• We can all thank NY Democrat Andrew Cuomo for killing Usenet

    From Nomen Nescio@nobody@dizum.com to alt.culture.usenet, alt.cypherpunks, alt.free.newsservers, alt.privacy.anon-server on Mon Dec 8 07:45:01 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.free.newsservers

    In 2008, Verizon Communications, Time Warner Cable and Sprint Nextel
    signed an agreement with Attorney General of New York Andrew Cuomo to shut down access to sources of child pornography.[65] Time Warner Cable stopped offering access to Usenet. Verizon reduced its access to the "Big 8" hierarchies. Sprint stopped access to the alt.* hierarchies. AT&T stopped access to the alt.binaries.* hierarchies. Cuomo never specifically named Usenet in his anti-child pornography campaign. David DeJean of PC World
    said that some worry that the ISPs used Cuomo's campaign as an excuse to
    end portions of Usenet access, as it is costly for the Internet service providers and not in high demand by customers. In 2008 AOL, which no
    longer offered Usenet access, and the four providers that responded to the Cuomo campaign were the five largest Internet service providers in the
    United States; they had more than 50% of the U.S. ISP market share.[66] On June 8, 2009, AT&T announced that it would no longer provide access to the Usenet service as of July 15, 2009.[67]

    AOL announced that it would discontinue its integrated Usenet service in
    early 2005, citing the growing popularity of weblogs, chat forums and on-
    line conferencing.[68] The AOL community had a tremendous role in
    popularizing Usenet some 11 years earlier.[69]

    In August 2009, Verizon announced that it would discontinue access to
    Usenet on September 30, 2009.[70][71] JANET announced it would discontinue Usenet service, effective July 31, 2010, citing Google Groups as an alternative.[72] Microsoft announced that it would discontinue support for
    its public newsgroups (msnews.microsoft.com) from June 1, 2010, offering
    web forums as an alternative.[73]

    Primary reasons cited for the discontinuance of Usenet service by general
    ISPs include the decline in volume of actual readers due to competition
    from blogs, along with cost and liability concerns of increasing
    proportion of traffic devoted to file-sharing and spam on unused or discontinued groups.[74][75]

    Some ISPs did not include pressure from Cuomo's campaign against child pornography as one of their reasons for dropping Usenet feeds as part of
    their services.[76] ISPs Cox and Atlantic Communications resisted the 2008 trend but both did eventually drop their respective Usenet feeds in 2010.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Yamn2 Remailer@noreply@mixmin.net to alt.culture.usenet, alt.cypherpunks, alt.free.newsservers, alt.privacy.anon-server on Mon Dec 8 13:15:15 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.free.newsservers

    Around that time, my ISP did away with Usenet service.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nomen Nescio@nobody@dizum.com to alt.culture.usenet, alt.cypherpunks, alt.free.newsservers, alt.privacy.anon-server on Mon Dec 8 21:39:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.free.newsservers

    On 08 Dec 2025, Yamn2 Remailer <noreply@mixmin.net> posted some news:20251208.131515.912b04e3@mixmin.net:

    Around that time, my ISP did away with Usenet service.

    Many did, largely because of Cuomo's actions and false assertions about
    what Usenet was being used for.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.culture.usenet,alt.cypherpunks,alt.free.newsservers,alt.privacy.anon-server on Tue Dec 9 16:27:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.free.newsservers

    On 2025-12-08 21:39, Nomen Nescio wrote:
    On 08 Dec 2025, Yamn2 Remailer <noreply@mixmin.net> posted some news:20251208.131515.912b04e3@mixmin.net:

    Around that time, my ISP did away with Usenet service.

    Many did, largely because of Cuomo's actions and false assertions about
    what Usenet was being used for.

    That can hardly explain why ISPs in different countries removed the
    Usenet service, at different dates.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ESEfc-Efc+, EUEfc-Efc|;
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From doseas@not@here.com to alt.free.newsservers on Sat Dec 13 16:18:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.free.newsservers

    On 12/9/2025 7:27 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-12-08 21:39, Nomen Nescio wrote:
    On 08 Dec 2025, Yamn2 Remailer <noreply@mixmin.net> posted some
    news:20251208.131515.912b04e3@mixmin.net:

    -a-a Around that time, my ISP did away with Usenet service.

    Many did, largely because of Cuomo's actions and false assertions about
    what Usenet was being used for.

    That can hardly explain why ISPs in different countries removed the
    Usenet service, at different dates.



    It does explain it.

    After Cuomo discouraged (AKA threatened) the big ISPs from offering
    Usenet in the US, the usage rate dropped dramatically. Therefore, many
    non-US ISPs later decided that it wasn't worth the effort to continue to
    offer it. And now we have a dying system on its last gasp.

    The result was a rise in individual web-based discussion forums and
    social media.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to alt.free.newsservers on Thu Dec 18 00:49:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.free.newsservers

    On 2025-12-14 01:18, doseas wrote:
    On 12/9/2025 7:27 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-12-08 21:39, Nomen Nescio wrote:
    On 08 Dec 2025, Yamn2 Remailer <noreply@mixmin.net> posted some
    news:20251208.131515.912b04e3@mixmin.net:

    -a-a Around that time, my ISP did away with Usenet service.

    Many did, largely because of Cuomo's actions and false assertions about
    what Usenet was being used for.

    That can hardly explain why ISPs in different countries removed the
    Usenet service, at different dates.



    It does explain it.

    After Cuomo discouraged (AKA threatened) the big ISPs from offering
    Usenet in the US, the usage rate dropped dramatically. Therefore, many non-US ISPs later decided that it wasn't worth the effort to continue to offer it.-a And now we have a dying system on its last gasp.

    Nope.

    My ISP also removed mail.

    They also removed private webs.

    People wanted other services.

    They cancelled anything that was not profitable and was a nuisance.


    The result was a rise in individual web-based discussion forums and
    social media.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ESEfc-Efc+, EUEfc-Efc|;
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From David Chmelik@dchmelik@gmail.com to alt.free.newsservers on Tue Dec 30 06:04:15 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.free.newsservers

    On Sat, 13 Dec 2025 16:18:29 -0800, doseas wrote:

    On 12/9/2025 7:27 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-12-08 21:39, Nomen Nescio wrote:
    On 08 Dec 2025, Yamn2 Remailer <noreply@mixmin.net> posted some
    news:20251208.131515.912b04e3@mixmin.net:

    -a-a Around that time, my ISP did away with Usenet service.

    Many did, largely because of Cuomo's actions and false assertions
    about what Usenet was being used for.

    That can hardly explain why ISPs in different countries removed the
    Usenet service, at different dates.

    [...] It does explain it.

    After Cuomo discouraged (AKA threatened) the big ISPs from offering
    Usenet in the US, the usage rate dropped dramatically. Therefore, many
    non-US ISPs later decided that it wasn't worth the effort to continue to offer it. And now we have a dying system on its last gasp.

    The result was a rise in individual web-based discussion forums and
    social media.

    He sounds like a corrupt scammer--like most politicians.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2