• Freenode IRC News

    From ant@ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) to alt.irc,alt.irc.networks on Wed May 19 20:24:22 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.irc

    ...
    04:14PM <AfterShock> https://boingboing.net/2021/05/19/freenode-irc-staff-quit-after-new-owner-seizes-control.html
    04:14PM <URL> [ Freenode IRC staff quit after new owner "seizes" control of network | Boing Boing ] - boingboing.net
    04:14PM <AfterShock> https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/19/freenode_staff_resigns/
    04:14PM <URL> [ Freenode IRC staff resign en masse, unhappy about new
    management ??? The Register ] - www.theregister.com
    ...

    Wow.
    --
    SW:TPM is 22 yrs. old!
    Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
    /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org.
    / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.
    | |o o| |
    \ _ /
    ( )
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From locogh0st@locogh0st@ghost.local to alt.irc,alt.irc.networks on Thu May 20 10:29:10 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.irc

    On 2021-05-20, Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
    ...
    04:14PM <AfterShock> https://boingboing.net/2021/05/19/freenode-irc-staff-quit-after-new-owner-seizes-control.html
    04:14PM <URL> [ Freenode IRC staff quit after new owner "seizes" control of network | Boing Boing ] - boingboing.net
    04:14PM <AfterShock> https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/19/freenode_staff_resigns/
    04:14PM <URL> [ Freenode IRC staff resign en masse, unhappy about new
    management ??? The Register ] - www.theregister.com
    ...

    Wow.

    Interesting.
    --
    +++>> locogh0st <<+++
    cloakn3kcia4pnos.onion port 6697 ssl
    cloaknet@REMOVEriseup.net
    Twitter: @locogh0st
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From superkuh@superkuh@superkuh.com to alt.irc,alt.irc.networks on Fri May 21 12:29:28 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.irc

    Yeah, it's quite a quagmire. I'm pretty upset about it. I've spent most
    of my free time the last two days trying to figure out exactly what went
    on, if I should do anything, and how to do it.

    As far as I can tell it started when the holding company Freenode LLC
    was set up. IRC nerds aren't the best at legal bullshit so help from
    rasengan was brought in and he ended up on the board. Later christel
    wanted out for undetermined reasons and sold the freenode llc holding
    company to rasengan. At that time there was a lot of anxiety on freenode
    (I was there) over the new corporate ownership; rasengan/Andrew Lee has
    a lot of other for-profit businesses. But we, and staff, were assured
    that he was just doing this because he loved IRC (which I still believe)
    and that he'd stay out of server operations.

    At this point rasengan owned the holding company that owned the domain
    name. Everything else, the servers, the DNS control accounts, etc were
    owned and operated by staff. That includes setting up the relationships
    for third parties to donate servers to freenode.

    With christel's departure the staff got together and decided to vote
    tomaw as the new freenode leader to handle server operations. Things
    were okay for a while.

    Then there was a hiccup with rasengan putting a little ad/link for one
    of his for-profit companies on the freenode website. That acted as the catalyst for tension and tomaw asked for full control of the domain name.

    Things became more tense when, after some time of freenode staff
    contributing to the dev of an updated IRCd they made a post about it on
    the blog about switching to it. This was a problem for rasengan since
    his overarching goal with IRC.com and ownership of IRC networks (like
    snoonet running on IRC.com resources) is to set up a truly distributed
    IRC where any server can peer to any other and easily switch networks.
    He'd put in a significant amount of money into developing this IRC.com
    IRCd, I've heard. And this provided his motivation to opposing the
    staff's switch to their modified IRCd for future operations.

    This was now rasengan interering directly in the operations of the
    freenode network. And the heated debates this caused eventually lead to litigation by rasengan against tomaw. At this point it was obvious that christel/rasengan's statements about the sale were just words and that
    now legal means were going to be used to take control of the operation
    of the servers.

    They drafted their various resignation letters, some got leaked early on
    the 16th. At this point I got involved as a regular user on #freenode
    and talked to rasengan there and on Hackernews forums. I also talked to
    the staff. Even then I personally hoped for reconciliation. But
    apparently it wasn't possible. Legally, Freenode LLC (if not actual
    freenode, the people and servers) was owned by rasengan. So the staff
    decided to resign in mass.

    I've been a user on freenode for about 20 years and this breakup is
    painful for me. But personally I think that libera represents the ideals
    and people that make up freenode far more than Freenode itself does
    anymore. I'm trying to move but it's going to take a long time to let
    everyone know what's going on. Most, reasonably, don't care about
    network drama.

    Anyway, I look forward to seeing you all on libera.chat going forwards.



    On 05/19/2021 08:24 PM, Ant wrote:
    ...
    04:14PM <AfterShock> https://boingboing.net/2021/05/19/freenode-irc-staff-quit-after-new-owner-seizes-control.html
    04:14PM <URL> [ Freenode IRC staff quit after new owner "seizes" control of network | Boing Boing ] - boingboing.net
    04:14PM <AfterShock> https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/19/freenode_staff_resigns/
    04:14PM <URL> [ Freenode IRC staff resign en masse, unhappy about new
    management ??? The Register ] - www.theregister.com
    ...

    Wow.


    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From locogh0st@locogh0st@ghost.local to alt.irc,alt.irc.networks on Sat May 22 13:05:17 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.irc

    On 2021-05-21, superkuh <superkuh@superkuh.com> wrote:
    Yeah, it's quite a quagmire. I'm pretty upset about it. I've spent most
    of my free time the last two days trying to figure out exactly what went
    on, if I should do anything, and how to do it.

    As far as I can tell it started when the holding company Freenode LLC
    was set up. IRC nerds aren't the best at legal bullshit so help from rasengan was brought in and he ended up on the board. Later christel
    wanted out for undetermined reasons and sold the freenode llc holding company to rasengan. At that time there was a lot of anxiety on freenode
    (I was there) over the new corporate ownership; rasengan/Andrew Lee has
    a lot of other for-profit businesses. But we, and staff, were assured
    that he was just doing this because he loved IRC (which I still believe)
    and that he'd stay out of server operations.

    At this point rasengan owned the holding company that owned the domain
    name. Everything else, the servers, the DNS control accounts, etc were
    owned and operated by staff. That includes setting up the relationships
    for third parties to donate servers to freenode.

    With christel's departure the staff got together and decided to vote
    tomaw as the new freenode leader to handle server operations. Things
    were okay for a while.

    Then there was a hiccup with rasengan putting a little ad/link for one
    of his for-profit companies on the freenode website. That acted as the catalyst for tension and tomaw asked for full control of the domain name.

    Things became more tense when, after some time of freenode staff contributing to the dev of an updated IRCd they made a post about it on
    the blog about switching to it. This was a problem for rasengan since
    his overarching goal with IRC.com and ownership of IRC networks (like snoonet running on IRC.com resources) is to set up a truly distributed
    IRC where any server can peer to any other and easily switch networks.
    He'd put in a significant amount of money into developing this IRC.com
    IRCd, I've heard. And this provided his motivation to opposing the
    staff's switch to their modified IRCd for future operations.

    This was now rasengan interering directly in the operations of the
    freenode network. And the heated debates this caused eventually lead to litigation by rasengan against tomaw. At this point it was obvious that christel/rasengan's statements about the sale were just words and that
    now legal means were going to be used to take control of the operation
    of the servers.

    They drafted their various resignation letters, some got leaked early on
    the 16th. At this point I got involved as a regular user on #freenode
    and talked to rasengan there and on Hackernews forums. I also talked to
    the staff. Even then I personally hoped for reconciliation. But
    apparently it wasn't possible. Legally, Freenode LLC (if not actual freenode, the people and servers) was owned by rasengan. So the staff decided to resign in mass.

    I've been a user on freenode for about 20 years and this breakup is
    painful for me. But personally I think that libera represents the ideals
    and people that make up freenode far more than Freenode itself does
    anymore. I'm trying to move but it's going to take a long time to let everyone know what's going on. Most, reasonably, don't care about
    network drama.

    Anyway, I look forward to seeing you all on libera.chat going forwards.



    On 05/19/2021 08:24 PM, Ant wrote:
    ...
    04:14PM <AfterShock> https://boingboing.net/2021/05/19/freenode-irc-staff-quit-after-new-owner-seizes-control.html
    04:14PM <URL> [ Freenode IRC staff quit after new owner "seizes" control of network | Boing Boing ] - boingboing.net
    04:14PM <AfterShock> https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/19/freenode_staff_resigns/
    04:14PM <URL> [ Freenode IRC staff resign en masse, unhappy about new
    management ??? The Register ] - www.theregister.com
    ...

    Wow.


    Will be interesting to see what happens. Sorry to hear this.
    --
    +++>> locogh0st <<+++
    cloakn3kcia4pnos.onion port 6697 ssl
    cloaknet@REMOVEriseup.net
    Twitter: @locogh0st
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From superkuh@superkuh@superkuh.com to alt.irc,alt.irc.networks on Thu Aug 5 06:42:22 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.irc

    Welp, it's a couple months down the line and now what is called
    "Freenode" is totally dead. Back in June Lee deleted Freenode completely
    (the database, all accounts, channels, history, etc) but still a few
    hangers on to his cult of $$$$ and the idle bouncers remained. As of a
    week or two ago "Freenode" started blocking all users from connecting
    that didn't have an account. This killed off all the idle bouncers and prevents anyone from accidentally connecting to freenode. That's great
    for everyone since now all the old documentation referring to "Freenode"
    on the internet and in applications will no longer work and people won't accidentally end up there.

    So, now "Freenode" is down to about ~10k "users" which based on the lack
    of any daily variation in usercount and the slow decay are just the idle bouncers that haven't been kicked off yet. https://www.hinner.com/ircstat/Socip_F.html

    At this point we can all stop paying attention to Lee and his silly
    bullshit. He's failed so completely I'd wonder if it were intentional if
    I didn't know about his history of similar behavior while on cocaine binges.

    RIP Freenode. Fuck the shambling corpse that is "freenode"/leenode, and
    long live Libera.

    On 05/22/2021 08:05 AM, locogh0st wrote:
    On 2021-05-21, superkuh <superkuh@superkuh.com> wrote:
    Yeah, it's quite a quagmire. I'm pretty upset about it. I've spent most
    of my free time the last two days trying to figure out exactly what went
    on, if I should do anything, and how to do it.

    As far as I can tell it started when the holding company Freenode LLC
    was set up. IRC nerds aren't the best at legal bullshit so help from
    rasengan was brought in and he ended up on the board. Later christel
    wanted out for undetermined reasons and sold the freenode llc holding
    company to rasengan. At that time there was a lot of anxiety on freenode
    (I was there) over the new corporate ownership; rasengan/Andrew Lee has
    a lot of other for-profit businesses. But we, and staff, were assured
    that he was just doing this because he loved IRC (which I still believe)
    and that he'd stay out of server operations.

    At this point rasengan owned the holding company that owned the domain
    name. Everything else, the servers, the DNS control accounts, etc were
    owned and operated by staff. That includes setting up the relationships
    for third parties to donate servers to freenode.

    With christel's departure the staff got together and decided to vote
    tomaw as the new freenode leader to handle server operations. Things
    were okay for a while.

    Then there was a hiccup with rasengan putting a little ad/link for one
    of his for-profit companies on the freenode website. That acted as the
    catalyst for tension and tomaw asked for full control of the domain name.

    Things became more tense when, after some time of freenode staff
    contributing to the dev of an updated IRCd they made a post about it on
    the blog about switching to it. This was a problem for rasengan since
    his overarching goal with IRC.com and ownership of IRC networks (like
    snoonet running on IRC.com resources) is to set up a truly distributed
    IRC where any server can peer to any other and easily switch networks.
    He'd put in a significant amount of money into developing this IRC.com
    IRCd, I've heard. And this provided his motivation to opposing the
    staff's switch to their modified IRCd for future operations.

    This was now rasengan interering directly in the operations of the
    freenode network. And the heated debates this caused eventually lead to
    litigation by rasengan against tomaw. At this point it was obvious that
    christel/rasengan's statements about the sale were just words and that
    now legal means were going to be used to take control of the operation
    of the servers.

    They drafted their various resignation letters, some got leaked early on
    the 16th. At this point I got involved as a regular user on #freenode
    and talked to rasengan there and on Hackernews forums. I also talked to
    the staff. Even then I personally hoped for reconciliation. But
    apparently it wasn't possible. Legally, Freenode LLC (if not actual
    freenode, the people and servers) was owned by rasengan. So the staff
    decided to resign in mass.

    I've been a user on freenode for about 20 years and this breakup is
    painful for me. But personally I think that libera represents the ideals
    and people that make up freenode far more than Freenode itself does
    anymore. I'm trying to move but it's going to take a long time to let
    everyone know what's going on. Most, reasonably, don't care about
    network drama.

    Anyway, I look forward to seeing you all on libera.chat going forwards.



    On 05/19/2021 08:24 PM, Ant wrote:
    ...
    04:14PM <AfterShock> https://boingboing.net/2021/05/19/freenode-irc-staff-quit-after-new-owner-seizes-control.html
    04:14PM <URL> [ Freenode IRC staff quit after new owner "seizes" control of network | Boing Boing ] - boingboing.net
    04:14PM <AfterShock> https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/19/freenode_staff_resigns/
    04:14PM <URL> [ Freenode IRC staff resign en masse, unhappy about new
    management ??? The Register ] - www.theregister.com
    ...

    Wow.


    Will be interesting to see what happens. Sorry to hear this.


    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2