pjm <pjm@example.com> wrote:
republican groups are blocked
rec.arts.tv "permanently closed"
Thanks for providing this service.
As everybody knows, I read and post in rec.arts.tv. There is no shortage
of crossposted and multi-posted off-topic articles, plenty of which are
from this server.
Republican groups? Nonsense. The group's name makes no difference. The political posters troll and troll feed each other, crossposting and multiposting.
What's occuring is absolutely obvious so I can't take you seriously as someone who isn't posting off topic and troll feeding.
Sorry, Ivo, but I just don't regularly read any of your users although a handful of people use your server for an alternative way to post.
Tom Mix <tommix@nowhere.com> wrote:
Sat, 6 Sep 2025 18:18:23 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:
pjm <pjm@example.com> wrote:
republican groups are blocked
rec.arts.tv "permanently closed"
Thanks for providing this service.
As everybody knows, I read and post in rec.arts.tv. There is no
shortage of crossposted and multi-posted off-topic articles, plenty
of which are from this server.
Republican groups? Nonsense. The group's name makes no difference.
The political posters troll and troll feed each other, crossposting
and multiposting.
What's occuring is absolutely obvious so I can't take you seriously
as someone who isn't posting off topic and troll feeding.
Sorry, Ivo, but I just don't regularly read any of your users
although a handful of people use your server for an alternative way
to post.
IMHO, blocking groups is ridiculous. How about server admins being
held accountable for doing nothing about their abusers?
It's clear that none of the servers that don't require registration
meet your needs. Act like a consumer and demand your money back. Take
your business elsewhere.
On 06/09/2025 19:47, Tom Mix wrote:
IMHO, blocking groups is ridiculous. How about server admins being
held accountable for doing nothing about their abusers?
If it were so easy, governments around the world would take action
against Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, and any other server with billions
of users and abusers. In a world where malicious individuals are
willing to fund free, anonymous servers to achieve their goals, it's
not easy. I'm not naming any particular country or newsgroup operator.
I use Paganini and am quite happy with it.
Official Spokesperson <official.Spokesperson@aol.com> wrote:
On 06/09/2025 19:47, Tom Mix wrote:
IMHO, blocking groups is ridiculous. How about server admins being held >>>accountable for doing nothing about their abusers?
If it were so easy, governments around the world would take action
against Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, and any other server with billions of >>users and abusers. In a world where malicious individuals are willing to >>fund free, anonymous servers to achieve their goals, it's not easy. I'm >>not naming any particular country or newsgroup operator. I use Paganini >>and am quite happy with it.
That pile of linty, dirty, holely sockpuppets is just getting higher and higher. Who will do the laundry?
How about if we send you a bill for the oxygen you steal?
alt.adam-h-kerman.config
alt.fuckchop.adam-kerman
alt.idiot.adam-h-kerman
alt.scumbag.adam-kerman
alt.troll.adam-h-kerman
alt.usenet.kooks.adam-h-kerman
06 Sep 2025, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> posted:
pjm <pjm@example.com> wrote:
republican groups are blocked
rec.arts.tv "permanently closed"
r.a.t is available now, it wasn't a few weeks ago. That's when it
reported "permanently closed".
Thanks for providing this service.
As everybody knows, I read and post in rec.arts.tv. There is no shortage
of crossposted and multi-posted off-topic articles, plenty of which are >>from this server.
Republican groups? Nonsense. The group's name makes no difference. The >>political posters troll and troll feed each other, crossposting and >>multiposting.
You were in the wife-beating human-trafficking MS-13 discussions in >rec.arts.tv.
What's occuring is absolutely obvious so I can't take you seriously as >>someone who isn't posting off topic and troll feeding.
Sorry, Ivo, but I just don't regularly read any of your users although a >>handful of people use your server for an alternative way to post.
Most of those users don't read you either unless they're just looking for >someone to poke with a stick.
pjm <pjm@example.com> wrote:
06 Sep 2025, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> posted:
pjm <pjm@example.com> wrote:
republican groups are blocked
rec.arts.tv "permanently closed"
r.a.t is available now, it wasn't a few weeks ago. That's when it >>reported "permanently closed".
Thanks for providing this service.
As everybody knows, I read and post in rec.arts.tv. There is no
shortage of crossposted and multi-posted off-topic articles, plenty
of which are from this server.
Republican groups? Nonsense. The group's name makes no difference.
The political posters troll and troll feed each other, crossposting
and multiposting.
You were in the wife-beating human-trafficking MS-13 discussions in >>rec.arts.tv.
Not that I recall. If I crossposted in followup, it was inadvertent or
I was forged. Since you're stalking me, what was that Message-ID of
the pathetic loser crossposted followup you accuse me of authoring?
I'll need to add myself to my own kill file.
What's occuring is absolutely obvious so I can't take you seriously
as someone who isn't posting off topic and troll feeding.
Sorry, Ivo, but I just don't regularly read any of your users
although a handful of people use your server for an alternative way
to post.
Most of those users don't read you either unless they're just looking
for someone to poke with a stick.
Yeah. Loser says, You are useless. I hate you and every thing you
write, but I can't help reading it all.
I'm the easiest person on Usenet to ignore because I never morph.
People write endlessly about how they hate me and have kill filed me,
but still read it all and even comment by piggybacking on another
followup.
Why don't you get something more out of your sad life by reading posts written by someone you don't despise? Obviously because maintaining
your loserhood is more important that finding true happiness.
07 Sep 2025, "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> posted:
pjm <pjm@example.com> wrote:
06 Sep 2025, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> posted:
pjm <pjm@example.com> wrote:
republican groups are blocked
rec.arts.tv "permanently closed"
r.a.t is available now, it wasn't a few weeks ago. That's when it >>>reported "permanently closed".
Thanks for providing this service.
As everybody knows, I read and post in rec.arts.tv. There is no >>>>shortage of crossposted and multi-posted off-topic articles, plenty
of which are from this server.
Republican groups? Nonsense. The group's name makes no difference.
The political posters troll and troll feed each other, crossposting
and multiposting.
You were in the wife-beating human-trafficking MS-13 discussions in >>>rec.arts.tv.
Not that I recall. If I crossposted in followup, it was inadvertent or
I was forged. Since you're stalking me, what was that Message-ID of
the pathetic loser crossposted followup you accuse me of authoring?
I'll need to add myself to my own kill file.
Stalking...? You...? That's amusing.
Here's your MID.
Message-ID: <109karg$3p5ap$2@dont-email.me>
Subject: John Roberts won't save Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia
pjm <pjm@example.com> wrote:
How about if we send you a bill for the oxygen you steal?
alt.adam-h-kerman.config
alt.fuckchop.adam-kerman
alt.idiot.adam-h-kerman
alt.scumbag.adam-kerman
alt.troll.adam-h-kerman
alt.usenet.kooks.adam-h-kerman
Go for it. My enemies who sent the newfroups never had enough interest
in discussing their hatred of me to warrant even a single revenge froup,
let alone six. It's just more evidence that the would-be anonymous posting entities who despise me -- apparently including you -- are pathetic
losers.
In the grand scheme of things, I'm unimportant, but objecting to my
comments from behind a screen with great vitriol makes other unimportant people, too ashamed not to be anonymous fuckheads, feel better about
their own loserhood.
Speaking of hypocritical pathetic losers, I see that you still posted
through Ivo's server despite complaining about the way he administers it
to limit only some of the abuse.
On 07 Sep 2025, "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> posted some news:109karg$3p5ap$2@dont-email.me:
pjm <pjm@example.com> wrote:
06 Sep 2025, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> posted:
As everybody knows, I read and post in rec.arts.tv. There is no
shortage of crossposted and multi-posted off-topic articles, plenty
of which are from this server.
Republican groups? Nonsense. The group's name makes no difference.
The political posters troll and troll feed each other, crossposting
and multiposting.
You were in the wife-beating human-trafficking MS-13 discussions in
rec.arts.tv.
Not that I recall. If I crossposted in followup, it was inadvertent or
I was forged. Since you're stalking me, what was that Message-ID of
the pathetic loser crossposted followup you accuse me of authoring?
I'll need to add myself to my own kill file.
Stalking...? You...? That's amusing. Here's your MID.
Message-ID: <109karg$3p5ap$2@dont-email.me>
Subject: John Roberts won't save Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
pjm <pjm@example.com> wrote:
How about if we send you a bill for the oxygen you steal?
alt.adam-h-kerman.config
alt.fuckchop.adam-kerman
alt.idiot.adam-h-kerman
alt.scumbag.adam-kerman
alt.troll.adam-h-kerman
alt.usenet.kooks.adam-h-kerman
Go for it. My enemies who sent the newfroups never had enough interest
in discussing their hatred of me to warrant even a single revenge froup, >>let alone six. It's just more evidence that the would-be anonymous posting >>entities who despise me -- apparently including you -- are pathetic
losers.
In the grand scheme of things, I'm unimportant, but objecting to my >>comments from behind a screen with great vitriol makes other unimportant >>people, too ashamed not to be anonymous fuckheads, feel better about
their own loserhood.
Speaking of hypocritical pathetic losers, I see that you still posted >>through Ivo's server despite complaining about the way he administers it
to limit only some of the abuse.
Imagine writing an essay to prove you don't care - that's peak
clown energy.
Tom Mix <tommix@mixmin.net> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
pjm <pjm@example.com> wrote:
How about if we send you a bill for the oxygen you steal?
alt.adam-h-kerman.config
alt.fuckchop.adam-kerman
alt.idiot.adam-h-kerman
alt.scumbag.adam-kerman
alt.troll.adam-h-kerman
alt.usenet.kooks.adam-h-kerman
Go for it. My enemies who sent the newfroups never had enough interest
in discussing their hatred of me to warrant even a single revenge froup, >>> let alone six. It's just more evidence that the would-be anonymous
posting
entities who despise me -- apparently including you -- are pathetic
losers.
In the grand scheme of things, I'm unimportant, but objecting to my
comments from behind a screen with great vitriol makes other unimportant >>> people, too ashamed not to be anonymous fuckheads, feel better about
their own loserhood.
Speaking of hypocritical pathetic losers, I see that you still posted
through Ivo's server despite complaining about the way he administers it >>> to limit only some of the abuse.
Imagine writing an essay to prove you don't care - that's peak
clown energy.
Imagine waiting six days to prepare that brilliant followup, being
unable to just let your butthurt go and recognize that the flame war had already died out.
We're all so impressed with how very brave you are, flaming from behind
that
remailer.
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Tom Mix <tommix@mixmin.net> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
pjm <pjm@example.com> wrote:
How about if we send you a bill for the oxygen you steal?
alt.adam-h-kerman.config
alt.fuckchop.adam-kerman
alt.idiot.adam-h-kerman
alt.scumbag.adam-kerman
alt.troll.adam-h-kerman
alt.usenet.kooks.adam-h-kerman
Go for it. My enemies who sent the newfroups never had enough interest >>>>in discussing their hatred of me to warrant even a single revenge >>>>froup, let alone six. It's just more evidence that the would-be >>>>anonymous posting entities who despise me -- apparently including
you -- are pathetic losers.
In the grand scheme of things, I'm unimportant, but objecting to my >>>>comments from behind a screen with great vitriol makes other unimportant >>>>people, too ashamed not to be anonymous fuckheads, feel better about >>>>their own loserhood.
Speaking of hypocritical pathetic losers, I see that you still posted >>>>through Ivo's server despite complaining about the way he administers it >>>>to limit only some of the abuse.
Imagine writing an essay to prove you don't care - that's peak
clown energy.
Imagine waiting six days to prepare that brilliant followup, being
unable to just let your butthurt go and recognize that the flame war had >>already died out.
We're all so impressed with how very brave you are, flaming from behind >>that remailer.
As if someone had to prepare to flame an idiot like you. HAHAHA
That's a good one.
Tom Mix <tommix@mixmin.net> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Tom Mix <tommix@mixmin.net> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
pjm <pjm@example.com> wrote:
How about if we send you a bill for the oxygen you steal?
alt.adam-h-kerman.config
alt.fuckchop.adam-kerman
alt.idiot.adam-h-kerman
alt.scumbag.adam-kerman
alt.troll.adam-h-kerman
alt.usenet.kooks.adam-h-kerman
Go for it. My enemies who sent the newfroups never had enough interest >>>>> in discussing their hatred of me to warrant even a single revenge
froup, let alone six. It's just more evidence that the would-be
anonymous posting entities who despise me -- apparently including
you -- are pathetic losers.
In the grand scheme of things, I'm unimportant, but objecting to my
comments from behind a screen with great vitriol makes other
unimportant
people, too ashamed not to be anonymous fuckheads, feel better about >>>>> their own loserhood.
Speaking of hypocritical pathetic losers, I see that you still posted >>>>> through Ivo's server despite complaining about the way he administers >>>>> it
to limit only some of the abuse.
Imagine writing an essay to prove you don't care - that's peak
clown energy.
Imagine waiting six days to prepare that brilliant followup, being
unable to just let your butthurt go and recognize that the flame war had >>> already died out.
We're all so impressed with how very brave you are, flaming from behind
that remailer.
As if someone had to prepare to flame an idiot like you. HAHAHA
That's a good one.
You're still terrified of me and everybody else on Usenet, hiding behind
that remailer. Your life is sad.
Since you and pjm are pretending to be two different anonymous posting entities, this wasn't your flame war, which means you are doing
butthurt, stewing over it for six days, by proxy. It doesn't get any
more pathetic than that.
On 9/8/25 01:46, pjm wrote:
On 07 Sep 2025, "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> posted some
news:109karg$3p5ap$2@dont-email.me:
pjm <pjm@example.com> wrote:
06 Sep 2025, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> posted:
As everybody knows, I read and post in rec.arts.tv. There is no
shortage of crossposted and multi-posted off-topic articles,
plenty of which are from this server.
Republican groups? Nonsense. The group's name makes no difference.
The political posters troll and troll feed each other,
crossposting and multiposting.
You were in the wife-beating human-trafficking MS-13 discussions in
rec.arts.tv.
Not that I recall. If I crossposted in followup, it was inadvertent
or I was forged. Since you're stalking me, what was that Message-ID
of the pathetic loser crossposted followup you accuse me of
authoring? I'll need to add myself to my own kill file.
Stalking...? You...? That's amusing. Here's your MID.
Message-ID: <109karg$3p5ap$2@dont-email.me>
Subject: John Roberts won't save Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia
That is the Message-ID of an article by Adam Kerman in
alt.free.newsservers that doesn't mention John Roberts. So you're
lying.
"<vt21tl$1666m$1@dont-email.me>" is the Message-ID of the article from
Adam Kerman starting the thread about John Roberts. None of the
articles posted by Kerman in that thread was cross-posted. More
lying.
On 14 Sep 2025, David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> posted some news:10a70jt$229d5$1@paganini.bofh.team:
On 9/8/25 01:46, pjm wrote:
On 07 Sep 2025, "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> posted some
news:109karg$3p5ap$2@dont-email.me:
pjm <pjm@example.com> wrote:
06 Sep 2025, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> posted:
As everybody knows, I read and post in rec.arts.tv. There is no
shortage of crossposted and multi-posted off-topic articles,
plenty of which are from this server.
Republican groups? Nonsense. The group's name makes no difference. >>>>>> The political posters troll and troll feed each other,
crossposting and multiposting.
You were in the wife-beating human-trafficking MS-13 discussions in
rec.arts.tv.
Not that I recall. If I crossposted in followup, it was inadvertent
or I was forged. Since you're stalking me, what was that Message-ID
of the pathetic loser crossposted followup you accuse me of
authoring? I'll need to add myself to my own kill file.
Stalking...? You...? That's amusing. Here's your MID.
Message-ID: <109karg$3p5ap$2@dont-email.me>
Subject: John Roberts won't save Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia
That is the Message-ID of an article by Adam Kerman in
alt.free.newsservers that doesn't mention John Roberts. So you're
lying.
Odd that Adam didn't catch that innit?
"<vt21tl$1666m$1@dont-email.me>" is the Message-ID of the article from
Adam Kerman starting the thread about John Roberts. None of the
articles posted by Kerman in that thread was cross-posted. More
lying.
Only one of us said it was cross-posted. Now that you've publicly embarrassed Adam by pointing out his whiffs, do you feel vindicated?
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 04:17:59 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
921 files (14,318M bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,528 |