From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

Attorney Who Sued Hospitals in 40 States Over Ivermectin Tells Ron
Johnson: 69 of 72 Patients Who Received Ivermectin Survived When Courts
Forced Treatment rCo All 140 Patients Denied the Drug Died

Attorney Ralph Lorigo delivered striking testimony Monday during Sen.
Ron JohnsonrCOs roundtable examining COVID-era hospital protocols, telling
the Wisconsin Republican that he represented 212 families across 40
states who went to court seeking alternative treatment for critically
ill COVID patients.

Johnson convened the September 28 roundtable, titled rCLCOVID-19 Hospital Protocols: Real Stories from Real People,rCY to hear testimony from
patients, family members, doctors, nurses and others about their
experiences inside hospitals during the pandemic. According to Sen. JohnsonrCOs office, the event was the first in JohnsonrCOs series of COVID-related hearings and roundtables devoted entirely to hospital
protocols.

Lorigo told the panel that of the 212 families he represented, there
were 72 cases in which he prevailed and ivermectin was ultimately administered.

According to Lorigo, only three of those 72 patients died.

rCLIn all, I represented 212 families across 40 states,rCY Lorigo said. rCLI won 72 where ivermectin was actually given. Only 3 people died.rCY

That means 69 of the 72 patients Lorigo identified survived, a survival
rate of approximately 95.8 percent among that group.


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/attorney-who-sued-hospitals-40-states-ivermectin-tells/


--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

On 2026-09-29, Black Republican <black.republican@jury.duty> wrote:

Attorney Who Sued Hospitals in 40 States Over Ivermectin Tells Ron
Johnson: 69 of 72 Patients Who Received Ivermectin Survived When Courts Forced Treatment rCo All 140 Patients Denied the Drug Died

Not statistically significant. Sample size too small. Sample
not randomly selected.
--
Cindy Hamilton
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

On 9/29/26 10:42, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

On 2026-09-29, Black Republican <black.republican@jury.duty> wrote:

Attorney Who Sued Hospitals in 40 States Over Ivermectin Tells Ron
Johnson: 69 of 72 Patients Who Received Ivermectin Survived When Courts
Forced Treatment rCo All 140 Patients Denied the Drug Died

Not statistically significant. Sample size too small. Sample
not randomly selected.

Well OK then.
See your doctor to find out if Remdesivir is right for you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

Here is my favorite (ChatGPT) analysis:

A I says :

Clinical trials and large-scale studies have consistently shown that
ivermectin is ineffective at treating or preventing COVID-19. Taking
unapproved medications or altering prescribed dosages can lead to
severe health risks, including nausea, vomiting, low blood pressure,
allergic reactions, dizziness, and liver injury.

John T.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

hubops@ccanoemail.com wrote:

Here is my favorite (ChatGPT) analysis:

A I says :

Clinical trials and large-scale studies have consistently shown that ivermectin is ineffective at treating or preventing COVID-19. Taking unapproved medications or altering prescribed dosages can lead to
severe health risks, including nausea, vomiting, low blood pressure,
allergic reactions, dizziness, and liver injury.

John T.

Joey ByeDone said that the spike protein clot-shots stop the infection and the spread so you're totally protected.
As long as the clot-shot is not mandatory, I'm OK with *you* taking them.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

Cindy Hamilton wrote:

On 2026-09-29, Black Republican <black.republican@jury.duty> wrote:

Attorney Who Sued Hospitals in 40 States Over Ivermectin Tells Ron
Johnson: 69 of 72 Patients Who Received Ivermectin Survived When Courts
Forced Treatment rCo All 140 Patients Denied the Drug Died

Not statistically significant. Sample size too small. Sample
not randomly selected.

What if the way deaths are officially recorded is hiding the true story of what is actually killing Americans?

This week on VSRF Live, data analyst and researcher John Beaudoin, Sr. returns to take us deep inside the nation's mortality datarCoand what he
says are profound problems with the way deaths are recorded, coded and ultimately presented to the public.

For years, Beaudoin has pursued the records behind the statistics. Through public-records requests, he has obtained and analyzed more than 1.6
million death certificates, comparing individual records with federal mortality data and cross-referencing deaths with reports submitted to the
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). His work has focused particularly on deaths during and after the COVID era and on cases in which
the medical history contained in the underlying records appears to tell a different story from the official cause-of-death data.

Among Beaudoin's most significant findings is a dramatic rise in deaths involving acute kidney and renal failure beginning in 2020. He argues
that the magnitude of that increase is obscured when researchers look only at the designated "underlying cause of death," rather than examining
all conditions recorded on death certificates. His analysis of CDC mortality data finds acute renal failure appearing on hundreds of thousands
more death records as a multiple cause than as the underlying cause alone.

Beaudoin has also compared death certificates with VAERS reports and examined the ICD codes used to identify vaccine-related deaths. He contends
that these records reveal serious inconsistenciesrCoincluding cases in which vaccination was documented in connection with a death but was absent
from the mortality coding ultimately used for national statistics. He argues that some deaths attributed to COVID-19 likewise deserve renewed
scrutiny based on the individual medical records and circumstances surrounding those deaths.

Now, his investigation is raising an even bigger question: How much can we trust what we think we know about the leading causes of death in
America when the underlying data itself may be incomplete, miscoded or misleading?

John joins us to show the records, explain how death-certificate data become national mortality statistics, and reveal why he believes some of
our most fundamental assumptions about what is killing Americans need to be reexamined.

Join us for Death by Data ManipulationrCothis week on VSRF Live.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyXYi3z4Jso ( skip ahead to about 5:30 )

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

On 9/29/26 5:16 PM, Disinformation Superspreader wrote:

hubops@ccanoemail.com wrote:

Here is my favorite (ChatGPT) analysis:

-a-a A I-a-a says-a-a :

Clinical trials and large-scale studies have consistently shown that
ivermectin is ineffective at treating or preventing COVID-19. Taking
unapproved medications or altering prescribed dosages can lead to
severe health risks, including nausea, vomiting, low blood pressure,
allergic reactions, dizziness, and liver injury.

-a-a-a John T.

Joey ByeDone said that the spike protein clot-shots stop the infection
and the spread so you're totally protected.
As long as the clot-shot is not mandatory, I'm OK with *you* taking them.

"clinical trial" my ass. They were Big Pharma funded
trials.

And there are a OF of placebo controlled double blind
clinical trials that are not funded by Big Pharma show
it to be very effective.

This is corruption on a massive scale.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

On 9/29/26 12:37 PM, Black Republican wrote:

On 9/29/26 10:42, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

On 2026-09-29, Black Republican <black.republican@jury.duty> wrote:

Attorney Who Sued Hospitals in 40 States Over Ivermectin Tells Ron
Johnson: 69 of 72 Patients Who Received Ivermectin Survived When Courts
Forced Treatment rCo All 140 Patients Denied the Drug Died

Not statistically significant.-a Sample size too small.-a Sample
not randomly selected.

Well OK then.
See your doctor to find out if Remdesivir is right for you.

Our resident Woke-a-puss is pulling things out her ass again.
It is indeed "overwhelmingly statistically significant".

Here is my favorite SI's (ChatGPT) analysis:

Q. I am only interest in "statistical significance". Not
whether the test was done correctly. Would you show me
the results of "Fisher's" test.

A. ChatGPT said:

Yes. Using exactly the numbers you supplied:
Survived Died Total
Ivermectin 69 3 72
No ivermectin 0 140 140
Total 69 143 212
Fisher's exact test

For the observed table, the one-sided Fisher's exact p-value is
approximately:

p = 8.31 |u 10rU+rU|-|

or

p = 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000831

The corresponding two-sided Fisher's exact p-value is also
approximately 8.31 |u 10rU+rU|-| for this extreme table.

Using the conventional threshold of p < 0.05, this is
*overwhelmingly statistically significant*.

In other words, if those are the actual counts, Fisher's
exact test gives an extraordinarily small p-value.

This is purely the statistical-significance calculation
you asked for; it does not address how the data were
obtained or what caused the difference.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

On 2026-09-30, Disinformation Superspreader <gramma.killer@scamdemic.dnc> wrote:

This week on VSRF Live, data analyst and researcher John Beaudoin, Sr. returns to take us deep inside the nation's mortality datarCoand what he
says are profound problems with the way deaths are recorded, coded and ultimately presented to the public.

Why is it that a google search for him only turns up a handful of
lawsuits and an appearance on "Ask Dr. Drew"?

Oh, and an excerpt from his curriculum vitae that shows his "credentials":

Education: BS Systems Engineering 1988 & MBA 2018; one year law school 2020/2021

Career: 30-years in semiconductors - Career ENDED - unrecoverable due to
Covid activism (per statement from hiring director of the largest and
most advanced semiconductor company in the world - and I was the most
qualified and accomplished candidate - job pays about $400K/yr - all
IrCOve done in Covid killed that career)
--
Cindy Hamilton
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

On 9/30/26 05:11, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

On 2026-09-30, Disinformation Superspreader <gramma.killer@scamdemic.dnc> wrote:

This week on VSRF Live, data analyst and researcher John Beaudoin, Sr. returns to take us deep inside the nation's mortality datarCoand what he
says are profound problems with the way deaths are recorded, coded and ultimately presented to the public.

Why is it that a google search for him only turns up a handful of
lawsuits and an appearance on "Ask Dr. Drew"?

Oh, and an excerpt from his curriculum vitae that shows his "credentials":

Education: BS Systems Engineering 1988 & MBA 2018; one year law school 2020/2021

Career: 30-years in semiconductors - Career ENDED - unrecoverable due to Covid activism (per statement from hiring director of the largest and
most advanced semiconductor company in the world - and I was the most qualified and accomplished candidate - job pays about $400K/yr - all
IrCOve done in Covid killed that career)

Hey T, ever notice when a purple-haired Woke-a-puss can't dispute the
facts, they launch an ad hominem attack?

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

On 9/30/26 05:11, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

On 2026-09-30, Disinformation Superspreader <gramma.killer@scamdemic.dnc> wrote:

This week on VSRF Live, data analyst and researcher John Beaudoin, Sr. returns to take us deep inside the nation's mortality datarCoand what he
says are profound problems with the way deaths are recorded, coded and ultimately presented to the public.

Why is it that a google search for him only turns up a handful of
lawsuits and an appearance on "Ask Dr. Drew"?

Oh, and an excerpt from his curriculum vitae that shows his "credentials":

Education: BS Systems Engineering 1988 & MBA 2018; one year law school 2020/2021

Career: 30-years in semiconductors - Career ENDED - unrecoverable due to Covid activism (per statement from hiring director of the largest and
most advanced semiconductor company in the world - and I was the most qualified and accomplished candidate - job pays about $400K/yr - all
IrCOve done in Covid killed that career)

So go take some of Steve's money. Easy-peasy, right?

AI Overview

The Steve Kirsch challenge typically refers to public financial offers, wagers, or debate challenges issued by tech entrepreneur and
prominent anti-vaccine activist Steve Kirsch regarding COVID-19 vaccines
and treatments.

The $1 Million / $500,000 Vaccine Wagers

rCo The Rootclaim Bet: Kirsch posted various open challenges regarding COVID-19 safety and efficacy data, including a prominent claim that mRNA vaccines have killed more people than they saved. The data analysis
platform Rootclaim accepted a $500,000-to-$1,000,000 formal
wager/challenge with Kirsch to adjudicate claims regarding vaccine
safety statistics using structured evidence analysis.

rCo Standing Debate Offers: Kirsch frequently offers sizeable monetary
rewards or charitable donations (often referenced around $1 million) to mainstream scientists or prominent figures like Dr. Paul Offit if they
agree to publicly debate him on COVID-19 vaccine safety. Mainstream
scientific and medical communities generally decline these challenges,
stating that vaccine safety is established through rigorous,
peer-reviewed data and reproducible scientific consensus rather than theatrical public wagers or cash-incentivized debates.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

On 2026-09-30, Black Republican <black.republican@jury.duty> wrote:

On 9/30/26 05:11, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

On 2026-09-30, Disinformation Superspreader <gramma.killer@scamdemic.dnc> wrote:

This week on VSRF Live, data analyst and researcher John Beaudoin, Sr. returns to take us deep inside the nation's mortality datarCoand what he
says are profound problems with the way deaths are recorded, coded and ultimately presented to the public.

Why is it that a google search for him only turns up a handful of
lawsuits and an appearance on "Ask Dr. Drew"?

Oh, and an excerpt from his curriculum vitae that shows his "credentials": >>
Education: BS Systems Engineering 1988 & MBA 2018; one year law school 2020/2021

Career: 30-years in semiconductors - Career ENDED - unrecoverable due to
Covid activism (per statement from hiring director of the largest and
most advanced semiconductor company in the world - and I was the most
qualified and accomplished candidate - job pays about $400K/yr - all
IrCOve done in Covid killed that career)

Hey T, ever notice when a purple-haired Woke-a-puss can't dispute the
facts, they launch an ad hominem attack?

Speaking of ad hominem, you're guilty of the same sin.

I've never had purple hair. It's pretty white now.
--
Cindy Hamilton
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

On Tue, 29 Sep 2026 17:53:50 -0700, T <T@invalid.invalid> wrote:

On 9/29/26 5:16 PM, Disinformation Superspreader wrote:

hubops@ccanoemail.com wrote:

Here is my favorite (ChatGPT) analysis:

aa A Iaa saysaa :

Clinical trials and large-scale studies have consistently shown that
ivermectin is ineffective at treating or preventing COVID-19. Taking
unapproved medications or altering prescribed dosages can lead to
severe health risks, including nausea, vomiting, low blood pressure,
allergic reactions, dizziness, and liver injury.

aaa John T.

Joey ByeDone said that the spike protein clot-shots stop the infection
and the spread so you're totally protected.
As long as the clot-shot is not mandatory, I'm OK with *you* taking them.

"clinical trial" my ass. They were Big Pharma funded
trials.

And there are a OF of placebo controlled double blind
clinical trials that are not funded by Big Pharma show
it to be very effective.

This is corruption on a massive scale.

Silly me .. trusting my doctor and my public health experts
and the whole world-ful of medical scientists - instead of the
internet anti-vax comspiracy nutters - my bad. :-)

.. have they figured-out which vaccination killed JFK yet ? :-)

John T.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

On 9/30/2026 9:08 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

Hey T, ever notice when a purple-haired Woke-a-puss can't dispute the
facts, they launch an ad hominem attack?

Speaking of ad hominem, you're guilty of the same sin.

I've never had purple hair. It's pretty white now.

I'm crushed! I always had this image of you with purple hair coming in
to rescue the world.
Heartbreaking

https://www.writeups.org/menat-street-fighter/

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

On 9/30/26 4:26 AM, Black Republican wrote:

On 9/30/26 05:11, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

On 2026-09-30, Disinformation Superspreader
<gramma.killer@scamdemic.dnc> wrote:

This week on VSRF Live, data analyst and researcher John Beaudoin,
Sr. returns to take us deep inside the nation's mortality datarCoand
what he
says are profound problems with the way deaths are recorded, coded
and ultimately presented to the public.

Why is it that a google search for him only turns up a handful of
lawsuits and an appearance on "Ask Dr. Drew"?

Oh, and an excerpt from his curriculum vitae that shows his
"credentials":

Education: BS Systems Engineering 1988 & MBA 2018; one year law school
2020/2021

Career: 30-years in semiconductors - Career ENDED - unrecoverable due to
Covid activism (per statement from hiring director of the largest and
most advanced semiconductor company in the world - and I was the most
qualified and accomplished candidate - job pays about $400K/yr - all
IrCOve done in Covid killed that career)

Hey T, ever notice when a purple-haired Woke-a-puss can't dispute the
facts, they launch an ad hominem attack?

Yup. She/He/It like to troll to get attention. And Negative
attention is easier to get.

Liberals do not believe in the freedom of speech. They think
being disagreed with is "violence". They do not believe in
the free and open exchange of ideas and information either.
They only believe in the narratives. It is a religion
and we are heretics to be shouted down.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

On Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:06:57 -0400, Black Republican <black.republican@jury.duty> wrote:

Attorney Who Sued Hospitals in 40 States Over Ivermectin Tells Ron
Johnson: 69 of 72 Patients Who Received Ivermectin Survived When Courts >Forced Treatment u All 140 Patients Denied the Drug Died

Attorney Ralph Lorigo delivered striking testimony Monday during Sen.
Ron JohnsonAs roundtable examining COVID-era hospital protocols, telling
the Wisconsin Republican that he represented 212 families across 40
states who went to court seeking alternative treatment for critically
ill COVID patients.

Johnson convened the September 28 roundtable, titled oCOVID-19 Hospital >Protocols: Real Stories from Real People,o to hear testimony from
patients, family members, doctors, nurses and others about their
experiences inside hospitals during the pandemic. ...

A.K.A. "hearsay". I'm not saying that hearsay is inherently wrong, but
in this case, the alleged effectiveness of ivermectin as treatment of
COVID-19 infections, it's pretty useless.

... According to Sen.
JohnsonAs office, the event was the first in JohnsonAs series of >COVID-related hearings and roundtables devoted entirely to hospital >protocols.

Lorigo told the panel that of the 212 families he represented, there
were 72 cases in which he prevailed and ivermectin was ultimately >administered.

I think the doctors in those 72 cases thought something along the line
of 'what the hell, the patients look like they're going to make it, so
let's just give them the damn de-wormer and get this Lorigo fellow out
of here. It can't hurt them.'

According to Lorigo, only three of those 72 patients died.

So, ivermectin didn't make any difference in those three cases. Aren't
you guys telling us it cures COVID-19?

oIn all, I represented 212 families across 40 states,o Lorigo said. oI
won 72 where ivermectin was actually given. Only 3 people died.o

That means 69 of the 72 patients Lorigo identified survived, a survival
rate of approximately 95.8 percent among that group.

My first question was 'what about the other 140 patients?'. Here's
what the article says about that:

"oTragically, of the 140 cases where I couldnAt get into court quick
enough or I lost, every single person died,o Lorigo testified."

Really? Sen. Johnson did what I would have done:

"Johnson immediately returned to the numbers, asking Lorigo to confirm
that all 140 patients in the group that did not receive the treatment
had died."

And what did Lorigo say?

oThey all died. Every single one.o

Here is my problem with this case. How do we know that ivermectin was
the cause of their survival? Would the 140 patients have survived if
they had been given ivermectin, or would they had died anyway, like
the three of the 72? Alas, there is no documentation, no control
groups, no peer review.

And Sen. Johnson shares my concerns:

"Johnson explicitly cautioned that LorigoAs experience was not a
randomized controlled trial, while arguing that the numbers
nevertheless deserved scrutiny.

oItAs not a randomized controlled trial,o Johnson said, obut thatAs
some pretty powerful evidence that I wish our federal regulators would
have taken a look at.o"

Seemingly it's all 'Trust me, bro'.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/attorney-who-sued-hospitals-40-states-ivermectin-tells/

Hearsay and Trust me, bro. What a waste of every one's time.

But, let me ask you this. Why would 'Big Pharma' not do everything
they can to keep their costumers alive? What do they stand to gain
from letting people die? If ivermectin were the panacea you all seem
to make it out to be, why not give to everybody (which would
inevitably raise the price and thus profits) and ensure that people
live longer and therefore consume more of their pharmaceutical
products?

You're conspiracy theory is leaking like a sieve. Yes, it it. Trust
me, bro...
--
Malte Runz
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

On Tue, 29 Sep 2026 19:09:14 -0400, hubops@ccanoemail.com wrote:

Here is my favorite (ChatGPT) analysis:

A I says :

Clinical trials and large-scale studies have consistently shown that >ivermectin is ineffective at treating or preventing COVID-19. Taking >unapproved medications or altering prescribed dosages can lead to
severe health risks, including nausea, vomiting, low blood pressure,
allergic reactions, dizziness, and liver injury.

John T.

Studies have shown that high doses of ivermectin affects the sperm
count and caused "testicular tissue inflammation" in rats.

But the effect seemed to be largely temporary and reversible, and I
would certainly encourage all freedom loving, patriotic science
deniers to take all the ivermectin they can get their hands on. Keep
on swallowing, boys, your balls will probably get better eventually.
--
Malte Runz
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2