From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

On 17 Jan 2026, Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> posted some news:696b7258$9$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

SUMMARY OF THE RENEE NICOLE GOOD CASE (JAN 2026)

The fatal shooting of Renee Good by ICE Agent Jonathan Ross in
Minneapolis has created a massive jurisdictional standoff. Here is the breakdown of the evidence vs. the legal reality.
THE EVIDENCE FOR MURDER:

Forensics (released Jan 16) show Good was hit 4 times (3 shots fired,
one "through-and-through"). Key points:

rCo Trajectory: Shots entered through the windshield and side window
while Ross was standing to the SIDE of the vehicle.
rCo The Threat: Video suggests the SUV was not steered toward the
agent. Ross was never in the "path of death," making the use of lethal
force a violation of standard ROE.
rCo Defensive Wounds: A wound to the forearm suggests Good was
shielding her face, not using the car as a weapon.

THE LEGAL "BLACK HOLE":
Despite the forensic evidence of an unlawful killing, the courts will
likely never reach a "Guilty" verdict due to Federal Shielding:
1. SUPREMACY CLAUSE IMMUNITY: Under "Neagle" precedents, federal
agents are largely immune from state (MN) prosecution if they can
claim they were performing federal duties. The Feds are already moving
to "remove" the case from state court to kill it.
2. QUALIFIED IMMUNITY: Even if a civil suit is filed, Ross is shielded
unless the family can prove he violated "clearly established law."
SCOTUS has narrowed this so much that "shooting a driver from the
side" might not be specific enough to pierce the shield.
3. BIVENS BARRIER: Recent 2024-2025 rulings have essentially slammed
the door on suing federal agents for civil rights violations in the
field.

BOTTOM LINE:
Forensically, it looks like murder. Legally, itrCOs a "non-justiciable event." Because Ross wears a federal badge, the State of Minnesota may
be constitutionally barred from even putting him in front of a jury.

MN AG Keith Ellison is fighting the "Removal" to federal court. If he
loses, the case is effectively over.

Self-defense. She hit the agent with the vehicle compelling a defensive reaction. It doesn't matter how hard or how many times, once is enough.

The snotty lesbian partner should be charged as an accessory during the commission of a felony, and murder for facilitating the death of Good by shouting "Drive!" "Drive!". Good did hit the gas, striking an agent and getting killed for her "ICE Watch" stupidity.

Gofundme needs to be taken to task over this one. Criminal acts should
not be rewarded with financial gain.

Defend the 612 participants need a 48 hour stay in a real federal prison
to help them focus on what's important for the rest of their lives.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

On Jan 17, 2026 at 2:21:35rC>PM MST, "Life Is Real" wrote <dab795b21bb0888cd9d28dc75d71ec9d@dizum.com>:

On 17 Jan 2026, Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> posted some news:696b7258$9$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

SUMMARY OF THE RENEE NICOLE GOOD CASE (JAN 2026)

The fatal shooting of Renee Good by ICE Agent Jonathan Ross in
Minneapolis has created a massive jurisdictional standoff. Here is the
breakdown of the evidence vs. the legal reality.
THE EVIDENCE FOR MURDER:

Forensics (released Jan 16) show Good was hit 4 times (3 shots fired,
one "through-and-through"). Key points:

rCo Trajectory: Shots entered through the windshield and side window
while Ross was standing to the SIDE of the vehicle.
rCo The Threat: Video suggests the SUV was not steered toward the
agent. Ross was never in the "path of death," making the use of lethal
force a violation of standard ROE.
rCo Defensive Wounds: A wound to the forearm suggests Good was
shielding her face, not using the car as a weapon.

THE LEGAL "BLACK HOLE":
Despite the forensic evidence of an unlawful killing, the courts will
likely never reach a "Guilty" verdict due to Federal Shielding:
1. SUPREMACY CLAUSE IMMUNITY: Under "Neagle" precedents, federal
agents are largely immune from state (MN) prosecution if they can
claim they were performing federal duties. The Feds are already moving
to "remove" the case from state court to kill it.
2. QUALIFIED IMMUNITY: Even if a civil suit is filed, Ross is shielded
unless the family can prove he violated "clearly established law."
SCOTUS has narrowed this so much that "shooting a driver from the
side" might not be specific enough to pierce the shield.
3. BIVENS BARRIER: Recent 2024-2025 rulings have essentially slammed
the door on suing federal agents for civil rights violations in the
field.

BOTTOM LINE:
Forensically, it looks like murder. Legally, itrCOs a "non-justiciable
event." Because Ross wears a federal badge, the State of Minnesota may
be constitutionally barred from even putting him in front of a jury.

MN AG Keith Ellison is fighting the "Removal" to federal court. If he
loses, the case is effectively over.

Self-defense. She hit the agent with the vehicle compelling a defensive reaction. It doesn't matter how hard or how many times, once is enough.

This is contrary to the law, to policy, to the facts, and common sense.

The snotty lesbian partner should be charged as an accessory during the commission of a felony, and murder for facilitating the death of Good by shouting "Drive!" "Drive!". Good did hit the gas, striking an agent and getting killed for her "ICE Watch" stupidity.

She turned the wheel to drive off.

Gofundme needs to be taken to task over this one. Criminal acts should
not be rewarded with financial gain.

She is not the murderer. The murderer is getting funded.

Defend the 612 participants need a 48 hour stay in a real federal prison
to help them focus on what's important for the rest of their lives.

--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

Self-defense. She hit the agent with the vehicle compelling a defensive
reaction. It doesn't matter how hard or how many times, once is enough.

This is contrary to the law, to policy, to the facts, and common sense.

Wrong, as you usually are.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

On Jan 17, 2026 at 4:39:30rC>PM MST, "Name" wrote <8d7omktue8lknjbjirrtsriq1td9p483q7@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

Self-defense. She hit the agent with the vehicle compelling a defensive >>> reaction. It doesn't matter how hard or how many times, once is enough.

This is contrary to the law, to policy, to the facts, and common sense.

Wrong, as you usually are.

-----
An officer cannot manufacture a threat by placing themselves
in harm's way: Barnes v. Felix (U.S. Supreme Court, May 15,
2025, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 9-0 decision). An
officer cannot manufacture a threat by placing themselves in
harm's way like jumping in front of a car trying to get away
and then claiming self-defense just because the car moves
toward them.
-----
From Title 1, U.S. DOJ Policy on Use of Force: "Firearms may
not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.
Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving
vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening
the officer or another person with deadly force by means
OTHER THAN THE VEHICLE [emphasis mine]; or (2) the vehicle
is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or
serious physical injury... and no other objectively
reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes
moving out of the path of the vehicle."
-----

I have evidence on my side. You?
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 17, 2026 at 4:39:30?PM MST, "Name" wrote ><8d7omktue8lknjbjirrtsriq1td9p483q7@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

Self-defense. She hit the agent with the vehicle compelling a defensive >>>> reaction. It doesn't matter how hard or how many times, once is enough. >>>

This is contrary to the law, to policy, to the facts, and common sense.

Wrong, as you usually are.

-----
An officer cannot manufacture a threat by placing themselves
in harm's way

They didn't. NEXT!

I have evidence on my side. You?

No, you have nothing except an incredible amount of dumbassedness.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

On Jan 17, 2026 at 5:53:17rC>PM MST, "Name" wrote <nmbomkdn410s18nsubrrh1scbtkrmcfhj7@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 17, 2026 at 4:39:30?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<8d7omktue8lknjbjirrtsriq1td9p483q7@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

Self-defense. She hit the agent with the vehicle compelling a defensive >>>>> reaction. It doesn't matter how hard or how many times, once is enough. >>>>

This is contrary to the law, to policy, to the facts, and common sense. >>>

Wrong, as you usually are.

-----
An officer cannot manufacture a threat by placing themselves
in harm's way: Barnes v. Felix (U.S. Supreme Court, May 15,
2025, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 9-0 decision). An
officer cannot manufacture a threat by placing themselves in
harm's way like jumping in front of a car trying to get away
and then claiming self-defense just because the car moves
toward them.
-----
From Title 1, U.S. DOJ Policy on Use of Force: "Firearms may
not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.
Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving
vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening
the officer or another person with deadly force by means
OTHER THAN THE VEHICLE [emphasis mine]; or (2) the vehicle
is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or
serious physical injury... and no other objectively
reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes
moving out of the path of the vehicle."
-----

I have evidence on my side. You?

They didn't. NEXT!

Video proof shows he did. Remember... facts matter to those of not tied to a cult focused on tribalism and scapegoating.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 17, 2026 at 5:53:17?PM MST, "Name" wrote ><nmbomkdn410s18nsubrrh1scbtkrmcfhj7@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 17, 2026 at 4:39:30?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<8d7omktue8lknjbjirrtsriq1td9p483q7@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

Self-defense. She hit the agent with the vehicle compelling a defensive >>>>>> reaction. It doesn't matter how hard or how many times, once is enough. >>>>>

This is contrary to the law, to policy, to the facts, and common sense. >>>>

Wrong, as you usually are.

-----
An officer cannot manufacture a threat by placing themselves
in harm's way: Barnes v. Felix (U.S. Supreme Court, May 15,
2025, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 9-0 decision). An
officer cannot manufacture a threat by placing themselves in
harm's way like jumping in front of a car trying to get away
and then claiming self-defense just because the car moves
toward them.
-----
From Title 1, U.S. DOJ Policy on Use of Force: "Firearms may
not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.
Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving
vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening
the officer or another person with deadly force by means
OTHER THAN THE VEHICLE [emphasis mine]; or (2) the vehicle
is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or
serious physical injury... and no other objectively
reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes
moving out of the path of the vehicle."
-----

I have evidence on my side. You?

They didn't. NEXT!

Video proof shows he did.

Well, no, it doesn't. The bitch got what she deserved.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

On Jan 18, 2026 at 4:32:17rC>AM MST, "Name" wrote <55hpmk1kgrtf5t4j1e04354cjnjg984pkr@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 17, 2026 at 5:53:17?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<nmbomkdn410s18nsubrrh1scbtkrmcfhj7@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 17, 2026 at 4:39:30?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<8d7omktue8lknjbjirrtsriq1td9p483q7@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

Self-defense. She hit the agent with the vehicle compelling a defensive
reaction. It doesn't matter how hard or how many times, once is enough.

This is contrary to the law, to policy, to the facts, and common sense. >>>>>

Wrong, as you usually are.

-----
An officer cannot manufacture a threat by placing themselves
in harm's way: Barnes v. Felix (U.S. Supreme Court, May 15,
2025, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 9-0 decision). An
officer cannot manufacture a threat by placing themselves in
harm's way like jumping in front of a car trying to get away
and then claiming self-defense just because the car moves
toward them.
-----
From Title 1, U.S. DOJ Policy on Use of Force: "Firearms may
not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.
Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving
vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening
the officer or another person with deadly force by means
OTHER THAN THE VEHICLE [emphasis mine]; or (2) the vehicle
is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or
serious physical injury... and no other objectively
reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes
moving out of the path of the vehicle."
-----

I have evidence on my side. You?

They didn't. NEXT!

Video proof shows he did.

Well, no, it doesn't. The bitch got what she deserved.

I know you FEEL that way -- you have your Goose Stepping Marching Orders --
but I am speaking of the evidence. Remember, where tribalism and scapegoating are key to your views, to me evidence and facts and equal rights matter. Just different worldviews.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/15/video/ice-shooting-renee-good-minneapolis-videos.html

https://www.facebook.com/reel/907491791853085

https://www.facebook.com/reel/752119487393129

https://www.facebook.com/reel/25916061978005513

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1963850637495837

https://www.facebook.com/reel/876691261428458

As I said, I have evidence. Receipts. Facts. Justice is important to me... not blind obedience to a fascist leader.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 18, 2026 at 4:32:17?AM MST, "Name" wrote ><55hpmk1kgrtf5t4j1e04354cjnjg984pkr@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 17, 2026 at 5:53:17?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<nmbomkdn410s18nsubrrh1scbtkrmcfhj7@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 17, 2026 at 4:39:30?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<8d7omktue8lknjbjirrtsriq1td9p483q7@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

Self-defense. She hit the agent with the vehicle compelling a defensive
reaction. It doesn't matter how hard or how many times, once is enough.

This is contrary to the law, to policy, to the facts, and common sense. >>>>>>

Wrong, as you usually are.

-----
An officer cannot manufacture a threat by placing themselves
in harm's way: Barnes v. Felix (U.S. Supreme Court, May 15,
2025, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 9-0 decision). An
officer cannot manufacture a threat by placing themselves in
harm's way like jumping in front of a car trying to get away
and then claiming self-defense just because the car moves
toward them.
-----
From Title 1, U.S. DOJ Policy on Use of Force: "Firearms may
not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.
Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving
vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening
the officer or another person with deadly force by means
OTHER THAN THE VEHICLE [emphasis mine]; or (2) the vehicle
is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or
serious physical injury... and no other objectively
reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes
moving out of the path of the vehicle."
-----

I have evidence on my side. You?

They didn't. NEXT!

Video proof shows he did.

Well, no, it doesn't. The bitch got what she deserved.

I know you FEEL that way -

It's facts. The terrorist leftist got exactly what she deserved.
Hopefully there will be several more examples of why you should
interfere with ICE agents performing their duties and ridding the
country of illegal aliens.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

On Jan 18, 2026 at 11:31:32rC>AM MST, "Name" wrote <6m9qmklkkm2cpnf4rdegfid9r19847gp93@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 18, 2026 at 4:32:17?AM MST, "Name" wrote
<55hpmk1kgrtf5t4j1e04354cjnjg984pkr@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 17, 2026 at 5:53:17?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<nmbomkdn410s18nsubrrh1scbtkrmcfhj7@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 17, 2026 at 4:39:30?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<8d7omktue8lknjbjirrtsriq1td9p483q7@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

Self-defense. She hit the agent with the vehicle compelling a defensive
reaction. It doesn't matter how hard or how many times, once is enough.

This is contrary to the law, to policy, to the facts, and common sense.

Wrong, as you usually are.

-----
An officer cannot manufacture a threat by placing themselves
in harm's way: Barnes v. Felix (U.S. Supreme Court, May 15,
2025, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 9-0 decision). An
officer cannot manufacture a threat by placing themselves in
harm's way like jumping in front of a car trying to get away
and then claiming self-defense just because the car moves
toward them.
-----
From Title 1, U.S. DOJ Policy on Use of Force: "Firearms may
not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.
Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving
vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening
the officer or another person with deadly force by means
OTHER THAN THE VEHICLE [emphasis mine]; or (2) the vehicle
is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or
serious physical injury... and no other objectively
reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes
moving out of the path of the vehicle."
-----

I have evidence on my side. You?

They didn't. NEXT!

Video proof shows he did.

Well, no, it doesn't. The bitch got what she deserved.

I know you FEEL that way -- you have your Goose Stepping Marching Orders -- >> but I am speaking of the evidence. Remember, where tribalism and scapegoating
are key to your views, to me evidence and facts and equal rights matter. Just
different worldviews.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/15/video/ice-shooting-renee-good-minneapolis-videos.html

https://www.facebook.com/reel/907491791853085

https://www.facebook.com/reel/752119487393129

https://www.facebook.com/reel/25916061978005513

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1963850637495837

https://www.facebook.com/reel/876691261428458

As I said, I have evidence. Receipts. Facts. Justice is important to me... not
blind obedience to a fascist leader.

It's facts.

What I presented and you snipped... sure.

Below you just troll. Not interested. Remember, I am not a part of a fascist cult and your emotional outbursts are not persuasive to me.

The terrorist leftist got exactly what she deserved.
Hopefully there will be several more examples of why you should
interfere with ICE agents performing their duties and ridding the
country of illegal aliens.

--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

I know you FEEL that way -

It's facts. The terrorist leftist got exactly what she deserved.
Hopefully there will be several more examples of why you should
interfere with ICE agents performing their duties and ridding the
country of illegal aliens.>What I presented and you snipped... sure.

Below you just troll. Not interested.

Of course you're not interested. You'd rather support illegal aliens
and leftist terrorists.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

On Jan 18, 2026 at 12:03:53rC>PM MST, "Name" wrote <3ibqmkd40vko18pnt4hav8dq8k1ra4dvkt@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

I know you FEEL that way -

It's facts. The terrorist leftist got exactly what she deserved.
Hopefully there will be several more examples of why you should
interfere with ICE agents performing their duties and ridding the
country of illegal aliens.>What I presented and you snipped... sure.

Below you just troll. Not interested.

Of course you're not interested.

Right. I care about the facts of the case -- your trolling is just you dealing with your own personal challenges. Not my problem.

Below you simply lie. Not interested in that, either. Again, we come at this from very different angles: I care about equal rights, about the environment, and about evidence. You back tribalism and scapegoating. We simply have different world views.

You'd rather support illegal aliens
and leftist terrorists.

--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 18, 2026 at 12:03:53?PM MST, "Name" wrote ><3ibqmkd40vko18pnt4hav8dq8k1ra4dvkt@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

I know you FEEL that way -

It's facts. The terrorist leftist got exactly what she deserved.
Hopefully there will be several more examples of why you should
interfere with ICE agents performing their duties and ridding the
country of illegal aliens.>What I presented and you snipped... sure.

Below you just troll. Not interested.

Of course you're not interested. You'd rather support illegal aliens
and leftist terrorists.

Right.

Don't you feel better admitting it? Now, go interfere with some ICE
and report back-- if you can.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

On Jan 18, 2026 at 1:06:32rC>PM MST, "Name" wrote <v7fqmk1egdvmml9bppk6s7gpi7n833m10v@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 18, 2026 at 12:03:53?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<3ibqmkd40vko18pnt4hav8dq8k1ra4dvkt@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

I know you FEEL that way -

It's facts. The terrorist leftist got exactly what she deserved.
Hopefully there will be several more examples of why you should
interfere with ICE agents performing their duties and ridding the
country of illegal aliens.>What I presented and you snipped... sure. >>>>>

Below you just troll. Not interested.

Of course you're not interested.

Right.

You'd rather support illegal aliens
and leftist terrorists.

I care about the facts of the case -- your trolling is just you dealing
with your own personal challenges. Not my problem.

Below you simply lie. Not interested in that, either. Again, we come at this >> from very different angles: I care about equal rights, about the environment,
and about evidence. You back tribalism and scapegoating. We simply have
different world views.

Don't you feel better admitting it?

Nothing to "admit" to. I am proud of backing equal rights and the environment and evidence and logic -- maybe even more proud than you are to back tribalism and scapegoating.

Now, go interfere with some ICE
and report back-- if you can.

--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 18, 2026 at 12:03:53?PM MST, "Name" wrote >>><3ibqmkd40vko18pnt4hav8dq8k1ra4dvkt@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

I know you FEEL that way -

It's facts. The terrorist leftist got exactly what she deserved.
Hopefully there will be several more examples of why you should
interfere with ICE agents performing their duties and ridding the
country of illegal aliens.>What I presented and you snipped... sure. >>>>>>

Below you just troll. Not interested.

Of course you're not interested. You'd rather support illegal aliens >>>>and leftist terrorists.

Right.

Don't you feel better admitting it? Now, go interfere with some ICE
and report back-- if you can.

Nothing to "admit" to. I am proud of backing equal rights and the environment >and evidence and logic

and rapists and murderers and illegal aliens.

Again, you admit it.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

On Jan 18, 2026 at 2:57:26rC>PM MST, "Name" wrote <uolqmk9ed2orul2tr1gii0f2mutree8l4f@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

On Jan 18, 2026 at 12:03:53?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<3ibqmkd40vko18pnt4hav8dq8k1ra4dvkt@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

I know you FEEL that way -

It's facts. The terrorist leftist got exactly what she deserved. >>>>>>> Hopefully there will be several more examples of why you should
interfere with ICE agents performing their duties and ridding the >>>>>>> country of illegal aliens.>What I presented and you snipped... sure. >>>>>>>

Below you just troll. Not interested.

Of course you're not interested. You'd rather support illegal aliens >>>>> and leftist terrorists.

Right.

Don't you feel better admitting it? Now, go interfere with some ICE
and report back-- if you can.

Nothing to "admit" to. I am proud of backing equal rights and the environment
and evidence and logic -- maybe even more proud than you are to back tribalism
and scapegoating.

and rapists and murderers and illegal aliens.

Trump is horrid, agreed.

Again, you admit it.

I am not please Trump is a rapist who backs murderers and has a wife who had questionable legal status, but it is what it is.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

Don't you feel better admitting it? Now, go interfere with some ICE >>>>and report back-- if you can.

Nothing to "admit" to. I am proud of backing equal rights and the environment
and evidence and logic

and rapists and murderers and illegal aliens.

Again, you admit it.

================================================== ==================================================
================= WARNING! ========================
**** IMPOTENT TRUMP PIVOT AHEAD! **** ================= WARNING! ======================== ================================================== ==================================================

Trump is horrid, agreed.

I am not please Trump is a rapist who backs murderers and has a wife who had >questionable legal status, but it is what it is.

Note that you do not deny supporting rapists and murderers and illegal
aliens.

As I predicted.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

Brock McNuggets wrote: |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| |"rCo The Threat: Video suggests the SUV was not steered toward the agent. Ross|
|was never in the "path of death," [. . .]" | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Videos do much better than suggest as they prove that she steered away
from him (to her right) while he stood on her left. It is completely
impossible for Ren|-e Nicole Good to attack him.

|-------------------------------------|
|"Forensically, it looks like murder."|
|-------------------------------------|

ICE did perpetrate this murder. Accessories or accomplices libel and
slander this murdered heroine.

This murderer can probably be sued via universal jurisdiction.

It is a pity that the country of the United States of America is
dishonest. It is a pity that the country of the United States of
America is evil. It is a pity that the country of the United States of
America employs hypocrites.

I am sorry that this crossposting is to only 2 groups. I am sending
via a server which does not allow a crosspost to many groups. It or
Tin also forbids many groups in a Followup-To: field.
(S. HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/ fuer Kontaktdaten!)
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

On Jan 18, 2026 at 3:40:04rC>PM MST, "Name" wrote <47oqmk9q5pth6ob772hc8cbhns748ej9mc@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

Don't you feel better admitting it? Now, go interfere with some ICE >>>>> and report back-- if you can.

Nothing to "admit" to. I am proud of backing equal rights and the environment
and evidence and logic

and rapists and murderers and illegal aliens.

Again, you admit it.

Trump is horrid, agreed.

I am not please Trump is a rapist who backs murderers and has a wife who had >> questionable legal status, but it is what it is.

Note that you do not deny supporting rapists and murderers

I am the one denouncing Trump.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> typed:

Don't you feel better admitting it? Now, go interfere with some ICE >>>>>>and report back-- if you can.

Nothing to "admit" to. I am proud of backing equal rights and the environment
and evidence and logic

and rapists and murderers and illegal aliens.

Again, you admit it.

================================================== >>==================================================
================= WARNING! ========================
**** IMPOTENT TRUMP PIVOT AHEAD! **** >>================= WARNING! ======================== >>================================================== >>==================================================

Trump is horrid, agreed.

I am not please Trump is a rapist who backs murderers and has a wife who had >>>questionable legal status, but it is what it is.

Note that you do not deny supporting rapists and murderers and illegal >>aliens.

As I predicted.

I am the one denouncing Trump.

You are the one supporting rapists and murderers and illegal aliens.
Agreed.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2