From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

- lots of repeated spelling tells: teh, qoute, defination, separatley, becouse, church's/religion's, souce

- heavy nested quoting, then a short absolute denial or correction

- fixates on literal word lists/definitions and keeps arguing the same
point after being shown contrary info

- uses ALL CAPS for emphasis when cornered or irritated

- recurring subjects are fast-food definitions, Big Mac ingredients, Burger King, Firehouse/Subs, and arguments about churches/money

There is also a whole anti-Jerry page archiving a lot of his posts,

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

Emily Postnews <Etrack@gnood.com> wrote in news:XnsB4BDABBC25147Correctal@65.108.165.7:

- lots of repeated spelling tells: teh, qoute, defination, separatley, becouse, church's/religion's, souce

- heavy nested quoting, then a short absolute denial or correction

- fixates on literal word lists/definitions and keeps arguing the same
point after being shown contrary info

- uses ALL CAPS for emphasis when cornered or irritated

- recurring subjects are fast-food definitions, Big Mac ingredients,
Burger King, Firehouse/Subs, and arguments about churches/money

There is also a whole anti-Jerry page archiving a lot of his posts,

Profile-wise, Jerry Sauk reads like an older Usenet crank with a very fixed argument style: literal-minded, repetitive, defensive when corrected, and
more interested in winning narrow word-definition fights than moving the discussion forward. He has a handful of durable obsessions -- fast food details, restaurant definitions, churches/money/religion arguments -- and
he circles back to them with the same phrasing and misspellings.

The strongest tells are the repeated spelling errors and his rhythm: big quoted block, then a short denial/correction, then another literal point.
He does not vary style much, which makes the nym fairly recognizable across threads.

I would describe the nym as stubborn, pedantic, socially combative, and
very pattern-bound,
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

On Fri, 4 Sep 2026 22:52:56 -0000 (UTC), Emily Postnews
<Etrack@gnood.com> wrote:

- lots of repeated spelling tells: teh, qoute, defination, separatley, >becouse, church's/religion's, souce

She [1] uses these to feed her well documented NEED to lie. Jerry
has proved, many times, she does know the correct spelling of words,
how to make words plural, and how to use proper grammar.

- heavy nested quoting, then a short absolute denial or correction

And often removing text in her reply to alter the context without
even pointing out the removal. It's another means by which she feeds
her NEED to lie.

- fixates on literal word lists/definitions and keeps arguing the same
point after being shown contrary info

Jerry not only has a NEED to lie, she also NEEDS to have her lies
exposed. This is why she posts the same lies over and over.

- uses ALL CAPS for emphasis when cornered or irritated

The use of all caps for emphasis is fine, in and of itself.

- recurring subjects are fast-food definitions, Big Mac ingredients, Burger >King, Firehouse/Subs, and arguments about churches/money

She also lies about what public and private property are. She's
been shown, more times than I am willing to count, the proper, legal
definition of both. So even if we pretend she didn't know at first,
Jerry does know now.
But her mental illness really does make intentional honesty so
difficult for her, you can safely say it's impossible.

There is also a whole anti-Jerry page archiving a lot of his posts,

Many of her documented lies (over 500) are archived on a web page
as well. In the unlikely, but not impossible, chance you don't know
it:

http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2


[1] The name Jerry is a girl's name meaning "ruler with the spear or
sacred name". https://nameberry.com/b/girl-baby-name-jerry
--
What's the nearest thing to silver?
The Lone Ranger's bottom!
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

On Fri, 4 Sep 2026 23:04:45 -0000 (UTC), Emily Postnews
<Etrack@gnood.com> wrote:

Emily Postnews <Etrack@gnood.com> wrote in >news:XnsB4BDABBC25147Correctal@65.108.165.7:

- lots of repeated spelling tells: teh, qoute, defination, separatley,
becouse, church's/religion's, souce

- heavy nested quoting, then a short absolute denial or correction

- fixates on literal word lists/definitions and keeps arguing the same
point after being shown contrary info

- uses ALL CAPS for emphasis when cornered or irritated

- recurring subjects are fast-food definitions, Big Mac ingredients,
Burger King, Firehouse/Subs, and arguments about churches/money

There is also a whole anti-Jerry page archiving a lot of his posts,

Profile-wise, Jerry Sauk reads like an older Usenet crank with a very fixed >argument style: literal-minded, repetitive, defensive when corrected, and >more interested in winning narrow word-definition fights than moving the >discussion forward. He has a handful of durable obsessions -- fast food >details, restaurant definitions, churches/money/religion arguments -- and
he circles back to them with the same phrasing and misspellings.

The strongest tells are the repeated spelling errors and his rhythm: big >quoted block, then a short denial/correction, then another literal point.
He does not vary style much, which makes the nym fairly recognizable across >threads.

I would describe the nym as stubborn, pedantic, socially combative, and
very pattern-bound,

And possessing a mental illness that makes her [1] NEED to lie
and NEED to have her lies exposed. This is why she offers the same
lies so often after they've been proved lies.


[1] The name Jerry is a girl's name meaning "ruler with the spear or
sacred name". https://nameberry.com/b/girl-baby-name-jerry
--
A steak pun is a rare medium well done.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food


"Emily Postnews" <Etrack@gnood.com> wrote in message news:XnsB4BDADBD2AF1CCorrectal@65.108.165.7...

Emily Postnews <Etrack@gnood.com> wrote in news:XnsB4BDABBC25147Correctal@65.108.165.7:

- lots of repeated spelling tells: teh, qoute, defination, separatley,
becouse, church's/religion's, souce

- heavy nested quoting, then a short absolute denial or correction

- fixates on literal word lists/definitions and keeps arguing the same
point after being shown contrary info

- uses ALL CAPS for emphasis when cornered or irritated

- recurring subjects are fast-food definitions, Big Mac ingredients,
Burger King, Firehouse/Subs, and arguments about churches/money

There is also a whole anti-Jerry page archiving a lot of his posts,

Profile-wise, Jerry Sauk reads like an older Usenet crank with a very
fixed
argument style: literal-minded, repetitive, defensive when corrected, and more interested in winning narrow word-definition fights than moving the discussion forward. He has a handful of durable obsessions -- fast food details, restaurant definitions, churches/money/religion arguments -- and
he circles back to them with the same phrasing and misspellings.

The strongest tells are the repeated spelling errors and his rhythm: big quoted block, then a short denial/correction, then another literal point.
He does not vary style much, which makes the nym fairly recognizable
across
threads.

I would describe the nym as stubborn, pedantic, socially combative, and
very pattern-bound,

Oh your hilarious.

Now do Skeeter.


--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food


"Emily Postnews" <Etrack@gnood.com> wrote in message news:XnsB4BDABBC25147Correctal@65.108.165.7...

- lots of repeated spelling tells: teh, qoute, defination, separatley,
becouse, church's/religion's, souce

And yet everyone knows exactly what I'm saying.

- heavy nested quoting, then a short absolute denial or correction

The heavy nested qouting is a result of klous's absolute REFUSUL to trim qoute's unless he's been proven wrong in the qoute's. I trim FAR more frequently then he does.

- fixates on literal word lists/definitions and keeps arguing the same
point after being shown contrary info

Incorrect. that "contrary info" is usually foulty logic on the part of
klous, as I always explain in my reply.

- uses ALL CAPS for emphasis when cornered or irritated

Common Usenet occurance, although I am rarely cornered I am frequently irritated.

- recurring subjects are fast-food definitions, Big Mac ingredients,
Burger
King, Firehouse/Subs,

You do realize this is a fast-food newsgroup?

and arguments about churches/money

No, not a recurring subject but it is a current subject, again due to
klous and his wrong opinion's about chik-fil-a, which is a fast-food restournat.


--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

On Tue, 8 Sep 2026 12:42:01 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

"Emily Postnews" <Etrack@gnood.com> wrote in message >news:XnsB4BDABBC25147Correctal@65.108.165.7...

- lots of repeated spelling tells: teh, qoute, defination, separatley,
becouse, church's/religion's, souce

And yet everyone knows exactly what I'm saying.

- heavy nested quoting, then a short absolute denial or correction

The heavy nested qouting is a result of klous's absolute REFUSUL to trim
qoute's unless he's been proven wrong in the qoute's.

BWAH ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha hah a ha ha ha ha haha ha hah a ha

- fixates on literal word lists/definitions and keeps arguing the same
point after being shown contrary info

Incorrect. that "contrary info" is usually foulty logic on the part of >klous, as I always explain in my reply.

The "contrary info" I show you is ALWAYS factual.

- uses ALL CAPS for emphasis when cornered or irritated

Common Usenet occurance, although I am rarely cornered I am frequently >irritated.

You've been cornered several hundred times, and run away frequently.

No, not a recurring subject but it is a current subject, again due to
klous and his wrong opinion's about chik-fil-a, which is a fast-food >restournat.

Another lie from Jenny. Nobody has ever said chik-fil-a isn't a fast
food restaurant.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

On Tue, 8 Sep 2026 12:37:28 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

"Emily Postnews" <Etrack@gnood.com> wrote in message >news:XnsB4BDADBD2AF1CCorrectal@65.108.165.7...

Emily Postnews <Etrack@gnood.com> wrote in
news:XnsB4BDABBC25147Correctal@65.108.165.7:

- lots of repeated spelling tells: teh, qoute, defination, separatley,
becouse, church's/religion's, souce

- heavy nested quoting, then a short absolute denial or correction

- fixates on literal word lists/definitions and keeps arguing the same
point after being shown contrary info

- uses ALL CAPS for emphasis when cornered or irritated

- recurring subjects are fast-food definitions, Big Mac ingredients,
Burger King, Firehouse/Subs, and arguments about churches/money

There is also a whole anti-Jerry page archiving a lot of his posts,

Profile-wise, Jerry Sauk reads like an older Usenet crank with a very
fixed
argument style: literal-minded, repetitive, defensive when corrected, and
more interested in winning narrow word-definition fights than moving the
discussion forward. He has a handful of durable obsessions -- fast food
details, restaurant definitions, churches/money/religion arguments -- and
he circles back to them with the same phrasing and misspellings.

The strongest tells are the repeated spelling errors and his rhythm: big
quoted block, then a short denial/correction, then another literal point.
He does not vary style much, which makes the nym fairly recognizable
across
threads.

I would describe the nym as stubborn, pedantic, socially combative, and
very pattern-bound,

Oh your hilarious.

Her hilarious WHAT? Or did you feed your very real NEED to lie
via spelling again?

Now do Skeeter.

You may be lusting after Skeeter, but I'm confident he wouldn't
want to be with a female [1] of your ever expanding girth. And there
is NOTHING to suggest Emily has an interest in "doing" Skeeter.


[Cue Jenny (Jerry) running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]

"but [sic] I am well known liar."
-- Jerry Sauk accidentally admitting the TRUTH
in Message-ID: <0tOdnYfymqTgq6n3nZ2dnZfqnPgAAAAA@supernews.com>


[1] The name Jerry is a girl's name meaning "ruler with the spear or
sacred name". https://nameberry.com/b/girl-baby-name-jerry
--
Over 500 documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk. http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

On Tue, 8 Sep 2026 12:42:01 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

"Emily Postnews" <Etrack@gnood.com> wrote in message >news:XnsB4BDABBC25147Correctal@65.108.165.7...

- lots of repeated spelling tells: teh, qoute, defination, separatley,
becouse, church's/religion's, souce

And yet everyone knows exactly what I'm saying.

And yet, everyone KNOWS you do it to feed your irresistible NEED
to lie.

- heavy nested quoting, then a short absolute denial or correction

The heavy nested qouting

Your feeding your absolute NEED to lie, via spelling, is
acknowledged.

is a result of klous's

Who is "klous" and what does your NEED to lie make you claim s/he
owns?

absolute REFUSUL

Your feeding your absolute NEED to lie, via spelling, is
acknowledged.

to trim
qoute's

Your feeding your well documented NEED to lie, via spelling AND
an apostrophe, is acknowledged.

unless he's been proven wrong in the qoute's.

Ibid.

I trim FAR more
frequently then he does.

When you do, it's to alter the context so that you can better
feed your NEED to lie.
You can't even make it known you've snipped because that would
require you to be honest, intentionally. And, as you have admitted by
YOUR standards (not denying a claim is equal to admitting the claim is
true), you've admitted this.

- fixates on literal word lists/definitions and keeps arguing the same
point after being shown contrary info

Incorrect. that

Your feeding your absolute NEED to lie, via grammar, is
acknowledged.

"contrary info" is usually foulty

Your feeding your absolute NEED to lie, via spelling, is
acknowledged.

logic on the part of
klous,

Again, who is "klous?"

as I always explain in my reply.

Your lying doesn't explain anything.

- uses ALL CAPS for emphasis when cornered or irritated

Common Usenet occurance, although I am rarely cornered I am frequently >irritated.

You are consistently cornered. But that is your intent. You NEED
to be caught lying, so you ensure you will be. That is how you are
consistently cornered.
Since your NEED to lie, and NEED to be caught lying, have both
been met, you are NOT irritated. You're extremely pleased when both
occur.

- recurring subjects are fast-food definitions, Big Mac ingredients,
Burger
King, Firehouse/Subs,

You do realize this is a fast-food newsgroup?

and arguments about churches/money

No, not a recurring subject but it is a current subject, again due to
klous

Ibid.

and his wrong opinion's

Your feeding your proven NEED to lie, via an apostrophe, is
acknowledged.

about chik-fil-a,

Your feeding your deep NEED to lie, via grammar, is acknowledged.

which is a fast-food
restournat.

Your feeding your absolute NEED to lie, via spelling, is
acknowledged.

When, in REALITY and NOT your NEED to lie, has anyone claimed
Chick-Fil-A is not a fast food restaurant? Post the MID and/or archive
link to at least one such post. If you're merely feeding your well
documented NEED to lie, you will offer neither.


[Cue Jenny (Jerry) running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]

"but [sic] I am well known liar."
-- Jerry Sauk accidentally admitting the TRUTH
in Message-ID: <0tOdnYfymqTgq6n3nZ2dnZfqnPgAAAAA@supernews.com>


The name Jerry is a girl's name meaning "ruler with the spear or
sacred name". https://nameberry.com/b/girl-baby-name-jerry
--
Over 500 documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk. http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

"Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote in news:dE2dnUaZEdgk1z33nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@supernews.com:

"Emily Postnews" <Etrack@gnood.com> wrote in message news:XnsB4BDADBD2AF1CCorrectal@65.108.165.7...

Emily Postnews <Etrack@gnood.com> wrote in
news:XnsB4BDABBC25147Correctal@65.108.165.7:

- lots of repeated spelling tells: teh, qoute, defination,
separatley, becouse, church's/religion's, souce

- heavy nested quoting, then a short absolute denial or correction

- fixates on literal word lists/definitions and keeps arguing the
same point after being shown contrary info

- uses ALL CAPS for emphasis when cornered or irritated

- recurring subjects are fast-food definitions, Big Mac ingredients,
Burger King, Firehouse/Subs, and arguments about churches/money

There is also a whole anti-Jerry page archiving a lot of his posts,

Profile-wise, Jerry Sauk reads like an older Usenet crank with a very
fixed
argument style: literal-minded, repetitive, defensive when corrected,
and more interested in winning narrow word-definition fights than
moving the discussion forward. He has a handful of durable obsessions
-- fast food details, restaurant definitions, churches/money/religion
arguments -- and he circles back to them with the same phrasing and
misspellings.

The strongest tells are the repeated spelling errors and his rhythm:
big quoted block, then a short denial/correction, then another
literal point. He does not vary style much, which makes the nym
fairly recognizable across
threads.

I would describe the nym as stubborn, pedantic, socially combative,
and very pattern-bound,

Oh your hilarious.

Now do Skeeter.

Skeeter)
Communication patterns: High-volume participation, mostly short replies
nested in quote chains. Messages are brief, taunting, and often designed
to keep a thread moving rather than develop a long argument.

Recurring topics: Fauci/COVID responsibility, economy/bankruptcy
dispute, military-service proof dispute, Rudy/Alan/Holman exchanges, and RootBadger signature continuity.

Interaction style: Reactive and confrontational. Often frames others as avoiding proof, losing, or being easy to manipulate.

Argumentation style: Uses compact assertions and challenges more than
evidence chains. Repeatedly challenges opponents on proof standards, especially Tesla ownership and military-service claims.

Emotional/expression patterns: Consistently mocking and blunt; little de-escalation in the sampled posts.

Relationship to other participants: Opposes Poster B, Poster I, Poster
Z, and Poster F in several threads. Often appears closer to Poster C,
Poster AL, and Poster Q on Fauci/anti-left framing.

Communication-level stability observations: Stable public style across
the window: terse, combative, responsive, and repetition-friendly.
Strongest evidence: Article 3302926 (oHe recommended it.o), 3302931
(oYou claim to own a Tesla...o), 3302935 (Davis-Monthan/U-2
clarification), 3303031 (oAll...with no back upo), and 3303102
(oDuplicate posts not allowed.o).

Alternative explanations: The brevity may be a deliberate flame-war
efficiency tactic rather than unwillingness to argue in detail.
Confidence level: High for style and role; medium for topic weighting
because many posts are quote-heavy.

What cannot reasonably be concluded: Private identity, military history, real-world motives, psychological condition, or truth of underlying
claims.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2