• Highest and lowest quality burgers

    From KenitoBenito@Kenito@Benito.too to alt.food.fast-food on Sat Sep 19 09:03:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

    https://www.thetakeout.com/1630452/fast-food-chains-highest-lowest-quality-burgers/

    I had Jack in the Box only once in my life. It was decades ago,
    so my memory may not be 100% accurate. But I remember the burger being extremely greasy. Not bad, in and of itself. But it did make for a
    messy lunch.

    According to my youngest, Beast Burger is TERRIBLE! I don't know
    if it still exists. A quick check of Yelp shows it does still operate,
    but, well, it sucks!

    https://www.yelp.com/biz/mrbeast-burger-north-hollywood

    White Castle is low? OK, it's been a while since I had WC, but I
    recall the burgers being really good.

    In-N-Out is high. In other breaking news, fire is hot.
    --
    Cogito, ergo spud.
    I think, therefore I yam.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From KlausSchadenfreude@klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com to alt.food.fast-food on Sat Sep 19 15:43:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

    On Sat, 19 Sep 2026 09:03:58 -0700, KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too>
    wrote:

    https://www.thetakeout.com/1630452/fast-food-chains-highest-lowest-quality-burgers/

    I had Jack in the Box only once in my life. It was decades ago,
    so my memory may not be 100% accurate. But I remember the burger being >extremely greasy. Not bad, in and of itself. But it did make for a
    messy lunch.

    I do love a Sourdough Jack and Curly fries and I have them at least
    once a year without fail. I've also been known to shove down an
    Ultimate Cheeseburger. They advertise 100% beef in their burgers, so
    the author of this story must have a personal "beef" with them for
    suggesting they don't.

    According to my youngest, Beast Burger is TERRIBLE! I don't know
    if it still exists. A quick check of Yelp shows it does still operate,
    but, well, it sucks!

    https://www.yelp.com/biz/mrbeast-burger-north-hollywood

    Looks like that location is run by incompetent goons. This is
    interesting:

    MrBeast Burger is a virtual brand offering a separate concept to run
    out of your kitchen, available for delivery and pick up only via food
    delivery services.

    So it's not a "chain" as we know it.


    White Castle is low? OK, it's been a while since I had WC, but I
    recall the burgers being really good.

    I think White Castle is in a burger category all by itself.

    In-N-Out is high. In other breaking news, fire is hot.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From KenitoBenito@Kenito@Benito.too to alt.food.fast-food on Sun Sep 20 05:33:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

    On Sat, 19 Sep 2026 15:43:03 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Sep 2026 09:03:58 -0700, KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too>
    wrote:

    https://www.thetakeout.com/1630452/fast-food-chains-highest-lowest-quality-burgers/

    I had Jack in the Box only once in my life. It was decades ago,
    so my memory may not be 100% accurate. But I remember the burger being >>extremely greasy. Not bad, in and of itself. But it did make for a
    messy lunch.

    I do love a Sourdough Jack and Curly fries and I have them at least
    once a year without fail.

    That sounds so good! Unfortunately, the meal will prove too high
    in net carbs for me to eat.

    I've also been known to shove down an
    Ultimate Cheeseburger. They advertise 100% beef in their burgers, so
    the author of this story must have a personal "beef" with them for
    suggesting they don't.


    I suspect it's the use of a spice blend that the author is using
    to justify the claim.
    Their tacos use a different meat blend. In addition to beef, it
    has maltodextrin, hydrolyzed soy protein (which MAY be in the burger
    meat, but probably not), coloring and a *Mexican inspired* spice
    blend.

    According to my youngest, Beast Burger is TERRIBLE! I don't know
    if it still exists. A quick check of Yelp shows it does still operate,
    but, well, it sucks!

    https://www.yelp.com/biz/mrbeast-burger-north-hollywood

    Looks like that location is run by incompetent goons. This is
    interesting:

    Based on what I've read of other locations, incompetence is a
    prerequisite to offering Mr. Beast Burgers. Often cold and undercooked
    food. Very long delivery/pick up times. I can understand why Jimmy
    sued to get out of the agreement.


    MrBeast Burger is a virtual brand offering a separate concept to run
    out of your kitchen, available for delivery and pick up only via food >delivery services.

    So it's not a "chain" as we know it.

    There is, or at least was, a single physical location in New
    Jersey. Every other "location" is a virtual kitchen, sometimes called
    a ghost kitchen. There is nothing instantly wrong with this. But
    nearly everything I've read about Mr. Beast Burger is negative.


    White Castle is low? OK, it's been a while since I had WC, but I >>recall the burgers being really good.

    I think White Castle is in a burger category all by itself.

    There is a similar restaurant named Krystal. I call it a White
    Castle Clone. The one time I had it, the food was, in effect, the same
    as WC. They were also really good, as I recall.


    In-N-Out is high. In other breaking news, fire is hot.
    --
    Due to inflation, dirty deeds can no longer be done dirt cheap.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2