two innocent people, dead in a crossfire they had nothing to do with.

    Four others, including a two-year-old boy, were shot. A toddler. It was
    so bad you can hear it on the dispatch audio, someone asking for a
    tourniquet small enough for a child that age. Witnessed by hundreds. The immediate aftermath shared by thousands, if not millions, online. Blood
    on the ground. Vendors abandoned their booths. Shoes left behind as
    people ran. A fence knocked down by the crowd trying to get out.

    Last month, Seattle celebrated its first murder-free June in more than
    50 years. I wrote about it. I praised the department. I praised the
    trend. Twenty-six days later, three people are dead at the Seattle
    Center, and a toddler is in the hospital.

    The first question in a mass shooting is simple. It took five hours to
    answer
    Bob Calkins is a retired Washington State Patrol public information
    officer. HerCOs spent a career handling crisis communications for one of
    the staterCOs largest law enforcement agencies. He posted an analysis of
    the cityrCOs response on Facebook.

    The first thing Calkins pointed out is that a mass shooting always
    begins with a simple, two-part question: was this a random shooter
    targeting people indiscriminately, or was this a confrontation between
    armed individuals shooting at each other? The answer to that question determines whether every bar, restaurant, and grocery store in the city
    needs to close. Whether thererCOs an ongoing threat to the public, or
    whether the immediate danger has passed.

    You donrCOt need five hours to figure that out. Officers on the scene knew
    the answer long before anyone shared it.

    Instead, nearby residents didnrCOt know what was happening. Was this an ongoing threat? Had it been neutralized? The people whose job it is to
    provide direct, clear information to the public were not providing it.

    rCyWhat you know, as you know it.rCO ThatrCOs the standard. SPD didnrCOt meet it
    In a Facebook post, Calkins laid out the basic rule of crisis
    communication: share what you know, as you know it. The operative word
    is rCLknow.rCY You canrCOt guess or speculate. That requires discipline. But you also donrCOt need to know everything before you say anything. Do we
    know the caliber of the guns? No. Detectives will figure that out. But
    you can tell a terrified public whether the threat is ongoing, and you
    can do it in minutes, not hours.

    The Seattle Police Department (SPD) has had this problem before. Calkins
    said the agency has excellent public information officers, but a history
    of detectives lowering a cone of silence over major incidents while they
    sort out details that the public doesnrCOt need immediately. The nuts and bolts can wait. Whether your family is safe cannot.

    Someone decided to hold the information. The question is who
    Much of that delay, it turns out, was connected to dignitaries wanting
    to be present at the briefing. Governor Bob Ferguson. Congresswoman
    Pramila Jayapal.

    A police public information officer told reporters waiting outside the
    Museum of Pop Culture that the delay was to wait for dignitaries to
    arrive. Mayor Wilson denied it at MondayrCOs press conference, saying she
    was at a different location with Ferguson and Jayapal, waiting for SPD
    to clear the nearby IMAX theater after reports a second suspect may have
    run inside.

    rCLAs soon as we coordinated with SPD and agreed that it was time to talk
    to the media, as soon as we knew that we were going to be doing that, I, Governor Ferguson and Congresswoman Jayapal arrived on the scene within minutes,rCY Wilson said.

    Those two accounts donrCOt match. Somebody is wrong, and the public
    deserves to know who.

    I suspect Ferguson and Jayapal would have wanted SPD to hold a press
    briefing about whether there was a public threat sooner than five hours
    after the shooting, and would have wanted to be present for a fuller
    press conference later in the evening. I donrCOt believe theyrCOd want critical safety information held back so they could stand in the
    background giving statements about how awful this is and what a great
    response there was.

    But Calkins raised something that is a concern. Governor FergusonrCOs
    office requires state agencies to get media releases approved before
    they go out. Axios reported earlier this year that this policy has
    produced real delays inside state agencies, with one former
    communications manager calling it rCLgruelingrCY and a rCLcontinual barrier.rCY
    Calkins, who worked under Governor InsleerCOs communications team for
    years, says that team routinely trusted the expertise of agency PIOs.
    They didnrCOt sit on information. They didnrCOt require approval before
    facts could reach the public.

    If Mayor Wilson has adopted a similar approval requirement for city
    agencies, that would explain the five-hour vapor lock. It would mean
    SPDrCOs public information officers, people who know how to do this job,
    were muzzled by the higher-ups. This is a question that demands answers.

    There is a time for elected leaders to speak. Sympathy. Empathy. Policy. Resources. rCLWe are Seattle strong.rCY But as Calkins pointed out, that
    press conference doesnrCOt have to delay the release of basic safety information. In fact, it probably shouldnrCOt happen at the same press conference at all. A worried restaurant owner trying to decide whether
    to close for the night doesnrCOt need your empathy statement. They need to know whether thererCOs a gunman loose.

    The chief wasnrCOt in town. The real question is why his people werenrCOt ready Chief Shon Barnes wasnrCOt in Seattle when the shooting happened. He said Monday he had a medical procedure on Friday that took him out of town. ThatrCOs a legitimate reason to be away, and IrCOll take him at his word.

    But Calkins made a point that reframes this. A chiefrCOs first job is to
    train subordinates so the operation runs when the chief is away. Chiefs
    get to take breaks. They get to have surgery. They get to go on
    vacation. What they donrCOt get to do is leave a department that canrCOt communicate with the public during a mass casualty event.

    Barnes went through a mass shooting at his previous department. With
    that experience, he should have been training his people and setting expectations long before Sunday. The five-hour silence suggests that
    training either didnrCOt happen or didnrCOt stick.

    And when South Seattle Emerald reporter Connor Nash asked Barnes about
    his absence after todayrCOs press conference, Barnes got in his face.
    Inches away. On camera. KOMO recorded it.

    rCLI donrCOt have to tell you where I go,rCY Barnes said. rCLI have been here working as hard as I can for this city from the day I got here.rCY


    His own staff had to intervene, pushing him toward the door.

    It was a fair question. Nash is a journalist doing his job. The question
    of whether the chief was in town when three people were killed, and a
    toddler was shot, is exactly the kind of question reporters are supposed
    to ask, and chiefs are supposed to answer. Calmly. Professionally. With
    the weight of the office in mind.

    And it raises another question that preceded this incident. Does Barnes
    have a full-time residence in Seattle? The word is his family still
    lives in Chicago, that Barnes keeps an apartment here and heads back on weekends and for extended stretches. That deserves a straight answer.

    RELATED STORIES
    'Something's not right': Gee questions why it took 17 hours to confirm
    second shooter at Bite of Seattle
    Bite of Seattle shooting victims identified as police investigate
    possible gang connection, gunman still at large
    'Crickets from city leaders': KIRO reporter blasts 5-hour silence after
    Bite of Seattle shooting

    Why canrCOt you just say what this was?

    As of MondayrCOs press conference, police have confirmed this appears to
    be gang-related. At least two people, possibly three, were exchanging
    gunfire at the Seattle Center in front of families and children.

    So why couldnrCOt that have been said Sunday night? Why leave people
    wondering for hours whether thererCOs some ongoing mystery threat, when investigators on the scene could see what this was?

    Telling the public what happened, clearly and promptly, is the most
    basic function of crisis communication. You donrCOt need five hours and a governor to do it. You need someone in a uniform looking into a camera
    and saying: This is what we know, this is what werCOre doing, and this is
    what you need to do right now.

    This was an epic communication failure
    The officers who responded to the scene did their jobs. The firefighters
    and medics who treated the wounded did their jobs. The people
    responsible for telling the public what was happening failed them.

    IrCOve covered this city for decades. IrCOve praised this department when it earned it, including last month. IrCOll praise it again when it earns it again. But the communication failures here point to a leadership problem
    that existed before the first shot was fired.

    Seattle just showed the world its best face for the World Cup. Two weeks later, three people are dead at a food festival, and a two-year-old was hospitalized, and the people in charge couldnrCOt figure out how to tell
    us what happened for five hours.

    Do better.

    Charlie Harger is the host of rCLSeattlerCOs Morning NewsrCY on KIRO Newsradio. You can read more of his stories and commentaries here.
    Follow Charlie on X and email him here.






    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2