• Re: Trump's Folly: Honda Posts First ever Loss Due to EV investments

    From Damon Cloche@b@ke.bread to sci.environment,alt.global-warming,alt.home.repair,rec.food.cooking on Sun Sep 6 09:51:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.home.repair

    On Sat, 05 Sep 2026 18:36:35 -0700
    Roger Rhino <not@my.home> wrote:
    Ed P <esp@snet.n> wrote:
    On 9/4/2026 3:45 PM, Jeremiah Jones wrote:
    Damon Cloche <b@ke.bread> wrote:

    Current Estimates

    400+Years: The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimated
    that total recoverable U.S. coal reserves would last about 422
    years based on recent production levels.


    Meanwhile we have more than enough
    recoverable reserves of lead and
    arsenic to last thousands of years.
    Keep digging!

    Using coal can be good, but the emissions must be controlled too. Respiratory conditions can kill


    There's no such thing as clean coal.
    You're WRONG again, shitwit!
    AI Overview
    Anthracite is a significantly cleaner-burning coal
    than bituminous coal.
    Key Differences in Cleanliness
    Anthracite (Hard Coal):
    Contains 86% to
    97% fixed carbon and very low volatile matter. It produces almost no
    visible smoke, minimal soot, and lower sulfur dioxide emissions when
    burned.
    Bituminous (Soft Coal):
    Contains 60% to 80% carbon with much higher
    volatile impurities. Burning it creates thick, dark smoke, higher
    particulate matter, and more sulfur pollution.
    Why Anthracite is Cleaner
    Higher Purity:
    It has undergone greater
    metamorphic heat and pressure over time, squeezing out impurities and
    moisture.
    Smokeless Performance:
    Because it lacks heavy volatile gases,
    it burns with a short, clean blue flame rather than a smoky yellow
    flame.
    "Clean coal" plants still produce substantial amounts of sulfur
    dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and mercury.
    AI Overview
    A state-of-the-art "clean coal" plant (using
    ultra-supercritical combustion and advanced scrubbers) reduces
    traditional criteria air pollutants by 90% to 99%+ compared to older unmitigated plants...
    Controlled Air Pollutants (Reduced by 80%rCo99%)Modern facilities use
    Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR), Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)
    scrubbers, and fabric filters to capture nearly all of the primary
    toxic output:
    Particulate
    Matter (PM / Soot):
    Reduced by roughly 99.8%.
    Sulfur Dioxide (SOree):
    Reduced by 95% to 98%.
    Nitrogen Oxides: Reduced by
    roughly 83% to 87%.
    Mercury and Trace Heavy Metals:
    Controlled via specialized sorbent injection and fabric filters by
    upwards of 90%.
    Not to mention that the CO2 emissions are quite a bit higher than other fossil fuels, even diesel.
    Good, we're in a position where historically our CO2 levels are rather
    on the low side and dropping: https://co2coalition.org/facts/140-million-year-trend-of-dangerously-decreasing-co2/
    For the last 140 million years, CO2 levels fell precipitously &
    steadily to within about 30 ppm of the 150 ppm rCLline of deathrCY below
    which plants canrCOt survive. Both the relatively short-term data from
    ice cores and much longer-term data going back 140 million years
    (Berner 2001) show an alarming downward trend toward CO2 starvation.
    The release of carbon dioxide by the use of fossil fuels has allowed
    humanity to increase concentrations of this beneficial molecule, and
    perhaps avert an actual CO2-related climate apocalypse.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2