• Re: google groups final usenet article?

    From Librarian2025@librarian2025@cock.li to alt.free.newsservers,alt.google-sucks,comp.internet.services.google on Mon Jul 27 21:37:12 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.free.newsservers


    frod <frod@none.org> writes:

    On 23 Feb 2024, "Jan K." <janicekoziol@nie.ma.spamu.prosze.com> posted
    some news:urb2jv$4kq$1$koziolja@news.chmurka.net:

    W Fri, 23 Feb 2024 20:41:41 -0000 (UTC), k napisal:

    Indeed. The spam floods from SEA have been stopped. They will now
    move to other social media platforms, hopefully tiktok.

    The two confusing parts of the spam flood that I never understood was
    what were they trying to accomplish (since their spam made no sense
    when read)?

    And why didn't google just put a stop to it? For example if the same
    account spams a thousand messages, all they have to do is ban it.

    google is all about money. Groups weren't making any.

    Reddit is probably making some money, and it's essentially yet another
    clone of Usenet. All Google had to do is to take Usenet seriously and
    allocate some resources to it. They were potentially sitting on one of
    the major social networks (Reddit is more popular than Twitter, for
    example). Maybe oldschool Usenet users wouldn't like the crowd that such popularity will inevitably attract, and maybe a lot of the users would
    think they're using clone of Reddit, but I have a feeling that it's
    technically possible to have newbie-friendly Reddit-like web interface
    or an app while maintaining backward compatibility with classic Usenet, including decentralization, and thus be sitting on a searchable archive
    that goes back decades. For better or for worse, nothing like that
    happened, but I believe that there was a chance that many people who are
    using Reddit right now could have been using Googler or something like
    that.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2