Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 27 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 43:36:35 |
Calls: | 631 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 1,187 |
D/L today: |
24 files (29,813K bytes) |
Messages: | 175,620 |
I will update https://
usenet.blueworldhosting.com with further status information soon.
On Mon, 1 Sep 2025 03:59:35 -0000 (UTC), Jesse Rehmer wrote :
I will update https://
usenet.blueworldhosting.com with further status information soon.
What would be fantastic, if it exists, is to replicate the ability for anyone, without an nntp engine, to search & copy a link to articles
found.
Google did it, but as you know, it's now no longer updated after Feb
2024.
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/alt.free.newsservers
<https://groups.google.com/g/alt.free.newsservers>
This replicated that engine, but it's broken more often than not.
<https://alt.free.newsservers.narkive.com/>
This was kindly added by retro guy, as I recall, in the summer of 2024.
<https://www.novabbs.com/tech/thread.php?group=alt.free.newsservers>
And, at some point, this was added, but I'm not sure if it's working.
<https://newsgrouper.org/alt.free.newsservers>
Obviously, what is truly needed is what Google did, which is:
a. An obvious link that is easy to remember b. That does a search on
common text newsgroups c. Which spits out a single URI to a single
article or thread
Something like this URI for a search engine would be perfect...
<https:// usenet.blueworldhosting.com/g/alt.free.newsservers>
There are have been a number of attempts at making something to replace Google Groups. You've pointed out a few and another:
https://i2pn2.pugleaf.net/groups/alt.free.newsservers
I'm not a developer, nor am I particularly interested in making the
archive available via the web. Others have done or are doing that.
And, at some point, this was added, but I'm not sure if it's working.
<https://newsgrouper.org/alt.free.newsservers>
Web application software, regardless of the underlying language, is typically buggy and full of vulnerabilities. I foresee headaches and potential risk/harm to Usenet with web-based software that has not
undergone robust vulnerability review, and is not developed by a
community.
Most of the efforts in this area seem like a one-person show. That's not sustainable,
but should a community come together to develop and take
ownership of a tool that's useful and is regularly updated/patched, I'd be interested in it.
This was kindly added by retro guy, as I recall, in the summer of 2024.
<https://www.novabbs.com/tech/thread.php?group=alt.free.newsservers>
Jesse Rehmer <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> posted:
Web application software, regardless of the underlying language, is
typically buggy and full of vulnerabilities. I foresee headaches and
potential risk/harm to Usenet with web-based software that has not
undergone robust vulnerability review, and is not developed by a
community.
My software for newsgrouper.org is online at https://chiselapp.com/user/cmacleod/repository/newsgrouper/home .
I would be delighted if anyone was to review it and point out any vulnerabilities, but I'm not holding my breath...
...
E.g. I develop in a language that works well for me, but that few other people
are interested in working with.
On 02.09.25 10:34, Colin Macleod wrote:
I saw there is now a report there with lots of points which
will take time to go through.
I did see that the first "critical logic issue" listed is bogus:
That's our part to filter false positives and what's really a bug
or hallucination / missed context.
Ok, I've now gone through this. A lot of the complaints are bogus but
a few are genuine, generally related to not guarding enough against maliciously-crafted input. Overall the report is quite impressive.
Would it make sense to update the todo.md file with my response to
each point?
For the points which I think need attention I will implement fixes
and check them in to Fossil.
Interesting but I'm not sure this is genuinely serious.> the user database first, which should not be possible.
I took a look at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_table .
- For an attacker to use this method they need to have got a copy of
I do have a github account: cgmacleod
I saw there is now a report there with lots of points which
will take time to go through.
I did see that the first "critical logic issue" listed is bogus:
On 02.09.25 18:07, Colin Macleod wrote:
For the points which I think need attention I will implement fixes
and check them in to Fossil.
AI can provide fixes too but I'm gathering some data first
and compare with claude in agent mode.
The other points raised are bogus, except for the one about "magic numbers" which I will address in time, but that's just bad style, not a bug or vulnerability.
I want to thank Billy G. for taking the initiative to run my code through github co-pilot, it has been a useful exercise. EfyC
On 04.09.25 10:17, Colin Macleod wrote:
I want to thank Billy G. for taking the initiative to run my code through
github co-pilot, it has been a useful exercise. EfyC
Thank you for linking pugleaf in wikipedia :D
Line 1352 subst Command Injection Vulnerability Analysis
https://github.com/go-while/newsgrouper/pull/10#issuecomment-3255393367
makes sense, or not. I don't understand tcl :D
"Billy G." <contact-5c2e-000@pugleaf.net> posted:
Line 1352 subst Command Injection Vulnerability Analysis
https://github.com/go-while/newsgrouper/pull/10#issuecomment-3255393367
makes sense, or not. I don't understand tcl :D
I replied by email with details, that's also bogus.
--
Colin Macleod ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ https://cmacleod.me.uk
FEED FEED FEED FEED FEED FEED FEED FEED
GAZA GAZA GAZA GAZA GAZA GAZA GAZA GAZA
NOW! NOW! NOW! NOW! NOW! NOW! NOW! NOW!