From Newsgroup: alt.html
Siard <
saylor259@mailbox.org> wrote or quoted:
<p style="font-size:16px">Not a <span style="font-size:24px">big</span> problem</p>
That reminds me of HTML 3.2:
BIG places text in a large font
SMALL places text in a small font
. And here's the rant by a hypothetical HTML 3.2 engineer:
|You young coders think you're so sophisticated with your
|bloated attributes, but look at that hideous snippet: you are
|literally hardcoding a rigid, pixel-exact physical size right
|into your content! That completely destroys the soul of the
|Web. Back in my day with HTML 3.2, <BIG> and <SMALL> were
|beautifully abstract and truly scalable; they didn't force a
|dynamic screen into a static 24-pixel cage, they simply told
|the browser, "Hey, make this structurally larger or smaller
|relative to whatever font the user prefers." It was semantic,
|elegant, and infinitely more adaptable to unknown screens
|than messy, inline CSS clutter that confuses styling with raw
|structure!
.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2